xref: /dpdk/doc/guides/howto/security.rst (revision 8711af290f353f727989684de2e75c7c41d2779a)

.. SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
   Copyright 2024 The DPDK contributors

Security Support
================

This document describes the security features of interest for DPDK.
This guide will provides information on each protocol,
including supported algorithms, practical implementation details, and references.

By detailing the supported algorithms and providing insights into each security protocol,
this document serves as a resource for anyone looking
to implement or enhance security measures within their DPDK-based environments.


Related Documentation
---------------------

Here is a list of related documents that provide detail of each library,
its capabilities and what level of support it currently has within DPDK.

:doc:`../prog_guide/cryptodev_lib`
   This section contains the design of the crypto API.

:doc:`../cryptodevs/index`
   This section contains information about all the crypto drivers in DPDK,
   such as feature support availability, cipher algorithms and authentication algorithms.

:doc:`../prog_guide/rte_security`
   This library is the session-level glue between ethdev and cryptodev APIs
   for the supported protocols.

High-level protocol processing
   * :doc:`../prog_guide/ipsec_lib`
   * :doc:`../prog_guide/pdcp_lib`


Protocols
---------

MACSec
~~~~~~

MACsec is a network security standard
that operates at the medium access control layer
and defines connectionless data confidentiality
and integrity for media access independent protocols.
It is standardized by the IEEE 802.1 working group.

Wikipedia Link
  * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1AE

Standard Link
  * https://1.ieee802.org/security/802-1ae/

Level of Support in DPDK
  * Supported
  * :doc:`Sample Application <../sample_app_ug/l2_forward_macsec>`

Supported Algorithms
  * As specified by MACsec specification: AES-128-GCM, AES-256-GCM

Drivers
  * Marvell :doc:`cnxk <../nics/cnxk>`
  * Marvell/Aquantia :doc:`atlantic <../nics/atlantic>` with PMD-specific API
  * Intel :doc:`ixgbe <../nics/ixgbe>` with PMD-specific API

Facts
  * Uses the AES-GCM cryptography algorithm.
  * Works on layer 2 and protects all DHCP and ARP traffic.
  * Each MAC frame has a separate integrity verification code.
  * Prevents attackers from resending copied MAC frames
    into the network without being detected.
  * Commonly used in environments where securing Ethernet traffic between devices is critical,
    such as in enterprise networks, data centers and service provider networks.

Cons
  * Only operates at Layer 2,
    so it doesn't protect traffic beyond the local Ethernet segment
    or over Layer 3 networks or the Internet.
  * Data is decrypted and re-encrypted at each network device,
    which could expose data at each point.
  * Can't detect rogue devices that operate on Layer 1.
  * Relies on hardware for encryption and decryption,
    so not all network devices can use it.


IPsec
~~~~~

IPsec allows secure communication over the Internet
by encrypting data traffic between two or more devices or networks.
IPsec works on a different layer than MACsec, at layer 3.

Wikipedia Link
  * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPsec

Standard Link
  * https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ipsec/about/

Level of Support in DPDK
  * Supported
  * :doc:`High-level library <../prog_guide/ipsec_lib>`
  * :doc:`Sample application <../sample_app_ug/ipsec_secgw>`

Supported Algorithms
  * AES-GCM and ChaCha20-Poly1305
  * AES-CBC and AES-CTR
  * HMAC-SHA1/SHA2 for integrity protection and authenticity

Drivers
  * Intel :doc:`ixgbe <../nics/ixgbe>`, :doc:`iavf <../nics/intel_vf>`,
    :doc:`qat <../cryptodevs/qat>`, :doc:`ipsec_mb <../cryptodevs/aesni_mb>`
  * Marvell :doc:`cnxk <../nics/cnxk>`, :doc:`mvsam <../cryptodevs/mvsam>`
  * Netronome :doc:`nfp <../nics/nfp>`
  * NXP :doc:`caam_jr <../cryptodevs/caam_jr>`,
    :doc:`dpaa_sec <../cryptodevs/dpaa_sec>`, :doc:`dpaa2_sec <../cryptodevs/dpaa2_sec>`
  * Wangxun :doc:`txgbe <../nics/txgbe>`

Pros
  * Uses public keys to create an encrypted, authenticated tunnel.
  * Offers strong security, scalability, and interoperability.
  * IPsec can work across routers.

