History log of /llvm-project/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StackAddrEscapeChecker.cpp (Results 1 – 25 of 72)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3
# 684c26c8 23-Oct-2024 z1nke <iamczn.cpp@gmail.com>

[analyzer] Remove redundant "returned to caller" suffix for compound literal in StackAddressEscape

This patch simplifies the diagnostic message in the core.StackAddrEscape
for stack memory associat

[analyzer] Remove redundant "returned to caller" suffix for compound literal in StackAddressEscape

This patch simplifies the diagnostic message in the core.StackAddrEscape
for stack memory associated with compound literals by removing the
redundant "returned to caller" suffix.
Example: https://godbolt.org/z/KxM67vr7c

```c
// clang --analyze -Xanalyzer -analyzer-checker=core.StackAddressEscape
void* compound_literal() {
return &(unsigned short){((unsigned short)0x22EF)};
}
```

warning: Address of stack memory associated with a compound literal
declared on line 2 **returned to caller returned to caller**
[core.StackAddressEscape]

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1
# be0b1142 23-Sep-2024 Arseniy Zaostrovnykh <necto.ne@gmail.com>

[analyzer][StackAddrEscapeChecker] Fix assert failure for alloca regions (#109655)

Fixes #107852

Make it explicit that the checker skips `alloca` regions to avoid the
risk of producing false pos

[analyzer][StackAddrEscapeChecker] Fix assert failure for alloca regions (#109655)

Fixes #107852

Make it explicit that the checker skips `alloca` regions to avoid the
risk of producing false positives for code with advanced memory
management.
StackAddrEscapeChecker already used this strategy when it comes to
malloc'ed regions, so this change relaxes the assertion and explicitly
silents the issues related to memory regions generated with `alloca`.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.0
# b3470c3d 16-Sep-2024 Congcong Cai <congcongcai0907@163.com>

[clang][NFC] declare internal linkage function static (#108759)

Detected by `misc-use-internal-linkage`


Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4
# aa4f81ef 03-Sep-2024 Arseniy Zaostrovnykh <necto.ne@gmail.com>

[analyzer] Fix false positive for stack-addr leak on simple param ptr (#107003)

Assigning to a pointer parameter does not leak the stack address because
it stays within the function and is not share

[analyzer] Fix false positive for stack-addr leak on simple param ptr (#107003)

Assigning to a pointer parameter does not leak the stack address because
it stays within the function and is not shared with the caller.

Previous implementation reported any association of a pointer parameter
with a local address, which is too broad.

This fix enforces that the pointer to a stack variable is related by at
least one level of indirection.

CPP-5642

Fixes #106834

show more ...


# 0141a3cd 29-Aug-2024 Arseniy Zaostrovnykh <necto.ne@gmail.com>

[analyzer] Fix nullptr dereference for symbols from pointer invalidation (#106568)

As reported in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105648#issuecomment-2317144635
commit 08ad8dc7154bf3ab79f7

[analyzer] Fix nullptr dereference for symbols from pointer invalidation (#106568)

As reported in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105648#issuecomment-2317144635
commit 08ad8dc7154bf3ab79f750e6d5fb7df597c7601a
introduced a nullptr dereference in the case when store contains a
binding to a symbol that has no origin region associated with it, such
as the symbol generated when a pointer is passed to an opaque function.

show more ...


# 190449a5 28-Aug-2024 Arseniy Zaostrovnykh <necto.ne@gmail.com>

[analyzer] Detect leaks of stack addresses via output params, indirect globals 3/3 (#105648)

