#
2a0f2c5e |
| 06-Mar-2019 |
Ayonam Ray <ayonam@rrlogic.co.in> |
[CodeGen] Omit range checks from jump tables when lowering switches with unreachable default
During the lowering of a switch that would result in the generation of a jump table, a range check is per
[CodeGen] Omit range checks from jump tables when lowering switches with unreachable default
During the lowering of a switch that would result in the generation of a jump table, a range check is performed before indexing into the jump table, for the switch value being outside the jump table range and a conditional branch is inserted to jump to the default block. In case the default block is unreachable, this conditional jump can be omitted. This patch implements omitting this conditional branch for unreachable defaults.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52002 Reviewers: Hans Wennborg, Eli Freidman, Roman Lebedev
llvm-svn: 355490
show more ...
|
#
af92b7a3 |
| 06-Mar-2019 |
Ayonam Ray <ayonam@rrlogic.co.in> |
Reversing the commit of revision 355483 since it is giving a regression on a newly added test.
llvm-svn: 355487
|
#
6025fa8e |
| 06-Mar-2019 |
Ayonam Ray <ayonam@rrlogic.co.in> |
[CodeGen] Omit range checks from jump tables when lowering switches with unreachable default
During the lowering of a switch that would result in the generation of a jump table, a range check is per
[CodeGen] Omit range checks from jump tables when lowering switches with unreachable default
During the lowering of a switch that would result in the generation of a jump table, a range check is performed before indexing into the jump table, for the switch value being outside the jump table range and a conditional branch is inserted to jump to the default block. In case the default block is unreachable, this conditional jump can be omitted. This patch implements omitting this conditional branch for unreachable defaults.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52002 Reviewers: Hans Wennborg, Eli Freidman, Roman Lebedev
llvm-svn: 355483
show more ...
|
#
195a62e9 |
| 03-Mar-2019 |
Heejin Ahn <aheejin@gmail.com> |
[WebAssembly] Delete ThrowUnwindDest map from WasmEHFuncInfo
Summary: Before when we implemented the first EH proposal, 'catch <tag>' instruction may not catch an exception so there were multiple EH
[WebAssembly] Delete ThrowUnwindDest map from WasmEHFuncInfo
Summary: Before when we implemented the first EH proposal, 'catch <tag>' instruction may not catch an exception so there were multiple EH pads an exception can unwind to. That means a BB could have multiple EH pad successors.
Now after we switched to the new proposal, every 'catch' instruction catches an exception, and there is only one catchpad per catchswitch, so we at most have one EH pad successor, making `ThrowUnwindDest` map in `WasmEHInfo` unnecessary.
Keeping `ThrowUnwindDest` map in `WasmEHInfo` has its own problems, because other optimization passes can split a BB that contains possibly throwing calls (previously invokes), and we have to update the map every time that happens, which is not easy for common CodeGen passes.
This also correctly updates successor info in LateEHPrepare when we add a rethrow instruction.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58486
llvm-svn: 355296
show more ...
|
#
288a95fc |
| 27-Feb-2019 |
Philip Reames <listmail@philipreames.com> |
Seperate volatility and atomicity/ordering in SelectionDAG
At the moment, we mark every atomic memory access as being also volatile. This is unnecessarily conservative and prohibits many legal trans
Seperate volatility and atomicity/ordering in SelectionDAG
At the moment, we mark every atomic memory access as being also volatile. This is unnecessarily conservative and prohibits many legal transforms (DCE, folding, etc..).
This patch removes MOVolatile from the MachineMemOperands of atomic, but not volatile, instructions. This should be strictly NFC after a series of previous patches which have gone in to ensure backend code is conservative about handling of isAtomic MMOs. Once it's in and baked for a bit, we'll start working through removing unnecessary bailouts one by one. We applied this same strategy to the middle end a few years ago, with good success.
To make sure this patch itself is NFC, it is build on top of a series of other patches which adjust code to (for the moment) be as conservative for an atomic access as for a volatile access and build up a test corpus (mostly in test/CodeGen/X86/atomics-unordered.ll)..