Cons
  * Can be simple to apply but complex to use.
    It can also be difficult to configure
    and place an administrative burden on network administrators.
  * Can impact network performance
    because it encrypts all traffic and uses strict authentication processes,
    both of which consume network bandwidth and increase data usage.
  * IPsec relies on the security of public keys.
    Key management protocol is not part of DPDK
    but DPDK provides asymmetric crypto API which is required for key generation.


TLS
~~~

Transport Layer Security (TLS) is a cryptographic protocol
that operates at the fifth application layer.
It encrypts data sent between web applications and servers,
such as when a web browser loads a website.
TLS can also be used to encrypt other types of communication, including:
email, Voice over IP (VoIP), file transfers, video/audio conferencing,
and Internet services like DNS and NTP.

Wikipedia Link
  * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security

Standard Links
  * https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5246 - TLS 1.2
  * https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8446 - TLS 1.3
  * https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9147 - DTLS 1.3

Level of Support in DPDK
  * DPDK supports TLS/DTLS record processing via rte_security API

Pros
  * Considered one of the strongest encryption protocols available.
  * Doesn't require parties to encrypt the content they exchange.
  * Universally deployable, doesn't rely on specific operating systems or applications.
  * Can reduce the risk of phishing attacks.

Cons
  * May not work with complex proxy caching systems.
  * Adding a server to handle encryption before it gets to the caching server
    can require additional costs.
  * TLS can be vulnerable to attacks and data leaks,
    including downgrade attacks, weak ciphers, and programming errors.
  * The added layer of security that TLS provides can come at the cost of speed.


TLS Handshake
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

TLS Handshake is the process that kicks off a communication session that uses TLS.
During a TLS handshake, the two communicating sides exchange messages
to acknowledge each other, verify each other,
establish the cryptographic algorithms they will use, and agree on session keys.

Wikipedia Link
  * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security#TLS_handshake

Standard Link
  * https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8446#section-4

Level of Support in DPDK
  * Handshake as protocol is not implemented in DPDK.
    However, it supports asymmetric crypto API, which can be used by the protocol.

Note
  * TLS 1.3 also supports an even faster version of the TLS handshake
    that does not require any round trips,
    or back-and-forth communication between client and server, at all.


TLS Record
^^^^^^^^^^

TLS Record Protocol is a layer of the TLS protocol
that protects application data using keys created during the TLS handshake.

Wikipedia Link
  * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security#TLS_record

Standard Link
  * https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8446#section-5

Level of Support in DPDK
  * Supported

Supported Algorithms
  * 3DES-CBC-SHA1-HMAC, NULL-SHA1-HMAC
  * AES-GCM-128, AES-GCM-256, AES-128-CBC-SHA1, AES-128-CBC-SHA256,
  * AES-256-CBC-SHA1, AES-256-CBC-SHA256, AES-256-CBC-SHA384,
  * CHACHA20-POLY1305

Drivers
  * Marvell :doc:`cnxk <../cryptodevs/cnxk>`


PDCP
~~~~

Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) is a sublayer in the LTE radio protocol stack
that provides security and integrity protections to Protocol Data Units (PDU)
in both the control and data planes.
PDCP is located between the Radio Link Control (RLC) layer
and the upper layers of the network, such as the IP layer.