Fix some false negatives of StackAddrEscapeChecker:
- Output parameters
```
void top(int **out) {

[analyzer] Detect leaks of stack addresses via output params, indirect globals 3/3 (#105648)

Fix some false negatives of StackAddrEscapeChecker:
- Output parameters
```
void top(int **out) {
int local = 42;
*out = &local; // Noncompliant
}
```
- Indirect global pointers
```
int **global;

void top() {
int local = 42;
*global = &local; // Noncompliant
}
```

Note that now StackAddrEscapeChecker produces a diagnostic if a function
with an output parameter is analyzed as top-level or as a callee. I took
special care to make sure the reports point to the same primary location
and, in many cases, feature the same primary message. That is the
motivation to modify Core/BugReporter.cpp and Core/ExplodedGraph.cpp

To avoid false positive reports when a global indirect pointer is
assigned a local address, invalidated, and then reset, I rely on the
fact that the invalidation symbol will be a DerivedSymbol of a
ConjuredSymbol that refers to the same memory region.

The checker still has a false negative for non-trivial escaping via a
returned value. It requires a more sophisticated traversal akin to
scanReachableSymbols, which out of the scope of this change.

CPP-4734

---------

This is the last of the 3 stacked PRs, it must not be merged before
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105652 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105653

show more ...


# 6e44cb3c 27-Aug-2024 Arseniy Zaostrovnykh <necto.ne@gmail.com>

[analyzer][NFC] Remove a non-actionable dump (#106232)

This dump, if it is ever executed, is not actionable by the user and
might produce unwanted noise in the stderr.

The original intention behind

[analyzer][NFC] Remove a non-actionable dump (#106232)

This dump, if it is ever executed, is not actionable by the user and
might produce unwanted noise in the stderr.

The original intention behind this dump, to provide maximum information
in an unexpected situation, does not outweigh the potential annoyance
caused to users who might not even realize that they witnessed an
unexpected situation.

show more ...


# 95b37a76 26-Aug-2024 Arseniy Zaostrovnykh <necto.ne@gmail.com>

[analyzer] Detect leak of a stack address through output arguments 2/3 (#105653)

At this point, only functions called from other functions (i.e., not
top-level) are covered. Top-level functions hav

[analyzer] Detect leak of a stack address through output arguments 2/3 (#105653)

At this point, only functions called from other functions (i.e., not
top-level) are covered. Top-level functions have a different exit
sequence and will be handled by a subsequent change.

CPP-4734

-------

This is the second of three commits constituting
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105648
it must not be merged before
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105652

show more ...


# f80c248a 26-Aug-2024 Arseniy Zaostrovnykh <necto.ne@gmail.com>

[analyzer][NFC] Add tests for and refactor StackAddrEscapeChecker 1/3 (#105652)

These tests and refactoring are preparatory for the upcoming changes:
detection of the indirect leak via global varia

[analyzer][NFC] Add tests for and refactor StackAddrEscapeChecker 1/3 (#105652)

These tests and refactoring are preparatory for the upcoming changes:
detection of the indirect leak via global variables and output
parameters.

CPP-4734

-------

This is the first of three commits constituting
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105648

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2
# 73dcbd41 20-Sep-2023 Balazs Benics <benicsbalazs@gmail.com>

[analyzer] Fix StackAddrEscapeChecker crash on temporary object fields (#66493)

