1================================ 2Source Level Debugging with LLVM 3================================ 4 5.. contents:: 6 :local: 7 8Introduction 9============ 10 11This document is the central repository for all information pertaining to debug 12information in LLVM. It describes the :ref:`actual format that the LLVM debug 13information takes <format>`, which is useful for those interested in creating 14front-ends or dealing directly with the information. Further, this document 15provides specific examples of what debug information for C/C++ looks like. 16 17Philosophy behind LLVM debugging information 18-------------------------------------------- 19 20The idea of the LLVM debugging information is to capture how the important 21pieces of the source-language's Abstract Syntax Tree map onto LLVM code. 22Several design aspects have shaped the solution that appears here. The 23important ones are: 24 25* Debugging information should have very little impact on the rest of the 26 compiler. No transformations, analyses, or code generators should need to 27 be modified because of debugging information. 28 29* LLVM optimizations should interact in :ref:`well-defined and easily described 30 ways <intro_debugopt>` with the debugging information. 31 32* Because LLVM is designed to support arbitrary programming languages, 33 LLVM-to-LLVM tools should not need to know anything about the semantics of 34 the source-level-language. 35 36* Source-level languages are often **widely** different from one another. 37 LLVM should not put any restrictions of the flavor of the source-language, 38 and the debugging information should work with any language. 39 40* With code generator support, it should be possible to use an LLVM compiler 41 to compile a program to native machine code and standard debugging 42 formats. This allows compatibility with traditional machine-code level 43 debuggers, like GDB or DBX. 44 45The approach used by the LLVM implementation is to use a small set of 46:ref:`intrinsic functions <format_common_intrinsics>` to define a mapping 47between LLVM program objects and the source-level objects. The description of 48the source-level program is maintained in LLVM metadata in an 49:ref:`implementation-defined format <ccxx_frontend>` (the C/C++ front-end 50currently uses working draft 7 of the `DWARF 3 standard 51<http://www.eagercon.com/dwarf/dwarf3std.htm>`_). 52 53When a program is being debugged, a debugger interacts with the user and turns 54the stored debug information into source-language specific information. As 55such, a debugger must be aware of the source-language, and is thus tied to a 56specific language or family of languages. 57 58Debug information consumers 59--------------------------- 60 61The role of debug information is to provide meta information normally stripped 62away during the compilation process. This meta information provides an LLVM 63user a relationship between generated code and the original program source 64code. 65 66Currently, there are two backend consumers of debug info: DwarfDebug and 67CodeViewDebug. DwarfDebug produces DWARF suitable for use with GDB, LLDB, and 68other DWARF-based debuggers. :ref:`CodeViewDebug <codeview>` produces CodeView, 69the Microsoft debug info format, which is usable with Microsoft debuggers such 70as Visual Studio and WinDBG. LLVM's debug information format is mostly derived 71from and inspired by DWARF, but it is feasible to translate into other target 72debug info formats such as STABS. 73 74It would also be reasonable to use debug information to feed profiling tools 75for analysis of generated code, or, tools for reconstructing the original 76source from generated code. 77 78.. _intro_debugopt: 79 80Debug information and optimizations 81----------------------------------- 82 83An extremely high priority of LLVM debugging information is to make it interact 84well with optimizations and analysis. In particular, the LLVM debug 85information provides the following guarantees: 86 87* LLVM debug information **always provides information to accurately read 88 the source-level state of the program**, regardless of which LLVM 89 optimizations have been run. :doc:`HowToUpdateDebugInfo` specifies how debug 90 info should be updated in various kinds of code transformations to avoid 91 breaking this guarantee, and how to preserve as much useful debug info as 92 possible. Note that some optimizations may impact the ability to modify the 93 current state of the program with a debugger, such as setting program 94 variables, or calling functions that have been deleted. 95 96* As desired, LLVM optimizations can be upgraded to be aware of debugging 97 information, allowing them to update the debugging information as they 98 perform aggressive optimizations. This means that, with effort, the LLVM 99 optimizers could optimize debug code just as well as non-debug code. 100 101* LLVM debug information does not prevent optimizations from 102 happening (for example inlining, basic block reordering/merging/cleanup, 103 tail duplication, etc). 104 105* LLVM debug information is automatically optimized along with the rest of 106 the program, using existing facilities. For example, duplicate 107 information is automatically merged by the linker, and unused information 108 is automatically removed. 109 110Basically, the debug information allows you to compile a program with 111"``-O0 -g``" and get full debug information, allowing you to arbitrarily modify 112the program as it executes from a debugger. Compiling a program with 113"``-O3 -g``" gives you full debug information that is always available and 114accurate for reading (e.g., you get accurate stack traces despite tail call 115elimination and inlining), but you might lose the ability to modify the program 116and call functions which were optimized out of the program, or inlined away 117completely. 118 119The :doc:`LLVM test-suite <TestSuiteMakefileGuide>` provides a framework to 120test the optimizer's handling of debugging information. It can be run like 121this: 122 123.. code-block:: bash 124 125 % cd llvm/projects/test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks # or some other level 126 % make TEST=dbgopt 127 128This will test impact of debugging information on optimization passes. If 129debugging information influences optimization passes then it will be reported 130as a failure. See :doc:`TestingGuide` for more information on LLVM test 131infrastructure and how to run various tests. 132 133.. _format: 134 135Debugging information format 136============================ 137 138LLVM debugging information has been carefully designed to make it possible for 139the optimizer to optimize the program and debugging information without 140necessarily having to know anything about debugging information. In 141particular, the use of metadata avoids duplicated debugging information from 142the beginning, and the global dead code elimination pass automatically deletes 143debugging information for a function if it decides to delete the function. 144 145To do this, most of the debugging information (descriptors for types, 146variables, functions, source files, etc) is inserted by the language front-end 147in the form of LLVM metadata. 148 149Debug information is designed to be agnostic about the target debugger and 150debugging information representation (e.g. DWARF/Stabs/etc). It uses a generic 151pass to decode the information that represents variables, types, functions, 152namespaces, etc: this allows for arbitrary source-language semantics and 153type-systems to be used, as long as there is a module written for the target 154debugger to interpret the information. 155 156To provide basic functionality, the LLVM debugger does have to make some 157assumptions about the source-level language being debugged, though it keeps 158these to a minimum. The only common features that the LLVM debugger assumes 159exist are `source files <LangRef.html#difile>`_, and `program objects 160<LangRef.html#diglobalvariable>`_. These abstract objects are used by a 161debugger to form stack traces, show information about local variables, etc. 162 163This section of the documentation first describes the representation aspects 164common to any source-language. :ref:`ccxx_frontend` describes the data layout 165conventions used by the C and C++ front-ends. 166 167Debug information descriptors are `specialized metadata nodes 168<LangRef.html#specialized-metadata>`_, first-class subclasses of ``Metadata``. 169 170.. _format_common_intrinsics: 171 172Debugger intrinsic functions 173---------------------------- 174 175LLVM uses several intrinsic functions (name prefixed with "``llvm.dbg``") to 176track source local variables through optimization and code generation. 177 178``llvm.dbg.addr`` 179^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 180 181.. code-block:: llvm 182 183 void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata, metadata, metadata) 184 185This intrinsic provides information about a local element (e.g., variable). 186The first argument is metadata holding the address of variable, typically a 187static alloca in the function entry block. The second argument is a 188`local variable <LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_ containing a description of 189the variable. The third argument is a `complex expression 190<LangRef.html#diexpression>`_. An `llvm.dbg.addr` intrinsic describes the 191*address* of a source variable. 192 193.. code-block:: text 194 195 %i.addr = alloca i32, align 4 196 call void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata i32* %i.addr, metadata !1, 197 metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !2 198 !1 = !DILocalVariable(name: "i", ...) ; int i 199 !2 = !DILocation(...) 200 ... 201 %buffer = alloca [256 x i8], align 8 202 ; The address of i is buffer+64. 203 call void @llvm.dbg.addr(metadata [256 x i8]* %buffer, metadata !3, 204 metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus, 64)), !dbg !4 205 !3 = !DILocalVariable(name: "i", ...) ; int i 206 !4 = !DILocation(...) 207 208A frontend should generate exactly one call to ``llvm.dbg.addr`` at the point 209of declaration of a source variable. Optimization passes that fully promote the 210variable from memory to SSA values will replace this call with possibly 211multiple calls to `llvm.dbg.value`. Passes that delete stores are effectively 212partial promotion, and they will insert a mix of calls to ``llvm.dbg.value`` 213and ``llvm.dbg.addr`` to track the source variable value when it is available. 214After optimization, there may be multiple calls to ``llvm.dbg.addr`` describing 215the program points where the variables lives in memory. All calls for the same 216concrete source variable must agree on the memory location. 217 218 219``llvm.dbg.declare`` 220^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 221 222.. code-block:: llvm 223 224 void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata, metadata, metadata) 225 226This intrinsic is identical to `llvm.dbg.addr`, except that there can only be 227one call to `llvm.dbg.declare` for a given concrete `local variable 228<LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_. It is not control-dependent, meaning that if 229a call to `llvm.dbg.declare` exists and has a valid location argument, that 230address is considered to be the true home of the variable across its entire 231lifetime. This makes it hard for optimizations to preserve accurate debug info 232in the presence of ``llvm.dbg.declare``, so we are transitioning away from it, 233and we plan to deprecate it in future LLVM releases. 234 235 236``llvm.dbg.value`` 237^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 238 239.. code-block:: llvm 240 241 void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata, metadata, metadata) 242 243This intrinsic provides information when a user source variable is set to a new 244value. The first argument is the new value (wrapped as metadata). The second 245argument is a `local variable <LangRef.html#dilocalvariable>`_ containing a 246description of the variable. The third argument is a `complex expression 247<LangRef.html#diexpression>`_. 