xref: /netbsd-src/external/bsd/openldap/dist/doc/guide/admin/sasl.sdf (revision b1c86f5f087524e68db12794ee9c3e3da1ab17a0)
1# OpenLDAP: pkg/openldap-guide/admin/sasl.sdf,v 1.34.2.10 2009/04/29 01:27:12 quanah Exp
2# Copyright 1999-2009 The OpenLDAP Foundation, All Rights Reserved.
3# COPYING RESTRICTIONS APPLY, see COPYRIGHT.
4
5H1: Using SASL
6
7OpenLDAP clients and servers are capable of authenticating via the
8{{TERM[expand]SASL}} ({{TERM:SASL}}) framework, which is detailed
9in {{REF:RFC4422}}.   This chapter describes how to make use of
10SASL in OpenLDAP.
11
12There are several industry standard authentication mechanisms that
13can be used with SASL, including {{TERM:GSSAPI}} for {{TERM:Kerberos}}
14V, {{TERM:DIGEST-MD5}}, and {{TERM:PLAIN}} and {{TERM:EXTERNAL}}
15for use with {{TERM[expand]TLS}} (TLS).
16
17The standard client tools provided with OpenLDAP Software, such as
18{{ldapsearch}}(1) and {{ldapmodify}}(1), will by default attempt
19to authenticate the user to the {{TERM:LDAP}} directory server using
20SASL.  Basic authentication service can be set up by the LDAP
21administrator with a few steps, allowing users to be authenticated
22to the slapd server as their LDAP entry.  With a few extra steps,
23some users and services can be allowed to exploit SASL's proxy
24authorization feature, allowing them to authenticate themselves and
25then switch their identity to that of another user or service.
26
27This chapter assumes you have read {{Cyrus SASL for System
28Administrators}}, provided with the {{PRD:Cyrus SASL}}
29package (in {{FILE:doc/sysadmin.html}}) and have a working Cyrus
30SASL installation.  You should use the Cyrus SASL {{EX:sample_client}}
31and {{EX:sample_server}} to test your SASL installation before
32attempting to make use of it with OpenLDAP Software.
33
34Note that in the following text the term {{user}} is used to describe
35a person or application entity who is connecting to the LDAP server
36via an LDAP client, such as {{ldapsearch}}(1).  That is, the term
37{{user}} not only applies to both an individual using an LDAP client,
38but to an application entity which issues LDAP client operations
39without direct user control.  For example, an e-mail server which
40uses LDAP operations to access information held in an LDAP server
41is an application entity.
42
43
44H2: SASL Security Considerations
45
46SASL offers many different authentication mechanisms.  This section
47briefly outlines security considerations.
48
49Some mechanisms, such as PLAIN and LOGIN, offer no greater security
50over LDAP {{simple}} authentication.  Like LDAP {{simple}}
51authentication, such mechanisms should not be used unless you have
52adequate security protections in place.  It is recommended that
53these mechanisms be used only in conjunction with {{TERM[expand]TLS}}
54(TLS).  Use of PLAIN and LOGIN are not discussed further in this
55document.
56
57The DIGEST-MD5 mechanism is the mandatory-to-implement authentication
58mechanism for LDAPv3.  Though DIGEST-MD5 is not a strong authentication
59mechanism in comparison with trusted third party authentication
60systems (such as {{TERM:Kerberos}} or public key systems), it does
61offer significant protections against a number of attacks.  Unlike
62the {{TERM:CRAM-MD5}} mechanism, it prevents chosen plaintext
63attacks.  DIGEST-MD5 is favored over the use of plaintext password
64mechanisms.  The CRAM-MD5 mechanism is deprecated in favor of
65DIGEST-MD5.  Use of {{SECT:DIGEST-MD5}} is discussed below.
66
67The GSSAPI mechanism utilizes {{TERM:GSS-API}} {{TERM:Kerberos}} V
68to provide secure authentication services.  The KERBEROS_V4 mechanism
69is available for those using Kerberos IV.  Kerberos is viewed as a
70secure, distributed authentication system suitable for both small
71and large enterprises.  Use of {{SECT:GSSAPI}} and {{SECT:KERBEROS_V4}}
72are discussed below.
