10c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_analyze_test_checks.py 20c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output "-passes=print<scalar-evolution>" 2>&1 | FileCheck %s 30c101c9cSMax Kazantsev 40c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; Tests demonstrate the bug reported as PR48225 by Congzhe Cao. 50c101c9cSMax Kazantsev 60c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; When %boolcond = false and %cond = 0: 70c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; - %cond.false.on.first.iter is false on 1st iteration; 80c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; - %cond.false.on.second.iter is false on 2nd iteration; 90c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; - Therefore, their AND is false on first two iterations, and the backedge is taken twice. 10211d9411SMax Kazantsev; 'constant max backedge-taken count is 1' is a bug caused by wrong treatment of AND 110c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; condition in the computation logic. It should be 2. 120c101c9cSMax Kazantsevdefine void @test_and(i1 %boolcond) { 130c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-LABEL: 'test_and' 140c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: Classifying expressions for: @test_and 150c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: %conv = zext i1 %boolcond to i32 160c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: --> (zext i1 %boolcond to i32) U: [0,2) S: [0,2) 170c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: %iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %backedge ] 1848d7cc6aSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: --> {0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop> U: [0,3) S: [0,3) Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } 190c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: %or.cond = and i1 %cond.false.on.first.iter, %cond.false.on.second.iter 20503541faSRoman Lebedev; CHECK-NEXT: --> (%cond.false.on.first.iter umin %cond.false.on.second.iter) U: full-set S: full-set Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %loop: Variant } 210c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: %inc = add nuw nsw i32 %iv, 1 2248d7cc6aSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: --> {1,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop> U: [1,4) S: [1,4) Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } 230c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @test_and 240c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %loop: <multiple exits> Unpredictable backedge-taken count. 25*0d38f21eSPhilip Reames; CHECK-NEXT: exit count for loop: i32 2 260c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: exit count for backedge: ***COULDNOTCOMPUTE*** 277755c261SPhilip Reames; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %loop: constant max backedge-taken count is i32 2 28*0d38f21eSPhilip Reames; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %loop: symbolic max backedge-taken count is i32 2 29*0d38f21eSPhilip Reames; CHECK-NEXT: symbolic max exit count for loop: i32 2 30e5fa7eb1SMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: symbolic max exit count for backedge: ***COULDNOTCOMPUTE*** 310c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; 320c101c9cSMax Kazantseventry: 330c101c9cSMax Kazantsev %conv = zext i1 %boolcond to i32 340c101c9cSMax Kazantsev br label %loop 350c101c9cSMax Kazantsev 360c101c9cSMax Kazantsevloop: 370c101c9cSMax Kazantsev %iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %backedge ] 380c101c9cSMax Kazantsev %cmp = icmp ult i32 %iv, 2 390c101c9cSMax Kazantsev br i1 %cmp, label %backedge, label %for.end 400c101c9cSMax Kazantsev 410c101c9cSMax Kazantsevbackedge: 420c101c9cSMax Kazantsev %cond.false.on.first.iter = icmp ne i32 %iv, 0 430c101c9cSMax Kazantsev %cond.false.on.second.iter = icmp eq i32 %iv, %conv 440c101c9cSMax Kazantsev %or.cond = and i1 %cond.false.on.first.iter, %cond.false.on.second.iter 450c101c9cSMax Kazantsev %inc = add nuw nsw i32 %iv, 1 460c101c9cSMax Kazantsev br i1 %or.cond, label %exit, label %loop 470c101c9cSMax Kazantsev 480c101c9cSMax Kazantsevexit: 490c101c9cSMax Kazantsev unreachable 500c101c9cSMax Kazantsev 510c101c9cSMax Kazantsevfor.end: 520c101c9cSMax Kazantsev ret void 530c101c9cSMax Kazantsev} 540c101c9cSMax Kazantsev 550c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; When %boolcond = false and %cond = 0: 560c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; - %cond.true.on.first.iter is true on 1st iteration; 570c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; - %cond.true.on.second.iter is true on 2nd iteration; 580c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; - Therefore, their OR is true on first two iterations, and the backedge is taken twice. 59211d9411SMax Kazantsev; 'constant max backedge-taken count is 1' is a bug caused by wrong treatment of OR 600c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; condition in the computation logic. It should be 2. 610c101c9cSMax Kazantsevdefine void @test_or(i1 %boolcond) { 620c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-LABEL: 'test_or' 630c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: Classifying expressions for: @test_or 640c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: %conv = zext i1 %boolcond to i32 650c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: --> (zext i1 %boolcond to i32) U: [0,2) S: [0,2) 660c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: %iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %backedge ] 6748d7cc6aSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: --> {0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop> U: [0,3) S: [0,3) Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } 680c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: %or.cond = or i1 %cond.true.on.first.iter, %cond.true.on.second.iter 69e7e0834fSRoman Lebedev; CHECK-NEXT: --> (%cond.true.on.first.iter umax %cond.true.on.second.iter) U: full-set S: full-set Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %loop: Variant } 700c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: %inc = add nuw nsw i32 %iv, 1 7148d7cc6aSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: --> {1,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop> U: [1,4) S: [1,4) Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } 720c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @test_or 730c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %loop: <multiple exits> Unpredictable backedge-taken count. 74*0d38f21eSPhilip Reames; CHECK-NEXT: exit count for loop: i32 2 750c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: exit count for backedge: ***COULDNOTCOMPUTE*** 767755c261SPhilip Reames; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %loop: constant max backedge-taken count is i32 2 77*0d38f21eSPhilip Reames; CHECK-NEXT: Loop %loop: symbolic max backedge-taken count is i32 2 78*0d38f21eSPhilip Reames; CHECK-NEXT: symbolic max exit count for loop: i32 2 79e5fa7eb1SMax Kazantsev; CHECK-NEXT: symbolic max exit count for backedge: ***COULDNOTCOMPUTE*** 800c101c9cSMax Kazantsev; 810c101c9cSMax Kazantseventry: 820c101c9cSMax Kazantsev %conv = zext i1 %boolcond to i32 830c101c9cSMax Kazantsev br label %loop 840c101c9cSMax Kazantsev 850c101c9cSMax Kazantsevloop: 860c101c9cSMax Kazantsev %iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %backedge ] 870c101c9cSMax Kazantsev %cmp = icmp ult i32 %iv, 2 880c101c9cSMax Kazantsev br i1 %cmp, label %backedge, label %for.end 890c101c9cSMax Kazantsev 900c101c9cSMax Kazantsevbackedge: 910c101c9cSMax Kazantsev %cond.true.on.first.iter = icmp eq i32 %iv, 0 920c101c9cSMax Kazantsev %cond.true.on.second.iter = icmp ne i32 %iv, %conv 930c101c9cSMax Kazantsev %or.cond = or i1 %cond.true.on.first.iter, %cond.true.on.second.iter 940c101c9cSMax Kazantsev %inc = add nuw nsw i32 %iv, 1 950c101c9cSMax Kazantsev br i1 %or.cond, label %loop, label %exit 960c101c9cSMax Kazantsev 970c101c9cSMax Kazantsevexit: 980c101c9cSMax Kazantsev unreachable 990c101c9cSMax Kazantsev 1000c101c9cSMax Kazantsevfor.end: 1010c101c9cSMax Kazantsev ret void 1020c101c9cSMax Kazantsev} 103