Previously landed
D57593 Fix a bug in the definition of isUnordered on MachineMemOperand D57596 [CodeGen] Be conservative about atomic accesses as for volatile D57802 Be conservative about unordered accesses for the moment rL353959: [Tests] First batch of cornercase tests for unordered atomics. rL353966: [Tests] RMW folding tests w/unordered atomic operations. rL353972: [Tests] More unordered atomic lowering tests. rL353989: [SelectionDAG] Inline a single use helper function, and remove last non-MMO interface rL354740: [Hexagon, SystemZ] Be super conservative about atomics rL354800: [Lanai] Be super conservative about atomics rL354845: [ARM] Be super conservative about atomics
Attention Out of Tree Backend Owners: This patch may break you. If it does, you can use the TLI getMMOFlags hook to restore the MOVolatile to any instruction you need to. (See llvm-dev thread titled "PSA: Changes to how atomics are handled in backends" started Feb 27, 2019.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57601
llvm-svn: 355025
show more ...
|
#
0280a5e1 |
| 22-Feb-2019 |
Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault@amd.com> |
DAG: Add helper for creating shifts with correct type
llvm-svn: 354649
|
#
a0321c23 |
| 21-Feb-2019 |
Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com> |
Re-land part of r354244 "[DAGCombiner] Eliminate dead stores to stack."
This part introduces the lifetime node.
llvm-svn: 354578
|
#
292291fb |
| 18-Feb-2019 |
Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com> |
Revert r354244 "[DAGCombiner] Eliminate dead stores to stack."
Breaks some bots.
llvm-svn: 354245
|
#
57f34dbd |
| 18-Feb-2019 |
Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com> |
[DAGCombiner] Eliminate dead stores to stack.
Summary: A store to an object whose lifetime is about to end can be removed.
See PR40550 for motivation.
Reviewers: niravd
Subscribers: llvm-commits
[DAGCombiner] Eliminate dead stores to stack.
Summary: A store to an object whose lifetime is about to end can be removed.
See PR40550 for motivation.
Reviewers: niravd
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57541
llvm-svn: 354244
show more ...
|
#
78758411 |
| 15-Feb-2019 |
Nirav Dave <niravd@google.com> |
[X86] Fix LowerAsmOutputForConstraint.
Summary: Update Flag when generating cc output.
Fixes PR40737.
Reviewers: rnk, nickdesaulniers, craig.topper, spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
T
[X86] Fix LowerAsmOutputForConstraint.
Summary: Update Flag when generating cc output.
Fixes PR40737.
Reviewers: rnk, nickdesaulniers, craig.topper, spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58283
llvm-svn: 354163
show more ...
|
#
897a9f8d |
| 14-Feb-2019 |
Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse.llvm@gmail.com> |
Fix an accidentally flipped pair of arguments, NFCI
While rebasing a refactor in r353950 I accidentally swapped two function arguments; one is SelectionDAGBuilders "current" DebugLoc, the other is t
Fix an accidentally flipped pair of arguments, NFCI
While rebasing a refactor in r353950 I accidentally swapped two function arguments; one is SelectionDAGBuilders "current" DebugLoc, the other is the one from the "current" debug intrinsic. They're probably always identical, but I haven't proved that yet.
llvm-svn: 354019
show more ...
|
#
e4cfb7da |
| 13-Feb-2019 |
Philip Reames <listmail@philipreames.com> |
[SelectionDAG] Inline a single use helper function, and remove last non-MMO interface [NFC]
For D57601, we need to know whether the instruction is volatile. We'd either have to pass yet another par
[SelectionDAG] Inline a single use helper function, and remove last non-MMO interface [NFC]
For D57601, we need to know whether the instruction is volatile. We'd either have to pass yet another parameter, or just standardize on the MMO interface. I chose the second.
llvm-svn: 353989
show more ...
|
#
41f400c9 |
| 13-Feb-2019 |
Philip Reames <listmail@philipreames.com> |
[SelectionDAG] Kill last uses of getAtomic w/o a MMO operand [NFC]
The helper function was used by only two callers, and largely ended up providing distinct functionality based on optional arguments
[SelectionDAG] Kill last uses of getAtomic w/o a MMO operand [NFC]
The helper function was used by only two callers, and largely ended up providing distinct functionality based on optional arguments and opcode. Inline and simply to make the functionality much more clear.
llvm-svn: 353977
show more ...
|
#
291713a5 |
| 13-Feb-2019 |
Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse.llvm@gmail.com> |
[DebugInfo][DAG] Either salvage dangling debug info or emit Undef DBG_VALUEs
In this patch SelectionDAG tries to salvage any dbg.values that are going to be dropped, in case they can be recovered fr
[DebugInfo][DAG] Either salvage dangling debug info or emit Undef DBG_VALUEs
In this patch SelectionDAG tries to salvage any dbg.values that are going to be dropped, in case they can be recovered from Values in the current BB. It also strengthens SelectionDAGs handling of dangling debug data, so that dbg.values are *always* emitted (as Undef or otherwise) instead of dangling forever.
