History log of /llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86WinEHState.cpp (Results 26 – 50 of 92)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init
# 1ac7c50d 25-Dec-2019 Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>

[WinEH] Delete addFnAttr("no-frame-pointer-elim") which seems no longer needed

It was added in rL238619.

Reviewed By: rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71862


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3
# 5d986953 11-Dec-2019 Reid Kleckner <rnk@google.com>

[IR] Split out target specific intrinsic enums into separate headers

This has two main effects:
- Optimizes debug info size by saving 221.86 MB of obj file size in a
Windows optimized+debug build

[IR] Split out target specific intrinsic enums into separate headers

This has two main effects:
- Optimizes debug info size by saving 221.86 MB of obj file size in a
Windows optimized+debug build of 'all'. This is 3.03% of 7,332.7MB of
object file size.
- Incremental step towards decoupling target intrinsics.

The enums are still compact, so adding and removing a single
target-specific intrinsic will trigger a rebuild of all of LLVM.
Assigning distinct target id spaces is potential future work.

Part of PR34259

Reviewers: efriedma, echristo, MaskRay

Reviewed By: echristo, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71320

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1
# a8653da4 04-Nov-2019 Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>

[X86] Fix uninitialized variable warnings. NFCI.


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1
# 006cf8c0 22-Jul-2019 Christudasan Devadasan <Christudasan.Devadasan@amd.com>

Added address-space mangling for stack related intrinsics

Modified the following 3 intrinsics:
int_addressofreturnaddress,
int_frameaddress & int_sponentry.

Reviewed By: arsenm

Differential Revisi

Added address-space mangling for stack related intrinsics

Modified the following 3 intrinsics:
int_addressofreturnaddress,
int_frameaddress & int_sponentry.

Reviewed By: arsenm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64561

llvm-svn: 366679

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3
# f3356722 13-Jun-2019 Tom Stellard <tstellar@redhat.com>

X86: Clean up pass initialization

Summary:
- Remove redundant initializations from pass constructors that were
already being initialized by LLVMInitializeX86Target().

- Add initialization functio

X86: Clean up pass initialization

Summary:
- Remove redundant initializations from pass constructors that were
already being initialized by LLVMInitializeX86Target().

- Add initialization function for the FPS pass.

Reviewers: craig.topper

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63218

llvm-svn: 363221

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2
# 7716075a 01-Feb-2019 James Y Knight <jyknight@google.com>

[opaque pointer types] Pass value type to GetElementPtr creation.

This cleans up all GetElementPtr creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element

[opaque pointer types] Pass value type to GetElementPtr creation.

This cleans up all GetElementPtr creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57173

llvm-svn: 352913

show more ...


# 14359ef1 01-Feb-2019 James Y Knight <jyknight@google.com>

[opaque pointer types] Pass value type to LoadInst creation.

This cleans up all LoadInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass the
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.

[opaque pointer types] Pass value type to LoadInst creation.

This cleans up all LoadInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass the
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57172

llvm-svn: 352911

show more ...


# 7976eb58 01-Feb-2019 James Y Knight <jyknight@google.com>

[opaque pointer types] Pass function types to CallInst creation.

This cleans up all CallInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-ty

[opaque pointer types] Pass function types to CallInst creation.

This cleans up all CallInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57170

llvm-svn: 352909

show more ...


# 13680223 01-Feb-2019 James Y Knight <jyknight@google.com>

[opaque pointer types] Add a FunctionCallee wrapper type, and use it.

Recommit r352791 after tweaking DerivedTypes.h slightly, so that gcc
doesn't choke on it, hopefully.

Original Message:
The Func

[opaque pointer types] Add a FunctionCallee wrapper type, and use it.

Recommit r352791 after tweaking DerivedTypes.h slightly, so that gcc
doesn't choke on it, hopefully.

Original Message:
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.

Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.

One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.

However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)

Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315

llvm-svn: 352827

show more ...


# fadf2506 31-Jan-2019 James Y Knight <jyknight@google.com>

Revert "[opaque pointer types] Add a FunctionCallee wrapper type, and use it."

This reverts commit f47d6b38c7a61d50db4566b02719de05492dcef1 (r352791).

Seems to run into compilation failures with GC

Revert "[opaque pointer types] Add a FunctionCallee wrapper type, and use it."

This reverts commit f47d6b38c7a61d50db4566b02719de05492dcef1 (r352791).

Seems to run into compilation failures with GCC (but not clang, where
I tested it). Reverting while I investigate.

llvm-svn: 352800

show more ...


# f47d6b38 31-Jan-2019 James Y Knight <jyknight@google.com>

[opaque pointer types] Add a FunctionCallee wrapper type, and use it.

The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue pas

[opaque pointer types] Add a FunctionCallee wrapper type, and use it.

The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.

Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.

One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.