73
74The EXTERNAL mechanism utilizes authentication services provided
75by lower level network services such as {{TERM:TLS}} (TLS).  When
76used in conjunction with {{TERM:TLS}} {{TERM:X.509}}-based public
77key technology, EXTERNAL offers strong authentication.  Use of
78EXTERNAL is discussed in the {{SECT:Using TLS}} chapter.
79
80There are other strong authentication mechanisms to choose from,
81including {{TERM:OTP}} (one time passwords) and {{TERM:SRP}} (secure
82remote passwords).  These mechanisms are not discussed in this
83document.
84
85
86H2: SASL Authentication
87
88Getting basic SASL authentication running involves a few steps.
89The first step configures your slapd server environment so that it
90can communicate with client programs using the security system in
91place at your site. This usually involves setting up a service key,
92a public key, or other form of secret. The second step concerns
93mapping authentication identities to LDAP {{TERM:DN}}'s, which
94depends on how entries are laid out in your directory. An explanation
95of the first step will be given in the next section using Kerberos
96V4 as an example mechanism. The steps necessary for your site's
97authentication mechanism will be similar, but a guide to every
98mechanism available under SASL is beyond the scope of this chapter.
99The second step is described in the section {{SECT:Mapping
100Authentication Identities}}.
101
102
103H3: GSSAPI
104
105This section describes the use of the SASL GSSAPI mechanism and
106Kerberos V with OpenLDAP.  It will be assumed that you have Kerberos
107V deployed, you are familiar with the operation of the system, and
108that your users are trained in its use.  This section also assumes
109you have familiarized yourself with the use of the GSSAPI mechanism
110by reading {{Configuring GSSAPI and Cyrus SASL}} (provided with
111Cyrus SASL in the {{FILE:doc/gssapi}} file) and successfully
112experimented with the Cyrus provided {{EX:sample_server}} and
113{{EX:sample_client}} applications.  General information about
114Kerberos is available at {{URL:http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www/}}.
115
116To use the GSSAPI mechanism with {{slapd}}(8) one must create a service
117key with a principal for {{ldap}} service within the realm for the host
118on which the service runs.  For example, if you run {{slapd}} on
119{{EX:directory.example.com}} and your realm is {{EX:EXAMPLE.COM}},
120you need to create a service key with the principal:
121
122>	ldap/directory.example.com@EXAMPLE.COM
123
124When {{slapd}}(8) runs, it must have access to this key.  This is
125generally done by placing the key into a keytab file,
126{{FILE:/etc/krb5.keytab}}.  See your Kerberos and Cyrus SASL
127documentation for information regarding keytab location settings.
128
129To use the GSSAPI mechanism to authenticate to the directory, the
130user obtains a Ticket Granting Ticket (TGT) prior to running the
131LDAP client.  When using OpenLDAP client tools, the user may mandate
132use of the GSSAPI mechanism by specifying {{EX:-Y GSSAPI}} as a
133command option.
134
135For the purposes of authentication and authorization, {{slapd}}(8)
136associates an authentication request DN of the form:
137
138>	uid=<primary[/instance]>,cn=<realm>,cn=gssapi,cn=auth
139
140Continuing our example, a user with the Kerberos principal
141{{EX:kurt@EXAMPLE.COM}} would have the associated DN:
142
143>	uid=kurt,cn=example.com,cn=gssapi,cn=auth
144
145and the principal {{EX:ursula/admin@FOREIGN.REALM}} would have the
146associated DN:
147
148>	uid=ursula/admin,cn=foreign.realm,cn=gssapi,cn=auth
149
150
151The authentication request DN can be used directly ACLs and
152{{EX:groupOfNames}} "member" attributes, since it is of legitimate
153LDAP DN format.  Or alternatively, the authentication DN could be
154mapped before use.  See the section {{SECT:Mapping Authentication
155Identities}} for details.
156
157
158H3: KERBEROS_V4
159
160This section describes the use of the SASL KERBEROS_V4 mechanism
161with OpenLDAP.  It will be assumed that you are familiar with the
162workings of the Kerberos IV security system, and that your site has
163Kerberos IV deployed.  Your users should be familiar with
164authentication policy, how to receive credentials in
165a Kerberos ticket cache, and how to refresh expired credentials.
166
167Note: KERBEROS_V4 and Kerberos IV are deprecated in favor of GSSAPI
168and Kerberos V.
169
170Client programs will need to be able to obtain a session key for
171use when connecting to your LDAP server. This allows the LDAP server
172to know the identity of the user, and allows the client to know it
173is connecting to a legitimate server. If encryption layers are to
174be used, the session key can also be used to help negotiate that
175option.