248 249An `llvm.dbg.value` intrinsic describes the *value* of a source variable 250directly, not its address. Note that the value operand of this intrinsic may 251be indirect (i.e, a pointer to the source variable), provided that interpreting 252the complex expression derives the direct value. 253 254``llvm.dbg.assign`` 255^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 256.. toctree:: 257 :hidden: 258 259 AssignmentTracking 260 261.. code-block:: llvm 262 263 void @llvm.dbg.assign(Value *Value, 264 DIExpression *ValueExpression, 265 DILocalVariable *Variable, 266 DIAssignID *ID, 267 Value *Address, 268 DIExpression *AddressExpression) 269 270This intrinsic marks the position in IR where a source assignment occured. It 271encodes the value of the variable. It references the store, if any, that 272performs the assignment, and the destination address. 273 274The first three arguments are the same as for an ``llvm.dbg.value``. The fourth 275argument is a ``DIAssignID`` used to reference a store. The fifth is the 276destination of the store (wrapped as metadata), and the sixth is a `complex 277expression <LangRef.html#diexpression>`_ that modfies it. 278 279The formal LLVM-IR signature is: 280 281.. code-block:: llvm 282 283 void @llvm.dbg.assign(metadata, metadata, metadata, metadata, metadata, metadata) 284 285 286See :doc:`AssignmentTracking` for more info. 287 288Object lifetimes and scoping 289============================ 290 291In many languages, the local variables in functions can have their lifetimes or 292scopes limited to a subset of a function. In the C family of languages, for 293example, variables are only live (readable and writable) within the source 294block that they are defined in. In functional languages, values are only 295readable after they have been defined. Though this is a very obvious concept, 296it is non-trivial to model in LLVM, because it has no notion of scoping in this 297sense, and does not want to be tied to a language's scoping rules. 298 299In order to handle this, the LLVM debug format uses the metadata attached to 300llvm instructions to encode line number and scoping information. Consider the 301following C fragment, for example: 302 303.. code-block:: c 304 305 1. void foo() { 306 2. int X = 21; 307 3. int Y = 22; 308 4. { 309 5. int Z = 23; 310 6. Z = X; 311 7. } 312 8. X = Y; 313 9. } 314 315.. FIXME: Update the following example to use llvm.dbg.addr once that is the 316 default in clang. 317 318Compiled to LLVM, this function would be represented like this: 319 320.. code-block:: text 321 322 ; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable 323 define void @foo() #0 !dbg !4 { 324 entry: 325 %X = alloca i32, align 4 326 %Y = alloca i32, align 4 327 %Z = alloca i32, align 4 328 call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %X, metadata !11, metadata !13), !dbg !14 329 store i32 21, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !14 330 call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Y, metadata !15, metadata !13), !dbg !16 331 store i32 22, i32* %Y, align 4, !dbg !16 332 call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Z, metadata !17, metadata !13), !dbg !19 333 store i32 23, i32* %Z, align 4, !dbg !19 334 %0 = load i32, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !20 335 store i32 %0, i32* %Z, align 4, !dbg !21 336 %1 = load i32, i32* %Y, align 4, !dbg !22 337 store i32 %1, i32* %X, align 4, !dbg !23 338 ret void, !dbg !24 339 } 340 341 ; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone 342 declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata, metadata, metadata) #1 343 344 attributes #0 = { nounwind ssp uwtable "less-precise-fpmad"="false" "frame-pointer"="all" "no-infs-fp-math"="false" "no-nans-fp-math"="false" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "unsafe-fp-math"="false" "use-soft-float"="false" } 345 attributes #1 = { nounwind readnone } 346 347 !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0} 348 !llvm.module.flags = !{!7, !8, !9} 349 !llvm.ident = !{!10} 350 351 !0 = !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !1, producer: "clang version 3.7.0 (trunk 231150) (llvm/trunk 231154)", isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, enums: !2, retainedTypes: !2, subprograms: !3, globals: !2, imports: !2) 352 !1 = !DIFile(filename: "/dev/stdin", directory: "/Users/dexonsmith/data/llvm/debug-info") 353 !2 = !{} 354 !3 = !{!4} 355 !4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, isOptimized: false, retainedNodes: !2) 356 !5 = !DISubroutineType(types: !6) 357 !6 = !{null} 358 !7 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 2} 359 !8 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3} 360 !9 = !{i32 1, !"PIC Level", i32 2} 361 !10 = !{!"clang version 3.7.0 (trunk 231150) (llvm/trunk 231154)"} 362 !11 = !DILocalVariable(name: "X", scope: !4, file: !1, line: 2, type: !12) 363 !12 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, align: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed) 364 !13 = !DIExpression() 365 !14 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 9, scope: !4) 366 !15 = !DILocalVariable(name: "Y", scope: !4, file: !1, line: 3, type: !12) 367 !16 = !DILocation(line: 3, column: 9, scope: !4) 368 !17 = !DILocalVariable(name: "Z", scope: !18, file: !1, line: 5, type: !12) 369 !18 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !4, file: !1, line: 4, column: 5) 370 !19 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 11, scope: !18) 371 !20 = !DILocation(line: 6, column: 11, scope: !18) 372 !21 = !DILocation(line: 6, column: 9, scope: !18) 373 !22 = !DILocation(line: 8, column: 9, scope: !4) 374 !23 = !DILocation(line: 8, column: 7, scope: !4) 375 !24 = !DILocation(line: 9, column: 3, scope: !4) 376 377 378This example illustrates a few important details about LLVM debugging 379information. In particular, it shows how the ``llvm.dbg.declare`` intrinsic and 380location information, which are attached to an instruction, are applied 381together to allow a debugger to analyze the relationship between statements, 382variable definitions, and the code used to implement the function. 383 384.. code-block:: llvm 385 386 call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %X, metadata !11, metadata !13), !dbg !14 387 ; [debug line = 2:7] [debug variable = X] 388 389The first intrinsic ``%llvm.dbg.declare`` encodes debugging information for the 390variable ``X``. The metadata ``!dbg !14`` attached to the intrinsic provides 391scope information for the variable ``X``. 392 393.. code-block:: text 394 395 !14 = !DILocation(line: 2, column: 9, scope: !4) 396 !4 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5, 397 isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, 398 isOptimized: false, retainedNodes: !2) 399 400Here ``!14`` is metadata providing `location information 401<LangRef.html#dilocation>`_. In this example, scope is encoded by ``!4``, a 402`subprogram descriptor <LangRef.html#disubprogram>`_. This way the location 403information attached to the intrinsics indicates that the variable ``X`` is 404declared at line number 2 at a function level scope in function ``foo``. 405 406Now lets take another example. 407 408.. code-block:: llvm 409 410 call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %Z, metadata !17, metadata !13), !dbg !19 411 ; [debug line = 5:9] [debug variable = Z] 412 413The third intrinsic ``%llvm.dbg.declare`` encodes debugging information for 414variable ``Z``. The metadata ``!dbg !19`` attached to the intrinsic provides 415scope information for the variable ``Z``. 416 417.. code-block:: text 418 419 !18 = distinct !DILexicalBlock(scope: !4, file: !1, line: 4, column: 5) 420 !19 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 11, scope: !18) 421 422Here ``!19`` indicates that ``Z`` is declared at line number 5 and column 423number 11 inside of lexical scope ``!18``. The lexical scope itself resides 424inside of subprogram ``!4`` described above. 425 426The scope information attached with each instruction provides a straightforward 427way to find instructions covered by a scope. 428 429Object lifetime in optimized code 430================================= 431 432In the example above, every variable assignment uniquely corresponds to a 433memory store to the variable's position on the stack. However in heavily 434optimized code LLVM promotes most variables into SSA values, which can 435eventually be placed in physical registers or memory locations. To track SSA 436values through compilation, when objects are promoted to SSA values an 437``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsic is created for each assignment, recording the 438variable's new location. Compared with the ``llvm.dbg.declare`` intrinsic: 439 440* A dbg.value terminates the effect of any preceding dbg.values for (any 441 overlapping fragments of) the specified variable. 442* The dbg.value's position in the IR defines where in the instruction stream 443 the variable's value changes. 444* Operands can be constants, indicating the variable is assigned a 445 constant value. 446 447Care must be taken to update ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics when optimization 448passes alter or move instructions and blocks -- the developer could observe such 449changes reflected in the value of variables when debugging the program. For any 450execution of the optimized program, the set of variable values presented to the 451developer by the debugger should not show a state that would never have existed 452in the execution of the unoptimized program, given the same input. Doing so 453risks misleading the developer by reporting a state that does not exist, 454damaging their understanding of the optimized program and undermining their 455trust in the debugger. 456 457Sometimes perfectly preserving variable locations is not possible, often when a 458redundant calculation is optimized out. In such cases, a ``llvm.dbg.value`` 459with operand ``undef`` should be used, to terminate earlier variable locations 460and let the debugger present ``optimized out`` to the developer. Withholding 461these potentially stale variable values from the developer diminishes the 462amount of available debug information, but increases the reliability of the 463remaining information. 