Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7 |
|
#
5f6b7145 |
| 07-Jan-2025 |
Balazs Benics <benicsbalazs@gmail.com> |
[analyzer][NFC] Simplify PositiveAnalyzerOption handling (#121910)
This simplifies #120239
Addresses my comment at:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120239#issuecomment-2574600543
CPP-
[analyzer][NFC] Simplify PositiveAnalyzerOption handling (#121910)
This simplifies #120239
Addresses my comment at:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120239#issuecomment-2574600543
CPP-5920
show more ...
|
#
55391f85 |
| 06-Jan-2025 |
Balazs Benics <benicsbalazs@gmail.com> |
[analyzer] Retry UNDEF Z3 queries 2 times by default (#120239)
If we have a refutation Z3 query timed out (UNDEF), allow a couple of
retries to improve stability of the query. By default allow 2 re
[analyzer] Retry UNDEF Z3 queries 2 times by default (#120239)
If we have a refutation Z3 query timed out (UNDEF), allow a couple of
retries to improve stability of the query. By default allow 2 retries,
which will give us in maximum of 3 solve attempts per query.
Retries should help mitigating flaky Z3 queries.
See the details in the following RFC:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/analyzer-rfc-retry-z3-crosscheck-queries-on-timeout/83711
Note that with each attempt, we spend more time per query.
Currently, we have a 15 seconds timeout per query - which are also in
effect for the retry attempts.
---
Why should this help?
In short, retrying queries should bring stability because if a query
runs long
it's more likely that it did so due to some runtime anomaly than it's on
the edge of succeeding. This is because most queries run quick, and the
queries that run long, usually run long by a fair amount.
Consequently, retries should improve the stability of the outcome of the
Z3 query.
In general, the retries shouldn't increase the overall analysis time
because it's really rare we hit the 0.1% of the cases when we would do
retries. But keep in mind that the retry attempts can add up if many
retries are allowed, or the individual query timeout is large.
CPP-5920
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.6 |
|
#
ea8e328a |
| 13-Dec-2024 |
Kristóf Umann <dkszelethus@gmail.com> |
[analyzer][Z3] Restore the original timeout of 15s (#118291)
Discussion here:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/analyzer-rfc-taming-z3-query-times/79520/15?u=szelethus
The original patch, #97298 in
[analyzer][Z3] Restore the original timeout of 15s (#118291)
Discussion here:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/analyzer-rfc-taming-z3-query-times/79520/15?u=szelethus
The original patch, #97298 introduced new timeouts backed by thorough
testing and measurements to keep the running time of Z3 within
reasonable limits. The measurements also showed that only certain
reports and certain TUs were responsible for the poor performance of Z3
refutation.
Unfortunately, it seems like that on machines with different
characteristics (slower machines) the current timeouts don't just axe
0.01% of reports, but many more as well. Considering that timeouts are
inherently nondeterministic as a cutoff point, this lead reports sets
being vastly different on the same projects with the same configuration.
The discussion link shows that all configurations introduced in the
patch with their default values lead to severa nondeterminism of the
analyzer. As we, and others use the analyzer as a gating tool for PRs,
we should revert to the original defaults.
We should respect that
* There are still parts of the analyzer that are either proven or
suspected to contain nondeterministic code (like pointer sets),
* A 15s timeout is more likely to hit the same reports every time on a
wider range of machines, but is still inherently nondeterministic, but
an infinite timeout leads to the tool hanging,
* If you measure the performance of the analyzer on your machines, you
can and should achieve some speedup with little or no observable
nondeterminism.
---------
Co-authored-by: Balazs Benics <benicsbalazs@gmail.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init |
|
#
ae570d82 |
| 01-Jul-2024 |
Balazs Benics <benicsbalazs@gmail.com> |
Reland "[analyzer] Harden safeguards for Z3 query times" (#97298)
This is exactly as originally landed in #95129,
but now the minimal Z3 version was increased to meet this change in #96682.
http
Reland "[analyzer] Harden safeguards for Z3 query times" (#97298)
This is exactly as originally landed in #95129,
but now the minimal Z3 version was increased to meet this change in #96682.
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/bump-minimal-z3-requirements-from-4-7-1-to-4-8-9/79664/4
---
This patch is a functional change.
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/analyzer-rfc-taming-z3-query-times/79520
As a result of this patch, individual Z3 queries in refutation will be
bound by 300ms. Every report equivalence class will be processed in at
most 1 second.
The heuristic should have only really marginal observable impact -
except for the cases when we had big report eqclasses with long-running
(15s) Z3 queries, where previously CSA effectively halted. After this
patch, CSA will tackle such extreme cases as well.
(cherry picked from commit eacc3b3504be061f7334410dd0eb599688ba103a)
show more ...
|
#
b3b0d09c |
| 01-Jul-2024 |
Balazs Benics <benicsbalazs@gmail.com> |
Reland "[analyzer][NFC] Reorganize Z3 report refutation" (#97265)
This is exactly as originally landed in #95128,
but now the minimal Z3 version was increased to meet this change in #96682.
http
Reland "[analyzer][NFC] Reorganize Z3 report refutation" (#97265)
This is exactly as originally landed in #95128,
but now the minimal Z3 version was increased to meet this change in #96682.
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/bump-minimal-z3-requirements-from-4-7-1-to-4-8-9/79664/4
---
This change keeps existing behavior, namely that if we hit a Z3 timeout
we will accept the report as "satisfiable".
This prepares for the commit "Harden safeguards for Z3 query times".
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/analyzer-rfc-taming-z3-query-times/79520
(cherry picked from commit 89c26f6c7b0a6dfa257ec090fcf5b6e6e0c89aab)
show more ...
|
#
eacc3b35 |
| 18-Jun-2024 |
Balazs Benics <benicsbalazs@gmail.com> |
[analyzer] Harden safeguards for Z3 query times
This patch is a functional change. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/analyzer-rfc-taming-z3-query-times/79520
As a result of this patch, individual Z3 que
[analyzer] Harden safeguards for Z3 query times
This patch is a functional change. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/analyzer-rfc-taming-z3-query-times/79520
As a result of this patch, individual Z3 queries in refutation will be bound by 300ms. Every report equivalence class will be processed in at most 1 second.
The heuristic should have only really marginal observable impact - except for the cases when we had big report eqclasses with long-running (15s) Z3 queries, where previously CSA effectively halted. After this patch, CSA will tackle such extreme cases as well.
Reviewers: NagyDonat, haoNoQ, Xazax-hun, Szelethus, mikhailramalho
Reviewed By: NagyDonat
Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95129
show more ...
|
#
89c26f6c |
| 18-Jun-2024 |
Balazs Benics <benicsbalazs@gmail.com> |
[analyzer][NFC] Reorganize Z3 report refutation
This change keeps existing behavior, namely that if we hit a Z3 timeout we will accept the report as "satisfiable".
This prepares for the commit "Har
[analyzer][NFC] Reorganize Z3 report refutation
This change keeps existing behavior, namely that if we hit a Z3 timeout we will accept the report as "satisfiable".
This prepares for the commit "Harden safeguards for Z3 query times". https://discourse.llvm.org/t/analyzer-rfc-taming-z3-query-times/79520
Reviewers: NagyDonat, haoNoQ, Xazax-hun, mikhailramalho, Szelethus
Reviewed By: NagyDonat
Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95128
show more ...
|