1# OpenLDAP: pkg/openldap-guide/admin/sasl.sdf,v 1.34.2.10 2009/04/29 01:27:12 quanah Exp 2# Copyright 1999-2009 The OpenLDAP Foundation, All Rights Reserved. 3# COPYING RESTRICTIONS APPLY, see COPYRIGHT. 4 5H1: Using SASL 6 7OpenLDAP clients and servers are capable of authenticating via the 8{{TERM[expand]SASL}} ({{TERM:SASL}}) framework, which is detailed 9in {{REF:RFC4422}}. This chapter describes how to make use of 10SASL in OpenLDAP. 11 12There are several industry standard authentication mechanisms that 13can be used with SASL, including {{TERM:GSSAPI}} for {{TERM:Kerberos}} 14V, {{TERM:DIGEST-MD5}}, and {{TERM:PLAIN}} and {{TERM:EXTERNAL}} 15for use with {{TERM[expand]TLS}} (TLS). 16 17The standard client tools provided with OpenLDAP Software, such as 18{{ldapsearch}}(1) and {{ldapmodify}}(1), will by default attempt 19to authenticate the user to the {{TERM:LDAP}} directory server using 20SASL. Basic authentication service can be set up by the LDAP 21administrator with a few steps, allowing users to be authenticated 22to the slapd server as their LDAP entry. With a few extra steps, 23some users and services can be allowed to exploit SASL's proxy 24authorization feature, allowing them to authenticate themselves and 25then switch their identity to that of another user or service. 26 27This chapter assumes you have read {{Cyrus SASL for System 28Administrators}}, provided with the {{PRD:Cyrus SASL}} 29package (in {{FILE:doc/sysadmin.html}}) and have a working Cyrus 30SASL installation. You should use the Cyrus SASL {{EX:sample_client}} 31and {{EX:sample_server}} to test your SASL installation before 32attempting to make use of it with OpenLDAP Software. 33 34Note that in the following text the term {{user}} is used to describe 35a person or application entity who is connecting to the LDAP server 36via an LDAP client, such as {{ldapsearch}}(1). That is, the term 37{{user}} not only applies to both an individual using an LDAP client, 38but to an application entity which issues LDAP client operations 39without direct user control. For example, an e-mail server which 40uses LDAP operations to access information held in an LDAP server 41is an application entity. 42 43 44H2: SASL Security Considerations 45 46SASL offers many different authentication mechanisms. This section 47briefly outlines security considerations. 48 49Some mechanisms, such as PLAIN and LOGIN, offer no greater security 50over LDAP {{simple}} authentication. Like LDAP {{simple}} 51authentication, such mechanisms should not be used unless you have 52adequate security protections in place. It is recommended that 53these mechanisms be used only in conjunction with {{TERM[expand]TLS}} 54(TLS). Use of PLAIN and LOGIN are not discussed further in this 55document. 56 57The DIGEST-MD5 mechanism is the mandatory-to-implement authentication 58mechanism for LDAPv3. Though DIGEST-MD5 is not a strong authentication 59mechanism in comparison with trusted third party authentication 60systems (such as {{TERM:Kerberos}} or public key systems), it does 61offer significant protections against a number of attacks. Unlike 62the {{TERM:CRAM-MD5}} mechanism, it prevents chosen plaintext 63attacks. DIGEST-MD5 is favored over the use of plaintext password 64mechanisms. The CRAM-MD5 mechanism is deprecated in favor of 65DIGEST-MD5. Use of {{SECT:DIGEST-MD5}} is discussed below. 66 67The GSSAPI mechanism utilizes {{TERM:GSS-API}} {{TERM:Kerberos}} V 68to provide secure authentication services. The KERBEROS_V4 mechanism 69is available for those using Kerberos IV. Kerberos is viewed as a 70secure, distributed authentication system suitable for both small 71and large enterprises. Use of {{SECT:GSSAPI}} and {{SECT:KERBEROS_V4}} 72are discussed below. 73 74The EXTERNAL mechanism utilizes authentication services provided 75by lower level network services such as {{TERM:TLS}} (TLS). When 76used in conjunction with {{TERM:TLS}} {{TERM:X.509}}-based public 77key technology, EXTERNAL offers strong authentication. Use of 78EXTERNAL is discussed in the {{SECT:Using TLS}} chapter. 79 80There are other strong authentication mechanisms to choose from, 81including {{TERM:OTP}} (one time passwords) and {{TERM:SRP}} (secure 82remote passwords). These mechanisms are not discussed in this 83document. 84 85 86H2: SASL Authentication 87 88Getting basic SASL authentication running involves a few steps. 