xref: /dpdk/doc/guides/prog_guide/member_lib.rst (revision eb6d5a0af9a05bf940ba19ec1ddbe575b5e7540b)
1..  BSD LICENSE
2    Copyright(c) 2017 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
3    All rights reserved.
4
5    Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
6    modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
7    are met:
8
9    * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
10    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
11    * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
12    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
13    the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
14    distribution.
15    * Neither the name of Intel Corporation nor the names of its
16    contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
17    from this software without specific prior written permission.
18
19    THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
20    "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
21    LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
22    A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
23    OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
24    SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
25    LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
26    DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
27    THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
28    (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
29    OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
30
31
32.. _member_library:
33
34Membership Library
35==================
36
37Introduction
38------------
39
40The DPDK Membership Library provides an API for DPDK applications to insert a
41new member, delete an existing member, or query the existence of a member in a
42given set, or a group of sets. For the case of a group of sets, the library
43will return not only whether the element has been inserted before in one of
44the sets but also which set it belongs to.  The Membership Library is an
45extension and generalization of a traditional filter structure (for example
46Bloom Filter [Member-bloom]) that has multiple usages in a wide variety of
47workloads and applications. In general, the Membership Library is a data
48structure that provides a "set-summary" on whether a member belongs to a set,
49and as discussed in detail later, there are two advantages of using such a
50set-summary rather than operating on a "full-blown" complete list of elements:
51first, it has a much smaller storage requirement than storing the whole list of
52elements themselves, and secondly checking an element membership (or other
53operations) in this set-summary is much faster than checking it for the
54original full-blown complete list of elements.
55
56We use the term "Set-Summary" in this guide to refer to the space-efficient,
57probabilistic membership data structure that is provided by the library. A
58membership test for an element will return the set this element belongs to or
59that the element is "not-found" with very high probability of accuracy. Set-summary
60is a fundamental data aggregation component that can be used in many network
61(and other) applications. It is a crucial structure to address performance and
62scalability issues of diverse network applications including overlay networks,
63data-centric networks, flow table summaries, network statistics and
64traffic monitoring. A set-summary is useful for applications who need to
65include a list of elements while a complete list requires too much space
66and/or too much processing cost. In these situations, the set-summary works as
67a lossy hash-based representation of a set of members. It can dramatically
68reduce space requirement and significantly improve the performance of set
69membership queries at the cost of introducing a very small membership test error
70probability.
71
72.. _figure_membership1:
73.. figure:: img/member_i1.*
74
75  Example Usages of Membership Library
76
77There are various usages for a Membership Library in a very
78large set of applications and workloads. Interested readers can refer to
79[Member-survey] for a survey of possible networking usages. The above figure
80provide a small set of examples of using the Membership Library:
81
82* Sub-figure (a)
83  depicts a distributed web cache architecture where a collection of proxies
84  attempt to share their web caches (cached from a set of back-end web servers) to
85  provide faster responses to clients, and the proxies use the Membership
86  Library to share summaries of what web pages/objects they are caching. With the
87  Membership Library, a proxy receiving an http request will inquire the
88  set-summary to find its location and quickly determine whether to retrieve the
89  requested web page from a nearby proxy or from a back-end web server.
90
91* Sub-figure (b) depicts another example for using the Membership Library to
92  prevent routing loops which is typically done using slow TTL countdown and
93  dropping packets when TTL expires. As shown in Sub-figure (b), an embedded
94  set-summary in the packet header itself can be used to summarize the set of
95  nodes a packet has gone through, and each node upon receiving a packet can check
96  whether its id is a member of the set of visited nodes, and if it is, then a
97  routing loop is detected.
98
99* Sub-Figure (c) presents another usage of the Membership
100  Library to load-balance flows to worker threads with in-order guarantee where a
101  set-summary is used to query if a packet belongs to an existing flow or a new
102  flow. Packets belonging to a new flow are forwarded to the current least loaded
103  worker thread, while those belonging to an existing flow are forwarded to the
104  pre-assigned thread to guarantee in-order processing.