Basically, the issue was that we should have unwrapped the
base region before we special handle temp object regions.

[analyzer] Fix StackAddrEscapeChecker crash on temporary object fields (#66493)

Basically, the issue was that we should have unwrapped the
base region before we special handle temp object regions.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/66221

I also decided to add some extra range information to the diagnostics
to make it consistent with the other reporting path.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4
# 8a5cfdf7 25-Aug-2023 Donát Nagy <donat.nagy@ericsson.com>

[analyzer][NFC] Remove useless class BuiltinBug

...because it provides no useful functionality compared to its base
class `BugType`.

A long time ago there were substantial differences between `BugT

[analyzer][NFC] Remove useless class BuiltinBug

...because it provides no useful functionality compared to its base
class `BugType`.

A long time ago there were substantial differences between `BugType` and
`BuiltinBug`, but they were eliminated by commit 1bd58233 in 2009 (!).
Since then the only functionality provided by `BuiltinBug` was that it
specified `categories::LogicError` as the bug category and it stored an
extra data member `desc`.

This commit sets `categories::LogicError` as the default value of the
third argument (bug category) in the constructors of BugType and
replaces use of the `desc` field with simpler logic.

Note that `BugType` has a data member `Description` and a non-virtual
method `BugType::getDescription()` which queries it; these are distinct
from the member `desc` of `BuiltinBug` and the identically named method
`BuiltinBug::getDescription()` which queries it. This confusing name
collision was a major motivation for the elimination of `BuiltinBug`.

As this commit touches many files, I avoided functional changes and left
behind FIXME notes to mark minor issues that should be fixed later.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158855

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init
# e9877eca 26-Jun-2023 Sindhu Chittireddy <sindhu.chittireddy@intel.com>

[NFC] Initialize class member pointers to nullptr.

Fix clang-format issues in surrounding code.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153892


# 5c23e27b 05-Jul-2023 Balazs Benics <benicsbalazs@gmail.com>

[analyzer][NFC] Move away from using raw-for loops inside StaticAnalyzer

I'm involved with the Static Analyzer for the most part.
I think we should embrace newer language standard features and gradu

[analyzer][NFC] Move away from using raw-for loops inside StaticAnalyzer

I'm involved with the Static Analyzer for the most part.
I think we should embrace newer language standard features and gradually
move forward.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154325

show more ...


# feafbb9f 04-Jul-2023 Tomasz Kamiński <tomasz.kamiński@sonarsource.com>

[analyzer] Differentiate lifetime extended temporaries

This patch introduces a new `CXXLifetimeExtendedObjectRegion` as a representation
of the memory for the temporary object that is lifetime exten

[analyzer] Differentiate lifetime extended temporaries

This patch introduces a new `CXXLifetimeExtendedObjectRegion` as a representation
of the memory for the temporary object that is lifetime extended by the reference
to which they are bound.

This separation provides an ability to detect the use of dangling pointers
(either binding or dereference) in a robust manner.
For example, the `ref` is conditionally dangling in the following example:
```
template<typename T>
T const& select(bool cond, T const& t, T const& u) { return cond ? t : u; }

