xref: /openbsd-src/gnu/llvm/llvm/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.rst (revision d415bd752c734aee168c4ee86ff32e8cc249eb16)
1================================
2Source Level Debugging with LLVM
3================================
4
5.. contents::
6   :local:
7
8Introduction
9============
10
11This document is the central repository for all information pertaining to debug
12information in LLVM.  It describes the :ref:`actual format that the LLVM debug
13information takes <format>`, which is useful for those interested in creating
14front-ends or dealing directly with the information.  Further, this document
15provides specific examples of what debug information for C/C++ looks like.
16
17Philosophy behind LLVM debugging information
18--------------------------------------------
19
20The idea of the LLVM debugging information is to capture how the important
21pieces of the source-language's Abstract Syntax Tree map onto LLVM code.
22Several design aspects have shaped the solution that appears here.  The
23important ones are:
24
25* Debugging information should have very little impact on the rest of the
26  compiler.  No transformations, analyses, or code generators should need to
27  be modified because of debugging information.
28
29* LLVM optimizations should interact in :ref:`well-defined and easily described
30  ways <intro_debugopt>` with the debugging information.
31
32* Because LLVM is designed to support arbitrary programming languages,
33  LLVM-to-LLVM tools should not need to know anything about the semantics of
34  the source-level-language.
35
36* Source-level languages are often **widely** different from one another.
37  LLVM should not put any restrictions of the flavor of the source-language,
38  and the debugging information should work with any language.
39
40* With code generator support, it should be possible to use an LLVM compiler
41  to compile a program to native machine code and standard debugging
42  formats.  This allows compatibility with traditional machine-code level
43  debuggers, like GDB or DBX.
44
45The approach used by the LLVM implementation is to use a small set of
46:ref:`intrinsic functions <format_common_intrinsics>` to define a mapping
47between LLVM program objects and the source-level objects.  The description of
48the source-level program is maintained in LLVM metadata in an
49:ref:`implementation-defined format <ccxx_frontend>` (the C/C++ front-end
50currently uses working draft 7 of the `DWARF 3 standard
51<http://www.eagercon.com/dwarf/dwarf3std.htm>`_).
52
53When a program is being debugged, a debugger interacts with the user and turns
54the stored debug information into source-language specific information.  As
55such, a debugger must be aware of the source-language, and is thus tied to a
56specific language or family of languages.
57
58Debug information consumers
59---------------------------
60
61The role of debug information is to provide meta information normally stripped
62away during the compilation process.  This meta information provides an LLVM
63user a relationship between generated code and the original program source
64code.
65
66Currently, there are two backend consumers of debug info: DwarfDebug and
67CodeViewDebug. DwarfDebug produces DWARF suitable for use with GDB, LLDB, and
68other DWARF-based debuggers. :ref:`CodeViewDebug <codeview>` produces CodeView,
69the Microsoft debug info format, which is usable with Microsoft debuggers such
70as Visual Studio and WinDBG. LLVM's debug information format is mostly derived
71from and inspired by DWARF, but it is feasible to translate into other target
72debug info formats such as STABS.
73
74It would also be reasonable to use debug information to feed profiling tools
75for analysis of generated code, or, tools for reconstructing the original
76source from generated code.
77
78.. _intro_debugopt:
79
80Debug information and optimizations
81-----------------------------------
82
83An extremely high priority of LLVM debugging information is to make it interact
84well with optimizations and analysis.  In particular, the LLVM debug
85information provides the following guarantees:
86
87* LLVM debug information **always provides information to accurately read
88  the source-level state of the program**, regardless of which LLVM
89  optimizations have been run. :doc:`HowToUpdateDebugInfo` specifies how debug
90  info should be updated in various kinds of code transformations to avoid
91  breaking this guarantee, and how to preserve as much useful debug info as
92  possible.  Note that some optimizations may impact the ability to modify the
93  current state of the program with a debugger, such as setting program
94  variables, or calling functions that have been deleted.
95
96* As desired, LLVM optimizations can be upgraded to be aware of debugging
97  information, allowing them to update the debugging information as they
98  perform aggressive optimizations.  This means that, with effort, the LLVM
99  optimizers could optimize debug code just as well as non-debug code.
100
101* LLVM debug information does not prevent optimizations from
102  happening (for example inlining, basic block reordering/merging/cleanup,
103  tail duplication, etc).
104
105* LLVM debug information is automatically optimized along with the rest of
106  the program, using existing facilities.  For example, duplicate
107  information is automatically merged by the linker, and unused information
108  is automatically removed.
109
110Basically, the debug information allows you to compile a program with
111"``-O0 -g``" and get full debug information, allowing you to arbitrarily modify
112the program as it executes from a debugger.  Compiling a program with
113"``-O3 -g``" gives you full debug information that is always available and
114accurate for reading (e.g., you get accurate stack traces despite tail call
115elimination and inlining), but you might lose the ability to modify the program
116and call functions which were optimized out of the program, or inlined away
117completely.
118
119The :doc:`LLVM test-suite <TestSuiteMakefileGuide>` provides a framework to
120test the optimizer's handling of debugging information.  It can be run like
121this:
122
123.. code-block:: bash
124
125  % cd llvm/projects/test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks  # or some other level
126  % make TEST=dbgopt
127
128This will test impact of debugging information on optimization passes.  If
129debugging information influences optimization passes then it will be reported
130as a failure.  See :doc:`TestingGuide` for more information on LLVM test
131infrastructure and how to run various tests.
132
133.. _format:
134
135Debugging information format
136============================
137
138LLVM debugging information has been carefully designed to make it possible for
139the optimizer to optimize the program and debugging information without
140necessarily having to know anything about debugging information.  In
141particular, the use of metadata avoids duplicated debugging information from
142the beginning, and the global dead code elimination pass automatically deletes
143debugging information for a function if it decides to delete the function.
144
145To do this, most of the debugging information (descriptors for types,
146variables, functions, source files, etc) is inserted by the language front-end
147in the form of LLVM metadata.
148
149Debug information is designed to be agnostic about the target debugger and
150debugging information representation (e.g. DWARF/Stabs/etc).  It uses a generic
151pass to decode the information that represents variables, types, functions,
152namespaces, etc: this allows for arbitrary source-language semantics and
153type-systems to be used, as long as there is a module written for the target
154debugger to interpret the information.
155
156To provide basic functionality, the LLVM debugger does have to make some
157assumptions about the source-level language being debugged, though it keeps
158these to a minimum.  The only common features that the LLVM debugger assumes
159exist are `source files <LangRef.html#difile>`_, and `program objects
160<LangRef.html#diglobalvariable>`_.  These abstract objects are used by a
161debugger to form stack traces, show information about local variables, etc.
162
163This section of the documentation first describes the representation aspects
164common to any source-language.  :ref:`ccxx_frontend` describes the data layout
165conventions used by the C and C++ front-ends.
166
167Debug information descriptors are `specialized metadata nodes
168<LangRef.html#specialized-metadata>`_, first-class subclasses of ``Metadata``.
169
170.. _format_common_intrinsics:
171
172Debugger intrinsic functions
173----------------------------
174
175LLVM uses several intrinsic functions (name prefixed with "``llvm.dbg``") to
176track source local variables through optimization and code generation.
177
178``llvm.dbg.addr``
179^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
180
181.. code-block:: llvm
182
183  void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata, metadata, metadata)
184
185This intrinsic provides information about a local element (e.g., variable).
186The first argument is metadata holding the address of variable, typically a
187static alloca in the function entry block.  The second argument is a
188`local variable <LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_ containing a description of
189the variable.  The third argument is a `complex expression
190<LangRef.html#diexpression>`_.  An `llvm.dbg.addr` intrinsic describes the
191*address* of a source variable.
192
193.. code-block:: text
194
195    %i.addr = alloca i32, align 4
196    call void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata i32* %i.addr, metadata !1,
197                             metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !2
198    !1 = !DILocalVariable(name: "i", ...) ; int i
199    !2 = !DILocation(...)
200    ...
201    %buffer = alloca [256 x i8], align 8
202    ; The address of i is buffer+64.
203    call void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata [256 x i8]* %buffer, metadata !3,
204                             metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus, 64)), !dbg !4
205    !3 = !DILocalVariable(name: "i", ...) ; int i
206    !4 = !DILocation(...)
207
208A frontend should generate exactly one call to ``llvm.dbg.addr`` at the point
209of declaration of a source variable. Optimization passes that fully promote the
210variable from memory to SSA values will replace this call with possibly
211multiple calls to `llvm.dbg.value`. Passes that delete stores are effectively
212partial promotion, and they will insert a mix of calls to ``llvm.dbg.value``
213and ``llvm.dbg.addr`` to track the source variable value when it is available.
214After optimization, there may be multiple calls to ``llvm.dbg.addr`` describing
215the program points where the variables lives in memory. All calls for the same
216concrete source variable must agree on the memory location.
217
218
219``llvm.dbg.declare``
220^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
221
222.. code-block:: llvm
223
224  void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata, metadata, metadata)
225
226This intrinsic is identical to `llvm.dbg.addr`, except that there can only be
227one call to `llvm.dbg.declare` for a given concrete `local variable
228<LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_. It is not control-dependent, meaning that if
229a call to `llvm.dbg.declare` exists and has a valid location argument, that
230address is considered to be the true home of the variable across its entire
231lifetime. This makes it hard for optimizations to preserve accurate debug info
232in the presence of ``llvm.dbg.declare``, so we are transitioning away from it,
233and we plan to deprecate it in future LLVM releases.
234
235
236``llvm.dbg.value``
237^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
238
239.. code-block:: llvm
240
241  void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata, metadata, metadata)
242
243This intrinsic provides information when a user source variable is set to a new
244value.  The first argument is the new value (wrapped as metadata).  The second
245argument is a `local variable <LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_ containing a
246description of the variable.  The third argument is a `complex expression
247<LangRef.html#diexpression>`_.
248
249An `llvm.dbg.value` intrinsic describes the *value* of a source variable
250directly, not its address.  Note that the value operand of this intrinsic may
251be indirect (i.e, a pointer to the source variable), provided that interpreting
252the complex expression derives the direct value.
253
254``llvm.dbg.assign``
255^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
256.. toctree::
257   :hidden:
258
259   AssignmentTracking
260
261.. code-block:: llvm
262
263  void @llvm.dbg.assign(Value *Value,
264                        DIExpression *ValueExpression,
265                        DILocalVariable *Variable,
266                        DIAssignID *ID,
267                        Value *Address,
268                        DIExpression *AddressExpression)
269
270This intrinsic marks the position in IR where a source assignment occured. It
271encodes the value of the variable. It references the store, if any, that
272performs the assignment, and the destination address.
