#
70bc5f13 |
| 19-Jun-2015 |
Alexander Kornienko <alexfh@google.com> |
Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \ -checks=-*,llvm-namespace-c
Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \ -checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \ llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
show more ...
|
#
4915dd07 |
| 08-Jun-2015 |
Pete Cooper <peter_cooper@apple.com> |
Remove includes of MCMachOSymbolFlags.h after it was deleted
llvm-svn: 239318
|
#
36e60e91 |
| 04-Jun-2015 |
Jim Grosbach <grosbach@apple.com> |
MC: Clean up naming in MCObjectWriter. NFC.
s/WriteObject/writeObject/ s/RecordRelocation/recordRelocation/ s/IsSymbolRefDifferenceFullyResolved/isSymbolRefDifferenceFullyResolved/ s/Write8/write8/
MC: Clean up naming in MCObjectWriter. NFC.
s/WriteObject/writeObject/ s/RecordRelocation/recordRelocation/ s/IsSymbolRefDifferenceFullyResolved/isSymbolRefDifferenceFullyResolved/ s/Write8/write8/ s/WriteLE16/writeLE16/ s/WriteLE32/writeLE32/ s/WriteLE64/writeLE64/ s/WriteBE16/writeBE16/ s/WriteBE32/writeBE32/ s/WriteBE64/writeBE64/ s/Write16/write16/ s/Write32/write32/ s/Write64/write64/ s/WriteZeroes/writeZeroes/ s/WriteBytes/writeBytes/
llvm-svn: 239108
show more ...
|
#
7c76b4cc |
| 04-Jun-2015 |
Jim Grosbach <grosbach@apple.com> |
MC: Remove obsolete MachO UseAggressiveSymbolFolding.
Fix the FIXME and remove this old as(1) compat option. It was useful for bringup of the integrated assembler to diff object files, but now it's
MC: Remove obsolete MachO UseAggressiveSymbolFolding.
Fix the FIXME and remove this old as(1) compat option. It was useful for bringup of the integrated assembler to diff object files, but now it's just causing more relocations than strictly necessary to be generated.
rdar://21201804
llvm-svn: 239084
show more ...
|
#
13760bd1 |
| 30-May-2015 |
Jim Grosbach <grosbach@apple.com> |
MC: Clean up MCExpr naming. NFC.
llvm-svn: 238634
|
#
4d37b2a2 |
| 29-May-2015 |
Rafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> |
Remove getData.
This completes the mechanical part of merging MCSymbol and MCSymbolData.
llvm-svn: 238617
|
#
beb6060a |
| 29-May-2015 |
Rafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> |
Remove the MCSymbolData typedef.
The getData member function is next.
llvm-svn: 238611
|
#
3a5d3cce |
| 28-May-2015 |
Rafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> |
Remove a trivial forwarding function. NFC.
llvm-svn: 238506
|
#
61e724a8 |
| 26-May-2015 |
Rafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> |
Stop using MCSectionData in MCMachObjectWriter.h.
llvm-svn: 238165
|
#
079027ea |
| 26-May-2015 |
Rafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> |
Stop using MCSectionData in MCExpr.h.
llvm-svn: 238163
|
#
7549f876 |
| 26-May-2015 |
Rafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> |
Return a MCSection from MCFragment::getParent().
Another step in merging MCSectionData and MCSection.
llvm-svn: 238162
|
#
6e6820a7 |
| 25-May-2015 |
Rafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> |
Stop forwarding getOrdinal and setOrdinal.
llvm-svn: 238139
|
#
08b8726d |
| 20-May-2015 |
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith@apple.com> |
MC: Use MCSymbol in MachObjectWriter, NFC
Replace uses of `MCSymbolData` with `MCSymbol` where both are needed, so we can remove the backpointer.
llvm-svn: 237799
|
#
99d8a8e8 |
| 20-May-2015 |
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith@apple.com> |
MC: Take MCSymbol in MachObjectWriter::getSymbolAddress(), NFC
Pass through an `MCSymbol` instead of an `MCSymbolData` so we can get rid of the back pointer.
llvm-svn: 237750
|
#
2a404834 |
| 19-May-2015 |
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith@apple.com> |
MC: Use MCSymbol in MCAsmLayout::getSymbolOffset(), NFC
Continue to canonicalize on MCSymbol instead of MCSymbolData when both are needed.
llvm-svn: 237749
|
#
6f482000 |
| 18-May-2015 |
Jim Grosbach <grosbach@apple.com> |
MC: Clean up method names in MCContext.
The naming was a mish-mash of old and new style. Update to be consistent with the new. NFC.
llvm-svn: 237594
|
#
6e23e5a6 |
| 16-May-2015 |
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith@apple.com> |
MC: Use MCSymbol in RelAndSymbol, NFC
Switch from `MCSymbolData` to `MCSymbol`.
llvm-svn: 237502
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.6.1, llvmorg-3.6.1-rc1 |
|
#
5560a4cf |
| 14-Apr-2015 |
Rafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> |
Use raw_pwrite_stream in the object writer/streamer.