int const& le = Composite{}.x;
auto&& ref = select(cond, le, 10);
```
Before the change, regardless of the value of `cond`, the `select()` call would
have returned a `temp_object` region.
With the proposed change we would produce a (non-dangling) `lifetime_extended_object`
region with lifetime bound to `le` or a `temp_object` region for the dangling case.

We believe that such separation is desired, as such lifetime extended temporaries
are closer to the variables. For example, they may have a static storage duration
(this patch removes a static temporary region, which was an abomination).
We also think that alternative approaches are not viable.

While for some cases it may be possible to determine if the region is lifetime
extended by searching the parents of the initializer expr, this quickly becomes
complex in the presence of the conditions operators like this one:
```
Composite cc;
// Ternary produces prvalue 'int' which is extended, as branches differ in value category
auto&& x = cond ? Composite{}.x : cc.x;

// Ternary produces xvalue, and extends the Composite object
auto&& y = cond ? Composite{}.x : std::move(cc).x;
```

Finally, the lifetime of the `CXXLifetimeExtendedObjectRegion` is tied to the lifetime of
the corresponding variables, however, the "liveness" (or reachability) of the extending
variable does not imply the reachability of all symbols in the region.
In conclusion `CXXLifetimeExtendedObjectRegion`, in contrast to `VarRegions`, does not
need any special handling in `SymReaper`.

RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-detecting-uses-of-dangling-references/70731

Reviewed By: xazax.hun

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151325

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0
# a5e354ec 26-Aug-2022 ziqingluo-90 <ziqing@udel.edu>

[analyzer] Fixing a bug raising false positives of stack block object
leaking in ARC mode

When ARC (automatic reference count) is enabled, (objective-c) block
objects are automatically retained and

[analyzer] Fixing a bug raising false positives of stack block object
leaking in ARC mode

When ARC (automatic reference count) is enabled, (objective-c) block
objects are automatically retained and released thus they do not leak.
Without ARC, they still can leak from an expiring stack frame like
other stack variables.
With this commit, the static analyzer now puts a block object in an
"unknown" region if ARC is enabled because it is up to the
implementation to choose whether to put the object on stack initially
(then move to heap when needed) or in heap directly under ARC.
Therefore, the `StackAddrEscapeChecker` has no need to know
specifically about ARC at all and it will not report errors on objects
in "unknown" regions.

Reviewed By: NoQ (Artem Dergachev)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131009

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1
# 5114db93 10-Apr-2022 Vince Bridgers <vince.a.bridgers@gmail.com>

[analyzer] Clean checker options from bool to DefaultBool (NFC)

A recent review emphasized the preference to use DefaultBool instead of
bool for checker options. This change is a NFC and cleans up s

[analyzer] Clean checker options from bool to DefaultBool (NFC)

A recent review emphasized the preference to use DefaultBool instead of
bool for checker options. This change is a NFC and cleans up some of the
instances where bool was used, and could be changed to DefaultBool.

Reviewed By: steakhal

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123464

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3
# 6ad47e1c 27-Aug-2021 Balazs Benics <balazs.benics@sigmatechnology.se>

[analyzer] Catch leaking stack addresses via stack variables

Not only global variables can hold references to dead stack variables.
Consider this example:

void write_stack_address_to(char **q) {

[analyzer] Catch leaking stack addresses via stack variables

Not only global variables can hold references to dead stack variables.
Consider this example:

void write_stack_address_to(char **q) {
char local;
*q = &local;
}

void test_stack() {
char *p;
write_stack_address_to(&p);
}

The address of 'local' is assigned to 'p', which becomes a dangling
pointer after 'write_stack_address_to()' returns.

The StackAddrEscapeChecker was looking for bindings in the store which
referred to variables of the popped stack frame, but it only considered
global variables in this regard. This patch relaxes this, catching
stack variable bindings as well.

---

This patch also works for temporary objects like:

struct Bar {
const int &ref;
explicit Bar(int y) : ref(y) {
// Okay.
} // End of the constructor call, `ref` is dangling now. Warning!
};

void test() {
Bar{33}; // Temporary object, so the corresponding memregion is
// *not* a VarRegion.
}

---

The return value optimization aka. copy-elision might kick in but that
is modeled by passing an imaginary CXXThisRegion which refers to the
parent stack frame which is supposed to be the 'return slot'.
Objects residing in the 'return slot' outlive the scope of the inner
call, thus we should expect no warning about them - except if we
explicitly disable copy-elision.

Reviewed By: NoQ, martong

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107078

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1
# 3a6ee4fe 10-Apr-2020 Kirstóf Umann <dkszelethus@gmail.com>

[analyzer][StackAddressEscape] Tie warnings to the diagnostic checkers rather then core.StackAddrEscapeBase

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78101


# bda3dd0d 27-Mar-2020 Kirstóf Umann <dkszelethus@gmail.com>

[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions

Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options.
To make this possible this patc

[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions

Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options.
To make this possible this patch changes the parameter of the shouldRegister*
function to CheckerManager to be able to query the analyzer options when