273
274The first three arguments are the same as for an ``llvm.dbg.value``. The fourth
275argument is a ``DIAssignID`` used to reference a store. The fifth is the
276destination of the store (wrapped as metadata), and the sixth is a `complex
277expression <LangRef.html#diexpression>`_ that modfies it.
278
279The formal LLVM-IR signature is:
280
281.. code-block:: llvm
282
283  void @llvm.dbg.assign(metadata, metadata, metadata, metadata, metadata, metadata)
284
285
286See :doc:`AssignmentTracking` for more info.
287
288Object lifetimes and scoping
289============================
290
291In many languages, the local variables in functions can have their lifetimes or
292scopes limited to a subset of a function.  In the C family of languages, for
293example, variables are only live (readable and writable) within the source
294block that they are defined in.  In functional languages, values are only
295readable after they have been defined.  Though this is a very obvious concept,
296it is non-trivial to model in LLVM, because it has no notion of scoping in this
297sense, and does not want to be tied to a language's scoping rules.
298
299In order to handle this, the LLVM debug format uses the metadata attached to
300llvm instructions to encode line number and scoping information.  Consider the
301following C fragment, for example:
302
303.. code-block:: c
304
305  1.  void foo() {
306  2.    int X = 21;
307  3.    int Y = 22;
308  4.    {
309  5.      int Z = 23;
310  6.      Z = X;
311  7.    }
312  8.    X = Y;
313  9.  }
314
315.. FIXME: Update the following example to use llvm.dbg.addr once that is the
316   default in clang.
317
318Compiled to LLVM, this function would be represented like this:
319
320.. code-block:: text
321
322  ; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable
323  define void @foo() #0 !dbg !4 {
324  entry:
325    %X = alloca i32, align 4
326    %Y = alloca i32, align 4
327    %Z = alloca i32, align 4
328    call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %X, metadata !11, metadata !13), !dbg !14
329    store i32 21, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !14
330    call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Y, metadata !15, metadata !13), !dbg !16
331    store i32 22, i32* %Y, align 4, !dbg !16
332    call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Z, metadata !17, metadata !13), !dbg !19
333    store i32 23, i32* %Z, align 4, !dbg !19
334    %0 = load i32, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !20
335    store i32 %0, i32* %Z, align 4, !dbg !21
336    %1 = load i32, i32* %Y, align 4, !dbg !22
337    store i32 %1, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !23
338    ret void, !dbg !24
339  }
340
341  ; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone
342  declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata, metadata, metadata) #1
343
344  attributes #0 = { nounwind ssp uwtable "less-precise-fpmad"="false" "frame-pointer"="all" "no-infs-fp-math"="false" "no-nans-fp-math"="false" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "unsafe-fp-math"="false" "use-soft-float"="false" }
345  attributes #1 = { nounwind readnone }
346
347  !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0}
348  !llvm.module.flags = !{!7, !8, !9}
349  !llvm.ident = !{!10}
350
351  !0 = !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !1, producer: "clang version 3.7.0 (trunk 231150) (llvm/trunk 231154)", isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, enums: !2, retainedTypes: !2, subprograms: !3, globals: !2, imports: !2)
352  !1 = !DIFile(filename: "/dev/stdin", directory: "/Users/dexonsmith/data/llvm/debug-info")
353  !2 = !{}
354  !3 = !{!4}
355  !4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, isOptimized: false, retainedNodes: !2)
356  !5 = !DISubroutineType(types: !6)
357  !6 = !{null}
358  !7 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 2}
359  !8 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3}
360  !9 = !{i32 1, !"PIC Level", i32 2}
361  !10 = !{!"clang version 3.7.0 (trunk 231150) (llvm/trunk 231154)"}
362  !11 = !DILocalVariable(name: "X", scope: !4, file: !1, line: 2, type: !12)
363  !12 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, align: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed)
364  !13 = !DIExpression()
365  !14 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 9, scope: !4)
366  !15 = !DILocalVariable(name: "Y", scope: !4, file: !1, line: 3, type: !12)
367  !16 = !DILocation(line: 3, column: 9, scope: !4)
368  !17 = !DILocalVariable(name: "Z", scope: !18, file: !1, line: 5, type: !12)
369  !18 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !4, file: !1, line: 4, column: 5)
370  !19 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 11, scope: !18)
371  !20 = !DILocation(line: 6, column: 11, scope: !18)
372  !21 = !DILocation(line: 6, column: 9, scope: !18)
373  !22 = !DILocation(line: 8, column: 9, scope: !4)
374  !23 = !DILocation(line: 8, column: 7, scope: !4)
375  !24 = !DILocation(line: 9, column: 3, scope: !4)
376
377
378This example illustrates a few important details about LLVM debugging
379information.  In particular, it shows how the ``llvm.dbg.declare`` intrinsic and
380location information, which are attached to an instruction, are applied
381together to allow a debugger to analyze the relationship between statements,
382variable definitions, and the code used to implement the function.
383
384.. code-block:: llvm
385
386  call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %X, metadata !11, metadata !13), !dbg !14
387    ; [debug line = 2:7] [debug variable = X]
388
389The first intrinsic ``%llvm.dbg.declare`` encodes debugging information for the
390variable ``X``.  The metadata ``!dbg !14`` attached to the intrinsic provides
391scope information for the variable ``X``.
392
393.. code-block:: text
394
395  !14 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 9, scope: !4)
396  !4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5,
397                              isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1,
398                              isOptimized: false, retainedNodes: !2)
399
400Here ``!14`` is metadata providing `location information
401<LangRef.html#dilocation>`_.  In this example, scope is encoded by ``!4``, a
402`subprogram descriptor <LangRef.html#disubprogram>`_.  This way the location
403information attached to the intrinsics indicates that the variable ``X`` is
404declared at line number 2 at a function level scope in function ``foo``.
405
406Now lets take another example.
407
408.. code-block:: llvm
409
410  call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Z, metadata !17, metadata !13), !dbg !19
411    ; [debug line = 5:9] [debug variable = Z]
412
413The third intrinsic ``%llvm.dbg.declare`` encodes debugging information for
414variable ``Z``.  The metadata ``!dbg !19`` attached to the intrinsic provides
415scope information for the variable ``Z``.
416
417.. code-block:: text
418
419  !18 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !4, file: !1, line: 4, column: 5)
420  !19 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 11, scope: !18)
421
422Here ``!19`` indicates that ``Z`` is declared at line number 5 and column
423number 11 inside of lexical scope ``!18``.  The lexical scope itself resides
424inside of subprogram ``!4`` described above.
425
426The scope information attached with each instruction provides a straightforward
427way to find instructions covered by a scope.
428
429Object lifetime in optimized code
430=================================
431
432In the example above, every variable assignment uniquely corresponds to a
433memory store to the variable's position on the stack. However in heavily
434optimized code LLVM promotes most variables into SSA values, which can
435eventually be placed in physical registers or memory locations. To track SSA
436values through compilation, when objects are promoted to SSA values an
437``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsic is created for each assignment, recording the
438variable's new location. Compared with the ``llvm.dbg.declare`` intrinsic:
439
440* A dbg.value terminates the effect of any preceding dbg.values for (any
441  overlapping fragments of) the specified variable.
442* The dbg.value's position in the IR defines where in the instruction stream
443  the variable's value changes.
444* Operands can be constants, indicating the variable is assigned a
445  constant value.
446
447Care must be taken to update ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics when optimization
448passes alter or move instructions and blocks -- the developer could observe such
449changes reflected in the value of variables when debugging the program. For any
450execution of the optimized program, the set of variable values presented to the
451developer by the debugger should not show a state that would never have existed
452in the execution of the unoptimized program, given the same input. Doing so
453risks misleading the developer by reporting a state that does not exist,
454damaging their understanding of the optimized program and undermining their
455trust in the debugger.
456
457Sometimes perfectly preserving variable locations is not possible, often when a
458redundant calculation is optimized out. In such cases, a ``llvm.dbg.value``
459with operand ``undef`` should be used, to terminate earlier variable locations
460and let the debugger present ``optimized out`` to the developer. Withholding
461these potentially stale variable values from the developer diminishes the
462amount of available debug information, but increases the reliability of the
463remaining information.
464
465To illustrate some potential issues, consider the following example:
466
467.. code-block:: llvm
468
469  define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) {
470  entry:
471    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2)
472    br i1 %cond, label %truebr, label %falsebr
473  truebr:
474    %tval = add i32 %bar, 1
475    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %tval, metadata !1, metadata !2)
476    %g1 = call i32 @gazonk()
477    br label %exit
478  falsebr:
479    %fval = add i32 %bar, 2
480    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %fval, metadata !1, metadata !2)
481    %g2 = call i32 @gazonk()
482    br label %exit
483  exit:
484    %merge = phi [ %tval, %truebr ], [ %fval, %falsebr ]
485    %g = phi [ %g1, %truebr ], [ %g2, %falsebr ]
486    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %merge, metadata !1, metadata !2)
487    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2)
488    %plusten = add i32 %merge, 10
489    %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g
490    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2)
491    ret i32 %toret
492  }
493
494Containing two source-level variables in ``!1`` and ``!3``. The function could,
495perhaps, be optimized into the following code:
496
497.. code-block:: llvm
498
499  define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) {
500  entry:
501    %g = call i32 @gazonk()
502    %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12
503    %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper
504    %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g
505    ret i32 %toret
506  }
507
508What ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics should be placed to represent the original variable
509locations in this code? Unfortunately the second, third and fourth
510dbg.values for ``!1`` in the source function have had their operands
511(%tval, %fval, %merge) optimized out. Assuming we cannot recover them, we
512might consider this placement of dbg.values:
513
514.. code-block:: llvm
515
516  define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) {
517  entry:
518    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2)
519    %g = call i32 @gazonk()
520    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2)
521    %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12
522    %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper
523    %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g
524    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2)
525    ret i32 %toret
526  }
527
528However, this will cause ``!3`` to have the return value of ``@gazonk()`` at
529the same time as ``!1`` has the constant value zero -- a pair of assignments
530that never occurred in the unoptimized program. To avoid this, we must terminate
531the range that ``!1`` has the constant value assignment by inserting an undef
532dbg.value before the dbg.value for ``!3``:
533
534.. code-block:: llvm
535
536  define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) {
537  entry:
538    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2)
539    %g = call i32 @gazonk()
540    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 undef, metadata !1, metadata !2)
541    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2)
542    %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12
543    %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper
544    %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g
545    call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2)
546    ret i32 %toret
547  }
548
549In general, if any dbg.value has its operand optimized out and cannot be
550recovered, then an undef dbg.value is necessary to terminate earlier variable
551locations. Additional undef dbg.values may be necessary when the debugger can
552observe re-ordering of assignments.