The motivation behind this patch exists in the new test case: a memory address (here a bitcast and GEP) exist in one basic block, and a dbg.value referring to the address is left in the 'next' block. The base pointer is live across all basic blocks. In current llvm trunk the dbg.value cannot be encoded, and it isn't even emitted as an Undef DBG_VALUE.
The change is simply: if we're definitely going to drop a dbg.value, repeatedly apply salvageDebugInfo to its operand until either we find something that can be encoded, or we can't salvage any further in which case we produce an Undef DBG_VALUE. To know when we're "definitely going to drop a dbg.value", SelectionDAG signals SelectionDAGBuilder when all IR instructions have been encoded to force salvaging. This ensures that any dbg.value that's dangling after DAG creation will have a corresponding DBG_VALUE encoded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57694
llvm-svn: 353954
show more ...
|
#
6d3cd3b4 |
| 13-Feb-2019 |
Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse.llvm@gmail.com> |
[DebugInfo][DAG] Refactor dbg.value lowering into its own method
This is a pure copy-and-paste job, moving the logic for lowering dbg.value intrinsics to SDDbgValues into its own function. This is a
[DebugInfo][DAG] Refactor dbg.value lowering into its own method
This is a pure copy-and-paste job, moving the logic for lowering dbg.value intrinsics to SDDbgValues into its own function. This is ahead of adding some more users of this logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57697
llvm-svn: 353950
show more ...
|
#
a9a11aac |
| 13-Feb-2019 |
Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse.llvm@gmail.com> |
[DebugInfo][DAG] Limit special-casing of dbg.values for Arguments
SelectionDAGBuilder has special handling for dbg.value intrinsics that are understood to define the location of function parameters
[DebugInfo][DAG] Limit special-casing of dbg.values for Arguments
SelectionDAGBuilder has special handling for dbg.value intrinsics that are understood to define the location of function parameters on entry to the function. To enable this, we avoid recording a dbg.value as a virtual register reference if it might be such a parameter, so that it later hits EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue.
This patch reduces the set of circumstances where we avoid recording a dbg.value as a virtual register reference, to allow more "normal" variables to be recorded that way. We now only bypass for potential parameters if: * The dbg.value operand is an Argument, * The Variable is a parameter, and * The Variable is not inlined. meaning it's very likely that the dbg.value is a function-entry parameter location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57584
llvm-svn: 353948
show more ...
|
#
4892f06e |
| 11-Feb-2019 |
Bjorn Pettersson <bjorn.a.pettersson@ericsson.com> |
[SelectionDAGBuilder] Add restrictions to EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue
Summary: This patch fixes PR40587.
When a dbg.value instrinsic is emitted to the DAG by using EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue the resulti
[SelectionDAGBuilder] Add restrictions to EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue
Summary: This patch fixes PR40587.
When a dbg.value instrinsic is emitted to the DAG by using EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue the resulting DBG_VALUE is hoisted to the beginning of the entry block. I think the idea is to be able to locate a formal argument already from the start of the function. However, EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue only checked that the value that was used to describe a variable was originating from a function parameter, not that the variable itself actually was an argument to the function. So when for example assigning a local variable "local" the value from an argument "a", the assocated DBG_VALUE instruction would be hoisted to the beginning of the function, even if the scope for "local" started somewhere else (or if "local" was mapped to other values earlier in the function).
This patch adds some logic to EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue to check that the variable being described actually is an argument to the function. And that the dbg.value being lowered already is in the entry block. Otherwise we bail out, and the dbg.value will be handled as an ordinary dbg.value (not as a "FuncArgumentDbgValue").
A tricky situation is when both the variable and the value is related to function arguments, but not neccessarily the same argument. We make sure that we do not describe the same argument more than once as a "FuncArgumentDbgValue". This solution works as long as opt has injected a "first" dbg.value that corresponds to the formal argument at the function entry.
Reviewers: jmorse, aprantl
Subscribers: jyknight, hiraditya, fedor.sergeev, dstenb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57702
llvm-svn: 353735
show more ...
|
#
3160734a |
| 11-Feb-2019 |
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> |
[CallSite removal] Migrate the statepoint GC infrastructure to use the `CallBase` class rather than `CallSite` wrappers.