89The first step configures your slapd server environment so that it 90can communicate with client programs using the security system in 91place at your site. This usually involves setting up a service key, 92a public key, or other form of secret. The second step concerns 93mapping authentication identities to LDAP {{TERM:DN}}'s, which 94depends on how entries are laid out in your directory. An explanation 95of the first step will be given in the next section using Kerberos 96V4 as an example mechanism. The steps necessary for your site's 97authentication mechanism will be similar, but a guide to every 98mechanism available under SASL is beyond the scope of this chapter. 99The second step is described in the section {{SECT:Mapping 100Authentication Identities}}. 101 102 103H3: GSSAPI 104 105This section describes the use of the SASL GSSAPI mechanism and 106Kerberos V with OpenLDAP. It will be assumed that you have Kerberos 107V deployed, you are familiar with the operation of the system, and 108that your users are trained in its use. This section also assumes 109you have familiarized yourself with the use of the GSSAPI mechanism 110by reading {{Configuring GSSAPI and Cyrus SASL}} (provided with 111Cyrus SASL in the {{FILE:doc/gssapi}} file) and successfully 112experimented with the Cyrus provided {{EX:sample_server}} and 113{{EX:sample_client}} applications. General information about 114Kerberos is available at {{URL:http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www/}}. 115 116To use the GSSAPI mechanism with {{slapd}}(8) one must create a service 117key with a principal for {{ldap}} service within the realm for the host 118on which the service runs. For example, if you run {{slapd}} on 119{{EX:directory.example.com}} and your realm is {{EX:EXAMPLE.COM}}, 120you need to create a service key with the principal: 121 122> ldap/directory.example.com@EXAMPLE.COM 123 124When {{slapd}}(8) runs, it must have access to this key. This is 125generally done by placing the key into a keytab file, 126{{FILE:/etc/krb5.keytab}}. See your Kerberos and Cyrus SASL 127documentation for information regarding keytab location settings. 128 129To use the GSSAPI mechanism to authenticate to the directory, the 130user obtains a Ticket Granting Ticket (TGT) prior to running the 131LDAP client. When using OpenLDAP client tools, the user may mandate 132use of the GSSAPI mechanism by specifying {{EX:-Y GSSAPI}} as a 133command option. 134 135For the purposes of authentication and authorization, {{slapd}}(8) 136associates an authentication request DN of the form: 137 138> uid=<primary[/instance]>,cn=<realm>,cn=gssapi,cn=auth 139 140Continuing our example, a user with the Kerberos principal 141{{EX:kurt@EXAMPLE.COM}} would have the associated DN: 142 143> uid=kurt,cn=example.com,cn=gssapi,cn=auth 144 145and the principal {{EX:ursula/admin@FOREIGN.REALM}} would have the 146associated DN: 147 148> uid=ursula/admin,cn=foreign.realm,cn=gssapi,cn=auth 149 150 151The authentication request DN can be used directly ACLs and 152{{EX:groupOfNames}} "member" attributes, since it is of legitimate 153LDAP DN format. Or alternatively, the authentication DN could be 154mapped before use. See the section {{SECT:Mapping Authentication 155Identities}} for details. 156 157 158H3: KERBEROS_V4 159 160This section describes the use of the SASL KERBEROS_V4 mechanism 161with OpenLDAP. It will be assumed that you are familiar with the 162workings of the Kerberos IV security system, and that your site has 163Kerberos IV deployed. Your users should be familiar with 164authentication policy, how to receive credentials in 165a Kerberos ticket cache, and how to refresh expired credentials. 166 167Note: KERBEROS_V4 and Kerberos IV are deprecated in favor of GSSAPI 168and Kerberos V. 169 170Client programs will need to be able to obtain a session key for 171use when connecting to your LDAP server. This allows the LDAP server 172to know the identity of the user, and allows the client to know it 173is connecting to a legitimate server. If encryption layers are to 174be used, the session key can also be used to help negotiate that 175option. 176 177The slapd server runs the service called "{{ldap}}", and the server 178will require a srvtab file with a service key. SASL aware client 179programs will be obtaining an "ldap" service ticket with the user's 180ticket granting ticket (TGT), with the instance of the ticket 181matching the hostname of the OpenLDAP server. For example, if your 182realm is named {{EX:EXAMPLE.COM}} and the slapd server is running 183on the host named {{EX:directory.example.com}}, the {{FILE:/etc/srvtab}} 184file on the server will have a service key 185 186> ldap.directory@EXAMPLE.COM 187 188When an LDAP client is authenticating a user to the directory using 189the KERBEROS_IV mechanism, it will request a session key for that 190same principal, either from the ticket cache or by obtaining a new 191one from