[libc++][C++03] Use `__cxx03/` headers in C++03 mode (#109002)

This patch implements the forwarding to frozen C++03 headers as
discussed in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-freezing-c-03-headers-in-

[libc++][C++03] Use `__cxx03/` headers in C++03 mode (#109002)

This patch implements the forwarding to frozen C++03 headers as
discussed in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-freezing-c-03-headers-in-libc. In the
RFC, we initially proposed selecting the right headers from the Clang
driver, however consensus seemed to steer towards handling this in the
library itself. This patch implements that direction.

At a high level, the changes basically amount to making each public
header look like this:

```
// inside <vector>
#ifdef _LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG
# include <__cxx03/vector>
#else
// normal <vector> content
#endif
```

In most cases, public headers are simple umbrella headers so there isn't
much code in the #else branch. In other cases, the #else branch contains
the actual implementation of the header.

show more ...

[libc++] Add #if 0 block to all the top-level headers (#119234)

Including The frozen C++03 headers results in a lot of formatting
changes in the main headers, so this splits these changes into a
sep

[libc++] Add #if 0 block to all the top-level headers (#119234)

Including The frozen C++03 headers results in a lot of formatting
changes in the main headers, so this splits these changes into a
separate commit instead.

This is part of
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-freezing-c-03-headers-in-libc.

show more ...

[libc++] Granularize <cstddef> includes (#108696)

[libc++][NFC] Run clang-format on libcxx/include again (#95874)

As time went by, a few files have become mis-formatted w.r.t.
clang-format. This was made worse by the fact that formatting was not

[libc++][NFC] Run clang-format on libcxx/include again (#95874)

As time went by, a few files have become mis-formatted w.r.t.
clang-format. This was made worse by the fact that formatting was not
being enforced in extensionless headers. This commit simply brings all
of libcxx/include in-line with clang-format again.

We might have to do this from time to time as we update our clang-format
version, but frankly this is really low effort now that we've formatted
everything once.

show more ...

[libc++][RFC] Only include what is required by-version in the umbrella headers (#83740)

This is a relatively low cost way of reducing the include sizes in older
language modes compared to the effec

[libc++][RFC] Only include what is required by-version in the umbrella headers (#83740)

This is a relatively low cost way of reducing the include sizes in older
language modes compared to the effect. For example, in C++14 mode the
include time of `<algorithm>` is reduced from 198ms to 127ms.

show more ...

[libc++] Remove a few includes from <__functional/hash.h> (#83254)

This also moves `__all` from `sfinae_helpers.h` to `conjunction.h`.

[libc++] Clean up includes of <__assert> (#80091)

Originally, we used __libcpp_verbose_abort to handle assertion failures.
That function was declared from all public headers. Since we don't use
th

[libc++] Clean up includes of <__assert> (#80091)

Originally, we used __libcpp_verbose_abort to handle assertion failures.
That function was declared from all public headers. Since we don't use
that mechanism anymore, we don't need to declare __libcpp_verbose_abort
from all public headers, and we can clean up a lot of unnecessary
includes.

This patch also moves the definition of the various assertion categories
to the <__assert> header, since we now rely on regular IWYU for these
assertion macros.

rdar://105510916

show more ...

[libc++] Granularize <type_traits> includes in <bit>, <numbers> and <coroutine>

`<coroutine>` seems to be new enough to not be a huge problem.

Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc

Spies: libcxx-commits, C

[libc++] Granularize <type_traits> includes in <bit>, <numbers> and <coroutine>

`<coroutine>` seems to be new enough to not be a huge problem.

Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc

Spies: libcxx-commits, ChuanqiXu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140600

show more ...

[libc++][NFC] Fix some standard-mandated includes comments

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134447

[NFC][libc++] Moves transitive includes location.

As discussed in D132284 they will be moved to the end.

Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133212

[libc++] Reduces the number of transitive includes.

This defines a new policy for removal of transitive includes.
The goal of the policy it to make it relatively easy to remove
headers when needed,

[libc++] Reduces the number of transitive includes.

This defines a new policy for removal of transitive includes.
The goal of the policy it to make it relatively easy to remove
headers when needed, but avoid breaking developers using and
vendors shipping libc++.

The method used is to guard transitive includes based on the
C++ language version. For the upcoming C++23 we can remove
headers when we want, but for other language versions we try
to keep it to a minimum.