I pushed this change down through most of the statepoint infrastructure, comp
[CallSite removal] Migrate the statepoint GC infrastructure to use the `CallBase` class rather than `CallSite` wrappers.
I pushed this change down through most of the statepoint infrastructure, completely removing the use of CallSite where I could reasonably do so. I ended up making a couple of cut-points: generic call handling (instcombine, TLI, SDAG). As soon as it hit truly generic handling with users outside the immediate code, I simply transitioned into or out of a `CallSite` to make this a reasonable sized chunk.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56122
llvm-svn: 353660
show more ...
|
#
784929d0 |
| 08-Feb-2019 |
Craig Topper <craig.topper@intel.com> |
Implementation of asm-goto support in LLVM
This patch accompanies the RFC posted here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html
This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction
Implementation of asm-goto support in LLVM
This patch accompanies the RFC posted here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html
This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction to support asm-goto inline assembly like gcc as used by the linux kernel. This instruction is both a call instruction and a terminator instruction with multiple successors. Only inline assembly usage is supported today.
This also adds a new INLINEASM_BR opcode to SelectionDAG and MachineIR to represent an INLINEASM block that is also considered a terminator instruction.
There will likely be more bug fixes and optimizations to follow this, but we felt it had reached a point where we would like to switch to an incremental development model.
Patch by Craig Topper, Alexander Ivchenko, Mikhail Dvoretckii
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53765
llvm-svn: 353563
show more ...
|
#
9d7e86a9 |
| 07-Feb-2019 |
Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> |
[CodeGen] Handle vector UADDO, SADDO, USUBO, SSUBO
This is part of https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40442.
Vector legalization is implemented for the add/sub overflow opcodes. UMULO/SMULO are
[CodeGen] Handle vector UADDO, SADDO, USUBO, SSUBO
This is part of https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40442.
Vector legalization is implemented for the add/sub overflow opcodes. UMULO/SMULO are also handled as far as legalization is concerned, but they don't support vector expansion yet (so no tests for them).
The vector result widening implementation is suboptimal, because it could result in a legalization loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57639
llvm-svn: 353464
show more ...
|
#
e5c37958 |
| 06-Feb-2019 |
Nirav Dave <niravd@google.com> |
[InlineAsm][X86] Add backend support for X86 flag output parameters.
Allow custom handling of inline assembly output parameters and add X86 flag parameter support.
llvm-svn: 353307
|
#
54511076 |
| 06-Feb-2019 |
Nirav Dave <niravd@google.com> |
[SelectionDAGBuilder] Refactor Inline Asm output check. NFCI.
llvm-svn: 353305
|
#
68d428e5 |
| 04-Feb-2019 |
Leonard Chan <leonardchan@google.com> |
[Intrinsic] Unsigned Fixed Point Multiplication Intrinsic
Add an intrinsic that takes 2 unsigned integers with the scale of them provided as the third argument and performs fixed point multiplicatio
[Intrinsic] Unsigned Fixed Point Multiplication Intrinsic
Add an intrinsic that takes 2 unsigned integers with the scale of them provided as the third argument and performs fixed point multiplication on them.
This is a part of implementing fixed point arithmetic in clang where some of the more complex operations will be implemented as intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55625
llvm-svn: 353059
show more ...
|
#
70d484d9 |
| 01-Feb-2019 |
Mandeep Singh Grang <mgrang@quicinc.org> |
[COFF, ARM64] Fix localaddress to handle stack realignment and variable size objects
Summary: This fixes using the correct stack registers for SEH when stack realignment is needed or when variable s
[COFF, ARM64] Fix localaddress to handle stack realignment and variable size objects
Summary: This fixes using the correct stack registers for SEH when stack realignment is needed or when variable size objects are present.
Reviewers: rnk, efriedma, ssijaric, TomTan
Reviewed By: rnk, efriedma
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57183
llvm-svn: 352923
show more ...
|
#
7976eb58 |
| 01-Feb-2019 |
James Y Knight <jyknight@google.com> |
[opaque pointer types] Pass function types to CallInst creation.
This cleans up all CallInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-ty
[opaque pointer types] Pass function types to CallInst creation.
This cleans up all CallInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57170
llvm-svn: 352909
show more ...
|