the Kerberos server. This will require the TGT to be 192available and valid in the cache as well. If it is not present or 193has expired, the client may print out the message: 194 195> ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Local error 196 197When the service ticket is obtained, it will be passed to the LDAP 198server as proof of the user's identity. The server will extract 199the identity and realm out of the service ticket using SASL 200library calls, and convert them into an {{authentication request 201DN}} of the form 202 203> uid=<username>,cn=<realm>,cn=<mechanism>,cn=auth 204 205So in our above example, if the user's name were "adamson", the 206authentication request DN would be: 207 208> uid=adamsom,cn=example.com,cn=kerberos_v4,cn=auth 209 210This authentication request DN can be used directly ACLs or, 211alternatively, mapped prior to use. See the section {{SECT:Mapping 212Authentication Identities}} for details. 213 214 215H3: DIGEST-MD5 216 217This section describes the use of the SASL DIGEST-MD5 mechanism 218using secrets stored either in the directory itself or in Cyrus 219SASL's own database. DIGEST-MD5 relies on the client and the server 220sharing a "secret", usually a password. The server generates a 221challenge and the client a response proving that it knows the shared 222secret. This is much more secure than simply sending the secret 223over the wire. 224 225Cyrus SASL supports several shared-secret mechanisms. To do this, 226it needs access to the plaintext password (unlike mechanisms which 227pass plaintext passwords over the wire, where the server can store 228a hashed version of the password). 229 230The server's copy of the shared-secret may be stored in Cyrus SASL's 231own {{sasldb}} database, in an external system accessed via 232{{saslauthd}}, or in LDAP database itself. In either case it is 233very important to apply file access controls and LDAP access controls 234to prevent exposure of the passwords. The configuration and commands 235discussed in this section assume the use of Cyrus SASL 2.1. 236 237To use secrets stored in {{sasldb}}, simply add users with the 238{{saslpasswd2}} command: 239 240> saslpasswd2 -c <username> 241 242The passwords for such users must be managed with the {{saslpasswd2}} 243command. 244 245To use secrets stored in the LDAP directory, place plaintext passwords 246in the {{EX:userPassword}} attribute. It will be necessary to add 247an option to {{EX:slapd.conf}} to make sure that passwords set using 248the LDAP Password Modify Operation are stored in plaintext: 249 250> password-hash {CLEARTEXT} 251 252Passwords stored in this way can be managed either with {{ldappasswd}}(1) 253or by simply modifying the {{EX:userPassword}} attribute. Regardless of 254where the passwords are stored, a mapping will be needed from 255authentication request DN to user's DN. 256 257The DIGEST-MD5 mechanism produces authentication IDs of the form: 258 259> uid=<username>,cn=<realm>,cn=digest-md5,cn=auth 260 261If the default realm is used, the realm name is omitted from the ID, 262giving: 263 264> uid=<username>,cn=digest-md5,cn=auth 265 266See {{SECT: Mapping Authentication Identities}} below for information 267on optional mapping of identities. 268 269With suitable mappings in place, users can specify SASL IDs when 270performing LDAP operations, and the password stored in {{sasldb}} or in 271the directory itself will be used to verify the authentication. 272For example, the user identified by the directory entry: 273 274> dn: cn=Andrew Findlay+uid=u000997,dc=example,dc=com 275> objectclass: inetOrgPerson 276> objectclass: person 277> sn: Findlay 278> uid: u000997 279> userPassword: secret 280 281can issue commands of the form: 282 283> ldapsearch -Y DIGEST-MD5 -U u000997 ... 284 285Note: in each of the above cases, no authorization identity (e.g. 286{{EX:-X}}) was provided. Unless you are attempting {{SECT:SASL 287Proxy Authorization}}, no authorization identity should be specified. 288The server will infer an authorization identity from authentication 289identity (as described below). 290 291 292H3: Mapping Authentication Identities 293 294The authentication mechanism in the slapd server will use SASL 295library calls to obtain the authenticated user's "username", based 296on whatever underlying authentication mechanism was used. This 297username is in the namespace of the authentication mechanism, and 298not in the normal LDAP namespace. As stated in the sections above, 299that username is reformatted into an authentication request DN of 300the form 301 302> uid=<username>,cn=<realm>,cn=<mechanism>,cn=auth 303 304or 305 306> uid=<username>,cn=<mechanism>,cn=auth 307 308depending on whether or not <mechanism> employs the concept of 309"realms". Note also that the realm part will be omitted if the 310default realm was used in the authentication. 