464 465To illustrate some potential issues, consider the following example: 466 467.. code-block:: llvm 468 469 define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) { 470 entry: 471 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2) 472 br i1 %cond, label %truebr, label %falsebr 473 truebr: 474 %tval = add i32 %bar, 1 475 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %tval, metadata !1, metadata !2) 476 %g1 = call i32 @gazonk() 477 br label %exit 478 falsebr: 479 %fval = add i32 %bar, 2 480 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %fval, metadata !1, metadata !2) 481 %g2 = call i32 @gazonk() 482 br label %exit 483 exit: 484 %merge = phi [ %tval, %truebr ], [ %fval, %falsebr ] 485 %g = phi [ %g1, %truebr ], [ %g2, %falsebr ] 486 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %merge, metadata !1, metadata !2) 487 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2) 488 %plusten = add i32 %merge, 10 489 %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g 490 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2) 491 ret i32 %toret 492 } 493 494Containing two source-level variables in ``!1`` and ``!3``. The function could, 495perhaps, be optimized into the following code: 496 497.. code-block:: llvm 498 499 define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) { 500 entry: 501 %g = call i32 @gazonk() 502 %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12 503 %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper 504 %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g 505 ret i32 %toret 506 } 507 508What ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics should be placed to represent the original variable 509locations in this code? Unfortunately the second, third and fourth 510dbg.values for ``!1`` in the source function have had their operands 511(%tval, %fval, %merge) optimized out. Assuming we cannot recover them, we 512might consider this placement of dbg.values: 513 514.. code-block:: llvm 515 516 define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) { 517 entry: 518 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2) 519 %g = call i32 @gazonk() 520 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2) 521 %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12 522 %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper 523 %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g 524 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2) 525 ret i32 %toret 526 } 527 528However, this will cause ``!3`` to have the return value of ``@gazonk()`` at 529the same time as ``!1`` has the constant value zero -- a pair of assignments 530that never occurred in the unoptimized program. To avoid this, we must terminate 531the range that ``!1`` has the constant value assignment by inserting an undef 532dbg.value before the dbg.value for ``!3``: 533 534.. code-block:: llvm 535 536 define i32 @foo(i32 %bar, i1 %cond) { 537 entry: 538 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !2) 539 %g = call i32 @gazonk() 540 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 undef, metadata !1, metadata !2) 541 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %g, metadata !3, metadata !2) 542 %addoper = select i1 %cond, i32 11, i32 12 543 %plusten = add i32 %bar, %addoper 544 %toret = add i32 %plusten, %g 545 call @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %toret, metadata !1, metadata !2) 546 ret i32 %toret 547 } 548 549In general, if any dbg.value has its operand optimized out and cannot be 550recovered, then an undef dbg.value is necessary to terminate earlier variable 551locations. Additional undef dbg.values may be necessary when the debugger can 552observe re-ordering of assignments. 553 554How variable location metadata is transformed during CodeGen 555============================================================ 556 557LLVM preserves debug information throughout mid-level and backend passes, 558ultimately producing a mapping between source-level information and 559instruction ranges. This 560is relatively straightforwards for line number information, as mapping 561instructions to line numbers is a simple association. For variable locations 562however the story is more complex. As each ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsic 563represents a source-level assignment of a value to a source variable, the 564variable location intrinsics effectively embed a small imperative program 565within the LLVM IR. By the end of CodeGen, this becomes a mapping from each 566variable to their machine locations over ranges of instructions. 567From IR to object emission, the major transformations which affect variable 568location fidelity are: 569 5701. Instruction Selection 5712. Register allocation 5723. Block layout 573 574each of which are discussed below. In addition, instruction scheduling can 575significantly change the ordering of the program, and occurs in a number of 576different passes. 577 578Some variable locations are not transformed during CodeGen. Stack locations 579specified by ``llvm.dbg.declare`` are valid and unchanging for the entire 580duration of the function, and are recorded in a simple MachineFunction table. 581Location changes in the prologue and epilogue of a function are also ignored: 582frame setup and destruction may take several instructions, require a 583disproportionate amount of debugging information in the output binary to 584describe, and should be stepped over by debuggers anyway. 585 586Variable locations in Instruction Selection and MIR 587--------------------------------------------------- 588 589Instruction selection creates a MIR function from an IR function, and just as 590it transforms ``intermediate`` instructions into machine instructions, so must 591``intermediate`` variable locations become machine variable locations. 592Within IR, variable locations are always identified by a Value, but in MIR 593there can be different types of variable locations. In addition, some IR 594locations become unavailable, for example if the operation of multiple IR 595instructions are combined into one machine instruction (such as 596multiply-and-accumulate) then intermediate Values are lost. To track variable 597locations through instruction selection, they are first separated into 598locations that do not depend on code generation (constants, stack locations, 599allocated virtual registers) and those that do. For those that do, debug 600metadata is attached to SDNodes in SelectionDAGs. After instruction selection 601has occurred and a MIR function is created, if the SDNode associated with debug 602metadata is allocated a virtual register, that virtual register is used as the 603variable location. If the SDNode is folded into a machine instruction or 604otherwise transformed into a non-register, the variable location becomes 605unavailable. 606 607Locations that are unavailable are treated as if they have been optimized out: 608in IR the location would be assigned ``undef`` by a debug intrinsic, and in MIR 609the equivalent location is used. 610 611After MIR locations are assigned to each variable, machine pseudo-instructions 612corresponding to each ``llvm.dbg.value`` and ``llvm.dbg.addr`` intrinsic are 613inserted. There are two forms of this type of instruction. 614 615The first form, ``DBG_VALUE``, appears thus: 616 617.. code-block:: text 618 619 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !123, !DIExpression() 620 621And has the following operands: 622 * The first operand can record the variable location as a register, 623 a frame index, an immediate, or the base address register if the original 624 debug intrinsic referred to memory. ``$noreg`` indicates the variable 625 location is undefined, equivalent to an ``undef`` dbg.value operand. 626 * The type of the second operand indicates whether the variable location is 627 directly referred to by the DBG_VALUE, or whether it is indirect. The 628 ``$noreg`` register signifies the former, an immediate operand (0) the 629 latter. 630 * Operand 3 is the Variable field of the original debug intrinsic. 631 * Operand 4 is the Expression field of the original debug intrinsic. 632 633The second form, ``DBG_VALUE_LIST``, appears thus: 634 635.. code-block:: text 636 637 DBG_VALUE_LIST !123, !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 0, DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 1, DW_OP_plus), %1, %2 638 639And has the following operands: 640 * The first operand is the Variable field of the original debug intrinsic. 641 * The second operand is the Expression field of the original debug intrinsic. 642 * Any number of operands, from the 3rd onwards, record a sequence of variable 643 location operands, which may take any of the same values as the first 644 operand of the ``DBG_VALUE`` instruction above. These variable location 645 operands are inserted into the final DWARF Expression in positions indicated 646 by the DW_OP_LLVM_arg operator in the `DIExpression 647 <LangRef.html#diexpression>`. 648 649The position at which the DBG_VALUEs are inserted should correspond to the 650positions of their matching ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics in the IR block. As 651with optimization, LLVM aims to preserve the order in which variable 652assignments occurred in the source program. However SelectionDAG performs some 653instruction scheduling, which can reorder assignments (discussed below). 654Function parameter locations are moved to the beginning of the function if 655they're not already, to ensure they're immediately available on function entry. 656 657To demonstrate variable locations during instruction selection, consider 658the following example: 659 660.. code-block:: llvm 661 662 define i32 @foo(i32* %addr) { 663 entry: 664 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5 665 br label %bb1, !dbg !5 666 667 bb1: ; preds = %bb1, %entry 668 %bar.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %add, %bb1 ] 669 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %bar.0, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5 670 %addr1 = getelementptr i32, i32 *%addr, i32 1, !dbg !5 671 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 *%addr1, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5 672 %loaded1 = load i32, i32* %addr1, !dbg !5 673 %addr2 = getelementptr i32, i32 *%addr, i32 %bar.0, !dbg !5 674 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 *%addr2, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5 675 %loaded2 = load i32, i32* %addr2, !dbg !5 676 %add = add i32 %bar.0, 1, !dbg !5 677 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %add, metadata !3, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !5 678 %added = add i32 %loaded1, %loaded2 679 %cond = icmp ult i32 %added, %bar.0, !dbg !5 680 br i1 %cond, label %bb1, label %bb2, !dbg !5 681 682 bb2: ; preds = %bb1 683 ret i32 0, !dbg !5 684 } 685 686If one compiles this IR with ``llc -o - -start-after=codegen-prepare -stop-after=expand-isel-pseudos -mtriple=x86_64--``, the following MIR is produced: 687 688.. code-block:: text 689 690 bb.0.entry: 691 successors: %bb.1(0x80000000) 692 liveins: $rdi 693 694 %2:gr64 = COPY $rdi 695 %3:gr32 = MOV32r0 implicit-def dead $eflags 696 DBG_VALUE 0, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5 697 698 bb.1.bb1: 699 successors: %bb.1(0x7c000000), %bb.2(0x04000000) 700 701 %0:gr32 = PHI %3, %bb.0, %1, %bb.1 702 DBG_VALUE %0, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5 703 DBG_VALUE %2, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4, DW_OP_stack_value), debug-location !5 704 %4:gr32 = MOV32rm %2, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1) 705 %5:gr64_nosp = MOVSX64rr32 %0, debug-location !5 706 DBG_VALUE $noreg, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5 707 %1:gr32 = INC32r %0, implicit-def dead $eflags, debug-location !5 708 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !3, !DIExpression(), debug-location !5 709 %6:gr32 = ADD32rm %4, %2, 4, killed %5, 0, $noreg, implicit-def dead $eflags :: (load 4 from %ir.addr2) 710 %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %0, implicit-def $eflags, debug-location !5 711 JB_1 %bb.1, implicit $eflags, debug-location !5 712 JMP_1 %bb.2, debug-location !5 713 714 bb.2.bb2: 715 %8:gr32 = MOV32r0 implicit-def dead $eflags 716 $eax = COPY %8, debug-location !5 717 RET 0, $eax, debug-location !5 718 719Observe first that there is a DBG_VALUE instruction for every ``llvm.dbg.value`` 720intrinsic in the source IR, ensuring no source level assignments go missing. 721Then consider the different ways in which variable locations have been recorded: 722 723* For the first dbg.value an immediate operand is used to record a zero value. 724* The dbg.value of the PHI instruction leads to a DBG_VALUE of virtual register 725 ``%0``. 726* The first GEP has its effect folded into the first load instruction 727 (as a 4-byte offset), but the variable location is salvaged by folding 728 the GEPs effect into the DIExpression. 729* The second GEP is also folded into the corresponding load. However, it is 730 insufficiently simple to be salvaged, and is emitted as a ``$noreg`` 731 DBG_VALUE, indicating that the variable takes on an undefined location. 