176
177The slapd server runs the service called "{{ldap}}", and the server
178will require a srvtab file with a service key.  SASL aware client
179programs will be obtaining an "ldap" service ticket with the user's
180ticket granting ticket (TGT), with the instance of the ticket
181matching the hostname of the OpenLDAP server. For example, if your
182realm is named {{EX:EXAMPLE.COM}} and the slapd server is running
183on the host named {{EX:directory.example.com}}, the {{FILE:/etc/srvtab}}
184file on the server will have a service key
185
186>	ldap.directory@EXAMPLE.COM
187
188When an LDAP client is authenticating a user to the directory using
189the KERBEROS_IV mechanism, it will request a session key for that
190same principal, either from the ticket cache or by obtaining a new
191one from the Kerberos server.  This will require the TGT to be
192available and valid in the cache as well.  If it is not present or
193has expired, the client may print out the message:
194
195>	ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Local error
196
197When the service ticket is obtained, it will be passed to the LDAP
198server as proof of the user's identity.  The server will extract
199the identity and realm out of the service ticket using SASL
200library calls, and convert them into an {{authentication request
201DN}} of the form
202
203>	uid=<username>,cn=<realm>,cn=<mechanism>,cn=auth
204
205So in our above example, if the user's name were "adamson", the
206authentication request DN would be:
207
208>	uid=adamsom,cn=example.com,cn=kerberos_v4,cn=auth
209
210This authentication request DN can be used directly ACLs or,
211alternatively, mapped prior to use.  See the section {{SECT:Mapping
212Authentication Identities}} for details.
213
214
215H3: DIGEST-MD5
216
217This section describes the use of the SASL DIGEST-MD5 mechanism
218using secrets stored either in the directory itself or in Cyrus
219SASL's own database. DIGEST-MD5 relies on the client and the server
220sharing a "secret", usually a password. The server generates a
221challenge and the client a response proving that it knows the shared
222secret. This is much more secure than simply sending the secret
223over the wire.
224
225Cyrus SASL supports several shared-secret mechanisms. To do this,
226it needs access to the plaintext password (unlike mechanisms which
227pass plaintext passwords over the wire, where the server can store
228a hashed version of the password).
229
230The server's copy of the shared-secret may be stored in Cyrus SASL's
231own {{sasldb}} database, in an external system accessed via
232{{saslauthd}}, or in LDAP database itself.  In either case it is
233very important to apply file access controls and LDAP access controls
234to prevent exposure of the passwords.  The configuration and commands
235discussed in this section assume the use of Cyrus SASL 2.1.
236
237To use secrets stored in {{sasldb}}, simply add users with the
238{{saslpasswd2}} command:
239
240>       saslpasswd2 -c <username>
241
242The passwords for such users must be managed with the {{saslpasswd2}}
243command.
244
245To use secrets stored in the LDAP directory, place plaintext passwords
246in the {{EX:userPassword}} attribute.  It will be necessary to add
247an option to {{EX:slapd.conf}} to make sure that passwords set using
248the LDAP Password Modify Operation are stored in plaintext:
249
250>       password-hash   {CLEARTEXT}
251
252Passwords stored in this way can be managed either with {{ldappasswd}}(1)
253or by simply modifying the {{EX:userPassword}} attribute.  Regardless of
254where the passwords are stored, a mapping will be needed from
255authentication request DN to user's DN.
256
257The DIGEST-MD5 mechanism produces authentication IDs of the form:
258
259>	uid=<username>,cn=<realm>,cn=digest-md5,cn=auth
260
261If the default realm is used, the realm name is omitted from the ID,
262giving:
263
264>	uid=<username>,cn=digest-md5,cn=auth
265
266See {{SECT: Mapping Authentication Identities}} below for information
267on optional mapping of identities.
268
269With suitable mappings in place, users can specify SASL IDs when
270performing LDAP operations, and the password stored in {{sasldb}} or in
271the directory itself will be used to verify the authentication.
272For example, the user identified by the directory entry:
273
274>       dn: cn=Andrew Findlay+uid=u000997,dc=example,dc=com
275>       objectclass: inetOrgPerson
276>       objectclass: person
277>       sn: Findlay
278>       uid: u000997
279>       userPassword: secret
280
281can issue commands of the form:
282
283>       ldapsearch -Y DIGEST-MD5 -U u000997 ...
