[Alignment][NFC] Use Align with CreateAlignedStore

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/20

[Alignment][NFC] Use Align with CreateAlignedStore

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet, bollu

Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kerbowa, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73274

show more ...

Reland [DataLayout] Fix occurrences that size and range of pointers are assumed to be the same.

GEP index size can be specified in the DataLayout, introduced in D42123. However, there were still pla

Reland [DataLayout] Fix occurrences that size and range of pointers are assumed to be the same.

GEP index size can be specified in the DataLayout, introduced in D42123. However, there were still places
in which getIndexSizeInBits was used interchangeably with getPointerSizeInBits. This notably caused issues
with Instcombine's visitPtrToInt; but the unit tests was incorrect, so this remained undiscovered.

This fixes the buildbot failures.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68328

Patch by Joseph Faulls!

show more ...

Temporarily Revert "[DataLayout] Fix occurrences that size and range of pointers are assumed to be the same."

This reverts commit 5f6208778ff92567c57d7c1e2e740c284d7e69a5.

This caused failures in T

Temporarily Revert "[DataLayout] Fix occurrences that size and range of pointers are assumed to be the same."

This reverts commit 5f6208778ff92567c57d7c1e2e740c284d7e69a5.

This caused failures in Transforms/PhaseOrdering/scev-custom-dl.ll
const: Assertion `getBitWidth() == CR.getBitWidth() && "ConstantRange types don't agree!"' failed.

show more ...

[DataLayout] Fix occurrences that size and range of pointers are assumed to be the same.

GEP index size can be specified in the DataLayout, introduced in D42123. However, there were still places
in

[DataLayout] Fix occurrences that size and range of pointers are assumed to be the same.

GEP index size can be specified in the DataLayout, introduced in D42123. However, there were still places
in which getIndexSizeInBits was used interchangeably with getPointerSizeInBits. This notably caused issues
with Instcombine's visitPtrToInt; but the unit tests was incorrect, so this remained undiscovered.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68328

Patch by Joseph Faulls!

show more ...

[SVE][IR] Scalable Vector size queries and IR instruction support

* Adds a TypeSize struct to represent the known minimum size of a type
along with a flag to indicate that the runtime size is a in

[SVE][IR] Scalable Vector size queries and IR instruction support

* Adds a TypeSize struct to represent the known minimum size of a type
along with a flag to indicate that the runtime size is a integer multiple
of that size
* Converts existing size query functions from Type.h and DataLayout.h to
return a TypeSize result
* Adds convenience methods (including a transparent conversion operator
to uint64_t) so that most existing code 'just works' as if the return
values were still scalars.
* Uses the new size queries along with ElementCount to ensure that all
supported instructions used with scalable vectors can be constructed
in IR.

Reviewers: hfinkel, lattner, rkruppe, greened, rovka, rengolin, sdesmalen

Reviewed By: rovka, sdesmalen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53137

llvm-svn: 374042

show more ...

[Alignment][NFC] Remove unneeded llvm:: scoping on Align types

llvm-svn: 373081

[Alignment][NFC] DataLayout migration to llvm::Align

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/

[Alignment][NFC] DataLayout migration to llvm::Align

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: jholewinski, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67914

llvm-svn: 372596

show more ...

[Alignment][NFC] Switch DataLayout private members to llvm::Align

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/piperm

[Alignment][NFC] Switch DataLayout private members to llvm::Align

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67836

llvm-svn: 372558

show more ...

[Alignment][NFC] migrate DataLayout internal struct to llvm::Align

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/piper

[Alignment][NFC] migrate DataLayout internal struct to llvm::Align

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

With this patch the PointerAlignElem struct goes from 20B to 16B.

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67400

llvm-svn: 372390

show more ...

[LLVM][NFC] Removing unused functions

Summary: Removes a not so useful function from DataLayout and cleans up Support/MathExtras.h

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #l

[LLVM][NFC] Removing unused functions

Summary: Removes a not so useful function from DataLayout and cleans up Support/MathExtras.h

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66691

llvm-svn: 369824

show more ...

[DataLayout] Check StackNatural and FunctionPtr alignments.

MaybeAlignment asserts that the passed in value is == 0 or a power of 2.

Fixes https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=1627

[DataLayout] Check StackNatural and FunctionPtr alignments.

MaybeAlignment asserts that the passed in value is == 0 or a power of 2.

Fixes https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=16272

Reviewers: michaelplatings, gchatelet, jakehehrlich, jfb

Reviewed By: gchatelet

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65858

llvm-svn: 368191

show more ...

[LLVM][Alignment] Introduce Alignment Type in DataLayout

Summary:
This is patch is part of a serie to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-d

[LLVM][Alignment] Introduce Alignment Type in DataLayout

Summary:
This is patch is part of a serie to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet, jfb, jakehehrlich

Subscribers: hiraditya, dexonsmith, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65521

Make getFunctionPtrAlign() return MaybeAlign

llvm-svn: 367817

show more ...