311 312The {{ldapwhoami}}(1) command may be used to determine the identity 313associated with the user. It is very useful for determining proper 314function of mappings. 315 316It is not intended that you should add LDAP entries of the above 317form to your LDAP database. Chances are you have an LDAP entry for 318each of the persons that will be authenticating to LDAP, laid out 319in your directory tree, and the tree does not start at cn=auth. 320But if your site has a clear mapping between the "username" and an 321LDAP entry for the person, you will be able to configure your LDAP 322server to automatically map a authentication request DN to the 323user's {{authentication DN}}. 324 325Note: it is not required that the authentication request DN nor the 326user's authentication DN resulting from the mapping refer to an 327entry held in the directory. However, additional capabilities 328become available (see below). 329 330The LDAP administrator will need to tell the slapd server how to 331map an authentication request DN to a user's authentication DN. 332This is done by adding one or more {{EX:authz-regexp}} directives to 333the {{slapd.conf}}(5) file. This directive takes two arguments: 334 335> authz-regexp <search pattern> <replacement pattern> 336 337The authentication request DN is compared to the search pattern 338using the regular expression functions {{regcomp}}() and {{regexec}}(), 339and if it matches, it is rewritten as the replacement pattern. If 340there are multiple {{EX:authz-regexp}} directives, only the first 341whose search pattern matches the authentication identity is used. 342The string that is output from the replacement pattern should be 343the authentication DN of the user or an LDAP URL. If replacement 344string produces a DN, the entry named by this DN need not be held 345by this server. If the replace string produces an LDAP URL, that 346LDAP URL must evaluate to one and only one entry held by this server. 347 348The search pattern can contain any of the regular expression 349characters listed in {{regexec}}(3C). The main characters of note 350are dot ".", asterisk "*", and the open and close parenthesis "(" 351and ")". Essentially, the dot matches any character, the asterisk 352allows zero or more repeats of the immediately preceding character 353or pattern, and terms in parenthesis are remembered for the replacement 354pattern. 355 356The replacement pattern will produce either a DN or URL referring 357to the user. Anything from the authentication request DN that 358matched a string in parenthesis in the search pattern is stored in 359the variable "$1". That variable "$1" can appear in the replacement 360pattern, and will be replaced by the string from the authentication 361request DN. If there were multiple sets of parentheses in the search 362pattern, the variables $2, $3, etc are used. 363 364H3: Direct Mapping 365 366Where possible, direct mapping of the authentication request DN to 367the user's DN is generally recommended. Aside from avoiding the 368expense of searching for the user's DN, it allows mapping to 369DNs which refer to entries not held by this server. 370 371Suppose the authentication request DN is written as: 372 373> uid=adamson,cn=example.com,cn=gssapi,cn=auth 374 375and the user's actual LDAP entry is: 376 377> uid=adamson,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com 378 379then the following {{EX:authz-regexp}} directive in {{slapd.conf}}(5) 380would provide for direct mapping. 381 382> authz-regexp 383> uid=([^,]*),cn=example.com,cn=gssapi,cn=auth 384> uid=$1,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com 385 386An even more lenient rule could be written as 387 388> authz-regexp 389> uid=([^,]*),cn=[^,]*,cn=auth 390> uid=$1,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com 391 392Be careful about setting the search pattern too leniently, however, 393since it may mistakenly allow persons to become authenticated as a 394DN to which they should not have access. It is better to write 395several strict directives than one lenient directive which has 396security holes. If there is only one authentication mechanism in 397place at your site, and zero or one realms in use, you might be 398able to map between authentication identities and LDAP DN's with a 399single {{EX:authz-regexp}} directive. 400 401Don't forget to allow for the case where the realm is omitted as 402well as the case with an explicitly specified realm. This may well 403require a separate {{EX:authz-regexp}} directive for each case, with 404the explicit-realm entry being listed first. 