284
285Note: in each of the above cases, no authorization identity (e.g.
286{{EX:-X}}) was provided.   Unless you are attempting {{SECT:SASL
287Proxy Authorization}}, no authorization identity should be specified.
288The server will infer an authorization identity from authentication
289identity (as described below).
290
291
292H3: Mapping Authentication Identities
293
294The authentication mechanism in the slapd server will use SASL
295library calls to obtain the authenticated user's "username", based
296on whatever underlying authentication mechanism was used.  This
297username is in the namespace of the authentication mechanism, and
298not in the normal LDAP namespace. As stated in the sections above,
299that username is reformatted into an authentication request DN of
300the form
301
302>	uid=<username>,cn=<realm>,cn=<mechanism>,cn=auth
303
304or
305
306>	uid=<username>,cn=<mechanism>,cn=auth
307
308depending on whether or not <mechanism> employs the concept of
309"realms".  Note also that the realm part will be omitted if the
310default realm was used in the authentication.
311
312The {{ldapwhoami}}(1) command may be used to determine the identity
313associated with the user.  It is very useful for determining proper
314function of mappings.
315
316It is not intended that you should add LDAP entries of the above
317form to your LDAP database.  Chances are you have an LDAP entry for
318each of the persons that will be authenticating to LDAP, laid out
319in your directory tree, and the tree does not start at cn=auth.
320But if your site has a clear mapping between the "username" and an
321LDAP entry for the person, you will be able to configure your LDAP
322server to automatically map a authentication request DN to the
323user's {{authentication DN}}.
324
325Note: it is not required that the authentication request DN nor the
326user's authentication DN resulting from the mapping refer to an
327entry held in the directory.  However, additional capabilities
328become available (see below).
329
330The LDAP administrator will need to tell the slapd server how to
331map an authentication request DN to a user's authentication DN.
332This is done by adding one or more {{EX:authz-regexp}} directives to
333the {{slapd.conf}}(5) file.  This directive takes two arguments:
334
335>	authz-regexp   <search pattern>   <replacement pattern>
336
337The authentication request DN is compared to the search pattern
338using the regular expression functions {{regcomp}}() and {{regexec}}(),
339and if it matches, it is rewritten as the replacement pattern. If
340there are multiple {{EX:authz-regexp}} directives, only the first
341whose search pattern matches the authentication identity is used.
342The string that is output from the replacement pattern should be
343the authentication DN of the user or an LDAP URL.  If replacement
344string produces a DN, the entry named by this DN need not be held
345by this server.  If the replace string produces an LDAP URL, that
346LDAP URL must evaluate to one and only one entry held by this server.
347
348The search pattern can contain any of the regular expression
349characters listed in {{regexec}}(3C). The main characters of note
350are dot ".", asterisk "*", and the open and close parenthesis "("
351and ")".  Essentially, the dot matches any character, the asterisk
352allows zero or more repeats of the immediately preceding character
353or pattern, and terms in parenthesis are remembered for the replacement
354pattern.
355
356The replacement pattern will produce either a DN or URL referring
357to the user.  Anything from the authentication request DN that
358matched a string in parenthesis in the search pattern is stored in
359the variable "$1". That variable "$1" can appear in the replacement
360pattern, and will be replaced by the string from the authentication
361request DN. If there were multiple sets of parentheses in the search
362pattern, the variables $2, $3, etc are used.
363
364H3: Direct Mapping
365
366Where possible, direct mapping of the authentication request DN to
367the user's DN is generally recommended.  Aside from avoiding the
368expense of searching for the user's DN, it allows mapping to
369DNs which refer to entries not held by this server.
370
371Suppose the authentication request DN is written as:
372
373>	uid=adamson,cn=example.com,cn=gssapi,cn=auth
374
375and the user's actual LDAP entry is:
376
377>	uid=adamson,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com
378
379then the following {{EX:authz-regexp}} directive in {{slapd.conf}}(5)
380would provide for direct mapping.