553
554How variable location metadata is transformed during CodeGen
555============================================================
556
557LLVM preserves debug information throughout mid-level and backend passes,
558ultimately producing a mapping between source-level information and
559instruction ranges. This
560is relatively straightforwards for line number information, as mapping
561instructions to line numbers is a simple association. For variable locations
562however the story is more complex. As each ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsic
563represents a source-level assignment of a value to a source variable, the
564variable location intrinsics effectively embed a small imperative program
565within the LLVM IR. By the end of CodeGen, this becomes a mapping from each
566variable to their machine locations over ranges of instructions.
567From IR to object emission, the major transformations which affect variable
568location fidelity are:
569
5701. Instruction Selection
5712. Register allocation
5723. Block layout
573
574each of which are discussed below. In addition, instruction scheduling can
575significantly change the ordering of the program, and occurs in a number of
576different passes.
577
578Some variable locations are not transformed during CodeGen. Stack locations
579specified by ``llvm.dbg.declare`` are valid and unchanging for the entire
580duration of the function, and are recorded in a simple MachineFunction table.
581Location changes in the prologue and epilogue of a function are also ignored:
582frame setup and destruction may take several instructions, require a
583disproportionate amount of debugging information in the output binary to
584describe, and should be stepped over by debuggers anyway.
585
586Variable locations in Instruction Selection and MIR
587---------------------------------------------------
588
589Instruction selection creates a MIR function from an IR function, and just as
590it transforms ``intermediate`` instructions into machine instructions, so must
591``intermediate`` variable locations become machine variable locations.
592Within IR, variable locations are always identified by a Value, but in MIR
593there can be different types of variable locations. In addition, some IR
594locations become unavailable, for example if the operation of multiple IR
595instructions are combined into one machine instruction (such as
596multiply-and-accumulate) then intermediate Values are lost. To track variable
597locations through instruction selection, they are first separated into
598locations that do not depend on code generation (constants, stack locations,
599allocated virtual registers) and those that do. For those that do, debug
600metadata is attached to SDNodes in SelectionDAGs. After instruction selection
601has occurred and a MIR function is created, if the SDNode associated with debug
602metadata is allocated a virtual register, that virtual register is used as the
603variable location. If the SDNode is folded into a machine instruction or
604otherwise transformed into a non-register, the variable location becomes
605unavailable.
606
607Locations that are unavailable are treated as if they have been optimized out:
608in IR the location would be assigned ``undef`` by a debug intrinsic, and in MIR
609the equivalent location is used.
610
611After MIR locations are assigned to each variable, machine pseudo-instructions
612corresponding to each ``llvm.dbg.value`` and ``llvm.dbg.addr`` intrinsic are
613inserted. There are two forms of this type of instruction.
614
615The first form, ``DBG_VALUE``, appears thus:
616
617.. code-block:: text
618
619  DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !123, !DIExpression()
620
621And has the following operands:
622 * The first operand can record the variable location as a register,
623   a frame index, an immediate, or the base address register if the original
624   debug intrinsic referred to memory. ``$noreg`` indicates the variable
625   location is undefined, equivalent to an ``undef`` dbg.value operand.
626 * The type of the second operand indicates whether the variable location is
627   directly referred to by the DBG_VALUE, or whether it is indirect. The
628   ``$noreg`` register signifies the former, an immediate operand (0) the
629   latter.
630 * Operand 3 is the Variable field of the original debug intrinsic.
631 * Operand 4 is the Expression field of the original debug intrinsic.
632
633The second form, ``DBG_VALUE_LIST``, appears thus:
634
635.. code-block:: text
636
637  DBG_VALUE_LIST !123, !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 0, DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 1, DW_OP_plus), %1, %2
638
639And has the following operands:
640 * The first operand is the Variable field of the original debug intrinsic.
641 * The second operand is the Expression field of the original debug intrinsic.
642 * Any number of operands, from the 3rd onwards, record a sequence of variable
643   location operands, which may take any of the same values as the first
644   operand of the ``DBG_VALUE`` instruction above. These variable location
645   operands are inserted into the final DWARF Expression in positions indicated
646   by the DW_OP_LLVM_arg operator in the `DIExpression
647   <LangRef.html#diexpression>`.
648
649The position at which the DBG_VALUEs are inserted should correspond to the
650positions of their matching ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics in the IR block.  As
651with optimization, LLVM aims to preserve the order in which variable
652assignments occurred in the source program. However SelectionDAG performs some
653instruction scheduling, which can reorder assignments (discussed below).
654Function parameter locations are moved to the beginning of the function if
655they're not already, to ensure they're immediately available on function entry.
656
657To demonstrate variable locations during instruction selection, consider
658the following example:
659
660.. code-block:: llvm
661
662  define i32 @foo(i32* %addr) {
663  entry:
664    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5
665    br label %bb1, !dbg !5
666
667  bb1:                                              ; preds = %bb1, %entry
668    %bar.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %add, %bb1 ]
669    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %bar.0, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5
670    %addr1 = getelementptr i32, i32 *%addr, i32 1, !dbg !5
671    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 *%addr1, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5
672    %loaded1 = load i32, i32* %addr1, !dbg !5
673    %addr2 = getelementptr i32, i32 *%addr, i32 %bar.0, !dbg !5
674    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 *%addr2, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5
675    %loaded2 = load i32, i32* %addr2, !dbg !5
676    %add = add i32 %bar.0, 1, !dbg !5
677    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %add, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5
678    %added = add i32 %loaded1, %loaded2
679    %cond = icmp ult i32 %added, %bar.0, !dbg !5
680    br i1 %cond, label %bb1, label %bb2, !dbg !5
681
682  bb2:                                              ; preds = %bb1
683    ret i32 0, !dbg !5
684  }
685
686If one compiles this IR with ``llc -o - -start-after=codegen-prepare -stop-after=expand-isel-pseudos -mtriple=x86_64--``, the following MIR is produced:
687
688.. code-block:: text
689
690  bb.0.entry:
691    successors: %bb.1(0x80000000)
692    liveins: $rdi
693
694    %2:gr64 = COPY $rdi
695    %3:gr32 = MOV32r0 implicit-def dead $eflags
696    DBG_VALUE 0, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5
697
698  bb.1.bb1:
699    successors: %bb.1(0x7c000000), %bb.2(0x04000000)
700
701    %0:gr32 = PHI %3, %bb.0, %1, %bb.1
702    DBG_VALUE %0, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5
703    DBG_VALUE %2, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4, DW_OP_stack_value), debug-location !5
704    %4:gr32 = MOV32rm %2, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1)
705    %5:gr64_nosp = MOVSX64rr32 %0, debug-location !5
706    DBG_VALUE $noreg, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5
707    %1:gr32 = INC32r %0, implicit-def dead $eflags, debug-location !5
708    DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5
709    %6:gr32 = ADD32rm %4, %2, 4, killed %5, 0, $noreg, implicit-def dead $eflags :: (load 4 from %ir.addr2)
710    %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %0, implicit-def $eflags, debug-location !5
711    JB_1 %bb.1, implicit $eflags, debug-location !5
712    JMP_1 %bb.2, debug-location !5
713
714  bb.2.bb2:
715    %8:gr32 = MOV32r0 implicit-def dead $eflags
716    $eax = COPY %8, debug-location !5
717    RET 0, $eax, debug-location !5
718
719Observe first that there is a DBG_VALUE instruction for every ``llvm.dbg.value``
720intrinsic in the source IR, ensuring no source level assignments go missing.
721Then consider the different ways in which variable locations have been recorded:
722
723* For the first dbg.value an immediate operand is used to record a zero value.
724* The dbg.value of the PHI instruction leads to a DBG_VALUE of virtual register
725  ``%0``.
726* The first GEP has its effect folded into the first load instruction
727  (as a 4-byte offset), but the variable location is salvaged by folding
728  the GEPs effect into the DIExpression.
729* The second GEP is also folded into the corresponding load. However, it is
730  insufficiently simple to be salvaged, and is emitted as a ``$noreg``
731  DBG_VALUE, indicating that the variable takes on an undefined location.
732* The final dbg.value has its Value placed in virtual register ``%1``.
733
734Instruction Scheduling
735----------------------
736
737A number of passes can reschedule instructions, notably instruction selection
738and the pre-and-post RA machine schedulers. Instruction scheduling can
739significantly change the nature of the program -- in the (very unlikely) worst
740case the instruction sequence could be completely reversed. In such
741circumstances LLVM follows the principle applied to optimizations, that it is
742better for the debugger not to display any state than a misleading state.
743Thus, whenever instructions are advanced in order of execution, any
744corresponding DBG_VALUE is kept in its original position, and if an instruction
745is delayed then the variable is given an undefined location for the duration
746of the delay. To illustrate, consider this pseudo-MIR:
747
748.. code-block:: text
749
750  %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1)
751  DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2
752  %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags
753  DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4
754  %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags
755  DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6
756
757Imagine that the SUB32rr were moved forward to give us the following MIR:
758
759.. code-block:: text
760
761  %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags
762  %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1)
763  DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2
764  %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags
765  DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4
766  DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6
767
768In this circumstance LLVM would leave the MIR as shown above. Were we to move
769the DBG_VALUE of virtual register %7 upwards with the SUB32rr, we would re-order
770assignments and introduce a new state of the program. Whereas with the solution
771above, the debugger will see one fewer combination of variable values, because
772``!3`` and ``!5`` will change value at the same time. This is preferred over
773misrepresenting the original program.
774
775In comparison, if one sunk the MOV32rm, LLVM would produce the following:
776
777.. code-block:: text
778
779  DBG_VALUE $noreg, $noreg, !1, !2
780  %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags
781  DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4
782  %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags
783  DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6
784  %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1)
785  DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2
786
787Here, to avoid presenting a state in which the first assignment to ``!1``
788disappears, the DBG_VALUE at the top of the block assigns the variable the
789undefined location, until its value is available at the end of the block where
790an additional DBG_VALUE is added. Were any other DBG_VALUE for ``!1`` to occur
791in the instructions that the MOV32rm was sunk past, the DBG_VALUE for ``%1``
792would be dropped and the debugger would never observe it in the variable. This
793accurately reflects that the value is not available during the corresponding
794portion of the original program.