405 406H3: Search-based mappings 407 408There are a number of cases where mapping to a LDAP URL may be 409appropriate. For instance, some sites may have person objects 410located in multiple areas of the LDAP tree, such as if there were 411an {{EX:ou=accounting}} tree and an {{EX:ou=engineering}} tree, 412with persons interspersed between them. Or, maybe the desired 413mapping must be based upon information in the user's information. 414Consider the need to map the above authentication request DN to 415user whose entry is as follows: 416 417> dn: cn=Mark Adamson,ou=People,dc=Example,dc=COM 418> objectclass: person 419> cn: Mark Adamson 420> uid: adamson 421 422The information in the authentication request DN is insufficient 423to allow the user's DN to be directly derived, instead the user's 424DN must be searched for. For these situations, a replacement pattern 425which produces a LDAP URL can be used in the {{EX:authz-regexp}} 426directives. This URL will then be used to perform an internal 427search of the LDAP database to find the person's authentication DN. 428 429An LDAP URL, similar to other URL's, is of the form 430 431> ldap://<host>/<base>?<attrs>?<scope>?<filter> 432 433This contains all of the elements necessary to perform an LDAP 434search: the name of the server <host>, the LDAP DN search base 435<base>, the LDAP attributes to retrieve <attrs>, the search scope 436<scope> which is one of the three options "base", "one", or "sub", 437and lastly an LDAP search filter <filter>. Since the search is for 438an LDAP DN within the current server, the <host> portion should be 439empty. The <attrs> field is also ignored since only the DN is of 440concern. These two elements are left in the format of the URL to 441maintain the clarity of what information goes where in the string. 442 443Suppose that the person in the example from above did in fact have 444an authentication username of "adamson" and that information was 445kept in the attribute "uid" in their LDAP entry. The {{EX:authz-regexp}} 446directive might be written as 447 448> authz-regexp 449> uid=([^,]*),cn=example.com,cn=gssapi,cn=auth 450> ldap:///ou=people,dc=example,dc=com??one?(uid=$1) 451 452This will initiate an internal search of the LDAP database inside 453the slapd server. If the search returns exactly one entry, it is 454accepted as being the DN of the user. If there are more than one 455entries returned, or if there are zero entries returned, the 456authentication fails and the user's connection is left bound as the 457authentication request DN. 458 459The attributes that are used in the search filter <filter> in the 460URL should be indexed to allow faster searching. If they are not, 461the authentication step alone can take uncomfortably long periods, 462and users may assume the server is down. 463 464A more complex site might have several realms in use, each mapping 465to a different subtree in the directory. These can be handled with 466statements of the form: 467 468> # Match Engineering realm 469> authz-regexp 470> uid=([^,]*),cn=engineering.example.com,cn=digest-md5,cn=auth 471> ldap:///dc=eng,dc=example,dc=com??one?(&(uid=$1)(objectClass=person)) 472> 473> # Match Accounting realm 474> authz-regexp 475> uid=([^,].*),cn=accounting.example.com,cn=digest-md5,cn=auth 476> ldap:///dc=accounting,dc=example,dc=com??one?(&(uid=$1)(objectClass=person)) 477> 478> # Default realm is customers.example.com 479> authz-regexp 480> uid=([^,]*),cn=digest-md5,cn=auth 481> ldap:///dc=customers,dc=example,dc=com??one?(&(uid=$1)(objectClass=person)) 482 483Note that the explicitly-named realms are handled first, to avoid 484the realm name becoming part of the UID. Also note the use of scope 485and filters to limit matching to desirable entries. 486 487Note as well that {{EX:authz-regexp}} internal search are subject 488to access controls. Specifically, the authentication identity 489must have {{EX:auth}} access. 490 491See {{slapd.conf}}(5) for more detailed information. 