381
382>	authz-regexp
383>	  uid=([^,]*),cn=example.com,cn=gssapi,cn=auth
384>	  uid=$1,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com
385
386An even more lenient rule could be written as
387
388>	authz-regexp
389>	  uid=([^,]*),cn=[^,]*,cn=auth
390>	  uid=$1,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com
391
392Be careful about setting the search pattern too leniently, however,
393since it may mistakenly allow persons to become authenticated as a
394DN to which they should not have access.  It is better to write
395several strict directives than one lenient directive which has
396security holes.  If there is only one authentication mechanism in
397place at your site, and zero or one realms in use, you might be
398able to map between authentication identities and LDAP DN's with a
399single {{EX:authz-regexp}} directive.
400
401Don't forget to allow for the case where the realm is omitted as
402well as the case with an explicitly specified realm. This may well
403require a separate {{EX:authz-regexp}} directive for each case, with
404the explicit-realm entry being listed first.
405
406H3: Search-based mappings
407
408There are a number of cases where mapping to a LDAP URL may be
409appropriate.  For instance, some sites may have person objects
410located in multiple areas of the LDAP tree, such as if there were
411an {{EX:ou=accounting}} tree and an {{EX:ou=engineering}} tree,
412with persons interspersed between them.  Or, maybe the desired
413mapping must be based upon information in the user's information.
414Consider the need to map the above authentication request DN to
415user whose entry is as follows:
416
417>	dn: cn=Mark Adamson,ou=People,dc=Example,dc=COM
418>	objectclass: person
419>	cn: Mark Adamson
420>	uid: adamson
421
422The information in the authentication request DN is insufficient
423to allow the user's DN to be directly derived, instead the user's
424DN must be searched for.  For these situations, a replacement pattern
425which produces a LDAP URL can be used in the {{EX:authz-regexp}}
426directives.  This URL will then be used to perform an internal
427search of the LDAP database to find the person's authentication DN.
428
429An LDAP URL, similar to other URL's, is of the form
430
431>	ldap://<host>/<base>?<attrs>?<scope>?<filter>
432
433This contains all of the elements necessary to perform an LDAP
434search:  the name of the server <host>, the LDAP DN search base
435<base>, the LDAP attributes to retrieve <attrs>, the search scope
436<scope> which is one of the three options "base", "one", or "sub",
437and lastly an LDAP search filter <filter>.  Since the search is for
438an LDAP DN within the current server, the <host> portion should be
439empty.  The <attrs> field is also ignored since only the DN is of
440concern.  These two elements are left in the format of the URL to
441maintain the clarity of what information goes where in the string.
442
443Suppose that the person in the example from above did in fact have
444an authentication username of "adamson" and that information was
445kept in the attribute "uid" in their LDAP entry. The {{EX:authz-regexp}}
446directive might be written as
447
448>	authz-regexp
449>	  uid=([^,]*),cn=example.com,cn=gssapi,cn=auth
450>	  ldap:///ou=people,dc=example,dc=com??one?(uid=$1)
451
452This will initiate an internal search of the LDAP database inside
453the slapd server. If the search returns exactly one entry, it is
454accepted as being the DN of the user. If there are more than one
455entries returned, or if there are zero entries returned, the
456authentication fails and the user's connection is left bound as the
457authentication request DN.
458
459The attributes that are used in the search filter <filter> in the
460URL should be indexed to allow faster searching. If they are not,
461the authentication step alone can take uncomfortably long periods,
462and users may assume the server is down.
463
464A more complex site might have several realms in use, each mapping
465to a different subtree in the directory.  These can be handled with
466statements of the form:
467
468>	# Match Engineering realm
469>	authz-regexp
470>	   uid=([^,]*),cn=engineering.example.com,cn=digest-md5,cn=auth
471>	   ldap:///dc=eng,dc=example,dc=com??one?(&(uid=$1)(objectClass=person))
472>
473>	# Match Accounting realm
474>	authz-regexp
475>	   uid=([^,].*),cn=accounting.example.com,cn=digest-md5,cn=auth
476>	   ldap:///dc=accounting,dc=example,dc=com??one?(&(uid=$1)(objectClass=person))
477>
478>	# Default realm is customers.example.com
479>	authz-regexp
480>	   uid=([^,]*),cn=digest-md5,cn=auth
481>	   ldap:///dc=customers,dc=example,dc=com??one?(&(uid=$1)(objectClass=person))
482
483Note that the explicitly-named realms are handled first, to avoid
484the realm name becoming part of the UID.  Also note the use of scope
485and filters to limit matching to desirable entries.
486
487Note as well that {{EX:authz-regexp}} internal search are subject
488to access controls.  Specifically, the authentication identity
489must have {{EX:auth}} access.