795
796Variable locations during Register Allocation
797---------------------------------------------
798
799To avoid debug instructions interfering with the register allocator, the
800LiveDebugVariables pass extracts variable locations from a MIR function and
801deletes the corresponding DBG_VALUE instructions. Some localized copy
802propagation is performed within blocks. After register allocation, the
803VirtRegRewriter pass re-inserts DBG_VALUE instructions in their original
804positions, translating virtual register references into their physical
805machine locations. To avoid encoding incorrect variable locations, in this
806pass any DBG_VALUE of a virtual register that is not live, is replaced by
807the undefined location. The LiveDebugVariables may insert redundant DBG_VALUEs
808because of virtual register rewriting. These will be subsequently removed by
809the RemoveRedundantDebugValues pass.
810
811LiveDebugValues expansion of variable locations
812-----------------------------------------------
813
814After all optimizations have run and shortly before emission, the
815LiveDebugValues pass runs to achieve two aims:
816
817* To propagate the location of variables through copies and register spills,
818* For every block, to record every valid variable location in that block.
819
820After this pass the DBG_VALUE instruction changes meaning: rather than
821corresponding to a source-level assignment where the variable may change value,
822it asserts the location of a variable in a block, and loses effect outside the
823block. Propagating variable locations through copies and spills is
824straightforwards: determining the variable location in every basic block
825requires the consideration of control flow. Consider the following IR, which
826presents several difficulties:
827
828.. code-block:: text
829
830  define dso_local i32 @foo(i1 %cond, i32 %input) !dbg !12 {
831  entry:
832    br i1 %cond, label %truebr, label %falsebr
833
834  bb1:
835    %value = phi i32 [ %value1, %truebr ], [ %value2, %falsebr ]
836    br label %exit, !dbg !26
837
838  truebr:
839    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %input, metadata !30, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24
840    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 1, metadata !23, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24
841    %value1 = add i32 %input, 1
842    br label %bb1
843
844  falsebr:
845    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %input, metadata !30, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24
846    call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 2, metadata !23, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24
847    %value = add i32 %input, 2
848    br label %bb1
849
850  exit:
851    ret i32 %value, !dbg !30
852  }
853
854Here the difficulties are:
855
856* The control flow is roughly the opposite of basic block order
857* The value of the ``!23`` variable merges into ``%bb1``, but there is no PHI
858  node
859
860As mentioned above, the ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics essentially form an
861imperative program embedded in the IR, with each intrinsic defining a variable
862location. This *could* be converted to an SSA form by mem2reg, in the same way
863that it uses use-def chains to identify control flow merges and insert phi
864nodes for IR Values. However, because debug variable locations are defined for
865every machine instruction, in effect every IR instruction uses every variable
866location, which would lead to a large number of debugging intrinsics being
867generated.
868
869Examining the example above, variable ``!30`` is assigned ``%input`` on both
870conditional paths through the function, while ``!23`` is assigned differing
871constant values on either path. Where control flow merges in ``%bb1`` we would
872want ``!30`` to keep its location (``%input``), but ``!23`` to become undefined
873as we cannot determine at runtime what value it should have in %bb1 without
874inserting a PHI node. mem2reg does not insert the PHI node to avoid changing
875codegen when debugging is enabled, and does not insert the other dbg.values
876to avoid adding very large numbers of intrinsics.
877
878Instead, LiveDebugValues determines variable locations when control
879flow merges. A dataflow analysis is used to propagate locations between blocks:
880when control flow merges, if a variable has the same location in all
881predecessors then that location is propagated into the successor. If the
882predecessor locations disagree, the location becomes undefined.
883
884Once LiveDebugValues has run, every block should have all valid variable
885locations described by DBG_VALUE instructions within the block. Very little
886effort is then required by supporting classes (such as
887DbgEntityHistoryCalculator) to build a map of each instruction to every
888valid variable location, without the need to consider control flow. From
889the example above, it is otherwise difficult to determine that the location
890of variable ``!30`` should flow "up" into block ``%bb1``, but that the location
891of variable ``!23`` should not flow "down" into the ``%exit`` block.
892
893.. _ccxx_frontend:
894
895C/C++ front-end specific debug information
896==========================================
897
898The C and C++ front-ends represent information about the program in a
899format that is effectively identical to `DWARF <http://www.dwarfstd.org/>`_
900in terms of information content.  This allows code generators to
901trivially support native debuggers by generating standard dwarf
902information, and contains enough information for non-dwarf targets to
903translate it as needed.
904
905This section describes the forms used to represent C and C++ programs.  Other
906languages could pattern themselves after this (which itself is tuned to
907representing programs in the same way that DWARF does), or they could choose
908to provide completely different forms if they don't fit into the DWARF model.
909As support for debugging information gets added to the various LLVM
910source-language front-ends, the information used should be documented here.
911
912The following sections provide examples of a few C/C++ constructs and
913the debug information that would best describe those constructs.  The
914canonical references are the ``DINode`` classes defined in
915``include/llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h`` and the implementations of the
916helper functions in ``lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp``.
917
918C/C++ source file information
919-----------------------------
920
921``llvm::Instruction`` provides easy access to metadata attached with an
922instruction.  One can extract line number information encoded in LLVM IR using
923``Instruction::getDebugLoc()`` and ``DILocation::getLine()``.
924
925.. code-block:: c++
926
927  if (DILocation *Loc = I->getDebugLoc()) { // Here I is an LLVM instruction
928    unsigned Line = Loc->getLine();
929    StringRef File = Loc->getFilename();
930    StringRef Dir = Loc->getDirectory();
931    bool ImplicitCode = Loc->isImplicitCode();
932  }
933
934When the flag ImplicitCode is true then it means that the Instruction has been
935added by the front-end but doesn't correspond to source code written by the user. For example
936
937.. code-block:: c++
938
939  if (MyBoolean) {
940    MyObject MO;
941    ...
942  }
943
944At the end of the scope the MyObject's destructor is called but it isn't written
945explicitly. This information is useful to avoid to have counters on brackets when
946making code coverage.
947
948C/C++ global variable information
949---------------------------------
950
951Given an integer global variable declared as follows:
952
953.. code-block:: c
954
955  _Alignas(8) int MyGlobal = 100;
956
957a C/C++ front-end would generate the following descriptors:
958
959.. code-block:: text
960
961  ;;
962  ;; Define the global itself.
963  ;;
964  @MyGlobal = global i32 100, align 8, !dbg !0
965
966  ;;
967  ;; List of debug info of globals
968  ;;
969  !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!1}
970
971  ;; Some unrelated metadata.
972  !llvm.module.flags = !{!6, !7}
973  !llvm.ident = !{!8}
974
975  ;; Define the global variable itself
976  !0 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(name: "MyGlobal", scope: !1, file: !2, line: 1, type: !5, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, align: 64)
977
978  ;; Define the compile unit.
979  !1 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !2,
980                               producer: "clang version 4.0.0",
981                               isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug,
982                               enums: !3, globals: !4)
983
984  ;;
985  ;; Define the file
986  ;;
987  !2 = !DIFile(filename: "/dev/stdin",
988               directory: "/Users/dexonsmith/data/llvm/debug-info")
989
990  ;; An empty array.
991  !3 = !{}
992
993  ;; The Array of Global Variables
994  !4 = !{!0}
995
996  ;;
997  ;; Define the type
998  ;;
999  !5 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed)
1000
1001  ;; Dwarf version to output.
1002  !6 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 4}
1003
1004  ;; Debug info schema version.
1005  !7 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3}
1006
1007  ;; Compiler identification
1008  !8 = !{!"clang version 4.0.0"}
1009
1010
1011The align value in DIGlobalVariable description specifies variable alignment in
1012case it was forced by C11 _Alignas(), C++11 alignas() keywords or compiler
1013attribute __attribute__((aligned ())). In other case (when this field is missing)
1014alignment is considered default. This is used when producing DWARF output
1015for DW_AT_alignment value.
1016
1017C/C++ function information
1018--------------------------
1019
1020Given a function declared as follows:
1021
1022.. code-block:: c
1023
1024  int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
1025    return 0;
1026  }
1027
1028a C/C++ front-end would generate the following descriptors:
1029
1030.. code-block:: text
1031
1032  ;;
1033  ;; Define the anchor for subprograms.
1034  ;;
1035  !4 = !DISubprogram(name: "main", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5,
1036                     isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1,
1037                     flags: DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false,
1038                     retainedNodes: !2)
1039
1040  ;;
1041  ;; Define the subprogram itself.
1042  ;;
1043  define i32 @main(i32 %argc, i8** %argv) !dbg !4 {
1044  ...
1045  }
1046
1047C++ specific debug information
1048==============================
1049
1050C++ special member functions information
1051----------------------------------------
1052
1053DWARF v5 introduces attributes defined to enhance debugging information of C++ programs. LLVM can generate (or omit) these appropriate DWARF attributes. In C++ a special member function Ctors, Dtors, Copy/Move Ctors, assignment operators can be declared with C++11 keyword deleted. This is represented in LLVM using spFlags value DISPFlagDeleted.
1054
1055Given a class declaration with copy constructor declared as deleted:
1056
1057.. code-block:: c
1058
1059  class foo {
1060   public:
1061     foo(const foo&) = deleted;
1062  };
1063
1064A C++ frontend would generate following:
1065
1066.. code-block:: text
1067
1068  !17 = !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !11, file: !1, line: 5, type: !18, scopeLine: 5, flags: DIFlagPublic | DIFlagPrototyped, spFlags: DISPFlagDeleted)
1069
1070and this will produce an additional DWARF attribute as:
1071
1072.. code-block:: text
1073
1074  DW_TAG_subprogram [7] *
1075    DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strx1]    (indexed (00000006) string = "foo")
1076    DW_AT_decl_line [DW_FORM_data1]       (5)
1077    ...
1078    DW_AT_deleted [DW_FORM_flag_present]  (true)
1079
1080Fortran specific debug information
1081==================================
1082
1083Fortran function information
1084----------------------------
1085
1086There are a few DWARF attributes defined to support client debugging of Fortran programs.  LLVM can generate (or omit) the appropriate DWARF attributes for the prefix-specs of ELEMENTAL, PURE, IMPURE, RECURSIVE, and NON_RECURSIVE.  This is done by using the spFlags values: DISPFlagElemental, DISPFlagPure, and DISPFlagRecursive.
