stack: allow lock-free only on relevant architectures

Since commit 7911ba0473e0 ("stack: enable lock-free implementation for
aarch64"), lock-free stack is supported on arm64 but this description was

stack: allow lock-free only on relevant architectures

Since commit 7911ba0473e0 ("stack: enable lock-free implementation for
aarch64"), lock-free stack is supported on arm64 but this description was
missing from the doxygen for the flag.

Currently it is impossible to detect programmatically whether lock-free
implementation of rte_stack is supported. One could check whether the
header guard for lock-free stubs is defined (_RTE_STACK_LF_STUBS_H_) but
that's an unstable implementation detail. Because of that currently all
lock-free ring creations silently succeed (as long as the stack header
is 16B long) which later leads to push and pop operations being NOPs.
The observable effect is that stack_lf_autotest fails on platforms not
supporting the lock-free. Instead it should just skip the lock-free test
altogether.

This commit adds a new errno value (ENOTSUP) that may be returned by
rte_stack_create() to indicate that a given combination of flags is not
supported on a current platform.
This is detected by checking a compile-time flag in the include logic in
rte_stack_lf.h which may be used by applications to check the lock-free
support at compile time.

Use the added RTE_STACK_LF_SUPPORTED flag to disable the lock-free stack
tests at the compile time.
Perf test doesn't fail because rte_ring_create() succeeds, however
marking this test as skipped gives a better indication of what actually
was tested.

Fixes: 7911ba0473e0 ("stack: enable lock-free implementation for aarch64")

Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Kardach <kda@semihalf.com>
Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>

show more ...

lib: remove librte_ prefix from directory names

There is no reason for the DPDK libraries to all have 'librte_' prefix on
the directory names. This prefix makes the directory names longer and also
m

lib: remove librte_ prefix from directory names

There is no reason for the DPDK libraries to all have 'librte_' prefix on
the directory names. This prefix makes the directory names longer and also
makes it awkward to add features referring to individual libraries in the
build - should the lib names be specified with or without the prefix.
Therefore, we can just remove the library prefix and use the library's
unique name as the directory name, i.e. 'eal' rather than 'librte_eal'

Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

show more ...