492 493 494H2: SASL Proxy Authorization 495 496The SASL offers a feature known as {{proxy authorization}}, which 497allows an authenticated user to request that they act on the behalf 498of another user. This step occurs after the user has obtained an 499authentication DN, and involves sending an authorization identity 500to the server. The server will then make a decision on whether or 501not to allow the authorization to occur. If it is allowed, the 502user's LDAP connection is switched to have a binding DN derived 503from the authorization identity, and the LDAP session proceeds with 504the access of the new authorization DN. 505 506The decision to allow an authorization to proceed depends on the 507rules and policies of the site where LDAP is running, and thus 508cannot be made by SASL alone. The SASL library leaves it up to the 509server to make the decision. The LDAP administrator sets the 510guidelines of who can authorize to what identity by adding information 511into the LDAP database entries. By default, the authorization 512features are disabled, and must be explicitly configured by the 513LDAP administrator before use. 514 515 516H3: Uses of Proxy Authorization 517 518This sort of service is useful when one entity needs to act on the 519behalf of many other users. For example, users may be directed to 520a web page to make changes to their personal information in their 521LDAP entry. The users authenticate to the web server to establish 522their identity, but the web server CGI cannot authenticate to the 523LDAP server as that user to make changes for them. Instead, the 524web server authenticates itself to the LDAP server as a service 525identity, say, 526 527> cn=WebUpdate,dc=example,dc=com 528 529and then it will SASL authorize to the DN of the user. Once so 530authorized, the CGI makes changes to the LDAP entry of the user, 531and as far as the slapd server can tell for its ACLs, it is the 532user themself on the other end of the connection. The user could 533have connected to the LDAP server directly and authenticated as 534themself, but that would require the user to have more knowledge 535of LDAP clients, knowledge which the web page provides in an easier 536format. 537 538Proxy authorization can also be used to limit access to an account 539that has greater access to the database. Such an account, perhaps 540even the root DN specified in {{slapd.conf}}(5), can have a strict 541list of people who can authorize to that DN. Changes to the LDAP 542database could then be only allowed by that DN, and in order to 543become that DN, users must first authenticate as one of the persons 544on the list. This allows for better auditing of who made changes 545to the LDAP database. If people were allowed to authenticate 546directly to the privileged account, possibly through the {{EX:rootpw}} 547{{slapd.conf}}(5) directive or through a {{EX:userPassword}} 548attribute, then auditing becomes more difficult. 549 550Note that after a successful proxy authorization, the original 551authentication DN of the LDAP connection is overwritten by the new 552DN from the authorization request. If a service program is able to 553authenticate itself as its own authentication DN and then authorize 554to other DN's, and it is planning on switching to several different 555identities during one LDAP session, it will need to authenticate 556itself each time before authorizing to another DN (or use a different 557proxy authorization mechanism). The slapd server does not keep 558record of the service program's ability to switch to other DN's. 559On authentication mechanisms like Kerberos this will not require 560multiple connections being made to the Kerberos server, since the 561user's TGT and "ldap" session key are valid for multiple uses for 562the several hours of the ticket lifetime. 563 564 565H3: SASL Authorization Identities 566 567The SASL authorization identity is sent to the LDAP server via the 568{{EX:-X}} switch for {{ldapsearch}}(1) and other tools, or in the 569{{EX:*authzid}} parameter to the {{lutil_sasl_defaults}}() call. 570The identity can be in one of two forms, either 571 572> u:<username> 573 574or 575 576> dn:<dn> 577 578In the first form, the <username> is from the same namespace as 579the authentication identities above. It is the user's username as 580it is referred to by the underlying authentication mechanism. 581Authorization identities of this form are converted into a DN format 582by the same function that the authentication process used, producing 583an {{authorization request DN}} of the form 584 585> uid=<username>,cn=<realm>,cn=<mechanism>,cn=auth 586 587That authorization request DN is then run through the same 588{{EX:authz-regexp}} process to convert it into a legitimate authorization 589DN from the database. If it cannot be converted due to a failed 590search from an LDAP URL, the authorization request fails with 591"inappropriate access". Otherwise, the DN string is now a legitimate 592authorization DN ready to undergo approval. 593 594If the authorization identity was provided in the second form, with 595a {{EX:"dn:"}} prefix, the string after the prefix is already in 596authorization DN form, ready to undergo approval. 