Fix: Reordering parameters in getFile and getFileOrSTDIN

There was a new getFileOrSTDIN call added recently which was not included in my patch. https://reviews.llvm.org/D99110
I reordered the args t

Fix: Reordering parameters in getFile and getFileOrSTDIN

There was a new getFileOrSTDIN call added recently which was not included in my patch. https://reviews.llvm.org/D99110
I reordered the args to match the new order.

Reviewed By: tunz

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99349

show more ...

[Coverage] Load records immediately

The current implementation keeps buffers generated for each object file
until it completes loading of all files. This approach requires a lot of memory
if there a

[Coverage] Load records immediately

The current implementation keeps buffers generated for each object file
until it completes loading of all files. This approach requires a lot of memory
if there are a lot of huge object files. Thus, make it to load coverage records
immediately rather than waiting for other binaries to be loaded.

This reduces memory usage of llvm-cov from >128GB to 5GB when
loading Chromium binaries in Windows.

Additional testing: check-profile, check-llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99110

show more ...

Revert "[llvm-cov] reset executation count to 0 after wrapped segment"

This reverts D85036

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98084

[llvm] Use llvm::append_range (NFC)

[Coverage] Add support for Branch Coverage in LLVM Source-Based Code Coverage

This is an enhancement to LLVM Source-Based Code Coverage in clang to track how
many times individual branch-generating

[Coverage] Add support for Branch Coverage in LLVM Source-Based Code Coverage

This is an enhancement to LLVM Source-Based Code Coverage in clang to track how
many times individual branch-generating conditions are taken (evaluate to TRUE)
and not taken (evaluate to FALSE). Individual conditions may comprise larger
boolean expressions using boolean logical operators. This functionality is
very similar to what is supported by GCOV except that it is very closely
anchored to the ASTs.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84467

show more ...

[llvm-cov] Warn when -arch spec is missing/invalid for universal binary (reland)

llvm-cov reports a poor error message when the -arch specifier is
missing or invalid, and a binary has multiple slice

[llvm-cov] Warn when -arch spec is missing/invalid for universal binary (reland)

llvm-cov reports a poor error message when the -arch specifier is
missing or invalid, and a binary has multiple slices. Make the error
message more specific.

(This version of the patch avoids using llvm::none_of -- the way I used
the utility caused compile errors on many bots, possibly because the
wrong overload of `none_of` was selected.)

rdar://40312677

show more ...

Revert "[llvm-cov] Warn when -arch spec is missing/invalid for universal binary"

This reverts commit b81d4bfb44c14575130bb06c047728b69c3213aa.

It's causing some bots to fail to build due to: "error

Revert "[llvm-cov] Warn when -arch spec is missing/invalid for universal binary"

This reverts commit b81d4bfb44c14575130bb06c047728b69c3213aa.

It's causing some bots to fail to build due to: "error: no matching
function for call to ‘__iterator_category".

show more ...

[llvm-cov] Warn when -arch spec is missing/invalid for universal binary

llvm-cov reports a poor error message when the -arch specifier is
missing or invalid, and a binary has multiple slices. Make t

[llvm-cov] Warn when -arch spec is missing/invalid for universal binary

llvm-cov reports a poor error message when the -arch specifier is
missing or invalid, and a binary has multiple slices. Make the error
message more specific.

rdar://40312677

show more ...

[Coverage] Add empty line regions to SkippedRegions

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84988

[llvm-cov] reset executation count to 0 after wrapped segment

Fix the bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36979. It also fixes this bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35404, which I t

[llvm-cov] reset executation count to 0 after wrapped segment

Fix the bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36979. It also fixes this bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35404, which I think is caused by the same problem.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85036

show more ...

Reland: [Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size

Try again with an up-to-date version of D69471 (99317124 was a stale
revision).

---

Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size

Reland: [Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size

Try again with an up-to-date version of D69471 (99317124 was a stale
revision).

---

Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:

1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.

This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).

Rationale for changes to the format:

- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.

- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.

- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).

See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.

Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.

[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471

show more ...

Revert "[Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size"

This reverts commit 99317124e1c772e9a9de41a0cd56e1db049b4ea4. This is
still busted on Windows:

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-w

Revert "[Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size"

This reverts commit 99317124e1c772e9a9de41a0cd56e1db049b4ea4. This is
still busted on Windows:

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-win7/builds/40873

The llvm-cov tests report 'error: Could not load coverage information'.

show more ...

[Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size

Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:

1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.

[Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size

Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:

1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.

This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).

Rationale for changes to the format:

- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.

- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.

- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).

See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.

Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.

[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471

show more ...

Revert "Remove redundant "std::move"s in return statements"

The build failed with

error: call to deleted constructor of 'llvm::Error'

errors.

This reverts commit 1c2241a7936bf85aa68aef94bd40c3b

Revert "Remove redundant "std::move"s in return statements"

The build failed with

error: call to deleted constructor of 'llvm::Error'

errors.

This reverts commit 1c2241a7936bf85aa68aef94bd40c3ba77d8ddf2.

show more ...

Remove redundant "std::move"s in return statements

Another round of GCC5 fixes.

Revert "[Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size"

This reverts commit e18531595bba495946aa52c0a16b9f9238cff8bc.

On Windows, there is an error:

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-win

Revert "[Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size"

This reverts commit e18531595bba495946aa52c0a16b9f9238cff8bc.

On Windows, there is an error:

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-windows/builds/54963/steps/stage%201%20check/logs/stdio

error: C:\b\slave\sanitizer-windows\build\stage1\projects\compiler-rt\test\profile\Profile-x86_64\Output\instrprof-merging.cpp.tmp.v1.o: Failed to load coverage: Malformed coverage data

show more ...

[Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size

Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:

1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.

[Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size

Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:

1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.

This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).

Rationale for changes to the format:

- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.

- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.

- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).

See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.

Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.

[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471

show more ...

[Coverage] Speed up file-based queries for coverage info, NFC

Speed up queries for coverage info in a file by reducing the amount of
time spent determining whether a function record corresponds to a

[Coverage] Speed up file-based queries for coverage info, NFC

Speed up queries for coverage info in a file by reducing the amount of
time spent determining whether a function record corresponds to a file.

This gives a 36% speedup when generating a coverage report for `llc`.
The reduction is entirely in user time.

rdar://54758110

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67575

llvm-svn: 372025

show more ...

Ignore object files that lack coverage information.

Before this change, if multiple binary files were presented, all of them must have been instrumented or the load would fail with coverage_map_erro

Ignore object files that lack coverage information.

Before this change, if multiple binary files were presented, all of them must have been instrumented or the load would fail with coverage_map_error::no_data_found.

Patch by Dean Sturtevant.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66763

llvm-svn: 370257

show more ...

[Coverage] Load code coverage data from archives

Support loading code coverage data from regular archives, thin archives,
and from MachO universal binaries which contain archives.

Testing: check-ll

[Coverage] Load code coverage data from archives

Support loading code coverage data from regular archives, thin archives,
and from MachO universal binaries which contain archives.

Testing: check-llvm, check-profile (with {A,UB}San enabled)

rdar://51538999

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63232

llvm-svn: 363325

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

llvm::sort(C.begin(), C.end(), ...) -> llvm::sort(C, ...)

Summary: The convenience wrapper in STLExtras is available since rL342102.

Reviewers: dblaikie, javed.absar, JDevlieghere, andreadb

Subscr

llvm::sort(C.begin(), C.end(), ...) -> llvm::sort(C, ...)

Summary: The convenience wrapper in STLExtras is available since rL342102.

Reviewers: dblaikie, javed.absar, JDevlieghere, andreadb

Subscribers: MatzeB, sanjoy, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, eraman, aheejin, kbarton, JDevlieghere, javed.absar, gbedwell, jrtc27, mgrang, atanasyan, steven_wu, george.burgess.iv, dexonsmith, kristina, jsji, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52573

llvm-svn: 343163

show more ...

[Coverage] Ignore 'unused' functions with non-zero execution counts

Frontends emit 'unused' coverage mapping records for functions which are
provably unused in a TU. These unused records contain a s

[Coverage] Ignore 'unused' functions with non-zero execution counts

Frontends emit 'unused' coverage mapping records for functions which are
provably unused in a TU. These unused records contain a single counter
with CounterKind::Zero. However, a function may be unused in one TU and
used in another. When this happens, prefer the records with a full set
of counters instead of arbitrarily picking the first loaded record.

There is no impact on the single-TU case. In the multiple-TU case, this
resolves issues causing a function to appear unused when it's not.

Testing: check-{llvm,clang,compiler-rt}

rdar://42981322

llvm-svn: 339194

show more ...

[Coverage] Delete getCounterMismatches, it's dead code (NFC)

Exactly one counted region is inserted into a function record for every
region in a coverage mapping.

llvm-svn: 339193