490
491See {{slapd.conf}}(5) for more detailed information.
492
493
494H2: SASL Proxy Authorization
495
496The SASL offers a feature known as {{proxy authorization}}, which
497allows an authenticated user to request that they act on the behalf
498of another user.  This step occurs after the user has obtained an
499authentication DN, and involves sending an authorization identity
500to the server. The server will then make a decision on whether or
501not to allow the authorization to occur. If it is allowed, the
502user's LDAP connection is switched to have a binding DN derived
503from the authorization identity, and the LDAP session proceeds with
504the access of the new authorization DN.
505
506The decision to allow an authorization to proceed depends on the
507rules and policies of the site where LDAP is running, and thus
508cannot be made by SASL alone. The SASL library leaves it up to the
509server to make the decision. The LDAP administrator sets the
510guidelines of who can authorize to what identity by adding information
511into the LDAP database entries. By default, the authorization
512features are disabled, and must be explicitly configured by the
513LDAP administrator before use.
514
515
516H3: Uses of Proxy Authorization
517
518This sort of service is useful when one entity needs to act on the
519behalf of many other users. For example, users may be directed to
520a web page to make changes to their personal information in their
521LDAP entry. The users authenticate to the web server to establish
522their identity, but the web server CGI cannot authenticate to the
523LDAP server as that user to make changes for them. Instead, the
524web server authenticates itself to the LDAP server as a service
525identity, say,
526
527>	cn=WebUpdate,dc=example,dc=com
528
529and then it will SASL authorize to the DN of the user. Once so
530authorized, the CGI makes changes to the LDAP entry of the user,
531and as far as the slapd server can tell for its ACLs, it is the
532user themself on the other end of the connection. The user could
533have connected to the LDAP server directly and authenticated as
534themself, but that would require the user to have more knowledge
535of LDAP clients, knowledge which the web page provides in an easier
536format.
537
538Proxy authorization can also be used to limit access to an account
539that has greater access to the database. Such an account, perhaps
540even the root DN specified in {{slapd.conf}}(5), can have a strict
541list of people who can authorize to that DN. Changes to the LDAP
542database could then be only allowed by that DN, and in order to
543become that DN, users must first authenticate as one of the persons
544on the list. This allows for better auditing of who made changes
545to the LDAP database.  If people were allowed to authenticate
546directly to the privileged account, possibly through the {{EX:rootpw}}
547{{slapd.conf}}(5) directive or through a {{EX:userPassword}}
548attribute, then auditing becomes more difficult.
549
550Note that after a successful proxy authorization, the original
551authentication DN of the LDAP connection is overwritten by the new
552DN from the authorization request. If a service program is able to
553authenticate itself as its own authentication DN and then authorize
554to other DN's, and it is planning on switching to several different
555identities during one LDAP session, it will need to authenticate
556itself each time before authorizing to another DN (or use a different
557proxy authorization mechanism).  The slapd server does not keep
558record of the service program's ability to switch to other DN's.
559On authentication mechanisms like Kerberos this will not require
560multiple connections being made to the Kerberos server, since the
561user's TGT and "ldap" session key are valid for multiple uses for
562the several hours of the ticket lifetime.
563
564
565H3: SASL Authorization Identities
566
567The SASL authorization identity is sent to the LDAP server via the
568{{EX:-X}} switch for {{ldapsearch}}(1) and other tools, or in the
569{{EX:*authzid}} parameter to the {{lutil_sasl_defaults}}() call.
570The identity can be in one of two forms, either
571
572>	u:<username>
573
574or
575
576>	dn:<dn>
577
578In the first form, the <username> is from the same namespace as
579the authentication identities above. It is the user's username as
580it is referred to by the underlying authentication mechanism.
581Authorization identities of this form are converted into a DN format
582by the same function that the authentication process used, producing
583an {{authorization request DN}} of the form
584
585>	uid=<username>,cn=<realm>,cn=<mechanism>,cn=auth
586
587That authorization request DN is then run through the same
588{{EX:authz-regexp}} process to convert it into a legitimate authorization
589DN from the database. If it cannot be converted due to a failed
590search from an LDAP URL, the authorization request fails with
591"inappropriate access".  Otherwise, the DN string is now a legitimate
592authorization DN ready to undergo approval.