105
106* Sub-figure (d) highlights
107  yet another usage example in the database domain where a set-summary is used to
108  determine joins between sets instead of creating a join by comparing each
109  element of a set against the other elements in a different set, a join is done
110  on the summaries since they can efficiently encode members of a given set.
111
112Membership Library is a configurable library that is optimized to cover set
113membership functionality for both a single set and multi-set scenarios. Two set-summary
114schemes are presented including (a) vector of Bloom Filters and (b) Hash-Table based
115set-summary schemes with and without false negative probability.
116This guide first briefly describes these different types of set-summaries, usage examples for each,
117and then it highlights the Membership Library API.
118
119Vector of Bloom Filters
120-----------------------
121
122Bloom Filter (BF) [Member-bloom] is a well-known space-efficient
123probabilistic data structure that answers set membership queries (test whether
124an element is a member of a set) with some probability of false positives and
125zero false negatives; a query for an element returns either it is "possibly in
126a set" (with very high probability) or "definitely not in a set".
127
128The BF is a method for representing a set of ``n`` elements (for example flow keys
129in network applications domain) to support membership queries. The idea of BF is
130to allocate a bit-vector ``v`` with ``m`` bits, which are initially all set to 0. Then
131it chooses ``k`` independent hash functions ``h1``, ``h2``, ... ``hk`` with hash values range from
132``0`` to ``m-1`` to perform hashing calculations on each element to be inserted. Every time when an
133element ``X`` being inserted into the set, the bits at positions ``h1(X)``, ``h2(X)``, ...
134``hk(X)`` in ``v`` are set to 1 (any particular bit might be set to 1 multiple times
135for multiple different inserted elements). Given a query for any element ``Y``, the
136bits at positions ``h1(Y)``, ``h2(Y)``, ... ``hk(Y)`` are checked. If any of them is 0,
137then Y is definitely not in the set. Otherwise there is a high probability that
138Y is a member of the set with certain false positive probability. As shown in
139the next equation, the false positive probability can be made arbitrarily small
140by changing the number of hash functions (``k``) and the vector length (``m``).
141
142.. _figure_membership2:
143.. figure:: img/member_i2.*
144
145  Bloom Filter False Positive Probability
146
147Without BF, an accurate membership testing could involve a costly hash table
148lookup and full element comparison. The advantage of using a BF is to simplify
149the membership test into a series of hash calculations and memory accesses for a
150small bit-vector, which can be easily optimized. Hence the lookup throughput
151(set membership test) can be significantly faster than a normal hash table
152lookup with element comparison.
153
154.. _figure_membership3:
155.. figure:: img/member_i3.*
156
157  Detecting Routing Loops Using BF
158
159BF is used for applications that need only one set, and the
160membership of elements is checked against the BF. The example discussed
161in the above figure is one example of potential applications that uses only one
162set to capture the node IDs that have been visited so far by the packet. Each
163node will then check this embedded BF in the packet header for its own id, and
164if the BF indicates that the current node is definitely not in the set then a
165loop-free route is guaranteed.
166
167
168.. _figure_membership4:
169.. figure:: img/member_i4.*
170
171  Vector Bloom Filter (vBF) Overview
172
173To support membership test for both multiple sets and a single set,
174the library implements a Vector Bloom Filter (vBF) scheme.
175vBF basically composes multiple bloom filters into a vector of bloom filers.
176The membership test is conducted on all of the
177bloom filters concurrently to determine which set(s) it belongs to or none of
178them. The basic idea of vBF is shown in the above figure where an element is
179used to address multiple bloom filters concurrently and the bloom filter
180index(es) with a hit is returned.
181
182.. _figure_membership5:
183.. figure:: img/member_i5.*
184
185  vBF for Flow Scheduling to Worker Thread
186
187As previously mentioned, there are many usages of such structures. vBF is used
188for applications that need to check membership against multiple sets
189simultaneously. The example shown in the above figure uses a set to capture
190all flows being assigned for processing at a given worker thread. Upon receiving
191a packet the vBF is used to quickly figure out if this packet belongs to a new flow
192so as to be forwarded to the current least loaded worker thread, or otherwise it
193should be queued for an existing thread to guarantee in-order processing (i.e.