However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)

Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315

llvm-svn: 352791

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1
# 2946cd70 19-Jan-2019 Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1
# a9f90056 01-Nov-2018 Matthias Braun <matze@braunis.de>

X86: Consistently declare pass initializers in X86.h; NFC

This avoids declaring them twice: in X86TargetMachine.cpp and the file
implementing the pass.

llvm-svn: 345801


# edb12a83 15-Oct-2018 Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>

[TI removal] Make variables declared as `TerminatorInst` and initialized
by `getTerminator()` calls instead be declared as `Instruction`.

This is the biggest remaining chunk of the usage of `getTerm

[TI removal] Make variables declared as `TerminatorInst` and initialized
by `getTerminator()` calls instead be declared as `Instruction`.

This is the biggest remaining chunk of the usage of `getTerminator()`
that insists on the narrow type and so is an easy batch of updates.
Several files saw more extensive updates where this would cascade to
requiring API updates within the file to use `Instruction` instead of
`TerminatorInst`. All of these were trivial in nature (pervasively using
`Instruction` instead just worked).

llvm-svn: 344502

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2
# d34e60ca 14-May-2018 Nicola Zaghen <nicola.zaghen@imgtec.com>

Rename DEBUG macro to LLVM_DEBUG.

The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/

Rename DEBUG macro to LLVM_DEBUG.

The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.

In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624

llvm-svn: 332240

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1
# a2d119a0 28-Dec-2017 Reid Kleckner <rnk@google.com>

[WinEH] Don't emit state stores or EH thunks for available_externally functions

The exception handler thunk needs to reference the LSDA of the parent
function, which won't be emitted if it's availab

[WinEH] Don't emit state stores or EH thunks for available_externally functions

The exception handler thunk needs to reference the LSDA of the parent
function, which won't be emitted if it's available_externally.

Fixes PR35736. ThinLTO ends up producing available_externally functions
that use _CxxFrameHandler3.

llvm-svn: 321532

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1
# f9b72327 20-Oct-2017 Dave Lee <davelee.com@gmail.com>

Make x86 __ehhandler comdat if parent function is

Summary:
This change comes from using lld for i686-windows-msvc. Before this change, lld
emits an error of:

error: relocation against symbol in

Make x86 __ehhandler comdat if parent function is

Summary:
This change comes from using lld for i686-windows-msvc. Before this change, lld
emits an error of:

error: relocation against symbol in discarded section: .xdata

It's possible that this could be addressed in lld, but I think this change is
reasonable on its own.

At a high level, this is being generated:

A (.text comdat) -> B (.text) -> C (.xdata comdat)

Where A is a C++ inline function, which references B, an exception handler
thunk, which references C, the exception handling info.

With this structure, lld will error when applying relocations to B if the C it
references has been discarded (some other C has been selected).

This change checks if A is comdat, and if so places the exception registration
thunk (B) in the comdata group of A (and B).

It appears that MSVC makes the __ehhandler function comdat.

Is it possible that duplicate thunks are being emitted into the final binary
with other linkers, or are they stripping the unused thunks?

Reviewers: rnk, majnemer, compnerd, smeenai

Reviewed By: rnk, compnerd

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38940

llvm-svn: 316219

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.0, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.1, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc3
# 6bda14b3 06-Jun-2017 Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>

Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....

I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line

Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....

I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.

I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.

This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.

Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).

llvm-svn: 304787

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-4.0.1-rc2
# 6f0ecca3 16-May-2017 Peter Collingbourne <peter@pcc.me.uk>

IR: Give function GlobalValue::getRealLinkageName() a less misleading name: dropLLVMManglingEscape().

This function gives the wrong answer on some non-ELF platforms in some
cases. The function that

IR: Give function GlobalValue::getRealLinkageName() a less misleading name: dropLLVMManglingEscape().

This function gives the wrong answer on some non-ELF platforms in some
cases. The function that does the right thing lives in Mangler.h. To try to
discourage people from using this function, give it a different name.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33162

llvm-svn: 303134

show more ...


# a0b45f4b 03-May-2017 Reid Kleckner <rnk@google.com>

[IR] Abstract away ArgNo+1 attribute indexing as much as possible

Summary:
Do three things to help with that:
- Add AttributeList::FirstArgIndex, which is an enumerator currently set
to 1. It allo

[IR] Abstract away ArgNo+1 attribute indexing as much as possible

Summary:
Do three things to help with that:
- Add AttributeList::FirstArgIndex, which is an enumerator currently set
to 1. It allows us to change the indexing scheme with fewer changes.
- Add addParamAttr/removeParamAttr. This just shortens addAttribute call
sites that would otherwise need to spell out FirstArgIndex.
- Remove some attribute-specific getters and setters from Function that
take attribute list indices. Most of these were only used from
BuildLibCalls, and doesNotAlias was only used to test or set if the
return value is malloc-like.

I'm happy to split the patch, but I think they are probably easier to
review when taken together.

