1# This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger. 2 3# Copyright 1997-2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 4 5# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify 6# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by 7# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or 8# (at your option) any later version. 9# 10# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, 11# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of 12# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the 13# GNU General Public License for more details. 14# 15# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License 16# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */ 17# step-test.exp -- Expect script to test stepping in gdb 18 19standard_testfile .c 20 21remote_exec build "rm -f ${binfile}" 22if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug}] != "" } { 23 untested "failed to compile" 24 return -1 25} 26 27clean_restart ${binfile} 28 29if ![runto_main] then { 30 fail "can't run to main" 31 return 0 32} 33 34# Set a breakpoint at line 45, if stepi then finish fails, we would 35# run to the end of the program, which would mess up the rest of the tests. 36 37# Vanilla step/next 38# 39gdb_test "next" ".*${decimal}.*x = 1;.*" "next 1" 40gdb_test "step" ".*${decimal}.*y = 2;.*" "step 1" 41 42# With count 43# 44gdb_test "next 2" ".*${decimal}.*w = w.*2;.*" "next 2" 45gdb_test "step 3" ".*${decimal}.*z = z.*5;.*" "step 3" 46gdb_test "next" ".*${decimal}.*callee.*OVER.*" "next 3" 47 48# Step over call 49# 50gdb_test "next" ".*${decimal}.*callee.*INTO.*" "next over" 51 52# Step into call 53# 54gdb_test "step" ".*${decimal}.*myglob.*" "step into" 55 56# Step out of call 57# 58# I wonder if this is really portable. Are there any caller-saves 59# platforms, on which `finish' will return you to some kind of pop 60# instruction, which is attributed to the line containing the function 61# call? 62 63# On PA64, we end up at a different instruction than PA32. 64# On IA-64, we also end up on callee instead of on the next line due 65# to the restoration of the global pointer (which is a caller-save). 66# Similarly on MIPS PIC targets. 67set test "step out" 68if { [istarget "ia64-*-*"] || [istarget "mips*-*-*"]} { 69 gdb_test_multiple "finish" "$test" { 70 -re ".*${decimal}.*a.*5.*= a.*3.*$gdb_prompt $" { 71 pass "$test" 72 } 73 -re ".*${decimal}.*callee.*INTO.*$gdb_prompt $" { 74 pass "$test" 75 } 76 } 77} else { 78 gdb_test "finish" ".*${decimal}.*a.*5.*= a.*3.*" "step out" 79} 80 81### Testing nexti and stepi. 82### 83### test_i NAME COMMAND HERE THERE 84### 85### Send COMMAND to gdb over and over, while the output matches the 86### regexp HERE, followed by the gdb prompt. Pass if the output 87### eventually matches the regexp THERE, followed by the gdb prompt; 88### fail if we have to iterate more than a hundred times, we time out 89### talking to gdb, or we get output which is neither HERE nor THERE. :) 90### 91### Use NAME as the name of the test. 92### 93### The exact regexps used are "$HERE.*$gdb_prompt $" 94### and "$THERE.*$gdb_prompt $" 95### 96proc test_i {name command here there} { 97 global gdb_prompt 98 99 set i 0 100 gdb_test_multiple "$command" "$name" { 101 -re "$here.*$gdb_prompt $" { 102 # Have we gone for too many steps without seeing any progress? 103 if {[incr i] >= 100} { 104 fail "$name (no progress after 100 steps)" 105 return 106 } 107 send_gdb "$command\n" 108 exp_continue 109 } 110 -re "$there.*$gdb_prompt $" { 111 # We've reached the next line. Rah. 112 pass "$name" 113 return 114 } 115 } 116} 117 118test_i "stepi to next line" "stepi" \ 119 ".*${decimal}.*a.*5.* = a.*3" \ 120 ".*${decimal}.*callee.*STEPI" 121 122# Continue to step until we enter the function. Also keep stepping 123# if this passes through a (useless) PLT entry. 124test_i "stepi into function" "stepi" \ 125 "(.*${decimal}.*callee.*STEPI|.* in callee@plt)" \ 126 ".*callee \\(\\) at .*step-test\\.c" 127 128# Continue to step until we reach the function's body. This makes it 129# more likely that we've actually completed the prologue, so "finish" 130# will work. 131test_i "stepi into function's first source line" "stepi" \ 132 ".*${decimal}.*int callee" \ 133 ".*${decimal}.*myglob.*; return 0;" 134 135# Have to be careful here, if the finish does not work, 136# then we may run to the end of the program, which 137# will cause erroneous failures in the rest of the tests 138set test "stepi: finish call" 139gdb_test_multiple "finish" "$test" { 140 -re ".*${decimal}.*callee.*NEXTI.*$gdb_prompt $" { 141 pass "$test" 142 } 143 -re ".*(Program received|$inferior_exited_re).*$gdb_prompt $" { 144 # Oops... We ran to the end of the program... Better reset 145 if {![runto_main]} then { 146 fail "$test (Can't run to main)" 147 return 0 148 } 149 if {![runto step-test.c:45]} { 150 fail "$test (Can't run to line 45)" 151 return 0 152 } 153 fail "$test" 154 } 155 -re ".*${decimal}.*callee.*STEPI.*$gdb_prompt $" { 156 # On PA64, we end up at a different instruction than PA32. 157 # On IA-64, we end up on callee instead of on the following line due 158 # to the restoration of the global pointer. 159 # Similarly on MIPS PIC targets. 160 if { [istarget "ia64-*-*"] || [istarget "mips*-*-*"] } { 161 test_i "$test" "stepi" \ 162 ".*${decimal}.*callee.*STEPI" ".*${decimal}.*callee.*NEXTI" 163 } else { 164 fail "$test" 165 } 166 } 167} 168 169test_i "nexti over function" "nexti" \ 170 ".*${decimal}.*callee.*NEXTI" \ 171 ".*${decimal}.*y = w \\+ z;" 172 173# On some platforms, if we try to step into a function call that 174# passes a large structure by value, then we actually end up stepping 175# into memcpy, bcopy, or some such --- GCC emits the call to pass the 176# argument. Opinion is bitterly divided about whether this is the 177# right behavior for GDB or not, but we'll catch it here, so folks 178# won't forget about it. 179# Update 4/4/2002 - Regardless of which opinion you have, you would 180# probably have to agree that gdb is currently behaving as designed, 181# in the absence of additional code to not stop in functions used 182# internally by the compiler. Since the testsuite should be checking 183# for conformance to the design, the correct behavior is to accept the 184# cases where gdb stops in memcpy/bcopy. 185 186gdb_test \ 187 "break [gdb_get_line_number "step-test.exp: large struct by value"]" \ 188 ".*Breakpoint.* at .*" \ 189 "set breakpoint at call to large_struct_by_value" 190gdb_test "continue" \ 191 ".*Breakpoint ${decimal},.*large_struct_by_value.*" \ 192 "run to pass large struct" 193set test "large struct by value" 194gdb_test_multiple "step" "$test" { 195 -re ".*step-test.exp: arrive here 1.*$gdb_prompt $" { 196 pass "$test" 197 } 198 -re ".*(memcpy|bcopy).*$gdb_prompt $" { 199 send_gdb "finish\n" ; gdb_expect -re "$gdb_prompt $" 200 send_gdb "step\n" 201 exp_continue 202 } 203} 204 205gdb_continue_to_end "step-test.exp" 206 207return 0 208