The ELF object writer will take advantage of that in the next commit.
llvm-svn: 234950
|
#
49286e9f |
| 09-Apr-2015 |
Rafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> |
clang-format bits of code to make a followup patch easy to read.
llvm-svn: 234519
|
#
42335572 |
| 06-Apr-2015 |
Tim Northover <tnorthover@apple.com> |
ARM: do not relax Thumb1 -> Thumb2 if only Thumb1 is available.
After recognising that a certain narrow instruction might need a relocation to be represented, we used to unconditionally relax it to
ARM: do not relax Thumb1 -> Thumb2 if only Thumb1 is available.
After recognising that a certain narrow instruction might need a relocation to be represented, we used to unconditionally relax it to a Thumb2 instruction to permit this. Unfortunately, some CPUs (e.g. v6m) don't even have most Thumb2 instructions, so we end up emitting a completely invalid instruction.
Theoretically, ELF does have relocations for these situations; but they are fairly unusable with such short ranges and the ABI document even says they're documented "for completeness". So an error is probably better there too.
rdar://20391953
llvm-svn: 234195
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.5.2, llvmorg-3.5.2-rc1, llvmorg-3.6.0, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc2 |
|
#
2658554a |
| 19-Jan-2015 |
Rafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> |
Add r224985 back with fixes.
The fixes are to note that AArch64 has additional restrictions on when local relocations can be used. In particular, ld64 requires that relocations to cstring/cfstrings
Add r224985 back with fixes.
The fixes are to note that AArch64 has additional restrictions on when local relocations can be used. In particular, ld64 requires that relocations to cstring/cfstrings use linker visible symbols.
Original message:
In an assembly expression like
bar: .long L0 + 1
the intended semantics is that bar will contain a pointer one byte past L0.
In sections that are merged by content (strings, 4 byte constants, etc), a single position in the section doesn't give the linker enough information. For example, it would not be able to tell a relocation must point to the end of a string, since that would look just like the start of the next.
The solution used in ELF to use relocation with symbols if there is a non-zero addend.
In MachO before this patch we would just keep all symbols in some sections.
This would miss some cases (only cstrings on x86_64 were implemented) and was inefficient since most relocations have an addend of 0 and can be represented without the symbol.
This patch implements the non-zero addend logic for MachO too.
llvm-svn: 226503
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.6.0-rc1 |
|
#
7244bb3c |
| 14-Jan-2015 |
Rafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> |
Revert "Add r224985 back with two fixes."
This reverts commit r225644 while I debug a regression.
llvm-svn: 226022
|
#
d9c3e308 |
| 12-Jan-2015 |
Rafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> |
Add r224985 back with two fixes.
One is that AArch64 has additional restrictions on when local relocations can be used. We have to take those into consideration when deciding to put a L symbol in th
Add r224985 back with two fixes.
One is that AArch64 has additional restrictions on when local relocations can be used. We have to take those into consideration when deciding to put a L symbol in the symbol table or not.
The other is that ld64 requires the relocations to cstring to use linker visible symbols on AArch64.
Thanks to Michael Zolotukhin for testing this!
Remove doesSectionRequireSymbols.
In an assembly expression like
bar: .long L0 + 1
the intended semantics is that bar will contain a pointer one byte past L0.
In sections that are merged by content (strings, 4 byte constants, etc), a single position in the section doesn't give the linker enough information. For example, it would not be able to tell a relocation must point to the end of a string, since that would look just like the start of the next.
The solution used in ELF to use relocation with symbols if there is a non-zero addend.
In MachO before this patch we would just keep all symbols in some sections.
This would miss some cases (only cstrings on x86_64 were implemented) and was inefficient since most relocations have an addend of 0 and can be represented without the symbol.
This patch implements the non-zero addend logic for MachO too.
llvm-svn: 225644
show more ...
|
#
04b37c40 |
| 06-Jan-2015 |
Lang Hames <lhames@gmail.com> |
Revert r225048: It broke ObjC on AArch64.
I've filed http://llvm.org/PR22100 to track this issue.
llvm-svn: 225228
|
#
54b435ec |
| 31-Dec-2014 |
Rafael Espindola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> |
Add r224985 back with a fix.
The issues was that AArch64 has additional restrictions on when local relocations can be used. We have to take those into consideration when deciding to put a L symbol i
Add r224985 back with a fix.
The issues was that AArch64 has additional restrictions on when local relocations can be used. We have to take those into consideration when deciding to put a L symbol in the symbol table or not.
Original message:
Remove doesSectionRequireSymbols.
In an assembly expression like
bar: .long L0 + 1
the intended semantics is that bar will contain a pointer one byte past L0.
In sections that are merged by content (strings, 4 byte constants, etc), a single position in the section doesn't give the linker enough information. For example, it would not be able to tell a relocation must point to the end of a string, since that would look just like the start of the next.
The solution used in ELF to use relocation with symbols if there is a non-zero addend.
In MachO before this patch we would just keep all symbols in some sections.
This would miss some cases (only cstrings on x86_64 were implemented) and was inefficient since most relocations have an addend of 0 and can be represented without the symbol.
This patch implements the non-zero addend logic for MachO too.
llvm-svn: 225048
show more ...
|