Cleanup: llvm::bsearch -> llvm::partition_point after r364719

llvm-svn: 364720

Simplify std::lower_bound with llvm::{bsearch,lower_bound}. NFC

llvm-svn: 364006

[IR][ARM] Add function pointer alignment to datalayout

Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is
incorrectly assumed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335

ll

[IR][ARM] Add function pointer alignment to datalayout

Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is
incorrectly assumed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335

llvm-svn: 355685

show more ...

Rollback of rL355585.

Introduces memory leak in FunctionTest.GetPointerAlignment that breaks sanitizer buildbots:

```
=================================================================
==2453==ERROR

Rollback of rL355585.

Introduces memory leak in FunctionTest.GetPointerAlignment that breaks sanitizer buildbots:

```
=================================================================
==2453==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 128 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105
#1 0x16936bc in llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/User.cpp:151:19
#2 0x7c3fe9 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:12
#3 0x7c3fe9 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136
#4 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
#5 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
#6 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
#7 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
#8 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
#9 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
#10 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
#11 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
#12 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
#13 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)

Indirect leak of 40 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105
#1 0x151be6b in make_unique<llvm::ValueSymbolTable> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:1349:29
#2 0x151be6b in llvm::Function::Function(llvm::FunctionType*, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, unsigned int, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::Module*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/Function.cpp:241
#3 0x7c4006 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:16
#4 0x7c4006 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136
#5 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
#6 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
#7 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
#8 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
#9 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
#10 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
#11 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
#12 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
#13 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
#14 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 168 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
```

See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/builds/11358/steps/check-llvm%20asan/logs/stdio for more information.

Also introduces use-of-uninitialized-value in ConstantsTest.FoldGlobalVariablePtr:
```
==7070==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0x14e703c in User /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5
#1 0x14e703c in Constant /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Constant.h:44
#2 0x14e703c in llvm::GlobalValue::GlobalValue(llvm::Type*, llvm::Value::ValueTy, llvm::Use*, unsigned int, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Twine const&, unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalValue.h:78
#3 0x14e5467 in GlobalObject /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalObject.h:34:9
#4 0x14e5467 in llvm::GlobalVariable::GlobalVariable(llvm::Type*, bool, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Constant*, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::GlobalValue::ThreadLocalMode, unsigned int, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/Globals.cpp:314
#5 0x6938f1 in llvm::(anonymous namespace)::ConstantsTest_FoldGlobalVariablePtr_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantsTest.cpp:565:18
#6 0x1a240a1 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
#7 0x1a240a1 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
#8 0x1a26d26 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
#9 0x1a2815f in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
#10 0x1a43de8 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
#11 0x1a42c47 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
#12 0x1a42c47 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
#13 0x1a0dfba in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
#14 0x1a0dfba in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
#15 0x7f2081c412e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
#16 0x4dff49 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/unittests/IR/IRTests+0x4dff49)

SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5 in User
```

See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/30222/steps/check-llvm%20msan/logs/stdio for more information.

llvm-svn: 355616

show more ...

[IR][ARM] Add function pointer alignment to datalayout

Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is
incorrectly assumed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335

ll

[IR][ARM] Add function pointer alignment to datalayout

Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is
incorrectly assumed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335

llvm-svn: 355585

show more ...

Revert "[IR][ARM] Add function pointer alignment to datalayout"

This reverts commit 2391bfca97290181ae65796ea6da135d1b6d037b.

This reverts rL355522 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335).

Kills buildbo

Revert "[IR][ARM] Add function pointer alignment to datalayout"

This reverts commit 2391bfca97290181ae65796ea6da135d1b6d037b.

This reverts rL355522 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335).

Kills buildbots that use '-Werror' with the following error:
/var/lib/buildbot/sanitizer-buildbot6/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android/build/llvm/lib/IR/Value.cpp:657:7: error: default label in switch which covers all enumeration values [-Werror,-Wcovered-switch-default]

See buildbots http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/30200/steps/check-llvm%20asan/logs/stdio for more information.

llvm-svn: 355537

show more ...

[IR][ARM] Add function pointer alignment to datalayout

Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is
incorrectly assumed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335

ll

[IR][ARM] Add function pointer alignment to datalayout

Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is
incorrectly assumed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335

llvm-svn: 355522

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

[BasicAA] Support arbitrary pointer sizes (and fix an overflow bug)

Motivated by the discussion in D38499, this patch updates BasicAA to support
arbitrary pointer sizes by switching most remaining n

[BasicAA] Support arbitrary pointer sizes (and fix an overflow bug)

Motivated by the discussion in D38499, this patch updates BasicAA to support
arbitrary pointer sizes by switching most remaining non-APInt calculations to
use APInt. The size of these APInts is set to the maximum pointer size (maximum
over all address spaces described by the data layout string).

Most of this translation is straightforward, but this patch contains a fix for
a bug that revealed itself during this translation process. In order for
test/Analysis/BasicAA/gep-and-alias.ll to pass, which is run with 32-bit
pointers, the intermediate calculations must be performed using 64-bit
integers. This is because, as noted in the patch, when GetLinearExpression
decomposes an expression into C1*V+C2, and we then multiply this by Scale, and
distribute, to get (C1*Scale)*V + C2*Scale, it can be the case that, even
through C1*V+C2 does not overflow for relevant values of V, (C2*Scale) can
overflow. If this happens, later logic will draw invalid conclusions from the
(base) offset value. Thus, when initially applying the APInt conversion,
because the maximum pointer size in this test is 32 bits, it started failing.
Suspicious, I created a 64-bit version of this test (included here), and that
failed (miscompiled) on trunk for a similar reason (the multiplication can
overflow).

After fixing this overflow bug, the first test case (at least) in
Analysis/BasicAA/q.bad.ll started failing. This is also a 32-bit test, and was
relying on having 64-bit intermediate values to have BasicAA return an accurate
result. In order to fix this problem, and because I believe that it is not
uncommon to use i64 indexing expressions in 32-bit code (especially portable
code using int64_t), it seems reasonable to always use at least 64-bit
integers. In this way, we won't regress our analysis capabilities (and there's
a command-line option added, so experimenting with this should be easy).

As pointed out by Eli during the review, there are other potential overflow
conditions that this patch does not address. Fixing those is left to follow-up
work.

Patch by me with contributions from Michael Ferguson (mferguson@cray.com).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38662

llvm-svn: 350220

show more ...

[NFC] Make getPreferredAlignment honor section markings.

This should more accurately reflect what the AsmPrinter will actually
do.

This is NFC, as far as I can tell; all the places that might be af

[NFC] Make getPreferredAlignment honor section markings.

This should more accurately reflect what the AsmPrinter will actually
do.

This is NFC, as far as I can tell; all the places that might be affected
already have an extra check to avoid using the result of
getPreferredAlignment in this situation.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51377

llvm-svn: 340999

show more ...

Use uniform mechanism for OOM errors handling

This is a recommit of r333506, which was reverted in r333518.
The original commit message is below.

In r325551 many calls of malloc/calloc/realloc were

Use uniform mechanism for OOM errors handling

This is a recommit of r333506, which was reverted in r333518.
The original commit message is below.

In r325551 many calls of malloc/calloc/realloc were replaces with calls of
their safe counterparts defined in the namespace llvm. There functions
generate crash if memory cannot be allocated, such behavior facilitates
handling of out of memory errors on Windows.

If the result of *alloc function were checked for success, the function was
not replaced with the safe variant. In these cases the calling function made
the error handling, like:

T *NewElts = static_cast<T*>(malloc(NewCapacity*sizeof(T)));
if (NewElts == nullptr)
report_bad_alloc_error("Allocation of SmallVector element failed.");

Actually knowledge about the function where OOM occurred is useless. Moreover
having a single entry point for OOM handling is convenient for investigation
of memory problems. This change removes custom OOM errors handling and
replaces them with calls to functions `llvm::safe_*alloc`.

Declarations of `safe_*alloc` are moved to a separate include file, to avoid
cyclic dependency in SmallVector.h

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47440

llvm-svn: 334344

show more ...

Revert commit 333506

It looks like this commit is responsible for the fail:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-autoconf/builds/24382.

llvm-svn: 333518

Use uniform mechanism for OOM errors handling

This is a recommit of r333390, which was reverted in r333395, because it
caused cyclic dependency when building shared library `LLVMDemangle.so`.
In thi

Use uniform mechanism for OOM errors handling

This is a recommit of r333390, which was reverted in r333395, because it
caused cyclic dependency when building shared library `LLVMDemangle.so`.
In this commit `ItaniumDemangler.cpp` was not changed.

The original commit message is below.

In r325551 many calls of malloc/calloc/realloc were replaces with calls of
their safe counterparts defined in the namespace llvm. There functions
generate crash if memory cannot be allocated, such behavior facilitates
handling of out of memory errors on Windows.

If the result of *alloc function were checked for success, the function was
not replaced with the safe variant. In these cases the calling function made
the error handling, like:

T *NewElts = static_cast<T*>(malloc(NewCapacity*sizeof(T)));
if (NewElts == nullptr)
report_bad_alloc_error("Allocation of SmallVector element failed.");

Actually knowledge about the function where OOM occurred is useless. Moreover
having a single entry point for OOM handling is convenient for investigation
of memory problems. This change removes custom OOM errors handling and
replaces them with calls to functions `llvm::safe_*alloc`.

Declarations of `safe_*alloc` are moved to a separate include file, to avoid
cyclic dependency in SmallVector.h

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47440

llvm-svn: 333506

show more ...