1087
1088.. code-block:: fortran
1089
1090  elemental function elem_func(a)
1091
1092a Fortran front-end would generate the following descriptors:
1093
1094.. code-block:: text
1095
1096  !11 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "subroutine2", scope: !1, file: !1,
1097          line: 5, type: !8, scopeLine: 6,
1098          spFlags: DISPFlagDefinition | DISPFlagElemental, unit: !0,
1099          retainedNodes: !2)
1100
1101and this will materialize an additional DWARF attribute as:
1102
1103.. code-block:: text
1104
1105  DW_TAG_subprogram [3]
1106     DW_AT_low_pc [DW_FORM_addr]     (0x0000000000000010 ".text")
1107     DW_AT_high_pc [DW_FORM_data4]   (0x00000001)
1108     ...
1109     DW_AT_elemental [DW_FORM_flag_present]  (true)
1110
1111There are a few DWARF tags defined to represent Fortran specific constructs i.e DW_TAG_string_type for representing Fortran character(n). In LLVM this is represented as DIStringType.
1112
1113.. code-block:: fortran
1114
1115  character(len=*), intent(in) :: string
1116
1117a Fortran front-end would generate the following descriptors:
1118
1119.. code-block:: text
1120
1121  !DILocalVariable(name: "string", arg: 1, scope: !10, file: !3, line: 4, type: !15)
1122  !DIStringType(name: "character(*)!2", stringLength: !16, stringLengthExpression: !DIExpression(), size: 32)
1123
1124A fortran deferred-length character can also contain the information of raw storage of the characters in addition to the length of the string. This information is encoded in the  stringLocationExpression field. Based on this information, DW_AT_data_location attribute is emitted in a DW_TAG_string_type debug info.
1125
1126  !DIStringType(name: "character(*)!2", stringLengthExpression: !DIExpression(), stringLocationExpression: !DIExpression(DW_OP_push_object_address, DW_OP_deref), size: 32)
1127
1128and this will materialize in DWARF tags as:
1129
1130.. code-block:: text
1131
1132   DW_TAG_string_type
1133                DW_AT_name      ("character(*)!2")
1134                DW_AT_string_length     (0x00000064)
1135   0x00000064:    DW_TAG_variable
1136                  DW_AT_location      (DW_OP_fbreg +16)
1137                  DW_AT_type  (0x00000083 "integer*8")
1138                  DW_AT_data_location (DW_OP_push_object_address, DW_OP_deref)
1139                  ...
1140                  DW_AT_artificial    (true)
1141
1142A Fortran front-end may need to generate a *trampoline* function to call a
1143function defined in a different compilation unit. In this case, the front-end
1144can emit the following descriptor for the trampoline function:
1145
1146.. code-block:: text
1147
1148  !DISubprogram(name: "sub1_.t0p", linkageName: "sub1_.t0p", scope: !4, file: !4, type: !5, spFlags: DISPFlagLocalToUnit | DISPFlagDefinition, unit: !7, retainedNodes: !24, targetFuncName: "sub1_")
1149
1150The targetFuncName field is the name of the function that the trampoline
1151calls. This descriptor results in the following DWARF tag:
1152
1153.. code-block:: text
1154
1155  DW_TAG_subprogram
1156    ...
1157    DW_AT_linkage_name	("sub1_.t0p")
1158    DW_AT_name	("sub1_.t0p")
1159    DW_AT_trampoline	("sub1_")
1160
1161Debugging information format
1162============================
1163
1164Debugging Information Extension for Objective C Properties
1165----------------------------------------------------------
1166
1167Introduction
1168^^^^^^^^^^^^
1169
1170Objective C provides a simpler way to declare and define accessor methods using
1171declared properties.  The language provides features to declare a property and
1172to let compiler synthesize accessor methods.
1173
1174The debugger lets developer inspect Objective C interfaces and their instance
1175variables and class variables.  However, the debugger does not know anything
1176about the properties defined in Objective C interfaces.  The debugger consumes
1177information generated by compiler in DWARF format.  The format does not support
1178encoding of Objective C properties.  This proposal describes DWARF extensions to
1179encode Objective C properties, which the debugger can use to let developers
1180inspect Objective C properties.
1181
1182Proposal
1183^^^^^^^^
1184
1185Objective C properties exist separately from class members.  A property can be
1186defined only by "setter" and "getter" selectors, and be calculated anew on each
1187access.  Or a property can just be a direct access to some declared ivar.
1188Finally it can have an ivar "automatically synthesized" for it by the compiler,
1189in which case the property can be referred to in user code directly using the
1190standard C dereference syntax as well as through the property "dot" syntax, but
1191there is no entry in the ``@interface`` declaration corresponding to this ivar.
1192
1193To facilitate debugging, these properties we will add a new DWARF TAG into the
1194``DW_TAG_structure_type`` definition for the class to hold the description of a
1195given property, and a set of DWARF attributes that provide said description.
1196The property tag will also contain the name and declared type of the property.
1197
1198If there is a related ivar, there will also be a DWARF property attribute placed
1199in the ``DW_TAG_member`` DIE for that ivar referring back to the property TAG
1200for that property.  And in the case where the compiler synthesizes the ivar
1201directly, the compiler is expected to generate a ``DW_TAG_member`` for that
1202ivar (with the ``DW_AT_artificial`` set to 1), whose name will be the name used
1203to access this ivar directly in code, and with the property attribute pointing
1204back to the property it is backing.
1205
1206The following examples will serve as illustration for our discussion:
1207
1208.. code-block:: objc
1209
1210  @interface I1 {
1211    int n2;
1212  }
1213
1214  @property int p1;
1215  @property int p2;
1216  @end
1217
1218  @implementation I1
1219  @synthesize p1;
1220  @synthesize p2 = n2;
1221  @end
1222
1223This produces the following DWARF (this is a "pseudo dwarfdump" output):
1224
1225.. code-block:: none
1226
1227  0x00000100:  TAG_structure_type [7] *
1228                 AT_APPLE_runtime_class( 0x10 )
1229                 AT_name( "I1" )
1230                 AT_decl_file( "Objc_Property.m" )
1231                 AT_decl_line( 3 )
1232
1233  0x00000110    TAG_APPLE_property
1234                  AT_name ( "p1" )
1235                  AT_type ( {0x00000150} ( int ) )
1236
1237  0x00000120:   TAG_APPLE_property
1238                  AT_name ( "p2" )
1239                  AT_type ( {0x00000150} ( int ) )
1240
1241  0x00000130:   TAG_member [8]
1242                  AT_name( "_p1" )
1243                  AT_APPLE_property ( {0x00000110} "p1" )
1244                  AT_type( {0x00000150} ( int ) )
1245                  AT_artificial ( 0x1 )
1246
1247  0x00000140:    TAG_member [8]
1248                   AT_name( "n2" )
1249                   AT_APPLE_property ( {0x00000120} "p2" )
1250                   AT_type( {0x00000150} ( int ) )
1251
1252  0x00000150:  AT_type( ( int ) )
1253
1254Note, the current convention is that the name of the ivar for an
1255auto-synthesized property is the name of the property from which it derives
1256with an underscore prepended, as is shown in the example.  But we actually
1257don't need to know this convention, since we are given the name of the ivar
1258directly.
1259
1260Also, it is common practice in ObjC to have different property declarations in
1261the @interface and @implementation - e.g. to provide a read-only property in
1262the interface, and a read-write interface in the implementation.  In that case,
1263the compiler should emit whichever property declaration will be in force in the
1264current translation unit.
1265
1266Developers can decorate a property with attributes which are encoded using
1267``DW_AT_APPLE_property_attribute``.
1268
1269.. code-block:: objc
1270
1271  @property (readonly, nonatomic) int pr;
1272
1273.. code-block:: none
1274
1275  TAG_APPLE_property [8]
1276    AT_name( "pr" )
1277    AT_type ( {0x00000147} (int) )
1278    AT_APPLE_property_attribute (DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readonly, DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nonatomic)
1279
1280The setter and getter method names are attached to the property using
1281``DW_AT_APPLE_property_setter`` and ``DW_AT_APPLE_property_getter`` attributes.
1282
1283.. code-block:: objc
1284
1285  @interface I1
1286  @property (setter=myOwnP3Setter:) int p3;
1287  -(void)myOwnP3Setter:(int)a;
1288  @end
1289
1290  @implementation I1
1291  @synthesize p3;
1292  -(void)myOwnP3Setter:(int)a{ }
1293  @end
1294
1295The DWARF for this would be:
1296
1297.. code-block:: none
1298
1299  0x000003bd: TAG_structure_type [7] *
1300                AT_APPLE_runtime_class( 0x10 )
1301                AT_name( "I1" )
1302                AT_decl_file( "Objc_Property.m" )
1303                AT_decl_line( 3 )
1304
1305  0x000003cd      TAG_APPLE_property
1306                    AT_name ( "p3" )
1307                    AT_APPLE_property_setter ( "myOwnP3Setter:" )
1308                    AT_type( {0x00000147} ( int ) )
1309
1310  0x000003f3:     TAG_member [8]
1311                    AT_name( "_p3" )
1312                    AT_type ( {0x00000147} ( int ) )
1313                    AT_APPLE_property ( {0x000003cd} )
1314                    AT_artificial ( 0x1 )
1315
1316New DWARF Tags
1317^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1318
1319+-----------------------+--------+
1320| TAG                   | Value  |
1321+=======================+========+
1322| DW_TAG_APPLE_property | 0x4200 |
1323+-----------------------+--------+
1324
1325New DWARF Attributes
1326^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1327
1328+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+
1329| Attribute                      | Value  | Classes   |
1330+================================+========+===========+
1331| DW_AT_APPLE_property           | 0x3fed | Reference |
1332+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+
1333| DW_AT_APPLE_property_getter    | 0x3fe9 | String    |
1334+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+
1335| DW_AT_APPLE_property_setter    | 0x3fea | String    |
1336+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+
1337| DW_AT_APPLE_property_attribute | 0x3feb | Constant  |
1338+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+
1339
1340New DWARF Constants
1341^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1342
1343+--------------------------------------+-------+
1344| Name                                 | Value |
1345+======================================+=======+
1346| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readonly           | 0x01  |
1347+--------------------------------------+-------+
1348| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_getter             | 0x02  |
1349+--------------------------------------+-------+
1350| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_assign             | 0x04  |
1351+--------------------------------------+-------+
1352| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readwrite          | 0x08  |
1353+--------------------------------------+-------+
1354| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_retain             | 0x10  |
1355+--------------------------------------+-------+
1356| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_copy               | 0x20  |
1357+--------------------------------------+-------+
1358| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nonatomic          | 0x40  |
1359+--------------------------------------+-------+
1360| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_setter             | 0x80  |
1361+--------------------------------------+-------+
1362| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_atomic             | 0x100 |
1363+--------------------------------------+-------+
1364| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_weak               | 0x200 |
1365+--------------------------------------+-------+
1366| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_strong             | 0x400 |
1367+--------------------------------------+-------+
1368| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_unsafe_unretained  | 0x800 |
1369+--------------------------------------+-------+
1370| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nullability        | 0x1000|
1371+--------------------------------------+-------+
1372| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_null_resettable    | 0x2000|
1373+--------------------------------------+-------+
1374| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_class              | 0x4000|
1375+--------------------------------------+-------+
1376
1377Name Accelerator Tables
1378-----------------------
1379
1380Introduction
1381^^^^^^^^^^^^
1382
1383The "``.debug_pubnames``" and "``.debug_pubtypes``" formats are not what a
1384debugger needs.  The "``pub``" in the section name indicates that the entries
1385in the table are publicly visible names only.  This means no static or hidden
1386functions show up in the "``.debug_pubnames``".  No static variables or private
1387class variables are in the "``.debug_pubtypes``".  Many compilers add different
1388things to these tables, so we can't rely upon the contents between gcc, icc, or
1389clang.