593
594If the authorization identity was provided in the second form, with
595a {{EX:"dn:"}} prefix, the string after the prefix is already in
596authorization DN form, ready to undergo approval.
597
598
599H3: Proxy Authorization Rules
600
601Once slapd has the authorization DN, the actual approval process
602begins. There are two attributes that the LDAP administrator can
603put into LDAP entries to allow authorization:
604
605>	authzTo
606>	authzFrom
607
608Both can be multivalued.  The {{EX:authzTo}} attribute is a
609source rule, and it is placed into the entry associated with the
610authentication DN to tell what authorization DNs the authenticated
611DN is allowed to assume.  The second attribute is a destination
612rule, and it is placed into the entry associated with the requested
613authorization DN to tell which authenticated DNs may assume it.
614
615The choice of which authorization policy attribute to use is up to
616the administrator.  Source rules are checked first in the person's
617authentication DN entry, and if none of the {{EX:authzTo}} rules
618specify the authorization is permitted, the {{EX:authzFrom}}
619rules in the authorization DN entry are then checked. If neither
620case specifies that the request be honored, the request is denied.
621Since the default behavior is to deny authorization requests, rules
622only specify that a request be allowed; there are no negative rules
623telling what authorizations to deny.
624
625The value(s) in the two attributes are of the same form as the
626output of the replacement pattern of a {{EX:authz-regexp}} directive:
627either a DN or an LDAP URL. For example, if a {{EX:authzTo}}
628value is a DN, that DN is one the authenticated user can authorize
629to. On the other hand, if the {{EX:authzTo}} value is an LDAP
630URL, the URL is used as an internal search of the LDAP database,
631and the authenticated user can become ANY DN returned by the search.
632If an LDAP entry looked like:
633
634>	dn: cn=WebUpdate,dc=example,dc=com
635>	authzTo: ldap:///dc=example,dc=com??sub?(objectclass=person)
636
637then any user who authenticated as {{EX:cn=WebUpdate,dc=example,dc=com}}
638could authorize to any other LDAP entry under the search base
639{{EX:dc=example,dc=com}} which has an objectClass of {{EX:Person}}.
640
641
642H4: Notes on Proxy Authorization Rules
643
644An LDAP URL in a {{EX:authzTo}} or {{EX:authzFrom}} attribute
645will return a set of DNs.  Each DN returned will be checked.  Searches
646which return a large set can cause the authorization process to
647take an uncomfortably long time. Also, searches should be performed
648on attributes that have been indexed by slapd.
649
650To help produce more sweeping rules for {{EX:authzFrom}} and
651{{EX:authzTo}}, the values of these attributes are allowed to
652be DNs with regular expression characters in them. This means a
653source rule like
654
655>	authzTo: dn.regex:^uid=[^,]*,dc=example,dc=com$
656
657would allow that authenticated user to authorize to any DN that
658matches the regular expression pattern given. This regular expression
659comparison can be evaluated much faster than an LDAP search for
660{{EX:(uid=*)}}.
661
662Also note that the values in an authorization rule must be one of
663the two forms: an LDAP URL or a DN (with or without regular expression
664characters). Anything that does not begin with "{{EX:ldap://}}" is
665taken as a DN. It is not permissible to enter another authorization
666identity of the form "{{EX:u:<username>}}" as an authorization rule.
667
668
669H4: Policy Configuration
670
671The decision of which type of rules to use, {{EX:authzFrom}}
672or {{EX:authzTo}}, will depend on the site's situation. For
673example, if the set of people who may become a given identity can
674easily be written as a search filter, then a single destination
675rule could be written. If the set of people is not easily defined
676by a search filter, and the set of people is small, it may be better
677to write a source rule in the entries of each of those people who
678should be allowed to perform the proxy authorization.
679
680By default, processing of proxy authorization rules is disabled.
681The {{EX:authz-policy}} directive must be set in the
682{{slapd.conf}}(5) file to enable authorization. This directive can
683be set to {{EX:none}} for no rules (the default), {{EX:to}} for
684source rules, {{EX:from}} for destination rules, or {{EX:both}} for
685both source and destination rules.
686
687Source rules are extremely powerful. If ordinary users have
688access to write the {{EX:authzTo}} attribute in their own
689entries, then they can write rules that would allow them to authorize
690as anyone else.  As such, when using source rules, the
691{{EX:authzTo}} attribute should be protected with an ACL that
692only allows privileged users to set its values.
693
694