Wikipedia Link
  * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Packet_Data_Convergence_Protocol

Standard Link
  * https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=1177

Level of Support in DPDK
  * Supported
  * :doc:`High-level library <../prog_guide/pdcp_lib>`
  * rte_security based PDCP sessions are also supported

Supported Algorithms
  * Encryption: NULL, AES-CTR, SNOW 3G, ZUC
  * Authentication: NULL, AES-CMAC, SNOW 3G, ZUC

Drivers supporting rte_security API (and used with the PDCP library)
  * NXP :doc:`dpaa_sec <../cryptodevs/dpaa_sec>`, :doc:`dpaa2_sec <../cryptodevs/dpaa2_sec>`

Drivers supported only with the PDCP library
  * Intel :doc:`qat <../cryptodevs/qat>`, :doc:`ipsec_mb <../cryptodevs/aesni_mb>`
  * Marvell :doc:`cnxk <../nics/cnxk>`

Pros
  * Compresses the IP header of user plane packets
    to reduce overhead and optimize bandwidth usage over the radio interface.
    This is particularly important in mobile networks
    where radio resources are limited and efficiency is critical.
  * PDCP encrypts and decrypts user plane data
    to ensure confidentiality and integrity of data transmitted over the air interface.
  * Has the option of interoperability between different generations of mobile networks
    (e.g., LTE and 5G) and compatibility with IP-based networks.

Cons
  * Limitations currently unclear.


PSP
~~~

PSP is a TLS-like protocol created by Google
for encrypting data in transit between data centers.
It uses concepts from IPsec ESP to create an encryption layer on top of IP,
and supports non-TCP protocols like UDP.
Google uses PSP along with other protocols,
such as TLS and IPsec, depending on the use case.

Links
  * https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/announcing-psp-security-protocol-is-now-open-source
  * https://github.com/google/psp

Level of Support in DPDK
  * Not supported in DPDK, but algorithms are supported.

Supported Algorithms
  * AES-GCM-128
  * AES-GCM-256
  * AES-GMAC

Pros
  * PSP is transport-independent and can be offloaded to hardware.
  * It does not mandate a specific key exchange protocol.
  * Enables per-connection security by allowing an encryption key
    per layer-4 connection (such as a TCP connection).

Cons
  * Offers few choices for the packet format and the cryptographic algorithms.


Wireguard
~~~~~~~~~

Wireguard is an open-source tunneling protocol over UDP.

Wikipedia Link
  * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WireGuard

Standard Link
  * https://www.wireguard.com/

Level of Support in DPDK
  * Not supported at this time, but algorithms are supported.

Supported Algorithms
  * ChaCha20
  * Poly1305

Pros
  * Faster than most VPNs.
  * Straightforward with a lean codebase.
  * Works with various operating systems such as Linux, Windows, macOS, Android, and iOS.
  * Quick connections (good for mobile environments).

Cons
  * Has been rapidly adopted, but still a new, young protocol.
  * May not have the same level of extensive real-world testing and deployment as other VPNs.
  * Widely supported, but compatibility may still be an issue.


QUIC
~~~~

QUIC (Quick UDP Internet Connections) is a transport layer network protocol
designed by Google to improve the speed and reliability of web connections.
QUIC is built on top of the User Datagram Protocol (UDP)
and uses a combination of encryption and multiplexing to achieve its goals.
The protocol's main goal is to reduce latency
compared to Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).
QUIC also aims to make HTTP traffic more secure
and eventually replace TCP and TLS on the web with HTTP/3.
Media over QUIC (MoQ) is a new live media protocol powered by QUIC.

Wikipedia Link
  * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QUIC

Standard Link
  * https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9000

Level of Support in DPDK
  * Not supported yet.

Pros
  * Useful for time-sensitive application like online gaming or video streaming.
  * Can send multiple streams of data over a single channel.
  * Automatically limits the packet transmission rate
    to counteract load peaks and avoid overload, even with low bandwidth connections.
  * Uses TLS 1.3, which offers better security than others.
  * Fast data transfer.
  * Combines features of TCP, such as reliability and congestion control,
    with the speed and flexibility of UDP.

Cons
  * Has more complex protocol logic,
    which can result in higher CPU and memory usage compared to TCP.
  * May result in poorer transmission rates.
  * Requires changes to client and server, making it more challenging to deploy than TCP.
  * Not yet as widely deployed as TCP.