732* The final dbg.value has its Value placed in virtual register ``%1``. 733 734Instruction Scheduling 735---------------------- 736 737A number of passes can reschedule instructions, notably instruction selection 738and the pre-and-post RA machine schedulers. Instruction scheduling can 739significantly change the nature of the program -- in the (very unlikely) worst 740case the instruction sequence could be completely reversed. In such 741circumstances LLVM follows the principle applied to optimizations, that it is 742better for the debugger not to display any state than a misleading state. 743Thus, whenever instructions are advanced in order of execution, any 744corresponding DBG_VALUE is kept in its original position, and if an instruction 745is delayed then the variable is given an undefined location for the duration 746of the delay. To illustrate, consider this pseudo-MIR: 747 748.. code-block:: text 749 750 %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1) 751 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2 752 %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags 753 DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4 754 %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags 755 DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6 756 757Imagine that the SUB32rr were moved forward to give us the following MIR: 758 759.. code-block:: text 760 761 %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags 762 %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1) 763 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2 764 %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags 765 DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4 766 DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6 767 768In this circumstance LLVM would leave the MIR as shown above. Were we to move 769the DBG_VALUE of virtual register %7 upwards with the SUB32rr, we would re-order 770assignments and introduce a new state of the program. Whereas with the solution 771above, the debugger will see one fewer combination of variable values, because 772``!3`` and ``!5`` will change value at the same time. This is preferred over 773misrepresenting the original program. 774 775In comparison, if one sunk the MOV32rm, LLVM would produce the following: 776 777.. code-block:: text 778 779 DBG_VALUE $noreg, $noreg, !1, !2 780 %4:gr32 = ADD32rr %3, %2, implicit-def dead $eflags 781 DBG_VALUE %4, $noreg, !3, !4 782 %7:gr32 = SUB32rr %6, %5, implicit-def dead $eflags 783 DBG_VALUE %7, $noreg, !5, !6 784 %1:gr32 = MOV32rm %0, 1, $noreg, 4, $noreg, debug-location !5 :: (load 4 from %ir.addr1) 785 DBG_VALUE %1, $noreg, !1, !2 786 787Here, to avoid presenting a state in which the first assignment to ``!1`` 788disappears, the DBG_VALUE at the top of the block assigns the variable the 789undefined location, until its value is available at the end of the block where 790an additional DBG_VALUE is added. Were any other DBG_VALUE for ``!1`` to occur 791in the instructions that the MOV32rm was sunk past, the DBG_VALUE for ``%1`` 792would be dropped and the debugger would never observe it in the variable. This 793accurately reflects that the value is not available during the corresponding 794portion of the original program. 795 796Variable locations during Register Allocation 797--------------------------------------------- 798 799To avoid debug instructions interfering with the register allocator, the 800LiveDebugVariables pass extracts variable locations from a MIR function and 801deletes the corresponding DBG_VALUE instructions. Some localized copy 802propagation is performed within blocks. After register allocation, the 803VirtRegRewriter pass re-inserts DBG_VALUE instructions in their original 804positions, translating virtual register references into their physical 805machine locations. To avoid encoding incorrect variable locations, in this 806pass any DBG_VALUE of a virtual register that is not live, is replaced by 807the undefined location. The LiveDebugVariables may insert redundant DBG_VALUEs 808because of virtual register rewriting. These will be subsequently removed by 809the RemoveRedundantDebugValues pass. 810 811LiveDebugValues expansion of variable locations 812----------------------------------------------- 813 814After all optimizations have run and shortly before emission, the 815LiveDebugValues pass runs to achieve two aims: 816 817* To propagate the location of variables through copies and register spills, 818* For every block, to record every valid variable location in that block. 819 820After this pass the DBG_VALUE instruction changes meaning: rather than 821corresponding to a source-level assignment where the variable may change value, 822it asserts the location of a variable in a block, and loses effect outside the 823block. Propagating variable locations through copies and spills is 824straightforwards: determining the variable location in every basic block 825requires the consideration of control flow. Consider the following IR, which 826presents several difficulties: 827 828.. code-block:: text 829 830 define dso_local i32 @foo(i1 %cond, i32 %input) !dbg !12 { 831 entry: 832 br i1 %cond, label %truebr, label %falsebr 833 834 bb1: 835 %value = phi i32 [ %value1, %truebr ], [ %value2, %falsebr ] 836 br label %exit, !dbg !26 837 838 truebr: 839 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %input, metadata !30, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24 840 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 1, metadata !23, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24 841 %value1 = add i32 %input, 1 842 br label %bb1 843 844 falsebr: 845 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %input, metadata !30, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24 846 call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 2, metadata !23, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !24 847 %value = add i32 %input, 2 848 br label %bb1 849 850 exit: 851 ret i32 %value, !dbg !30 852 } 853 854Here the difficulties are: 855 856* The control flow is roughly the opposite of basic block order 857* The value of the ``!23`` variable merges into ``%bb1``, but there is no PHI 858 node 859 860As mentioned above, the ``llvm.dbg.value`` intrinsics essentially form an 861imperative program embedded in the IR, with each intrinsic defining a variable 862location. This *could* be converted to an SSA form by mem2reg, in the same way 863that it uses use-def chains to identify control flow merges and insert phi 864nodes for IR Values. However, because debug variable locations are defined for 865every machine instruction, in effect every IR instruction uses every variable 866location, which would lead to a large number of debugging intrinsics being 867generated. 868 869Examining the example above, variable ``!30`` is assigned ``%input`` on both 870conditional paths through the function, while ``!23`` is assigned differing 871constant values on either path. Where control flow merges in ``%bb1`` we would 872want ``!30`` to keep its location (``%input``), but ``!23`` to become undefined 873as we cannot determine at runtime what value it should have in %bb1 without 874inserting a PHI node. mem2reg does not insert the PHI node to avoid changing 875codegen when debugging is enabled, and does not insert the other dbg.values 876to avoid adding very large numbers of intrinsics. 877 878Instead, LiveDebugValues determines variable locations when control 879flow merges. A dataflow analysis is used to propagate locations between blocks: 880when control flow merges, if a variable has the same location in all 881predecessors then that location is propagated into the successor. If the 882predecessor locations disagree, the location becomes undefined. 883 884Once LiveDebugValues has run, every block should have all valid variable 885locations described by DBG_VALUE instructions within the block. Very little 886effort is then required by supporting classes (such as 887DbgEntityHistoryCalculator) to build a map of each instruction to every 888valid variable location, without the need to consider control flow. From 889the example above, it is otherwise difficult to determine that the location 890of variable ``!30`` should flow "up" into block ``%bb1``, but that the location 891of variable ``!23`` should not flow "down" into the ``%exit`` block. 892 893.. _ccxx_frontend: 894 895C/C++ front-end specific debug information 896========================================== 897 898The C and C++ front-ends represent information about the program in a 899format that is effectively identical to `DWARF <http://www.dwarfstd.org/>`_ 900in terms of information content. This allows code generators to 901trivially support native debuggers by generating standard dwarf 902information, and contains enough information for non-dwarf targets to 903translate it as needed. 904 905This section describes the forms used to represent C and C++ programs. Other 906languages could pattern themselves after this (which itself is tuned to 907representing programs in the same way that DWARF does), or they could choose 908to provide completely different forms if they don't fit into the DWARF model. 909As support for debugging information gets added to the various LLVM 910source-language front-ends, the information used should be documented here. 911 912The following sections provide examples of a few C/C++ constructs and 913the debug information that would best describe those constructs. The 914canonical references are the ``DINode`` classes defined in 915``include/llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h`` and the implementations of the 916helper functions in ``lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp``. 917 918C/C++ source file information 919----------------------------- 920 921``llvm::Instruction`` provides easy access to metadata attached with an 922instruction. One can extract line number information encoded in LLVM IR using 923``Instruction::getDebugLoc()`` and ``DILocation::getLine()``. 924 925.. code-block:: c++ 926 927 if (DILocation *Loc = I->getDebugLoc()) { // Here I is an LLVM instruction 928 unsigned Line = Loc->getLine(); 929 StringRef File = Loc->getFilename(); 930 StringRef Dir = Loc->getDirectory(); 931 bool ImplicitCode = Loc->isImplicitCode(); 932 } 933 934When the flag ImplicitCode is true then it means that the Instruction has been 935added by the front-end but doesn't correspond to source code written by the user. For example 936 937.. code-block:: c++ 938 939 if (MyBoolean) { 940 MyObject MO; 941 ... 942 } 943 944At the end of the scope the MyObject's destructor is called but it isn't written 945explicitly. This information is useful to avoid to have counters on brackets when 946making code coverage. 947 948C/C++ global variable information 949--------------------------------- 950 951Given an integer global variable declared as follows: 952 953.. code-block:: c 954 955 _Alignas(8) int MyGlobal = 100; 956 957a C/C++ front-end would generate the following descriptors: 958 959.. code-block:: text 960 961 ;; 962 ;; Define the global itself. 963 ;; 964 @MyGlobal = global i32 100, align 8, !dbg !0 965 966 ;; 967 ;; List of debug info of globals 968 ;; 969 !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!1} 970 971 ;; Some unrelated metadata. 972 !llvm.module.flags = !{!6, !7} 973 !llvm.ident = !{!8} 974 975 ;; Define the global variable itself 976 !0 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(name: "MyGlobal", scope: !1, file: !2, line: 1, type: !5, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, align: 64) 977 978 ;; Define the compile unit. 979 !1 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !2, 980 producer: "clang version 4.0.0", 981 isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, 982 enums: !3, globals: !4) 983 984 ;; 985 ;; Define the file 986 ;; 987 !2 = !DIFile(filename: "/dev/stdin", 988 directory: "/Users/dexonsmith/data/llvm/debug-info") 989 990 ;; An empty array. 