597 598 599H3: Proxy Authorization Rules 600 601Once slapd has the authorization DN, the actual approval process 602begins. There are two attributes that the LDAP administrator can 603put into LDAP entries to allow authorization: 604 605> authzTo 606> authzFrom 607 608Both can be multivalued. The {{EX:authzTo}} attribute is a 609source rule, and it is placed into the entry associated with the 610authentication DN to tell what authorization DNs the authenticated 611DN is allowed to assume. The second attribute is a destination 612rule, and it is placed into the entry associated with the requested 613authorization DN to tell which authenticated DNs may assume it. 614 615The choice of which authorization policy attribute to use is up to 616the administrator. Source rules are checked first in the person's 617authentication DN entry, and if none of the {{EX:authzTo}} rules 618specify the authorization is permitted, the {{EX:authzFrom}} 619rules in the authorization DN entry are then checked. If neither 620case specifies that the request be honored, the request is denied. 621Since the default behavior is to deny authorization requests, rules 622only specify that a request be allowed; there are no negative rules 623telling what authorizations to deny. 624 625The value(s) in the two attributes are of the same form as the 626output of the replacement pattern of a {{EX:authz-regexp}} directive: 627either a DN or an LDAP URL. For example, if a {{EX:authzTo}} 628value is a DN, that DN is one the authenticated user can authorize 629to. On the other hand, if the {{EX:authzTo}} value is an LDAP 630URL, the URL is used as an internal search of the LDAP database, 631and the authenticated user can become ANY DN returned by the search. 632If an LDAP entry looked like: 633 634> dn: cn=WebUpdate,dc=example,dc=com 635> authzTo: ldap:///dc=example,dc=com??sub?(objectclass=person) 636 637then any user who authenticated as {{EX:cn=WebUpdate,dc=example,dc=com}} 638could authorize to any other LDAP entry under the search base 639{{EX:dc=example,dc=com}} which has an objectClass of {{EX:Person}}. 640 641 642H4: Notes on Proxy Authorization Rules 643 644An LDAP URL in a {{EX:authzTo}} or {{EX:authzFrom}} attribute 645will return a set of DNs. Each DN returned will be checked. Searches 646which return a large set can cause the authorization process to 647take an uncomfortably long time. Also, searches should be performed 648on attributes that have been indexed by slapd. 649 650To help produce more sweeping rules for {{EX:authzFrom}} and 651{{EX:authzTo}}, the values of these attributes are allowed to 652be DNs with regular expression characters in them. This means a 653source rule like 654 655> authzTo: dn.regex:^uid=[^,]*,dc=example,dc=com$ 656 657would allow that authenticated user to authorize to any DN that 658matches the regular expression pattern given. This regular expression 659comparison can be evaluated much faster than an LDAP search for 660{{EX:(uid=*)}}. 661 662Also note that the values in an authorization rule must be one of 663the two forms: an LDAP URL or a DN (with or without regular expression 664characters). Anything that does not begin with "{{EX:ldap://}}" is 665taken as a DN. It is not permissible to enter another authorization 666identity of the form "{{EX:u:<username>}}" as an authorization rule. 667 668 669H4: Policy Configuration 670 671The decision of which type of rules to use, {{EX:authzFrom}} 672or {{EX:authzTo}}, will depend on the site's situation. For 673example, if the set of people who may become a given identity can 674easily be written as a search filter, then a single destination 675rule could be written. If the set of people is not easily defined 676by a search filter, and the set of people is small, it may be better 677to write a source rule in the entries of each of those people who 678should be allowed to perform the proxy authorization. 679 680By default, processing of proxy authorization rules is disabled. 681The {{EX:authz-policy}} directive must be set in the 682{{slapd.conf}}(5) file to enable authorization. This directive can 683be set to {{EX:none}} for no rules (the default), {{EX:to}} for 684source rules, {{EX:from}} for destination rules, or {{EX:both}} for 685both source and destination rules. 686 687Source rules are extremely powerful. If ordinary users have 688access to write the {{EX:authzTo}} attribute in their own 689entries, then they can write rules that would allow them to authorize 690as anyone else. As such, when using source rules, the 691{{EX:authzTo}} attribute should be protected with an ACL that 692only allows privileged users to set its values. 693 694