194the property of vBF to indicate right away that a given flow is a new one or
195not is critical to minimize response time latency).
196
197It should be noted that vBF can be implemented using a set of single bloom
198filters with sequential lookup of each BF. However, being able to concurrently
199search all set-summaries is a big throughput advantage. In the library, certain
200parallelism is realized by the implementation of checking all bloom filters
201together.
202
203
204Hash-Table based Set-Summaries
205------------------------------
206
207Hash-table based set-summary (HTSS) is another scheme in the membership library.
208Cuckoo filter [Member-cfilter] is an example of HTSS.
209HTSS supports multi-set membership testing like
210vBF does. However, while vBF is better for a small number of targets, HTSS is more suitable
211and can easily outperform vBF when the number of sets is
212large, since HTSS uses a single hash table for membership testing while vBF
213requires testing a series of Bloom Filters each corresponding to one set.
214As a result, generally speaking vBF is more adequate for the case of a small limited number of sets
215while HTSS should be used with a larger number of sets.
216
217.. _figure_membership6:
218.. figure:: img/member_i6.*
219
220  Using HTSS for Attack Signature Matching
221
222As shown in the above figure, attack signature matching where each set
223represents a certain signature length (for correctness of this example, an
224attack signature should not be a subset of another one) in the payload is a good
225example for using HTSS with 0% false negative (i.e., when an element returns not
226found, it has a 100% certainty that it is not a member of any set).  The packet
227inspection application benefits from knowing right away that the current payload
228does not match any attack signatures in the database to establish its
229legitimacy, otherwise a deep inspection of the packet is needed.
230
231HTSS employs a similar but simpler data structure to a traditional hash table,
232and the major difference is that HTSS stores only the signatures but not the
233full keys/elements which can significantly reduce the footprint of the table.
234Along with the signature, HTSS also stores a value to indicate the target set.
235When looking up an element, the element is hashed and the HTSS is addressed
236to retrieve the signature stored. If the signature matches then the value is
237retrieved corresponding to the index of the target set which the element belongs
238to. Because signatures can collide, HTSS can still has false positive
239probability. Furthermore, if elements are allowed to be
240overwritten or evicted when the hash table becomes full, it will also have a
241false negative probability. We discuss this case in the next section.
242
243Set-Summaries with False Negative Probability
244~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
245
246As previously mentioned, traditional set-summaries (e.g. Bloom Filters) do not
247have a false negative probability, i.e., it is 100% certain when an element
248returns "not to be present" for a given set. However, the Membership Library
249also supports a set-summary probabilistic data structure based on HTSS which
250allows for false negative probability.
251
252In HTSS, when the hash table becomes full, keys/elements will fail to be added
253into the table and the hash table has to be resized to accommodate for these new
254elements, which can be expensive. However, if we allow new elements to overwrite
255or evict existing elements (as a cache typically does), then the resulting
256set-summary will begin to have false negative probability. This is because the
257element that was evicted from the set-summary may still be present in the target
258set. For subsequent inquiries the set-summary will falsely report the element
259not being in the set, hence having a false negative probability.
260
261The major usage of HTSS with false negative is to use it as a cache for
262distributing elements to different target sets. By allowing HTSS to evict old
263elements, the set-summary can keep track of the most recent elements
264(i.e. active) as a cache typically does. Old inactive elements (infrequently
265used elements) will automatically and eventually get evicted from the
266set-summary. It is worth noting that the set-summary still has false positive
267probability, which means the application either can tolerate certain false positive
268or it has fall-back path when false positive happens.
269
270.. _figure_membership7:
271.. figure:: img/member_i7.*
272
273  Using HTSS with False Negatives for Wild Card Classification
274
275HTSS with false negative (i.e. a cache) also has its wide set of applications.