991 !3 = !{} 992 993 ;; The Array of Global Variables 994 !4 = !{!0} 995 996 ;; 997 ;; Define the type 998 ;; 999 !5 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed) 1000 1001 ;; Dwarf version to output. 1002 !6 = !{i32 2, !"Dwarf Version", i32 4} 1003 1004 ;; Debug info schema version. 1005 !7 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3} 1006 1007 ;; Compiler identification 1008 !8 = !{!"clang version 4.0.0"} 1009 1010 1011The align value in DIGlobalVariable description specifies variable alignment in 1012case it was forced by C11 _Alignas(), C++11 alignas() keywords or compiler 1013attribute __attribute__((aligned ())). In other case (when this field is missing) 1014alignment is considered default. This is used when producing DWARF output 1015for DW_AT_alignment value. 1016 1017C/C++ function information 1018-------------------------- 1019 1020Given a function declared as follows: 1021 1022.. code-block:: c 1023 1024 int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { 1025 return 0; 1026 } 1027 1028a C/C++ front-end would generate the following descriptors: 1029 1030.. code-block:: text 1031 1032 ;; 1033 ;; Define the anchor for subprograms. 1034 ;; 1035 !4 = !DISubprogram(name: "main", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 1, type: !5, 1036 isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, 1037 flags: DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false, 1038 retainedNodes: !2) 1039 1040 ;; 1041 ;; Define the subprogram itself. 1042 ;; 1043 define i32 @main(i32 %argc, i8** %argv) !dbg !4 { 1044 ... 1045 } 1046 1047C++ specific debug information 1048============================== 1049 1050C++ special member functions information 1051---------------------------------------- 1052 1053DWARF v5 introduces attributes defined to enhance debugging information of C++ programs. LLVM can generate (or omit) these appropriate DWARF attributes. In C++ a special member function Ctors, Dtors, Copy/Move Ctors, assignment operators can be declared with C++11 keyword deleted. This is represented in LLVM using spFlags value DISPFlagDeleted. 1054 1055Given a class declaration with copy constructor declared as deleted: 1056 1057.. code-block:: c 1058 1059 class foo { 1060 public: 1061 foo(const foo&) = deleted; 1062 }; 1063 1064A C++ frontend would generate following: 1065 1066.. code-block:: text 1067 1068 !17 = !DISubprogram(name: "foo", scope: !11, file: !1, line: 5, type: !18, scopeLine: 5, flags: DIFlagPublic | DIFlagPrototyped, spFlags: DISPFlagDeleted) 1069 1070and this will produce an additional DWARF attribute as: 1071 1072.. code-block:: text 1073 1074 DW_TAG_subprogram [7] * 1075 DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strx1] (indexed (00000006) string = "foo") 1076 DW_AT_decl_line [DW_FORM_data1] (5) 1077 ... 1078 DW_AT_deleted [DW_FORM_flag_present] (true) 1079 1080Fortran specific debug information 1081================================== 1082 1083Fortran function information 1084---------------------------- 1085 1086There are a few DWARF attributes defined to support client debugging of Fortran programs. LLVM can generate (or omit) the appropriate DWARF attributes for the prefix-specs of ELEMENTAL, PURE, IMPURE, RECURSIVE, and NON_RECURSIVE. This is done by using the spFlags values: DISPFlagElemental, DISPFlagPure, and DISPFlagRecursive. 1087 1088.. code-block:: fortran 1089 1090 elemental function elem_func(a) 1091 1092a Fortran front-end would generate the following descriptors: 1093 1094.. code-block:: text 1095 1096 !11 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "subroutine2", scope: !1, file: !1, 1097 line: 5, type: !8, scopeLine: 6, 1098 spFlags: DISPFlagDefinition | DISPFlagElemental, unit: !0, 1099 retainedNodes: !2) 1100 1101and this will materialize an additional DWARF attribute as: 1102 1103.. code-block:: text 1104 1105 DW_TAG_subprogram [3] 1106 DW_AT_low_pc [DW_FORM_addr] (0x0000000000000010 ".text") 1107 DW_AT_high_pc [DW_FORM_data4] (0x00000001) 1108 ... 1109 DW_AT_elemental [DW_FORM_flag_present] (true) 1110 1111There are a few DWARF tags defined to represent Fortran specific constructs i.e DW_TAG_string_type for representing Fortran character(n). In LLVM this is represented as DIStringType. 1112 1113.. code-block:: fortran 1114 1115 character(len=*), intent(in) :: string 1116 1117a Fortran front-end would generate the following descriptors: 1118 1119.. code-block:: text 1120 1121 !DILocalVariable(name: "string", arg: 1, scope: !10, file: !3, line: 4, type: !15) 1122 !DIStringType(name: "character(*)!2", stringLength: !16, stringLengthExpression: !DIExpression(), size: 32) 1123 1124A fortran deferred-length character can also contain the information of raw storage of the characters in addition to the length of the string. This information is encoded in the stringLocationExpression field. Based on this information, DW_AT_data_location attribute is emitted in a DW_TAG_string_type debug info. 1125 1126 !DIStringType(name: "character(*)!2", stringLengthExpression: !DIExpression(), stringLocationExpression: !DIExpression(DW_OP_push_object_address, DW_OP_deref), size: 32) 1127 1128and this will materialize in DWARF tags as: 1129 1130.. code-block:: text 1131 1132 DW_TAG_string_type 1133 DW_AT_name ("character(*)!2") 1134 DW_AT_string_length (0x00000064) 1135 0x00000064: DW_TAG_variable 1136 DW_AT_location (DW_OP_fbreg +16) 1137 DW_AT_type (0x00000083 "integer*8") 1138 DW_AT_data_location (DW_OP_push_object_address, DW_OP_deref) 1139 ... 1140 DW_AT_artificial (true) 1141 1142A Fortran front-end may need to generate a *trampoline* function to call a 1143function defined in a different compilation unit. In this case, the front-end 1144can emit the following descriptor for the trampoline function: 1145 1146.. code-block:: text 1147 1148 !DISubprogram(name: "sub1_.t0p", linkageName: "sub1_.t0p", scope: !4, file: !4, type: !5, spFlags: DISPFlagLocalToUnit | DISPFlagDefinition, unit: !7, retainedNodes: !24, targetFuncName: "sub1_") 1149 1150The targetFuncName field is the name of the function that the trampoline 1151calls. This descriptor results in the following DWARF tag: 1152 1153.. code-block:: text 1154 1155 DW_TAG_subprogram 1156 ... 1157 DW_AT_linkage_name ("sub1_.t0p") 1158 DW_AT_name ("sub1_.t0p") 1159 DW_AT_trampoline ("sub1_") 1160 1161Debugging information format 1162============================ 1163 1164Debugging Information Extension for Objective C Properties 1165---------------------------------------------------------- 1166 1167Introduction 1168^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1169 1170Objective C provides a simpler way to declare and define accessor methods using 1171declared properties. The language provides features to declare a property and 1172to let compiler synthesize accessor methods. 1173 1174The debugger lets developer inspect Objective C interfaces and their instance 1175variables and class variables. However, the debugger does not know anything 1176about the properties defined in Objective C interfaces. The debugger consumes 1177information generated by compiler in DWARF format. The format does not support 1178encoding of Objective C properties. This proposal describes DWARF extensions to 1179encode Objective C properties, which the debugger can use to let developers 1180inspect Objective C properties. 1181 1182Proposal 1183^^^^^^^^ 1184 1185Objective C properties exist separately from class members. A property can be 1186defined only by "setter" and "getter" selectors, and be calculated anew on each 1187access. Or a property can just be a direct access to some declared ivar. 1188Finally it can have an ivar "automatically synthesized" for it by the compiler, 1189in which case the property can be referred to in user code directly using the 1190standard C dereference syntax as well as through the property "dot" syntax, but 1191there is no entry in the ``@interface`` declaration corresponding to this ivar. 1192 1193To facilitate debugging, these properties we will add a new DWARF TAG into the 1194``DW_TAG_structure_type`` definition for the class to hold the description of a 1195given property, and a set of DWARF attributes that provide said description. 1196The property tag will also contain the name and declared type of the property. 1197 1198If there is a related ivar, there will also be a DWARF property attribute placed 1199in the ``DW_TAG_member`` DIE for that ivar referring back to the property TAG 1200for that property. And in the case where the compiler synthesizes the ivar 1201directly, the compiler is expected to generate a ``DW_TAG_member`` for that 1202ivar (with the ``DW_AT_artificial`` set to 1), whose name will be the name used 1203to access this ivar directly in code, and with the property attribute pointing 1204back to the property it is backing. 1205 1206The following examples will serve as illustration for our discussion: 1207 1208.. code-block:: objc 1209 1210 @interface I1 { 1211 int n2; 1212 } 1213 1214 @property int p1; 1215 @property int p2; 1216 @end 1217 1218 @implementation I1 1219 @synthesize p1; 1220 @synthesize p2 = n2; 1221 @end 1222 1223This produces the following DWARF (this is a "pseudo dwarfdump" output): 1224 1225.. code-block:: none 1226 1227 0x00000100: TAG_structure_type [7] * 1228 AT_APPLE_runtime_class( 0x10 ) 1229 AT_name( "I1" ) 1230 AT_decl_file( "Objc_Property.m" ) 1231 AT_decl_line( 3 ) 1232 1233 0x00000110 TAG_APPLE_property 1234 AT_name ( "p1" ) 1235 AT_type ( {0x00000150} ( int ) ) 1236 1237 0x00000120: TAG_APPLE_property 1238 AT_name ( "p2" ) 1239 AT_type ( {0x00000150} ( int ) ) 1240 1241 0x00000130: TAG_member [8] 1242 AT_name( "_p1" ) 1243 AT_APPLE_property ( {0x00000110} "p1" ) 1244 AT_type( {0x00000150} ( int ) ) 1245 AT_artificial ( 0x1 ) 1246 1247 0x00000140: TAG_member [8] 1248 AT_name( "n2" ) 1249 AT_APPLE_property ( {0x00000120} "p2" ) 1250 AT_type( {0x00000150} ( int ) ) 1251 1252 0x00000150: AT_type( ( int ) ) 1253 1254Note, the current convention is that the name of the ivar for an 1255auto-synthesized property is the name of the property from which it derives 1256with an underscore prepended, as is shown in the example. But we actually 1257don't need to know this convention, since we are given the name of the ivar 1258directly. 1259 1260Also, it is common practice in ObjC to have different property declarations in 1261the @interface and @implementation - e.g. to provide a read-only property in 1262the interface, and a read-write interface in the implementation. In that case, 1263the compiler should emit whichever property declaration will be in force in the 1264current translation unit. 1265 1266Developers can decorate a property with attributes which are encoded using 1267``DW_AT_APPLE_property_attribute``. 1268 1269.. code-block:: objc 1270 1271 @property (readonly, nonatomic) int pr; 1272 1273.. code-block:: none 1274 1275 TAG_APPLE_property [8] 1276 AT_name( "pr" ) 1277 AT_type ( {0x00000147} (int) ) 1278 AT_APPLE_property_attribute (DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readonly, DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nonatomic) 1279 1280The setter and getter method names are attached to the property using 1281``DW_AT_APPLE_property_setter`` and ``DW_AT_APPLE_property_getter`` attributes. 