1390
1391The typical query given by users tends not to match up with the contents of
1392these tables.  For example, the DWARF spec states that "In the case of the name
1393of a function member or static data member of a C++ structure, class or union,
1394the name presented in the "``.debug_pubnames``" section is not the simple name
1395given by the ``DW_AT_name attribute`` of the referenced debugging information
1396entry, but rather the fully qualified name of the data or function member."
1397So the only names in these tables for complex C++ entries is a fully
1398qualified name.  Debugger users tend not to enter their search strings as
1399"``a::b::c(int,const Foo&) const``", but rather as "``c``", "``b::c``" , or
1400"``a::b::c``".  So the name entered in the name table must be demangled in
1401order to chop it up appropriately and additional names must be manually entered
1402into the table to make it effective as a name lookup table for debuggers to
1403use.
1404
1405All debuggers currently ignore the "``.debug_pubnames``" table as a result of
1406its inconsistent and useless public-only name content making it a waste of
1407space in the object file.  These tables, when they are written to disk, are not
1408sorted in any way, leaving every debugger to do its own parsing and sorting.
1409These tables also include an inlined copy of the string values in the table
1410itself making the tables much larger than they need to be on disk, especially
1411for large C++ programs.
1412
1413Can't we just fix the sections by adding all of the names we need to this
1414table? No, because that is not what the tables are defined to contain and we
1415won't know the difference between the old bad tables and the new good tables.
1416At best we could make our own renamed sections that contain all of the data we
1417need.
1418
1419These tables are also insufficient for what a debugger like LLDB needs.  LLDB
1420uses clang for its expression parsing where LLDB acts as a PCH.  LLDB is then
1421often asked to look for type "``foo``" or namespace "``bar``", or list items in
1422namespace "``baz``".  Namespaces are not included in the pubnames or pubtypes
1423tables.  Since clang asks a lot of questions when it is parsing an expression,
1424we need to be very fast when looking up names, as it happens a lot.  Having new
1425accelerator tables that are optimized for very quick lookups will benefit this
1426type of debugging experience greatly.
1427
1428We would like to generate name lookup tables that can be mapped into memory
1429from disk, and used as is, with little or no up-front parsing.  We would also
1430be able to control the exact content of these different tables so they contain
1431exactly what we need.  The Name Accelerator Tables were designed to fix these
1432issues.  In order to solve these issues we need to:
1433
1434* Have a format that can be mapped into memory from disk and used as is
1435* Lookups should be very fast
1436* Extensible table format so these tables can be made by many producers
1437* Contain all of the names needed for typical lookups out of the box
1438* Strict rules for the contents of tables
1439
1440Table size is important and the accelerator table format should allow the reuse
1441of strings from common string tables so the strings for the names are not
1442duplicated.  We also want to make sure the table is ready to be used as-is by
1443simply mapping the table into memory with minimal header parsing.
1444
1445The name lookups need to be fast and optimized for the kinds of lookups that
1446debuggers tend to do.  Optimally we would like to touch as few parts of the
1447mapped table as possible when doing a name lookup and be able to quickly find
1448the name entry we are looking for, or discover there are no matches.  In the
1449case of debuggers we optimized for lookups that fail most of the time.
1450
1451Each table that is defined should have strict rules on exactly what is in the
1452accelerator tables and documented so clients can rely on the content.
1453
1454Hash Tables
1455^^^^^^^^^^^
1456
1457Standard Hash Tables
1458""""""""""""""""""""
1459
1460Typical hash tables have a header, buckets, and each bucket points to the
1461bucket contents:
1462
1463.. code-block:: none
1464
1465  .------------.
1466  |  HEADER    |
1467  |------------|
1468  |  BUCKETS   |
1469  |------------|
1470  |  DATA      |
1471  `------------'
1472
1473The BUCKETS are an array of offsets to DATA for each hash:
1474
1475.. code-block:: none
1476
1477  .------------.
1478  | 0x00001000 | BUCKETS[0]
1479  | 0x00002000 | BUCKETS[1]
1480  | 0x00002200 | BUCKETS[2]
1481  | 0x000034f0 | BUCKETS[3]
1482  |            | ...
1483  | 0xXXXXXXXX | BUCKETS[n_buckets]
1484  '------------'
1485
1486So for ``bucket[3]`` in the example above, we have an offset into the table
14870x000034f0 which points to a chain of entries for the bucket.  Each bucket must
1488contain a next pointer, full 32 bit hash value, the string itself, and the data
1489for the current string value.
1490
1491.. code-block:: none
1492
1493              .------------.
1494  0x000034f0: | 0x00003500 | next pointer
1495              | 0x12345678 | 32 bit hash
1496              | "erase"    | string value
1497              | data[n]    | HashData for this bucket
1498              |------------|
1499  0x00003500: | 0x00003550 | next pointer
1500              | 0x29273623 | 32 bit hash
1501              | "dump"     | string value
1502              | data[n]    | HashData for this bucket
1503              |------------|
1504  0x00003550: | 0x00000000 | next pointer
1505              | 0x82638293 | 32 bit hash
1506              | "main"     | string value
1507              | data[n]    | HashData for this bucket
1508              `------------'
1509
1510The problem with this layout for debuggers is that we need to optimize for the
1511negative lookup case where the symbol we're searching for is not present.  So
1512if we were to lookup "``printf``" in the table above, we would make a 32-bit
1513hash for "``printf``", it might match ``bucket[3]``.  We would need to go to
1514the offset 0x000034f0 and start looking to see if our 32 bit hash matches.  To
1515do so, we need to read the next pointer, then read the hash, compare it, and
1516skip to the next bucket.  Each time we are skipping many bytes in memory and
1517touching new pages just to do the compare on the full 32 bit hash.  All of
1518these accesses then tell us that we didn't have a match.
1519
1520Name Hash Tables
1521""""""""""""""""
1522
1523To solve the issues mentioned above we have structured the hash tables a bit
1524differently: a header, buckets, an array of all unique 32 bit hash values,
1525followed by an array of hash value data offsets, one for each hash value, then
1526the data for all hash values:
1527
1528.. code-block:: none
1529
1530  .-------------.
1531  |  HEADER     |
1532  |-------------|
1533  |  BUCKETS    |
1534  |-------------|
1535  |  HASHES     |
1536  |-------------|
1537  |  OFFSETS    |
1538  |-------------|
1539  |  DATA       |
1540  `-------------'
1541
1542The ``BUCKETS`` in the name tables are an index into the ``HASHES`` array.  By
1543making all of the full 32 bit hash values contiguous in memory, we allow
1544ourselves to efficiently check for a match while touching as little memory as
1545possible.  Most often checking the 32 bit hash values is as far as the lookup
1546goes.  If it does match, it usually is a match with no collisions.  So for a
1547table with "``n_buckets``" buckets, and "``n_hashes``" unique 32 bit hash
1548values, we can clarify the contents of the ``BUCKETS``, ``HASHES`` and
1549``OFFSETS`` as:
1550
1551.. code-block:: none
1552
1553  .-------------------------.
1554  |  HEADER.magic           | uint32_t
1555  |  HEADER.version         | uint16_t
1556  |  HEADER.hash_function   | uint16_t
1557  |  HEADER.bucket_count    | uint32_t
1558  |  HEADER.hashes_count    | uint32_t
1559  |  HEADER.header_data_len | uint32_t
1560  |  HEADER_DATA            | HeaderData
1561  |-------------------------|
1562  |  BUCKETS                | uint32_t[n_buckets] // 32 bit hash indexes
1563  |-------------------------|
1564  |  HASHES                 | uint32_t[n_hashes] // 32 bit hash values
1565  |-------------------------|
1566  |  OFFSETS                | uint32_t[n_hashes] // 32 bit offsets to hash value data
1567  |-------------------------|
1568  |  ALL HASH DATA          |
1569  `-------------------------'
1570
1571So taking the exact same data from the standard hash example above we end up
1572with:
1573
1574.. code-block:: none
1575
1576              .------------.
1577              | HEADER     |
1578              |------------|
1579              |          0 | BUCKETS[0]
1580              |          2 | BUCKETS[1]
1581              |          5 | BUCKETS[2]
1582              |          6 | BUCKETS[3]
1583              |            | ...
