| #
f4c78117 |
| 07-Jul-2024 |
Younan Zhang <zyn7109@gmail.com> |
[Clang] Add captures to the instantiation scope for noexcept specifiers (#97166)
The noexcept specifiers of dependent lambdas would be transformed and
rebuilt, where the map of instantiation should
[Clang] Add captures to the instantiation scope for noexcept specifiers (#97166)
The noexcept specifiers of dependent lambdas would be transformed and
rebuilt, where the map of instantiation should also contain captured
variables in case they are used from the noexcept specifier.
I also uncovered another assertion failure while at it. However, I
decided to leave it as-is because 1) that doesn't appear to be the case
in the release version and 2) fixing that might lead to ABI breakage.
Anyhow, the case has been added to the test comment.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/95735
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
af10d6f3 |
| 29-Sep-2021 |
Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com> |
[clang] don't instantiate templates with injected arguments
There is a special situation with templates in local classes,
as can be seen in this example with generic lambdas in function scope:
```
t
[clang] don't instantiate templates with injected arguments
There is a special situation with templates in local classes,
as can be seen in this example with generic lambdas in function scope:
```
template<class T1> void foo() {
(void)[]<class T2>() {
struct S {
void bar() { (void)[]<class T3>(T2) {}; }
};
};
};
template void foo<int>();
```
As a consequence of the resolution of DR1484, bar is instantiated during the
substitution of foo, and in this context we would substitute the lambda within
it with it's own parameters "injected" (turned into arguments).
This can't be properly dealt with for at least a couple of reasons:
* The 'TemplateTypeParm' type itself can only deal with canonical replacement
types, which the injected arguments are not.
* If T3 were constrained in the example above, our (non-conforming) eager
substitution of type constraints would just leave that parameter dangling.
Instead of substituting with injected parameters, this patch just leaves those
inner levels unreplaced.
Since injected arguments appear to be unused within the users of
`getTemplateInstantiationArgs`, this patch just removes that support there and
leaves a couple of asserts in place.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110727
show more ...
|