1282 1283.. code-block:: objc 1284 1285 @interface I1 1286 @property (setter=myOwnP3Setter:) int p3; 1287 -(void)myOwnP3Setter:(int)a; 1288 @end 1289 1290 @implementation I1 1291 @synthesize p3; 1292 -(void)myOwnP3Setter:(int)a{ } 1293 @end 1294 1295The DWARF for this would be: 1296 1297.. code-block:: none 1298 1299 0x000003bd: TAG_structure_type [7] * 1300 AT_APPLE_runtime_class( 0x10 ) 1301 AT_name( "I1" ) 1302 AT_decl_file( "Objc_Property.m" ) 1303 AT_decl_line( 3 ) 1304 1305 0x000003cd TAG_APPLE_property 1306 AT_name ( "p3" ) 1307 AT_APPLE_property_setter ( "myOwnP3Setter:" ) 1308 AT_type( {0x00000147} ( int ) ) 1309 1310 0x000003f3: TAG_member [8] 1311 AT_name( "_p3" ) 1312 AT_type ( {0x00000147} ( int ) ) 1313 AT_APPLE_property ( {0x000003cd} ) 1314 AT_artificial ( 0x1 ) 1315 1316New DWARF Tags 1317^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1318 1319+-----------------------+--------+ 1320| TAG | Value | 1321+=======================+========+ 1322| DW_TAG_APPLE_property | 0x4200 | 1323+-----------------------+--------+ 1324 1325New DWARF Attributes 1326^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1327 1328+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1329| Attribute | Value | Classes | 1330+================================+========+===========+ 1331| DW_AT_APPLE_property | 0x3fed | Reference | 1332+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1333| DW_AT_APPLE_property_getter | 0x3fe9 | String | 1334+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1335| DW_AT_APPLE_property_setter | 0x3fea | String | 1336+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1337| DW_AT_APPLE_property_attribute | 0x3feb | Constant | 1338+--------------------------------+--------+-----------+ 1339 1340New DWARF Constants 1341^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1342 1343+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1344| Name | Value | 1345+======================================+=======+ 1346| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readonly | 0x01 | 1347+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1348| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_getter | 0x02 | 1349+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1350| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_assign | 0x04 | 1351+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1352| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_readwrite | 0x08 | 1353+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1354| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_retain | 0x10 | 1355+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1356| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_copy | 0x20 | 1357+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1358| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nonatomic | 0x40 | 1359+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1360| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_setter | 0x80 | 1361+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1362| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_atomic | 0x100 | 1363+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1364| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_weak | 0x200 | 1365+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1366| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_strong | 0x400 | 1367+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1368| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_unsafe_unretained | 0x800 | 1369+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1370| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_nullability | 0x1000| 1371+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1372| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_null_resettable | 0x2000| 1373+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1374| DW_APPLE_PROPERTY_class | 0x4000| 1375+--------------------------------------+-------+ 1376 1377Name Accelerator Tables 1378----------------------- 1379 1380Introduction 1381^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1382 1383The "``.debug_pubnames``" and "``.debug_pubtypes``" formats are not what a 1384debugger needs. The "``pub``" in the section name indicates that the entries 1385in the table are publicly visible names only. This means no static or hidden 1386functions show up in the "``.debug_pubnames``". No static variables or private 1387class variables are in the "``.debug_pubtypes``". Many compilers add different 1388things to these tables, so we can't rely upon the contents between gcc, icc, or 1389clang. 1390 1391The typical query given by users tends not to match up with the contents of 1392these tables. For example, the DWARF spec states that "In the case of the name 1393of a function member or static data member of a C++ structure, class or union, 1394the name presented in the "``.debug_pubnames``" section is not the simple name 1395given by the ``DW_AT_name attribute`` of the referenced debugging information 1396entry, but rather the fully qualified name of the data or function member." 1397So the only names in these tables for complex C++ entries is a fully 1398qualified name. Debugger users tend not to enter their search strings as 1399"``a::b::c(int,const Foo&) const``", but rather as "``c``", "``b::c``" , or 1400"``a::b::c``". So the name entered in the name table must be demangled in 1401order to chop it up appropriately and additional names must be manually entered 1402into the table to make it effective as a name lookup table for debuggers to 1403use. 1404 1405All debuggers currently ignore the "``.debug_pubnames``" table as a result of 1406its inconsistent and useless public-only name content making it a waste of 1407space in the object file. These tables, when they are written to disk, are not 1408sorted in any way, leaving every debugger to do its own parsing and sorting. 1409These tables also include an inlined copy of the string values in the table 1410itself making the tables much larger than they need to be on disk, especially 1411for large C++ programs. 1412 1413Can't we just fix the sections by adding all of the names we need to this 1414table? No, because that is not what the tables are defined to contain and we 1415won't know the difference between the old bad tables and the new good tables. 1416At best we could make our own renamed sections that contain all of the data we 1417need. 1418 1419These tables are also insufficient for what a debugger like LLDB needs. LLDB 1420uses clang for its expression parsing where LLDB acts as a PCH. LLDB is then 1421often asked to look for type "``foo``" or namespace "``bar``", or list items in 1422namespace "``baz``". Namespaces are not included in the pubnames or pubtypes 1423tables. Since clang asks a lot of questions when it is parsing an expression, 1424we need to be very fast when looking up names, as it happens a lot. Having new 1425accelerator tables that are optimized for very quick lookups will benefit this 1426type of debugging experience greatly. 1427 1428We would like to generate name lookup tables that can be mapped into memory 1429from disk, and used as is, with little or no up-front parsing. We would also 1430be able to control the exact content of these different tables so they contain 1431exactly what we need. The Name Accelerator Tables were designed to fix these 1432issues. In order to solve these issues we need to: 1433 1434* Have a format that can be mapped into memory from disk and used as is 1435* Lookups should be very fast 1436* Extensible table format so these tables can be made by many producers 1437* Contain all of the names needed for typical lookups out of the box 1438* Strict rules for the contents of tables 1439 1440Table size is important and the accelerator table format should allow the reuse 1441of strings from common string tables so the strings for the names are not 1442duplicated. We also want to make sure the table is ready to be used as-is by 1443simply mapping the table into memory with minimal header parsing. 1444 1445The name lookups need to be fast and optimized for the kinds of lookups that 1446debuggers tend to do. Optimally we would like to touch as few parts of the 1447mapped table as possible when doing a name lookup and be able to quickly find 1448the name entry we are looking for, or discover there are no matches. In the 1449case of debuggers we optimized for lookups that fail most of the time. 1450 1451Each table that is defined should have strict rules on exactly what is in the 1452accelerator tables and documented so clients can rely on the content. 1453 1454Hash Tables 1455^^^^^^^^^^^ 1456 1457Standard Hash Tables 1458"""""""""""""""""""" 1459 1460Typical hash tables have a header, buckets, and each bucket points to the 1461bucket contents: 1462 1463.. code-block:: none 1464 1465 .------------. 1466 | HEADER | 1467 |------------| 1468 | BUCKETS | 1469 |------------| 1470 | DATA | 1471 `------------' 1472 1473The BUCKETS are an array of offsets to DATA for each hash: 1474 1475.. code-block:: none 1476 1477 .------------. 1478 | 0x00001000 | BUCKETS[0] 1479 | 0x00002000 | BUCKETS[1] 1480 | 0x00002200 | BUCKETS[2] 1481 | 0x000034f0 | BUCKETS[3] 1482 | | ... 1483 | 0xXXXXXXXX | BUCKETS[n_buckets] 1484 '------------' 1485 1486So for ``bucket[3]`` in the example above, we have an offset into the table 14870x000034f0 which points to a chain of entries for the bucket. Each bucket must 1488contain a next pointer, full 32 bit hash value, the string itself, and the data 1489for the current string value. 1490 1491.. code-block:: none 1492 1493 .------------. 1494 0x000034f0: | 0x00003500 | next pointer 1495 | 0x12345678 | 32 bit hash 1496 | "erase" | string value 1497 | data[n] | HashData for this bucket 1498 |------------| 1499 0x00003500: | 0x00003550 | next pointer 1500 | 0x29273623 | 32 bit hash 1501 | "dump" | string value 1502 | data[n] | HashData for this bucket 1503 |------------| 1504 0x00003550: | 0x00000000 | next pointer 1505 | 0x82638293 | 32 bit hash 1506 | "main" | string value 1507 | data[n] | HashData for this bucket 1508 `------------' 1509 1510The problem with this layout for debuggers is that we need to optimize for the 1511negative lookup case where the symbol we're searching for is not present. So 1512if we were to lookup "``printf``" in the table above, we would make a 32-bit 1513hash for "``printf``", it might match ``bucket[3]``. We would need to go to 1514the offset 0x000034f0 and start looking to see if our 32 bit hash matches. To 1515do so, we need to read the next pointer, then read the hash, compare it, and 1516skip to the next bucket. Each time we are skipping many bytes in memory and 1517touching new pages just to do the compare on the full 32 bit hash. All of 1518these accesses then tell us that we didn't have a match. 1519 1520Name Hash Tables 1521"""""""""""""""" 1522 1523To solve the issues mentioned above we have structured the hash tables a bit 1524differently: a header, buckets, an array of all unique 32 bit hash values, 1525followed by an array of hash value data offsets, one for each hash value, then 1526the data for all hash values: 1527 1528.. code-block:: none 1529 1530 .-------------. 1531 | HEADER | 1532 |-------------| 1533 | BUCKETS | 1534 |-------------| 1535 | HASHES | 1536 |-------------| 1537 | OFFSETS | 1538 |-------------| 1539 | DATA | 1540 `-------------' 1541 1542The ``BUCKETS`` in the name tables are an index into the ``HASHES`` array. By 1543making all of the full 32 bit hash values contiguous in memory, we allow 1544ourselves to efficiently check for a match while touching as little memory as 1545possible. Most often checking the 32 bit hash values is as far as the lookup 1546goes. If it does match, it usually is a match with no collisions. So for a 1547table with "``n_buckets``" buckets, and "``n_hashes``" unique 32 bit hash 1548values, we can clarify the contents of the ``BUCKETS``, ``HASHES`` and 1549``OFFSETS`` as: 1550 1551.. code-block:: none 1552 1553 .-------------------------. 1554 | HEADER.magic | uint32_t 1555 | HEADER.version | uint16_t 1556 | HEADER.hash_function | uint16_t 1557 | HEADER.bucket_count | uint32_t 1558 | HEADER.hashes_count | uint32_t 1559 | HEADER.header_data_len | uint32_t 1560 | HEADER_DATA | HeaderData 1561 |-------------------------| 1562 | BUCKETS | uint32_t[n_buckets] // 32 bit hash indexes 1563 |-------------------------| 1564 | HASHES | uint32_t[n_hashes] // 32 bit hash values 1565 |-------------------------| 1566 | OFFSETS | uint32_t[n_hashes] // 32 bit offsets to hash value data 1567 |-------------------------| 1568 | ALL HASH DATA | 1569 `-------------------------' 1570 1571So taking the exact same data from the standard hash example above we end up 1572with: 1573 1574.. code-block:: none 1575 1576 .