1############################################################################# 2# This script contains two trivial examples of simple "scripted step" classes. 3# To fully understand how the lldb "Thread Plan" architecture works, read the 4# comments at the beginning of ThreadPlan.h in the lldb sources. The python 5# interface is a reduced version of the full internal mechanism, but captures 6# most of the power with a much simpler interface. 7# 8# But I'll attempt a brief summary here. 9# Stepping in lldb is done independently for each thread. Moreover, the stepping 10# operations are stackable. So for instance if you did a "step over", and in 11# the course of stepping over you hit a breakpoint, stopped and stepped again, 12# the first "step-over" would be suspended, and the new step operation would 13# be enqueued. Then if that step over caused the program to hit another breakpoint, 14# lldb would again suspend the second step and return control to the user, so 15# now there are two pending step overs. Etc. with all the other stepping 16# operations. Then if you hit "continue" the bottom-most step-over would complete, 17# and another continue would complete the first "step-over". 18# 19# lldb represents this system with a stack of "Thread Plans". Each time a new 20# stepping operation is requested, a new plan is pushed on the stack. When the 21# operation completes, it is pushed off the stack. 22# 23# The bottom-most plan in the stack is the immediate controller of stepping, 24# most importantly, when the process resumes, the bottom most plan will get 25# asked whether to set the program running freely, or to instruction-single-step 26# the current thread. In the scripted interface, you indicate this by returning 27# False or True respectively from the should_step method. 28# 29# Each time the process stops the thread plan stack for each thread that stopped 30# "for a reason", Ii.e. a single-step completed on that thread, or a breakpoint 31# was hit), is queried to determine how to proceed, starting from the most 32# recently pushed plan, in two stages: 33# 34# 1) Each plan is asked if it "explains" the stop. The first plan to claim the 35# stop wins. In scripted Thread Plans, this is done by returning True from 36# the "explains_stop method. This is how, for instance, control is returned 37# to the User when the "step-over" plan hits a breakpoint. The step-over 38# plan doesn't explain the breakpoint stop, so it returns false, and the 39# breakpoint hit is propagated up the stack to the "base" thread plan, which 40# is the one that handles random breakpoint hits. 41# 42# 2) Then the plan that won the first round is asked if the process should stop. 43# This is done in the "should_stop" method. The scripted plans actually do 44# three jobs in should_stop: 45# a) They determine if they have completed their job or not. If they have 46# they indicate that by calling SetPlanComplete on their thread plan. 47# b) They decide whether they want to return control to the user or not. 48# They do this by returning True or False respectively. 49# c) If they are not done, they set up whatever machinery they will use 50# the next time the thread continues. 51# 52# Note that deciding to return control to the user, and deciding your plan 53# is done, are orthgonal operations. You could set up the next phase of 54# stepping, and then return True from should_stop, and when the user next 55# "continued" the process your plan would resume control. Of course, the 56# user might also "step-over" or some other operation that would push a 57# different plan, which would take control till it was done. 58# 59# One other detail you should be aware of, if the plan below you on the 60# stack was done, then it will be popped and the next plan will take control 61# and its "should_stop" will be called. 62# 63# Note also, there should be another method called when your plan is popped, 64# to allow you to do whatever cleanup is required. I haven't gotten to that 65# yet. For now you should do that at the same time you mark your plan complete. 66# 67# Both examples show stepping through an address range for 20 bytes from the 68# current PC. The first one does it by single stepping and checking a condition. 69# It doesn't, however handle the case where you step into another frame while 70# still in the current range in the starting frame. 71# 72# That is better handled in the second example by using the built-in StepOverRange 73# thread plan. 74# 75# To use these stepping modes, you would do: 76# 77# (lldb) command script import scripted_step.py 78# (lldb) thread step-scripted -C scripted_step.SimpleStep 79# or 80# 81# (lldb) thread step-scripted -C scripted_step.StepWithPlan 82 83import lldb 84 85class SimpleStep: 86 def __init__ (self, thread_plan, dict): 87 self.thread_plan = thread_plan 88 self.start_address = thread_plan.GetThread().GetFrameAtIndex(0).GetPC() 89 90 def explains_stop (self, event): 91 # We are stepping, so if we stop for any other reason, it isn't 92 # because of us. 93 if self.thread_plan.GetThread().GetStopReason()== lldb.eStopReasonTrace: 94 return True 95 else: 96 return False 97 98 def should_stop (self, event): 99 cur_pc = self.thread_plan.GetThread().GetFrameAtIndex(0).GetPC() 100 101 if cur_pc < self.start_address or cur_pc >= self.start_address + 20: 102 self.thread_plan.SetPlanComplete(True) 103 return True 104 else: 105 return False 106 107 def should_step (self): 108 return True 109 110class StepWithPlan: 111 def__init__ (self,thread_plan, dict): 112 self.thread_plan = thread_plan 113 self.start_address = thread_plan.GetThread().GetFrameAtIndex(0).GetPCAddress() 114 self.step_thread_plan =thread_plan.QueueThreadPlanForStepOverRange(self.start_address, 20); 115 116 defexplains_stop (self, event): 117 # Since all I'm doing is running a plan, I will only ever get askedthis 118 # if myplan doesn't explain the stop, and in that caseI don'teither. 119 return False 120 121defshould_stop (self, event): 122if self.step_thread_plan.IsPlanComplete(): 123 self.thread_plan.SetPlanComplete(True) 124 return True 125else: 126 return False 127 128defshould_step (self): 129return False 130 131