[libc++] Remove _AlgPolicy from std::copy and algorithms using std::copy (#115887)

`std::copy` doesn't use the `_AlgPolicy` for anything other than calling
itself with it, so we can just remove the

[libc++] Remove _AlgPolicy from std::copy and algorithms using std::copy (#115887)

`std::copy` doesn't use the `_AlgPolicy` for anything other than calling
itself with it, so we can just remove the argument. This also removes
the need in a few other algorithms which had an `_AlgPolicy` argument
only to call `copy`.

show more ...

[libc++] Forward more algorithms to the classic algorithms (#114674)

This partially addresses #105687.

[libc++] Remove dedicated namespaces for ranges functions (#76543)

We originally put implementation-detail function objects into individual
namespaces for `std::ranges` without a good reason for do

[libc++] Remove dedicated namespaces for ranges functions (#76543)

We originally put implementation-detail function objects into individual
namespaces for `std::ranges` without a good reason for doing so. This
practice was continued, presumably because there was prior art. Since
there's no reason to keep these namespaces, this commit removes them,
which will slightly impact binary size.

This commit does not apply to CPOs, some of which need additional work.

show more ...

[libc++] Fix missing and incorrect push/pop macros (#79204)

We recently noticed that the unwrap_iter.h file was pushing macros, but
it was pushing them again instead of popping them at the end of t

[libc++] Fix missing and incorrect push/pop macros (#79204)

We recently noticed that the unwrap_iter.h file was pushing macros, but
it was pushing them again instead of popping them at the end of the
file. This led to libc++ basically swallowing any custom definition of
these macros in user code:

#define min HELLO
#include <algorithm>
// min is not HELLO anymore, it's not defined

While investigating this issue, I noticed that our push/pop pragmas were
actually entirely wrong too. Indeed, instead of pushing macros like
`move`, we'd push `move(int, int)` in the pragma, which is not a valid
macro name. As a result, we would not actually push macros like `move`
-- instead we'd simply undefine them. This led to the following code not
working:

#define move HELLO
#include <algorithm>
// move is not HELLO anymore

Fixing the pragma push/pop incantations led to a cascade of issues
because we use identifiers like `move` in a large number of places, and
all of these headers would now need to do the push/pop dance.

This patch fixes all these issues. First, it adds a check that we don't
swallow important names like min, max, move or refresh as explained
above. This is done by augmenting the existing
system_reserved_names.gen.py test to also check that the macros are what
we expect after including each header.

Second, it fixes the push/pop pragmas to work properly and adds missing
pragmas to all the files I could detect a failure in via the newly added
test.

rdar://121365472

show more ...

[libc++][NFC] Apply clang-format on large parts of the code base

This commit does a pass of clang-format over files in libc++ that
don't require major changes to conform to our style guide, or for
w

[libc++][NFC] Apply clang-format on large parts of the code base

This commit does a pass of clang-format over files in libc++ that
don't require major changes to conform to our style guide, or for
which we're not overly concerned about conflicting with in-flight
patches or hindering the git blame.

This roughly covers:
- benchmarks
- range algorithms
- concepts
- type traits

I did a manual verification of all the changes, and in particular I
applied clang-format on/off annotations in a few places where the
result was less readable after than before. This was not necessary
in a lot of places, however I did find that clang-format had pretty
bad taste when it comes to formatting concepts.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153140

show more ...

[libc++][NFC] Replace _LIBCPP_STD_VER > x with _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= x

This change is almost fully mechanical. The only interesting change is in `generate_feature_test_macro_components.py` to generate

[libc++][NFC] Replace _LIBCPP_STD_VER > x with _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= x

This change is almost fully mechanical. The only interesting change is in `generate_feature_test_macro_components.py` to generate `_LIBCPP_STD_VER >=` instead. To avoid churn in the git-blame this commit should be added to the `.git-blame-ignore-revs` once committed.

Reviewed By: ldionne, var-const, #libc

Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, arichardson, arphaman, wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143962

show more ...

Reapply "[libc++][ranges]Refactor `copy{,_backward}` and `move{,_backward}`"

This reverts commit a6e1080b87db8fbe0e1afadd96af5a3c0bd5e279.

Fix the conditions when the `memmove` optimization can be

Reapply "[libc++][ranges]Refactor `copy{,_backward}` and `move{,_backward}`"

This reverts commit a6e1080b87db8fbe0e1afadd96af5a3c0bd5e279.

Fix the conditions when the `memmove` optimization can be applied and refactor them out into a reusable type trait, fix and significantly expand the tests.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139235

show more ...

Revert "[libc++][ranges]Refactor `copy{,_backward}` and `move{,_backward}`"

Breaks msan, asan

https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/27904

This reverts commit 005916de58f73aa5c4264c084b

Revert "[libc++][ranges]Refactor `copy{,_backward}` and `move{,_backward}`"

Breaks msan, asan

https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/27904

This reverts commit 005916de58f73aa5c4264c084ba7b0e21040d88f.

show more ...

[libc++][ranges]Refactor `copy{,_backward}` and `move{,_backward}`

Instead of using `reverse_iterator`, share the optimization between the 4 algorithms. The key observation here that `memmove` appli

[libc++][ranges]Refactor `copy{,_backward}` and `move{,_backward}`

Instead of using `reverse_iterator`, share the optimization between the 4 algorithms. The key observation here that `memmove` applies to both `copy` and `move` identically, and to their `_backward` versions very similarly. All algorithms now follow the same pattern along the lines of:
```
if constexpr (can_memmove<InIter, OutIter>) {
memmove(first, last, out);
} else {
naive_implementation(first, last, out);
}
```
A follow-up will delete `unconstrained_reverse_iterator`.

This patch removes duplication and divergence between `std::copy`, `std::move` and `std::move_backward`. It also improves testing:
- the test for whether the optimization is used only applied to `std::copy` and, more importantly, was essentially a no-op because it would still pass if the optimization was not used;
- there were no tests to make sure the optimization is not used when the effect would be visible.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130695

show more ...

[libc++] Make <ranges> non-experimental

When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.

Differential Revision: https://re

[libc++] Make <ranges> non-experimental

When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151

show more ...

[libc++] Implement ranges::copy{, _n, _if, _backward}

Reviewed By: Mordante, var-const, #libc

Spies: sstefan1, libcxx-commits, mgorny

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122982