------------. 1577 | HEADER | 1578 |------------| 1579 | 0 | BUCKETS[0] 1580 | 2 | BUCKETS[1] 1581 | 5 | BUCKETS[2] 1582 | 6 | BUCKETS[3] 1583 | | ... 1584 | ... | BUCKETS[n_buckets] 1585 |------------| 1586 | 0x........ | HASHES[0] 1587 | 0x........ | HASHES[1] 1588 | 0x........ | HASHES[2] 1589 | 0x........ | HASHES[3] 1590 | 0x........ | HASHES[4] 1591 | 0x........ | HASHES[5] 1592 | 0x12345678 | HASHES[6] hash for BUCKETS[3] 1593 | 0x29273623 | HASHES[7] hash for BUCKETS[3] 1594 | 0x82638293 | HASHES[8] hash for BUCKETS[3] 1595 | 0x........ | HASHES[9] 1596 | 0x........ | HASHES[10] 1597 | 0x........ | HASHES[11] 1598 | 0x........ | HASHES[12] 1599 | 0x........ | HASHES[13] 1600 | 0x........ | HASHES[n_hashes] 1601 |------------| 1602 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[0] 1603 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[1] 1604 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[2] 1605 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[3] 1606 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[4] 1607 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[5] 1608 | 0x000034f0 | OFFSETS[6] offset for BUCKETS[3] 1609 | 0x00003500 | OFFSETS[7] offset for BUCKETS[3] 1610 | 0x00003550 | OFFSETS[8] offset for BUCKETS[3] 1611 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[9] 1612 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[10] 1613 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[11] 1614 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[12] 1615 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[13] 1616 | 0x........ | OFFSETS[n_hashes] 1617 |------------| 1618 | | 1619 | | 1620 | | 1621 | | 1622 | | 1623 |------------| 1624 0x000034f0: | 0x00001203 | .debug_str ("erase") 1625 | 0x00000004 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "erase" 1626 | 0x........ | HashData[0] 1627 | 0x........ | HashData[1] 1628 | 0x........ | HashData[2] 1629 | 0x........ | HashData[3] 1630 | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash) 1631 |------------| 1632 0x00003500: | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("collision") 1633 | 0x00000002 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "collision" 1634 | 0x........ | HashData[0] 1635 | 0x........ | HashData[1] 1636 | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("dump") 1637 | 0x00000003 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "dump" 1638 | 0x........ | HashData[0] 1639 | 0x........ | HashData[1] 1640 | 0x........ | HashData[2] 1641 | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash) 1642 |------------| 1643 0x00003550: | 0x00001203 | String offset into .debug_str ("main") 1644 | 0x00000009 | A 32 bit array count - number of HashData with name "main" 1645 | 0x........ | HashData[0] 1646 | 0x........ | HashData[1] 1647 | 0x........ | HashData[2] 1648 | 0x........ | HashData[3] 1649 | 0x........ | HashData[4] 1650 | 0x........ | HashData[5] 1651 | 0x........ | HashData[6] 1652 | 0x........ | HashData[7] 1653 | 0x........ | HashData[8] 1654 | 0x00000000 | String offset into .debug_str (terminate data for hash) 1655 `------------' 1656 1657So we still have all of the same data, we just organize it more efficiently for 1658debugger lookup. If we repeat the same "``printf``" lookup from above, we 1659would hash "``printf``" and find it matches ``BUCKETS[3]`` by taking the 32 bit 1660hash value and modulo it by ``n_buckets``. ``BUCKETS[3]`` contains "6" which 1661is the index into the ``HASHES`` table. We would then compare any consecutive 166232 bit hashes values in the ``HASHES`` array as long as the hashes would be in 1663``BUCKETS[3]``. We do this by verifying that each subsequent hash value modulo 1664``n_buckets`` is still 3. In the case of a failed lookup we would access the 1665memory for ``BUCKETS[3]``, and then compare a few consecutive 32 bit hashes 1666before we know that we have no match. We don't end up marching through 1667multiple words of memory and we really keep the number of processor data cache 1668lines being accessed as small as possible. 1669 1670The string hash that is used for these lookup tables is the Daniel J. 1671Bernstein hash which is also used in the ELF ``GNU_HASH`` sections. It is a 1672very good hash for all kinds of names in programs with very few hash 1673collisions. 1674 1675Empty buckets are designated by using an invalid hash index of ``UINT32_MAX``. 1676 1677Details 1678^^^^^^^ 1679 1680These name hash tables are designed to be generic where specializations of the 1681table get to define additional data that goes into the header ("``HeaderData``"), 1682how the string value is stored ("``KeyType``") and the content of the data for each 1683hash value. 1684 1685Header Layout 1686""""""""""""" 1687 1688The header has a fixed part, and the specialized part. The exact format of the 1689header is: 1690 1691.. code-block:: c 1692 1693 struct Header 1694 { 1695 uint32_t magic; // 'HASH' magic value to allow endian detection 1696 uint16_t version; // Version number 1697 uint16_t hash_function; // The hash function enumeration that was used 1698 uint32_t bucket_count; // The number of buckets in this hash table 1699 uint32_t hashes_count; // The total number of unique hash values and hash data offsets in this table 1700 uint32_t header_data_len; // The bytes to skip to get to the hash indexes (buckets) for correct alignment 1701 // Specifically the length of the following HeaderData field - this does not 1702 // include the size of the preceding fields 1703 HeaderData header_data; // Implementation specific header data 1704 }; 1705 1706The header starts with a 32 bit "``magic``" value which must be ``'HASH'`` 1707encoded as an ASCII integer. This allows the detection of the start of the 1708hash table and also allows the table's byte order to be determined so the table 1709can be correctly extracted. The "``magic``" value is followed by a 16 bit 1710``version`` number which allows the table to be revised and modified in the 1711future. The current version number is 1. ``hash_function`` is a ``uint16_t`` 1712enumeration that specifies which hash function was used to produce this table. 1713The current values for the hash function enumerations include: 1714 1715.. code-block:: c 1716 1717 enum HashFunctionType 1718 { 1719 eHashFunctionDJB = 0u, // Daniel J Bernstein hash function 1720 }; 1721 1722``bucket_count`` is a 32 bit unsigned integer that represents how many buckets 1723are in the ``BUCKETS`` array. ``hashes_count`` is the number of unique 32 bit 1724hash values that are in the ``HASHES`` array, and is the same number of offsets 1725are contained in the ``OFFSETS`` array. ``header_data_len`` specifies the size 1726in bytes of the ``HeaderData`` that is filled in by specialized versions of 1727this table. 1728 1729Fixed Lookup 1730"""""""""""" 1731 1732The header is followed by the buckets, hashes, offsets, and hash value data. 1733 1734.. code-block:: c 1735 1736 struct FixedTable 1737 { 1738 uint32_t buckets[Header.bucket_count]; // An array of hash indexes into the "hashes[]" array below 1739 uint32_t hashes [Header.hashes_count]; // Every unique 32 bit hash for the entire table is in this table 1740 uint32_t offsets[Header.hashes_count]; // An offset that corresponds to each item in the "hashes[]" array above 1741 }; 1742 1743``buckets`` is an array of 32 bit indexes into the ``hashes`` array. The 1744``hashes`` array contains all of the 32 bit hash values for all names in the 1745hash table. Each hash in the ``hashes`` table has an offset in the ``offsets`` 1746array that points to the data for the hash value. 1747 1748This table setup makes it very easy to repurpose these tables to contain 1749different data, while keeping the lookup mechanism the same for all tables. 1750This layout also makes it possible to save the table to disk and map it in 1751later and do very efficient name lookups with little or no parsing. 1752 1753DWARF lookup tables can be implemented in a variety of ways and can store a lot 1754of information for each name. We want to make the DWARF tables extensible and 1755able to store the data efficiently so we have used some of the DWARF features 1756that enable efficient data storage to define exactly what kind of data we store 1757for each name. 1758 1759The ``HeaderData`` contains a definition of the contents of each HashData chunk. 1760We might want to store an offset to all of the debug information entries (DIEs) 1761for each name. To keep things extensible, we create a list of items, or 1762Atoms, that are contained in the data for each name. First comes the type of 1763the data in each atom: 1764 1765.. code-block:: c 1766 1767 enum AtomType 1768 { 1769 eAtomTypeNULL = 0u, 1770 eAtomTypeDIEOffset = 1u, // DIE offset, check form for encoding 1771 eAtomTypeCUOffset = 2u, // DIE offset of the compiler unit header that contains the item in question 1772 eAtomTypeTag = 3u, // DW_TAG_xxx value, should be encoded as DW_FORM_data1 (if no tags exceed 255) or DW_FORM_data2 1773 eAtomTypeNameFlags = 4u, // Flags from enum NameFlags 1774 eAtomTypeTypeFlags = 5u, // Flags from enum TypeFlags 1775 }; 1776 1777The enumeration values and their meanings are: 1778 1779.. code-block:: none 1780 1781 eAtomTypeNULL - a termination atom that specifies the end of the atom list 1782 eAtomTypeDIEOffset - an offset into the .debug_info section for the DWARF DIE for this name 1783 eAtomTypeCUOffset - an offset into the .debug_info section for the CU that contains the DIE 1784 eAtomTypeDIETag - The DW_TAG_XXX enumeration value so you don't have to parse the DWARF to see what it is 1785 eAtomTypeNameFlags - Flags for functions and global variables (isFunction, isInlined, isExternal...) 1786 eAtomTypeTypeFlags - Flags for types (isCXXClass, isObjCClass, ...) 1787 1788Then we allow each atom type to define the atom type and how the data for each 1789atom type data is encoded: 1790 1791.. code-block:: c 1792 1793 struct Atom 1794 { 1795 uint16_t type; // AtomType enum value 1796 uint16_t form; // DWARF DW_FORM_XXX defines 1797 }; 1798 1799The ``form`` type above is from the DWARF specification and defines the exact 1800encoding of the data for the Atom type. See the DWARF specification for the 1801``DW_FORM_`` definitions. 1802 1803.. code-block:: c 1804 1805 struct HeaderData 1806 { 1807 uint32_t die_offset_base; 1808 uint32_t atom_count; 1809 Atoms atoms[atom_count0]; 1810 }; 1811 1812``HeaderData`` defines the base DIE offset that should be added to any atoms 1813that are encoded using the ``DW_FORM_ref1``, ``DW_FORM_ref2``, 1814``DW_FORM_ref4``, ``DW_FORM_ref8`` or ``DW_FORM_ref_udata``. It also defines 1815what is contained in each ``HashData`` object -- ``Atom.form`` tells us how large 1816each field will be in the ``HashData`` and the ``Atom.type`` tells us how this data 1817should be interpreted. 1818 1819For the current implementations of the "``.apple_names``" (all functions + 1820globals), the "``.apple_types``" (names of all types that are defined), and 1821the "``.apple_namespaces``" (all namespaces), we currently set the ``Atom`` 1822array to be: 1823 1824.. code-block:: c 1825 1826 HeaderData.atom_count = 1; 1827 HeaderData.atoms[0].type = eAtomTypeDIEOffset; 1828 HeaderData.atoms[0].form = DW_FORM_data4; 1829 1830This defines the contents to be the DIE offset (eAtomTypeDIEOffset) that is 1831encoded as a 32 bit value (DW_FORM_data4). This allows a single name to have 1832multiple matching DIEs in a single file, which could come up with an inlined 1833function for instance. Future tables could include more information about the 1834DIE such as flags indicating if the DIE is a function, method, block, 1835or inlined. 