deciding whether the checker should be registered.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75271

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4
# 2f169e7c 09-Sep-2019 Artem Dergachev <artem.dergachev@gmail.com>

[analyzer] NFC: Introduce sub-classes for path-sensitive and basic reports.

Checkers are now required to specify whether they're creating a
path-sensitive report or a path-insensitive report by cons

[analyzer] NFC: Introduce sub-classes for path-sensitive and basic reports.

Checkers are now required to specify whether they're creating a
path-sensitive report or a path-insensitive report by constructing an
object of the respective type.

This makes BugReporter more independent from the rest of the Static Analyzer
because all Analyzer-specific code is now in sub-classes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66572

llvm-svn: 371450

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3
# 2b3d49b6 14-Aug-2019 Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com>

[Clang] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique

Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
o

[Clang] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique

Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259

llvm-svn: 368942

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2
# 204bf2bb 26-Jan-2019 Kristof Umann <dkszelethus@gmail.com>

[analyzer] Add CheckerManager::getChecker, make sure that a registry function registers no more than 1 checker

This patch effectively fixes the almost decade old checker naming issue.
The solution i

[analyzer] Add CheckerManager::getChecker, make sure that a registry function registers no more than 1 checker

This patch effectively fixes the almost decade old checker naming issue.
The solution is to assert when CheckerManager::getChecker is called on an
unregistered checker, and assert when CheckerManager::registerChecker is called
on a checker that is already registered.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55429

llvm-svn: 352292

show more ...


# 8fd74ebf 26-Jan-2019 Kristof Umann <dkszelethus@gmail.com>

[analyzer] Reimplement dependencies between checkers

Unfortunately, up until now, the fact that certain checkers depended on one
another was known, but how these actually unfolded was hidden deep wi

[analyzer] Reimplement dependencies between checkers

Unfortunately, up until now, the fact that certain checkers depended on one
another was known, but how these actually unfolded was hidden deep within the
implementation. For example, many checkers (like RetainCount, Malloc or CString)
modelled a certain functionality, and exposed certain reportable bug types to
the user. For example, while MallocChecker models many many different types of
memory handling, the actual "unix.MallocChecker" checker the user was exposed to
was merely and option to this modeling part.

Other than this being an ugly mess, this issue made resolving the checker naming
issue almost impossible. (The checker naming issue being that if a checker
registered more than one checker within its registry function, both checker
object recieved the same name) Also, if the user explicitly disabled a checker
that was a dependency of another that _was_ explicitly enabled, it implicitly,
without "telling" the user, reenabled it.

Clearly, changing this to a well structured, declarative form, where the
handling of dependencies are done on a higher level is very much preferred.

This patch, among the detailed things later, makes checkers declare their
dependencies within the TableGen file Checkers.td, and exposes the same
functionality to plugins and statically linked non-generated checkers through
CheckerRegistry::addDependency. CheckerRegistry now resolves these dependencies,
makes sure that checkers are added to CheckerManager in the correct order,
and makes sure that if a dependency is disabled, so will be every checker that
depends on it.

In detail:

* Add a new field to the Checker class in CheckerBase.td called Dependencies,
which is a list of Checkers.
* Move unix checkers before cplusplus, as there is no forward declaration in
tblgen :/
* Add the following new checkers:
- StackAddrEscapeBase
- StackAddrEscapeBase
- CStringModeling
- DynamicMemoryModeling (base of the MallocChecker family)
- IteratorModeling (base of the IteratorChecker family)
- ValistBase
- SecuritySyntaxChecker (base of bcmp, bcopy, etc...)
- NSOrCFErrorDerefChecker (base of NSErrorChecker and CFErrorChecker)
- IvarInvalidationModeling (base of IvarInvalidation checker family)
- RetainCountBase (base of RetainCount and OSObjectRetainCount)
* Clear up and registry functions in MallocChecker, happily remove old FIXMEs.
* Add a new addDependency function to CheckerRegistry.
* Neatly format RUN lines in files I looked at while debugging.

Big thanks to Artem Degrachev for all the guidance through this project!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54438

llvm-svn: 352287

show more ...


# 058a7a45 26-Jan-2019 Kristof Umann <dkszelethus@gmail.com>

[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function

Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. T

[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function

Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. This will force every
checker to implement this function, but maybe it isn't that bad: I saw a lot of
ObjC or C++ specific checkers that should probably not register themselves based
on some LangOptions (mine too), but they do anyways.

A big benefit of this is that all registry functions now register their checker,
once it is called, registration is guaranteed.

This patch is a part of a greater effort to reinvent checker registration, more
info here: D54438#1315953

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55424

llvm-svn: 352277

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1
# 2946cd70 19-Jan-2019 Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...


123