1584              |        ... | BUCKETS[n_buckets]
1585              |------------|
1586              | 0x........ | HASHES[0]
1587              | 0x........ | HASHES[1]
1588              | 0x........ | HASHES[2]
1589              | 0x........ | HASHES[3]
1590              | 0x........ | HASHES[4]
1591              | 0x........ | HASHES[5]
1592              | 0x12345678 | HASHES[6]    hash for BUCKETS[3]
1593              | 0x29273623 | HASHES[7]    hash for BUCKETS[3]
1594              | 0x82638293 | HASHES[8]    hash for BUCKETS[3]
1595              | 0x........ | HASHES[9]
1596              | 0x........ | HASHES[10]
1597              | 0x........ | HASHES[11]
1598              | 0x........ | HASHES[12]
1599              | 0x........ | HASHES[13]
1600              | 0x........ | HASHES[n_hashes]
1601              |------------|
1602              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[0]
1603              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[1]
1604              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[2]
1605              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[3]
1606              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[4]
1607              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[5]
1608              | 0x000034f0 | OFFSETS[6]   offset for BUCKETS[3]
1609              | 0x00003500 | OFFSETS[7]   offset for BUCKETS[3]
1610              | 0x00003550 | OFFSETS[8]   offset for BUCKETS[3]
1611              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[9]
1612              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[10]
1613              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[11]
1614              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[12]
1615              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[13]
1616              | 0x........ | OFFSETS[n_hashes]
1617              |------------|
1618              |            |
1619              |            |
1620              |            |
1621              |            |
1622              |            |
1623              |------------|
1624  0x000034f0: | 0x00001203 | .debug_str ("erase")
1625              | 0x00000004 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "erase"
1626              | 0x........ | HashData[0]
1627              | 0x........ | HashData[1]
1628              | 0x........ | HashData[2]
1629              | 0x........ | HashData[3]
1630              | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash)
1631              |------------|
1632  0x00003500: | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("collision")
1633              | 0x00000002 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "collision"
1634              | 0x........ | HashData[0]
1635              | 0x........ | HashData[1]
1636              | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("dump")
1637              | 0x00000003 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "dump"
1638              | 0x........ | HashData[0]
1639              | 0x........ | HashData[1]
1640              | 0x........ | HashData[2]
1641              | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash)
1642              |------------|
1643  0x00003550: | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("main")
1644              | 0x00000009 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "main"
1645              | 0x........ | HashData[0]
1646              | 0x........ | HashData[1]
1647              | 0x........ | HashData[2]
1648              | 0x........ | HashData[3]
1649              | 0x........ | HashData[4]
1650              | 0x........ | HashData[5]
1651              | 0x........ | HashData[6]
1652              | 0x........ | HashData[7]
1653              | 0x........ | HashData[8]
1654              | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash)
1655              `------------'
1656
1657So we still have all of the same data, we just organize it more efficiently for
1658debugger lookup.  If we repeat the same "``printf``" lookup from above, we
1659would hash "``printf``" and find it matches ``BUCKETS[3]`` by taking the 32 bit
1660hash value and modulo it by ``n_buckets``.  ``BUCKETS[3]`` contains "6" which
1661is the index into the ``HASHES`` table.  We would then compare any consecutive
166232 bit hashes values in the ``HASHES`` array as long as the hashes would be in
1663``BUCKETS[3]``.  We do this by verifying that each subsequent hash value modulo
1664``n_buckets`` is still 3.  In the case of a failed lookup we would access the
1665memory for ``BUCKETS[3]``, and then compare a few consecutive 32 bit hashes
1666before we know that we have no match.  We don't end up marching through
1667multiple words of memory and we really keep the number of processor data cache
1668lines being accessed as small as possible.
1669
1670The string hash that is used for these lookup tables is the Daniel J.
1671Bernstein hash which is also used in the ELF ``GNU_HASH`` sections.  It is a
1672very good hash for all kinds of names in programs with very few hash
1673collisions.
1674
1675Empty buckets are designated by using an invalid hash index of ``UINT32_MAX``.
1676
1677Details
1678^^^^^^^
1679
1680These name hash tables are designed to be generic where specializations of the
1681table get to define additional data that goes into the header ("``HeaderData``"),
1682how the string value is stored ("``KeyType``") and the content of the data for each
1683hash value.
1684
1685Header Layout
1686"""""""""""""
1687
1688The header has a fixed part, and the specialized part.  The exact format of the
1689header is:
1690
1691.. code-block:: c
1692
1693  struct Header
1694  {
1695    uint32_t   magic;           // 'HASH' magic value to allow endian detection
1696    uint16_t   version;         // Version number
1697    uint16_t   hash_function;   // The hash function enumeration that was used
1698    uint32_t   bucket_count;    // The number of buckets in this hash table
1699    uint32_t   hashes_count;    // The total number of unique hash values and hash data offsets in this table
1700    uint32_t   header_data_len; // The bytes to skip to get to the hash indexes (buckets) for correct alignment
1701                                // Specifically the length of the following HeaderData field - this does not
1702                                // include the size of the preceding fields
1703    HeaderData header_data;     // Implementation specific header data
1704  };
1705
1706The header starts with a 32 bit "``magic``" value which must be ``'HASH'``
1707encoded as an ASCII integer.  This allows the detection of the start of the
1708hash table and also allows the table's byte order to be determined so the table
1709can be correctly extracted.  The "``magic``" value is followed by a 16 bit
1710``version`` number which allows the table to be revised and modified in the
1711future.  The current version number is 1. ``hash_function`` is a ``uint16_t``
1712enumeration that specifies which hash function was used to produce this table.
1713The current values for the hash function enumerations include:
1714
1715.. code-block:: c
1716
1717  enum HashFunctionType
1718  {
1719    eHashFunctionDJB = 0u, // Daniel J Bernstein hash function
1720  };
1721
1722``bucket_count`` is a 32 bit unsigned integer that represents how many buckets
1723are in the ``BUCKETS`` array.  ``hashes_count`` is the number of unique 32 bit
1724hash values that are in the ``HASHES`` array, and is the same number of offsets
1725are contained in the ``OFFSETS`` array.  ``header_data_len`` specifies the size
1726in bytes of the ``HeaderData`` that is filled in by specialized versions of
1727this table.
1728
1729Fixed Lookup
1730""""""""""""
1731
1732The header is followed by the buckets, hashes, offsets, and hash value data.
1733
1734.. code-block:: c
1735
1736  struct FixedTable
1737  {
1738    uint32_t buckets[Header.bucket_count];  // An array of hash indexes into the "hashes[]" array below
1739    uint32_t hashes [Header.hashes_count];  // Every unique 32 bit hash for the entire table is in this table
1740    uint32_t offsets[Header.hashes_count];  // An offset that corresponds to each item in the "hashes[]" array above
1741  };
1742
1743``buckets`` is an array of 32 bit indexes into the ``hashes`` array.  The
1744``hashes`` array contains all of the 32 bit hash values for all names in the
1745hash table.  Each hash in the ``hashes`` table has an offset in the ``offsets``
1746array that points to the data for the hash value.
1747
1748This table setup makes it very easy to repurpose these tables to contain
1749different data, while keeping the lookup mechanism the same for all tables.
1750This layout also makes it possible to save the table to disk and map it in
1751later and do very efficient name lookups with little or no parsing.
1752
1753DWARF lookup tables can be implemented in a variety of ways and can store a lot
1754of information for each name.  We want to make the DWARF tables extensible and
1755able to store the data efficiently so we have used some of the DWARF features
1756that enable efficient data storage to define exactly what kind of data we store
1757for each name.
1758
1759The ``HeaderData`` contains a definition of the contents of each HashData chunk.
1760We might want to store an offset to all of the debug information entries (DIEs)
1761for each name.  To keep things extensible, we create a list of items, or
1762Atoms, that are contained in the data for each name.  First comes the type of
1763the data in each atom:
1764
1765.. code-block:: c
1766
1767  enum AtomType
1768  {
1769    eAtomTypeNULL       = 0u,
1770    eAtomTypeDIEOffset  = 1u,   // DIE offset, check form for encoding
1771    eAtomTypeCUOffset   = 2u,   // DIE offset of the compiler unit header that contains the item in question
1772    eAtomTypeTag        = 3u,   // DW_TAG_xxx value, should be encoded as DW_FORM_data1 (if no tags exceed 255) or DW_FORM_data2
1773    eAtomTypeNameFlags  = 4u,   // Flags from enum NameFlags
1774    eAtomTypeTypeFlags  = 5u,   // Flags from enum TypeFlags
1775  };
1776
1777The enumeration values and their meanings are:
1778
1779.. code-block:: none
1780
1781  eAtomTypeNULL       - a termination atom that specifies the end of the atom list
1782  eAtomTypeDIEOffset  - an offset into the .debug_info section for the DWARF DIE for this name
1783  eAtomTypeCUOffset   - an offset into the .debug_info section for the CU that contains the DIE
1784  eAtomTypeDIETag     - The DW_TAG_XXX enumeration value so you don't have to parse the DWARF to see what it is
1785  eAtomTypeNameFlags  - Flags for functions and global variables (isFunction, isInlined, isExternal...)
1786  eAtomTypeTypeFlags  - Flags for types (isCXXClass, isObjCClass, ...)
1787
1788Then we allow each atom type to define the atom type and how the data for each
1789atom type data is encoded:
1790
1791.. code-block:: c
1792
1793  struct Atom
1794  {
1795    uint16_t type;  // AtomType enum value
1796    uint16_t form;  // DWARF DW_FORM_XXX defines
1797  };
1798
1799The ``form`` type above is from the DWARF specification and defines the exact
1800encoding of the data for the Atom type.  See the DWARF specification for the
1801``DW_FORM_`` definitions.
1802
1803.. code-block:: c
1804
1805  struct HeaderData
1806  {
1807    uint32_t die_offset_base;
1808    uint32_t atom_count;
1809    Atoms    atoms[atom_count0];
1810  };
1811
1812``HeaderData`` defines the base DIE offset that should be added to any atoms
1813that are encoded using the ``DW_FORM_ref1``, ``DW_FORM_ref2``,
1814``DW_FORM_ref4``, ``DW_FORM_ref8`` or ``DW_FORM_ref_udata``.  It also defines
1815what is contained in each ``HashData`` object -- ``Atom.form`` tells us how large
1816each field will be in the ``HashData`` and the ``Atom.type`` tells us how this data
1817should be interpreted.
1818
1819For the current implementations of the "``.apple_names``" (all functions +
1820globals), the "``.apple_types``" (names of all types that are defined), and
1821the "``.apple_namespaces``" (all namespaces), we currently set the ``Atom``
1822array to be:
1823
1824.. code-block:: c
1825
1826  HeaderData.atom_count = 1;
1827  HeaderData.atoms[0].type = eAtomTypeDIEOffset;
1828  HeaderData.atoms[0].form = DW_FORM_data4;
1829
1830This defines the contents to be the DIE offset (eAtomTypeDIEOffset) that is
1831encoded as a 32 bit value (DW_FORM_data4).  This allows a single name to have
1832multiple matching DIEs in a single file, which could come up with an inlined
1833function for instance.  Future tables could include more information about the
1834DIE such as flags indicating if the DIE is a function, method, block,
1835or inlined.
1836
1837The KeyType for the DWARF table is a 32 bit string table offset into the
1838".debug_str" table.  The ".debug_str" is the string table for the DWARF which
1839may already contain copies of all of the strings.  This helps make sure, with
1840help from the compiler, that we reuse the strings between all of the DWARF
1841sections and keeps the hash table size down.  Another benefit to having the
1842compiler generate all strings as DW_FORM_strp in the debug info, is that
1843DWARF parsing can be made much faster.