1836 1837The KeyType for the DWARF table is a 32 bit string table offset into the 1838".debug_str" table. The ".debug_str" is the string table for the DWARF which 1839may already contain copies of all of the strings. This helps make sure, with 1840help from the compiler, that we reuse the strings between all of the DWARF 1841sections and keeps the hash table size down. Another benefit to having the 1842compiler generate all strings as DW_FORM_strp in the debug info, is that 1843DWARF parsing can be made much faster. 1844 1845After a lookup is made, we get an offset into the hash data. The hash data 1846needs to be able to deal with 32 bit hash collisions, so the chunk of data 1847at the offset in the hash data consists of a triple: 1848 1849.. code-block:: c 1850 1851 uint32_t str_offset 1852 uint32_t hash_data_count 1853 HashData[hash_data_count] 1854 1855If "str_offset" is zero, then the bucket contents are done. 99.9% of the 1856hash data chunks contain a single item (no 32 bit hash collision): 1857 1858.. code-block:: none 1859 1860 .------------. 1861 | 0x00001023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0001023] => "main") 1862 | 0x00000004 | uint32_t HashData count 1863 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset 1864 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset 1865 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[2] DIE offset 1866 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[3] DIE offset 1867 | 0x00000000 | uint32_t KeyType (end of hash chain) 1868 `------------' 1869 1870If there are collisions, you will have multiple valid string offsets: 1871 1872.. code-block:: none 1873 1874 .------------. 1875 | 0x00001023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0001023] => "main") 1876 | 0x00000004 | uint32_t HashData count 1877 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset 1878 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset 1879 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[2] DIE offset 1880 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[3] DIE offset 1881 | 0x00002023 | uint32_t KeyType (.debug_str[0x0002023] => "print") 1882 | 0x00000002 | uint32_t HashData count 1883 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[0] DIE offset 1884 | 0x........ | uint32_t HashData[1] DIE offset 1885 | 0x00000000 | uint32_t KeyType (end of hash chain) 1886 `------------' 1887 1888Current testing with real world C++ binaries has shown that there is around 1 188932 bit hash collision per 100,000 name entries. 1890 1891Contents 1892^^^^^^^^ 1893 1894As we said, we want to strictly define exactly what is included in the 1895different tables. For DWARF, we have 3 tables: "``.apple_names``", 1896"``.apple_types``", and "``.apple_namespaces``". 1897 1898"``.apple_names``" sections should contain an entry for each DWARF DIE whose 1899``DW_TAG`` is a ``DW_TAG_label``, ``DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine``, or 1900``DW_TAG_subprogram`` that has address attributes: ``DW_AT_low_pc``, 1901``DW_AT_high_pc``, ``DW_AT_ranges`` or ``DW_AT_entry_pc``. It also contains 1902``DW_TAG_variable`` DIEs that have a ``DW_OP_addr`` in the location (global and 1903static variables). All global and static variables should be included, 1904including those scoped within functions and classes. For example using the 1905following code: 1906 1907.. code-block:: c 1908 1909 static int var = 0; 1910 1911 void f () 1912 { 1913 static int var = 0; 1914 } 1915 1916Both of the static ``var`` variables would be included in the table. All 1917functions should emit both their full names and their basenames. For C or C++, 1918the full name is the mangled name (if available) which is usually in the 1919``DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name`` attribute, and the ``DW_AT_name`` contains the 1920function basename. If global or static variables have a mangled name in a 1921``DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name`` attribute, this should be emitted along with the 1922simple name found in the ``DW_AT_name`` attribute. 1923 1924"``.apple_types``" sections should contain an entry for each DWARF DIE whose 1925tag is one of: 1926 1927* DW_TAG_array_type 1928* DW_TAG_class_type 1929* DW_TAG_enumeration_type 1930* DW_TAG_pointer_type 1931* DW_TAG_reference_type 1932* DW_TAG_string_type 1933* DW_TAG_structure_type 1934* DW_TAG_subroutine_type 1935* DW_TAG_typedef 1936* DW_TAG_union_type 1937* DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type 1938* DW_TAG_set_type 1939* DW_TAG_subrange_type 1940* DW_TAG_base_type 1941* DW_TAG_const_type 1942* DW_TAG_immutable_type 1943* DW_TAG_file_type 1944* DW_TAG_namelist 1945* DW_TAG_packed_type 1946* DW_TAG_volatile_type 1947* DW_TAG_restrict_type 1948* DW_TAG_atomic_type 1949* DW_TAG_interface_type 1950* DW_TAG_unspecified_type 1951* DW_TAG_shared_type 1952 1953Only entries with a ``DW_AT_name`` attribute are included, and the entry must 1954not be a forward declaration (``DW_AT_declaration`` attribute with a non-zero 1955value). For example, using the following code: 1956 1957.. code-block:: c 1958 1959 int main () 1960 { 1961 int *b = 0; 1962 return *b; 1963 } 1964 1965We get a few type DIEs: 1966 1967.. code-block:: none 1968 1969 0x00000067: TAG_base_type [5] 1970 AT_encoding( DW_ATE_signed ) 1971 AT_name( "int" ) 1972 AT_byte_size( 0x04 ) 1973 1974 0x0000006e: TAG_pointer_type [6] 1975 AT_type( {0x00000067} ( int ) ) 1976 AT_byte_size( 0x08 ) 1977 1978The DW_TAG_pointer_type is not included because it does not have a ``DW_AT_name``. 1979 1980"``.apple_namespaces``" section should contain all ``DW_TAG_namespace`` DIEs. 1981If we run into a namespace that has no name this is an anonymous namespace, and 1982the name should be output as "``(anonymous namespace)``" (without the quotes). 1983Why? This matches the output of the ``abi::cxa_demangle()`` that is in the 1984standard C++ library that demangles mangled names. 1985 1986 1987Language Extensions and File Format Changes 1988^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1989 1990Objective-C Extensions 1991"""""""""""""""""""""" 1992 1993"``.apple_objc``" section should contain all ``DW_TAG_subprogram`` DIEs for an 1994Objective-C class. The name used in the hash table is the name of the 1995Objective-C class itself. If the Objective-C class has a category, then an 1996entry is made for both the class name without the category, and for the class 1997name with the category. So if we have a DIE at offset 0x1234 with a name of 1998method "``-[NSString(my_additions) stringWithSpecialString:]``", we would add 1999an entry for "``NSString``" that points to DIE 0x1234, and an entry for 2000"``NSString(my_additions)``" that points to 0x1234. This allows us to quickly 2001track down all Objective-C methods for an Objective-C class when doing 2002expressions. It is needed because of the dynamic nature of Objective-C where 2003anyone can add methods to a class. The DWARF for Objective-C methods is also 2004emitted differently from C++ classes where the methods are not usually 2005contained in the class definition, they are scattered about across one or more 2006compile units. Categories can also be defined in different shared libraries. 2007So we need to be able to quickly find all of the methods and class functions 2008given the Objective-C class name, or quickly find all methods and class 2009functions for a class + category name. This table does not contain any 2010selector names, it just maps Objective-C class names (or class names + 2011category) to all of the methods and class functions. The selectors are added 2012as function basenames in the "``.debug_names``" section. 2013 2014In the "``.apple_names``" section for Objective-C functions, the full name is 2015the entire function name with the brackets ("``-[NSString 2016stringWithCString:]``") and the basename is the selector only 2017("``stringWithCString:``"). 2018 2019Mach-O Changes 2020"""""""""""""" 2021 2022The sections names for the apple hash tables are for non-mach-o files. For 2023mach-o files, the sections should be contained in the ``__DWARF`` segment with 2024names as follows: 2025 2026* "``.apple_names``" -> "``__apple_names``" 2027* "``.apple_types``" -> "``__apple_types``" 2028* "``.apple_namespaces``" -> "``__apple_namespac``" (16 character limit) 2029* "``.apple_objc``" -> "``__apple_objc``" 2030 2031.. _codeview: 2032 2033CodeView Debug Info Format 2034========================== 2035 2036LLVM supports emitting CodeView, the Microsoft debug info format, and this 2037section describes the design and implementation of that support. 2038 2039Format Background 2040----------------- 2041 2042CodeView as a format is clearly oriented around C++ debugging, and in C++, the 2043majority of debug information tends to be type information. Therefore, the 2044overriding design constraint of CodeView is the separation of type information 2045from other "symbol" information so that type information can be efficiently 2046merged across translation units. Both type information and symbol information is 2047generally stored as a sequence of records, where each record begins with a 204816-bit record size and a 16-bit record kind. 2049 2050Type information is usually stored in the ``.debug$T`` section of the object 2051file. All other debug info, such as line info, string table, symbol info, and 2052inlinee info, is stored in one or more ``.debug$S`` sections. There may only be 2053one ``.debug$T`` section per object file, since all other debug info refers to 2054it. If a PDB (enabled by the ``/Zi`` MSVC option) was used during compilation, 2055the ``.debug$T`` section will contain only an ``LF_TYPESERVER2`` record pointing 2056to the PDB. When using PDBs, symbol information appears to remain in the object 2057file ``.debug$S`` sections. 2058 2059Type records are referred to by their index, which is the number of records in 2060the stream before a given record plus ``0x1000``. Many common basic types, such 2061as the basic integral types and unqualified pointers to them, are represented 2062using type indices less than ``0x1000``. Such basic types are built in to 2063CodeView consumers and do not require type records. 2064 2065Each type record may only contain type indices that are less than its own type 2066index. This ensures that the graph of type stream references is acyclic. While 2067the source-level type graph may contain cycles through pointer types (consider a 2068linked list struct), these cycles are removed from the type stream by always 2069referring to the forward declaration record of user-defined record types. Only 2070"symbol" records in the ``.debug$S`` streams may refer to complete, 2071non-forward-declaration type records. 2072 2073Working with CodeView 2074--------------------- 2075 2076These are instructions for some common tasks for developers working to improve 2077LLVM's CodeView support. Most of them revolve around using the CodeView dumper 2078embedded in ``llvm-readobj``. 2079 2080* Testing MSVC's output:: 2081 2082 $ cl -c -Z7 foo.cpp # Use /Z7 to keep types in the object file 2083 $ llvm-readobj --codeview foo.obj 2084 2085* Getting LLVM IR debug info out of Clang:: 2086 2087 $ clang -g -gcodeview --target=x86_64-windows-msvc foo.cpp -S -emit-llvm 2088 2089 Use this to generate LLVM IR for LLVM test cases. 2090 2091* Generate and dump CodeView from LLVM IR metadata:: 2092 2093 $ llc foo.ll -filetype=obj -o foo.obj 2094 $ llvm-readobj --codeview foo.obj > foo.txt 2095 2096 Use this pattern in lit test cases and FileCheck the output of llvm-readobj 2097 2098Improving LLVM's CodeView support is a process of finding interesting type 2099records, constructing a C++ test case that makes MSVC emit those records, 2100dumping the records, understanding them, and then generating equivalent records 2101in LLVM's backend. 2102