[libc++] Removes base member from tests.

Change the tests to use the base friend function instead of members.
Also changed some types to have a base friends instead of members.

Reviewed By: #libc,

[libc++] Removes base member from tests.

Change the tests to use the base friend function instead of members.
Also changed some types to have a base friends instead of members.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120742

show more ...

[libc++] Removes cpp17_output_iterator's default constructor.

This has been suggested in D117950.

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, philnik

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118971

[libc++][NFC] Use cpp17_output_iterator in tests.

The renames the output_iterator to cpp17_output_iterator. These
iterators are still used in C++20 so it's not possible to change the
current type to

[libc++][NFC] Use cpp17_output_iterator in tests.

The renames the output_iterator to cpp17_output_iterator. These
iterators are still used in C++20 so it's not possible to change the
current type to the new C++20 requirements. This is done in a similar
fashion as the cpp17_input_iterator.

Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117950

show more ...

[libcxx][nfc] prefixes test type `input_iterator` with `cpp17_`

C++20 revised the definition of what it means to be an iterator. While
all _Cpp17InputIterators_ satisfy `std::input_iterator`, the re

[libcxx][nfc] prefixes test type `input_iterator` with `cpp17_`

C++20 revised the definition of what it means to be an iterator. While
all _Cpp17InputIterators_ satisfy `std::input_iterator`, the reverse
isn't true. D100271 introduces a new test adaptor to accommodate this
new definition (`cpp20_input_iterator`).

In order to help readers immediately distinguish which input iterator
adaptor is _Cpp17InputIterator_, the current `input_iterator` adaptor
has been prefixed with `cpp17_`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101242

show more ...

[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite

C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
ju

[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite

C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.

This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926

show more ...

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".

Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:

In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:

self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']

Run the tests and they all fail.

Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).

Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.

The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.

The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:

https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed

This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.

Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.

<rdar://problem/47754795>

Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF

Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624

llvm-svn: 353086

show more ...

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351648

show more ...

[libcxx] [test] D27022: Fix MSVC warning C4389 "signed/unsigned mismatch", part 9/12.

Add static_cast<std::size_t> to more comparisons. (Performed manually, unlike part 8/12.)

Also, include <cstdde

[libcxx] [test] D27022: Fix MSVC warning C4389 "signed/unsigned mismatch", part 9/12.

Add static_cast<std::size_t> to more comparisons. (Performed manually, unlike part 8/12.)

Also, include <cstddef> when it wasn't already being included.

llvm-svn: 288746

show more ...

[libcxx] [test] D26816: Fix non-Standard assumptions when testing sample().

sample() isn't specified with a reproducible algorithm, so expecting
exact output is non-Standard. Mark those tests with L

[libcxx] [test] D26816: Fix non-Standard assumptions when testing sample().

sample() isn't specified with a reproducible algorithm, so expecting
exact output is non-Standard. Mark those tests with LIBCPP_ASSERT.

In test_small_population(), we're guaranteed to get all of the elements,
but not necessarily in their original order. When PopulationCategory is
forward, we're guaranteed stability (and can therefore test equal()).
Otherwise, we can only test is_permutation(). (As it happens, both libcxx
and MSVC's STL provide stability in this scenario for input-only iterators.)

llvm-svn: 287383

show more ...

Implement C++17 std::sample.

This patch implements the std::sample function added to C++17 from LFTS. It
also removes the std::experimental::sample implementation which now forwards
to std::sample.

Implement C++17 std::sample.

This patch implements the std::sample function added to C++17 from LFTS. It
also removes the std::experimental::sample implementation which now forwards
to std::sample.

llvm-svn: 279948

show more ...