In this code the transitive include of `<chrono>` is removed
since D128577 introduces a header cycle between `<format>`
and `<chrono>`. This cycle is indirectly required by the
Standard. Our cycle dependency tool basically is a grep based
tool, so it needs some hints to ignore cycles. With the input
of our transitive include tests we can create a better tool.
However that's out of the scope of this patch.

Note the flag `_LIBCPP_REMOVE_TRANSITIVE_INCLUDES` remains
unchanged. So users can still opt-out of transitives includes
entirely.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, philnik

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132284

show more ...

[libc++] Re-add transitive includes that had been removed since LLVM 14

This commit re-adds transitive includes that had been removed by
4cd04d1687f1, c36870c8e79c, a83f4b9cda57, 1458458b558d, 2e2f3

[libc++] Re-add transitive includes that had been removed since LLVM 14

This commit re-adds transitive includes that had been removed by
4cd04d1687f1, c36870c8e79c, a83f4b9cda57, 1458458b558d, 2e2f3158c604,
and 489637e66dd3. This should cover almost all the includes that had
been removed since LLVM 14 and that would contribute to breaking user
code when releasing LLVM 15.

It is possible to disable the inclusion of these headers by defining
_LIBCPP_REMOVE_TRANSITIVE_INCLUDES. The intent is that vendors will
enable that macro and start fixing downstream issues immediately. We
can then remove the macro (and the transitive includes) by default in
a future release. That way, we will break users only once by removing
transitive includes in bulk instead of doing it bit by bit a every
release, which is more disruptive for users.

Note 1: The set of headers to re-add was found by re-generating the
transitive include test on a checkout of release/14.x, which
provided the list of all transitive includes we used to provide.

Note 2: Several includes of <vector>, <optional>, <array> and <unordered_map>
have been added in this commit. These transitive inclusions were
added when we implemented boyer_moore_searcher in <functional>.

Note 3: This is a best effort patch to try and resolve downstream breakage
caused since branching LLVM 14. I wasn't able to perfectly mirror
transitive includes in LLVM 14 for a few headers, so I added a
release note explaining it. To summarize, adding boyer_moore_searcher
created a bunch of circular dependencies, so we have to break
backwards compatibility in a few cases.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128661

show more ...

[libc++] Mark standard-mandated includes as such

Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc, saugustine

Spies: saugustine, MaskRay, arichardson, mstorsjo, jloser, libcxx-commits, arphaman

Differential

[libc++] Mark standard-mandated includes as such

Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc, saugustine

Spies: saugustine, MaskRay, arichardson, mstorsjo, jloser, libcxx-commits, arphaman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127953

show more ...

[libc++] Ensure that all public C++ headers include <__assert>

This patch changes the requirement for getting the declaration of the
assertion handler from including <__assert> to including any publ

[libc++] Ensure that all public C++ headers include <__assert>

This patch changes the requirement for getting the declaration of the
assertion handler from including <__assert> to including any public
C++ header of the library. Note that C compatibility headers are
excluded because we don't implement all the C headers ourselves --
some of them are taken straight from the C library, like assert.h.

It also adds a generated test to check it. Furthermore, this new
generated test is designed in a way that will make it possible to
replace almost all the existing test-generation scripts with this
system in upcoming patches.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122506

show more ...

[libc++] Normalize all our '#pragma GCC system_header', and regression-test.

Now we'll notice if a header forgets to include this magic phrase.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D1188

[libc++] Normalize all our '#pragma GCC system_header', and regression-test.

Now we'll notice if a header forgets to include this magic phrase.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118800

show more ...

[libc++] Alphabetize header #includes. NFCI.

The NFC part of D116809. We still want to enforce this in CI,
but the mechanism for that is still to-be-determined.

Differential Revision: https://revie

[libc++] Alphabetize header #includes. NFCI.

The NFC part of D116809. We still want to enforce this in CI,
but the mechanism for that is still to-be-determined.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116809

show more ...

[libcxx] [Coroutine] Conform Coroutine Implementation

Since coroutine is merged in C++ standard and the support for coroutine
seems relatively stable. It's the time to move the implementation of
cor

[libcxx] [Coroutine] Conform Coroutine Implementation

Since coroutine is merged in C++ standard and the support for coroutine
seems relatively stable. It's the time to move the implementation of
coroutine out of the experimental directory and the std::experimental
namespace. This patch creates header <coroutine> with conformed
implementation with C++ standard. To avoid breaking user's code too
fast, the <experimental/coroutine> header is remained. Note that
<experimental/coroutine> is deprecated and it would be removed in
LLVM15.

Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109433

show more ...