276For example wild card flow classification (e.g. ACL rules) highlighted in the
277above figure is an example of such application. In that case each target set
278represents a sub-table with rules defined by a certain flow mask. The flow masks
279are non-overlapping, and for flows matching more than one rule only the highest
280priority one is inserted in the corresponding sub-table (interested readers can
281refer to the Open vSwitch (OvS) design of Mega Flow Cache (MFC) [Member-OvS]
282for further details). Typically the rules will have a large number of distinct
283unique masks and hence, a large number of target sets each corresponding to one
284mask. Because the active set of flows varies widely based on the network
285traffic, HTSS with false negative will act as a cache for <flowid, target ACL
286sub-table> pair for the current active set of flows. When a miss occurs (as
287shown in red in the above figure) the sub-tables will be searched sequentially
288one by one for a possible match, and when found the flow key and target
289sub-table will be inserted into the set-summary (i.e. cache insertion) so
290subsequent packets from the same flow don’t incur the overhead of the
291sequential search of sub-tables.
292
293Library API Overview
294--------------------
295
296The design goal of the Membership Library API is to be as generic as possible to
297support all the different types of set-summaries we discussed in previous
298sections and beyond. Fundamentally, the APIs need to include creation,
299insertion, deletion, and lookup.
300
301
302Set-summary Create
303~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
304
305The ``rte_member_create()`` function is used to create a set-summary structure, the input parameter
306is a struct to pass in parameters that needed to initialize the set-summary, while the function returns the
307pointer to the created set-summary or ``NULL`` if the creation failed.
308
309The general input arguments used when creating the set-summary should include ``name``
310which is the name of the created set-summary, *type* which is one of the types
311supported by the library (e.g. ``RTE_MEMBER_TYPE_HT`` for HTSS or ``RTE_MEMBER_TYPE_VBF`` for vBF), and ``key_len``
312which is the length of the element/key. There are other parameters
313are only used for certain type of set-summary, or which have a slightly different meaning for different types of set-summary.
314For example, ``num_keys`` parameter means the maximum number of entries for Hash table based set-summary.
315However, for bloom filter, this value means the expected number of keys that could be
316inserted into the bloom filter(s). The value is used to calculate the size of each
317bloom filter.
318
319We also pass two seeds: ``prim_hash_seed`` and
320``sec_hash_seed`` for the primary and secondary hash functions to calculate two independent hash values.
321``socket_id`` parameter is the NUMA socket ID for the memory used to create the
322set-summary. For HTSS, another parameter ``is_cache`` is used to indicate
323if this set-summary is a cache (i.e. with false negative probability) or not.
324For vBF, extra parameters are needed. For example, ``num_set`` is the number of
325sets needed to initialize the vector bloom filters. This number is equal to the
326number of bloom filters will be created.
327``false_pos_rate`` is the false positive rate. num_keys and false_pos_rate will be used to determine
328the number of hash functions and the bloom filter size.
329
330
331Set-summary Element Insertion
332~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
333
334The ``rte_member_add()`` function is used to insert an element/key into a set-summary structure. If it fails an
335error is returned. For success the returned value is dependent on the
336set-summary mode to provide extra information for the users. For vBF
337mode, a return value of 0 means a successful insert. For HTSS mode without false negative, the insert
338could fail with ``-ENOSPC`` if the table is full. With false negative (i.e. cache mode),
339for insert that does not cause any eviction (i.e. no overwriting happens to an
340existing entry) the return value is 0. For insertion that causes eviction, the return
341value is 1 to indicate such situation, but it is not an error.
342
343The input arguments for the function should include the ``key`` which is a pointer to the element/key that needs to
344be added to the set-summary, and ``set_id`` which is the set id associated
345with the key that needs to be added.