1844
1845After a lookup is made, we get an offset into the hash data.  The hash data
1846needs to be able to deal with 32 bit hash collisions, so the chunk of data
1847at the offset in the hash data consists of a triple:
1848
1849.. code-block:: c
1850
1851  uint32_t str_offset
1852  uint32_t hash_data_count
1853  HashData[hash_data_count]
1854
1855If "str_offset" is zero, then the bucket contents are done. 99.9% of the
1856hash data chunks contain a single item (no 32 bit hash collision):
1857
1858.. code-block:: none
1859
1860  .------------.
1861  | 0x00001023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0001023] => "main")
1862  | 0x00000004 | uint32_t HashData count
1863  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset
1864  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset
1865  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[2] DIE offset
1866  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[3] DIE offset
1867  | 0x00000000 | uint32_t KeyType (end of hash chain)
1868  `------------'
1869
1870If there are collisions, you will have multiple valid string offsets:
1871
1872.. code-block:: none
1873
1874  .------------.
1875  | 0x00001023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0001023] => "main")
1876  | 0x00000004 | uint32_t HashData count
1877  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset
1878  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset
1879  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[2] DIE offset
1880  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[3] DIE offset
1881  | 0x00002023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0002023] => "print")
1882  | 0x00000002 | uint32_t HashData count
1883  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset
1884  | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset
1885  | 0x00000000 | uint32_t KeyType (end of hash chain)
1886  `------------'
1887
1888Current testing with real world C++ binaries has shown that there is around 1
188932 bit hash collision per 100,000 name entries.
1890
1891Contents
1892^^^^^^^^
1893
1894As we said, we want to strictly define exactly what is included in the
1895different tables.  For DWARF, we have 3 tables: "``.apple_names``",
1896"``.apple_types``", and "``.apple_namespaces``".
1897
1898"``.apple_names``" sections should contain an entry for each DWARF DIE whose
1899``DW_TAG`` is a ``DW_TAG_label``, ``DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine``, or
1900``DW_TAG_subprogram`` that has address attributes: ``DW_AT_low_pc``,
1901``DW_AT_high_pc``, ``DW_AT_ranges`` or ``DW_AT_entry_pc``.  It also contains
1902``DW_TAG_variable`` DIEs that have a ``DW_OP_addr`` in the location (global and
1903static variables).  All global and static variables should be included,
1904including those scoped within functions and classes.  For example using the
1905following code:
1906
1907.. code-block:: c
1908
1909  static int var = 0;
1910
1911  void f ()
1912  {
1913    static int var = 0;
1914  }
1915
1916Both of the static ``var`` variables would be included in the table.  All
1917functions should emit both their full names and their basenames.  For C or C++,
1918the full name is the mangled name (if available) which is usually in the
1919``DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name`` attribute, and the ``DW_AT_name`` contains the
1920function basename.  If global or static variables have a mangled name in a
1921``DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name`` attribute, this should be emitted along with the
1922simple name found in the ``DW_AT_name`` attribute.
1923
1924"``.apple_types``" sections should contain an entry for each DWARF DIE whose
1925tag is one of:
1926
1927* DW_TAG_array_type
1928* DW_TAG_class_type
1929* DW_TAG_enumeration_type
1930* DW_TAG_pointer_type
1931* DW_TAG_reference_type
1932* DW_TAG_string_type
1933* DW_TAG_structure_type
1934* DW_TAG_subroutine_type
1935* DW_TAG_typedef
1936* DW_TAG_union_type
1937* DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type
1938* DW_TAG_set_type
1939* DW_TAG_subrange_type
1940* DW_TAG_base_type
1941* DW_TAG_const_type
1942* DW_TAG_immutable_type
1943* DW_TAG_file_type
1944* DW_TAG_namelist
1945* DW_TAG_packed_type
1946* DW_TAG_volatile_type
1947* DW_TAG_restrict_type
1948* DW_TAG_atomic_type
1949* DW_TAG_interface_type
1950* DW_TAG_unspecified_type
1951* DW_TAG_shared_type
1952
1953Only entries with a ``DW_AT_name`` attribute are included, and the entry must
1954not be a forward declaration (``DW_AT_declaration`` attribute with a non-zero
1955value).  For example, using the following code:
1956
1957.. code-block:: c
1958
1959  int main ()
1960  {
1961    int *b = 0;
1962    return *b;
1963  }
1964
1965We get a few type DIEs:
1966
1967.. code-block:: none
1968
1969  0x00000067:     TAG_base_type [5]
1970                  AT_encoding( DW_ATE_signed )
1971                  AT_name( "int" )
1972                  AT_byte_size( 0x04 )
1973
1974  0x0000006e:     TAG_pointer_type [6]
1975                  AT_type( {0x00000067} ( int ) )
1976                  AT_byte_size( 0x08 )
1977
1978The DW_TAG_pointer_type is not included because it does not have a ``DW_AT_name``.
1979
1980"``.apple_namespaces``" section should contain all ``DW_TAG_namespace`` DIEs.
1981If we run into a namespace that has no name this is an anonymous namespace, and
1982the name should be output as "``(anonymous namespace)``" (without the quotes).
1983Why?  This matches the output of the ``abi::cxa_demangle()`` that is in the
1984standard C++ library that demangles mangled names.
1985
1986
1987Language Extensions and File Format Changes
1988^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1989
1990Objective-C Extensions
1991""""""""""""""""""""""
1992
1993"``.apple_objc``" section should contain all ``DW_TAG_subprogram`` DIEs for an
1994Objective-C class.  The name used in the hash table is the name of the
1995Objective-C class itself.  If the Objective-C class has a category, then an
1996entry is made for both the class name without the category, and for the class
1997name with the category.  So if we have a DIE at offset 0x1234 with a name of
1998method "``-[NSString(my_additions) stringWithSpecialString:]``", we would add
1999an entry for "``NSString``" that points to DIE 0x1234, and an entry for
2000"``NSString(my_additions)``" that points to 0x1234.  This allows us to quickly
2001track down all Objective-C methods for an Objective-C class when doing
2002expressions.  It is needed because of the dynamic nature of Objective-C where
2003anyone can add methods to a class.  The DWARF for Objective-C methods is also
2004emitted differently from C++ classes where the methods are not usually
2005contained in the class definition, they are scattered about across one or more
2006compile units.  Categories can also be defined in different shared libraries.
2007So we need to be able to quickly find all of the methods and class functions
2008given the Objective-C class name, or quickly find all methods and class
2009functions for a class + category name.  This table does not contain any
2010selector names, it just maps Objective-C class names (or class names +
2011category) to all of the methods and class functions.  The selectors are added
2012as function basenames in the "``.debug_names``" section.
2013
2014In the "``.apple_names``" section for Objective-C functions, the full name is
2015the entire function name with the brackets ("``-[NSString
2016stringWithCString:]``") and the basename is the selector only
2017("``stringWithCString:``").
2018
2019Mach-O Changes
2020""""""""""""""
2021
2022The sections names for the apple hash tables are for non-mach-o files.  For
2023mach-o files, the sections should be contained in the ``__DWARF`` segment with
2024names as follows:
2025
2026* "``.apple_names``" -> "``__apple_names``"
2027* "``.apple_types``" -> "``__apple_types``"
2028* "``.apple_namespaces``" -> "``__apple_namespac``" (16 character limit)
2029* "``.apple_objc``" -> "``__apple_objc``"
2030
2031.. _codeview:
2032
2033CodeView Debug Info Format
2034==========================
2035
2036LLVM supports emitting CodeView, the Microsoft debug info format, and this
2037section describes the design and implementation of that support.
2038
2039Format Background
2040-----------------
2041
2042CodeView as a format is clearly oriented around C++ debugging, and in C++, the
2043majority of debug information tends to be type information. Therefore, the
2044overriding design constraint of CodeView is the separation of type information
2045from other "symbol" information so that type information can be efficiently
2046merged across translation units. Both type information and symbol information is
2047generally stored as a sequence of records, where each record begins with a
204816-bit record size and a 16-bit record kind.
2049
2050Type information is usually stored in the ``.debug$T`` section of the object
2051file.  All other debug info, such as line info, string table, symbol info, and
2052inlinee info, is stored in one or more ``.debug$S`` sections. There may only be
2053one ``.debug$T`` section per object file, since all other debug info refers to
2054it. If a PDB (enabled by the ``/Zi`` MSVC option) was used during compilation,
2055the ``.debug$T`` section will contain only an ``LF_TYPESERVER2`` record pointing
2056to the PDB. When using PDBs, symbol information appears to remain in the object
2057file ``.debug$S`` sections.
2058
2059Type records are referred to by their index, which is the number of records in
2060the stream before a given record plus ``0x1000``. Many common basic types, such
2061as the basic integral types and unqualified pointers to them, are represented
2062using type indices less than ``0x1000``. Such basic types are built in to
2063CodeView consumers and do not require type records.
2064
2065Each type record may only contain type indices that are less than its own type
2066index. This ensures that the graph of type stream references is acyclic. While
2067the source-level type graph may contain cycles through pointer types (consider a
2068linked list struct), these cycles are removed from the type stream by always
2069referring to the forward declaration record of user-defined record types. Only
2070"symbol" records in the ``.debug$S`` streams may refer to complete,
2071non-forward-declaration type records.
2072
2073Working with CodeView
2074---------------------
2075
2076These are instructions for some common tasks for developers working to improve
2077LLVM's CodeView support. Most of them revolve around using the CodeView dumper
2078embedded in ``llvm-readobj``.
2079
2080* Testing MSVC's output::
2081
2082    $ cl -c -Z7 foo.cpp # Use /Z7 to keep types in the object file
2083    $ llvm-readobj --codeview foo.obj
2084
2085* Getting LLVM IR debug info out of Clang::
2086
2087    $ clang -g -gcodeview --target=x86_64-windows-msvc foo.cpp -S -emit-llvm
2088
2089  Use this to generate LLVM IR for LLVM test cases.
2090
2091* Generate and dump CodeView from LLVM IR metadata::
2092
2093    $ llc foo.ll -filetype=obj -o foo.obj
2094    $ llvm-readobj --codeview foo.obj > foo.txt
2095
2096  Use this pattern in lit test cases and FileCheck the output of llvm-readobj
2097
2098Improving LLVM's CodeView support is a process of finding interesting type
2099records, constructing a C++ test case that makes MSVC emit those records,
2100dumping the records, understanding them, and then generating equivalent records
2101in LLVM's backend.
2102