This patch should be NFC, but it sets the stage to change the indexing
scheme to this, which is more convenient when indexing into an array:
0: func attrs
1: retattrs
2...: arg attrs

Reviewers: chandlerc, pete, javed.absar

Subscribers: david2050, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32811

llvm-svn: 302060

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-4.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.0, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.1, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc1
# 117296c0 01-Oct-2016 Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>

Use StringRef in Pass/PassManager APIs (NFC)

llvm-svn: 283004


Revision tags: llvmorg-3.9.0, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc1
# f6be62f2 21-Jun-2016 Etienne Bergeron <etienneb@google.com>

[StackProtector] Fix computation of GSCookieOffset and EHCookieOffset with SEH4

Summary:
Fix the computation of the offsets present in the scopetable when using the
SEH (__except_handler4).

This pa

[StackProtector] Fix computation of GSCookieOffset and EHCookieOffset with SEH4

Summary:
Fix the computation of the offsets present in the scopetable when using the
SEH (__except_handler4).

This patch added an intrinsic to track the position of the allocation on the
stack of the EHGuard. This position is needed when producing the ScopeTable.

```
struct _EH4_SCOPETABLE {
DWORD GSCookieOffset;
DWORD GSCookieXOROffset;
DWORD EHCookieOffset;
DWORD EHCookieXOROffset;
_EH4_SCOPETABLE_RECORD ScopeRecord[1];
};

struct _EH4_SCOPETABLE_RECORD {
DWORD EnclosingLevel;
long (*FilterFunc)();
union {
void (*HandlerAddress)();
void (*FinallyFunc)();
};
};
```

The code to generate the EHCookie is added in `X86WinEHState.cpp`.
Which is adding these instructions when using SEH4.

```
Lfunc_begin0:
# BB#0: # %entry
pushl %ebp
movl %esp, %ebp
pushl %ebx
pushl %edi
pushl %esi
subl $28, %esp
movl %ebp, %eax <<-- Loading FramePtr
movl %esp, -36(%ebp)
movl $-2, -16(%ebp)
movl $L__ehtable$use_except_handler4_ssp, %ecx
xorl ___security_cookie, %ecx
movl %ecx, -20(%ebp)
xorl ___security_cookie, %eax <<-- XOR FramePtr and Cookie
movl %eax, -40(%ebp) <<-- Storing EHGuard
leal -28(%ebp), %eax
movl $__except_handler4, -24(%ebp)
movl %fs:0, %ecx
movl %ecx, -28(%ebp)
movl %eax, %fs:0
movl $0, -16(%ebp)
calll _may_throw_or_crash
LBB1_1: # %cont
movl -28(%ebp), %eax
movl %eax, %fs:0
addl $28, %esp
popl %esi
popl %edi
popl %ebx
popl %ebp
retl

```

And the corresponding offset is computed:
```
Luse_except_handler4_ssp$parent_frame_offset = -36
.p2align 2
L__ehtable$use_except_handler4_ssp:
.long -2 # GSCookieOffset
.long 0 # GSCookieXOROffset
.long -40 # EHCookieOffset <<----
.long 0 # EHCookieXOROffset
.long -2 # ToState
.long _catchall_filt # FilterFunction
.long LBB1_2 # ExceptionHandler

```

Clang is not yet producing function using SEH4, but it's a work in progress.
This patch is a step toward having a valid implementation of SEH4.
Unfortunately, it is not yet fully working. The EH registration block is not
allocated at the right offset on the stack.

Reviewers: rnk, majnemer

Subscribers: llvm-commits, chrisha

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21231

llvm-svn: 273281

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-3.8.1, llvmorg-3.8.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.8.0
# e60ee3b8 29-Feb-2016 David Majnemer <david.majnemer@gmail.com>

[WinEH] Make setjmp work correctly with EH

32-bit X86 EH on Windows utilizes a stack of registration nodes
allocated and deallocated on entry/exit. A registration node contains a
bunch of EH person

[WinEH] Make setjmp work correctly with EH

32-bit X86 EH on Windows utilizes a stack of registration nodes
allocated and deallocated on entry/exit. A registration node contains a
bunch of EH personality specific information like which try-state we are
currently in.

Because a setjmp target allows control flow from arbitrary program
points, there is no way to ensure that the try-state we are in is
correctly updated once we transfer control.

MSVC compatible compilers, like MSVC and ICC, utilize runtime helpers to
reinitialize the try-state when a longjmp occurs. This is implemented
by adding additional arguments to _setjmp3: the desired try-state and
a helper routine to update the try-state.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17721

llvm-svn: 262241

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-3.8.0-rc3
# 862c5ba3 20-Feb-2016 David Majnemer <david.majnemer@gmail.com>

Move some code from doInitialization to runOnFunction

This has no observable behavior change, it just makes the state
insertion pass look a little more like normal passes.

llvm-svn: 261420


# a822c880 18-Feb-2016 David Majnemer <david.majnemer@gmail.com>

[WinEH] Hoist state stores from successors

If we know that all of our successors want to be in the exact same
state, it makes sense to hoist the state transition into their common
predecessor.

Diff

[WinEH] Hoist state stores from successors

If we know that all of our successors want to be in the exact same
state, it makes sense to hoist the state transition into their common
predecessor.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17391

llvm-svn: 261262

show more ...


1234