346
347
348Set-summary Element Lookup
349~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
350
351The ``rte_member_lookup()`` function looks up a single key/element in the set-summary structure. It
352returns as soon as the first match is found. The return value is 1 if a
353match is found and 0 otherwise. The arguments for the function include ``key`` which is a pointer to the
354element/key that needs to be looked up, and ``set_id`` which is used to return the
355first target set id where the key has matched, if any.
356
357The ``rte_member_lookup_bulk()`` function is used to look up a bulk of keys/elements in the
358set-summary structure for their first match. Each key lookup returns as soon as the first match is found. The
359return value is the number of keys that find a match. The arguments of the function include ``keys``
360which is a pointer to a bulk of keys that are to be looked up,
361``num_keys`` is the number
362of keys that will be looked up, and ``set_ids`` are the return target set
363ids for the first match found for each of the input keys. ``set_ids`` is an array
364needs to be sized according to the ``num_keys``. If there is no match, the set id
365for that key will be set to RTE_MEMBER_NO_MATCH.
366
367The ``rte_member_lookup_multi()`` function looks up a single key/element in the
368set-summary structure for multiple matches. It
369returns ALL the matches (possibly more than one) found for this key when it
370is matched against all target sets (it is worth noting that for cache mode HTSS,
371the current implementation matches at most one target set). The return value is
372the number of matches
373that was found for this key (for cache mode HTSS the return value
374should be at most 1). The arguments for the function include ``key`` which is a pointer to the
375element/key that needs to be looked up, ``max_match_per_key`` which is to indicate the maximum number of matches
376the user expects to find for each key, and ``set_id`` which is used to return all
377target set ids where the key has matched, if any. The ``set_id`` array should be sized
378according to ``max_match_per_key``. For vBF, the maximum number of matches per key is equal
379to the number of sets. For HTSS, the maximum number of matches per key is equal to two time
380entry count per bucket. ``max_match_per_key`` should be equal or smaller than the maximum number of
381possible matches.
382
383The ``rte_membership_lookup_multi_bulk()`` function looks up a bulk of keys/elements in the
384set-summary structure for multiple matches, each key lookup returns ALL the matches (possibly more
385than one) found for this key when it is matched against all target sets (cache mode HTSS
386matches at most one target set). The
387return value is the number of keys that find one or more matches in the
388set-summary structure. The arguments of the
389function include ``keys`` which is
390a pointer to a bulk of keys that are to be looked up, ``num_keys`` is the number
391of keys that will be looked up, ``max_match_per_key`` is the possible
392maximum number of matches for each key, ``match_count`` which is the returned number
393of matches for each key, and ``set_ids`` are the returned target set
394ids for all matches found for each keys. ``set_ids`` is 2-D array
395containing a 1-D array for each key (the size of 1-D array per key should be set by the user according to ``max_match_per_key``).
396``max_match_per_key`` should be equal or smaller than the maximum number of
397possible matches, similar to ``rte_member_lookup_multi``.
398
399
400Set-summary Element Delete
401~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
402
403The ``rte_membership_delete()`` function deletes an element/key from a set-summary structure, if it fails
404an error is returned. The input arguments should include ``key`` which is a pointer to the
405element/key that needs to be deleted from the set-summary, and ``set_id``
406which is the set id associated with the key to delete. It is worth noting that current
407implementation of vBF does not support deletion [1]_. An error code ``-EINVAL`` will be returned.
408
409.. [1] Traditional bloom filter does not support proactive deletion. Supporting proactive deletion require additional implementation and performance overhead.
410
411References
412-----------
413
414[Member-bloom] B H Bloom, "Space/Time Trade-offs in Hash Coding with Allowable Errors," Communications of the ACM, 1970.
415
416[Member-survey] A Broder and M Mitzenmacher, "Network Applications of Bloom Filters: A Survey," in Internet Mathematics, 2005.
417
418[Member-cfilter] B Fan, D G Andersen and M Kaminsky, "Cuckoo Filter: Practically Better Than Bloom," in Conference on emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies, 2014.
419
420[Member-OvS] B Pfaff, "The Design and Implementation of Open vSwitch," in NSDI, 2015.
421