History log of /llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunction.cpp (Results 76 – 100 of 588)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
# e2b838dd 04-Oct-2021 Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse@sony.com>

[DebugInfo][InstrRef] Accept landingpad block arguments

This patch makes instruction-referencing accepts an additional scenario
where values can be read from physical registers at the start of block

[DebugInfo][InstrRef] Accept landingpad block arguments

This patch makes instruction-referencing accepts an additional scenario
where values can be read from physical registers at the start of blocks. As
far as I was aware, this only happened:
* With arguments in the entry block,
* With constant physical registers,

To which this patch adds a third case:
* With exception-handling landing-pad blocks

In the attached test: the operand of the dbg.value traces back to the
"landingpad" instruction, which becomes some copies from physregs. Right
now, that's deemed unacceptable, and the assertion fires. The fix is to
just accept this scenario; this is a case where the value in question is
defined by a register and a position, not by an instruction that defines
it. Reading it with a DBG_PHI is the correct behaviour, there isn't a
non-copy instruction that we can refer to.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109005

show more ...


# 0116ed00 25-Aug-2021 Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse@sony.com>

[DebugInfo][InstrRef] Don't use instr-ref for unoptimised functions

InstrRefBasedLDV is marginally slower than VarlocBasedLDV when analysing
optimised code -- however, it's much slower when analysin

[DebugInfo][InstrRef] Don't use instr-ref for unoptimised functions

InstrRefBasedLDV is marginally slower than VarlocBasedLDV when analysing
optimised code -- however, it's much slower when analysing code compiled
-O0.

To avoid this: don't use instruction referencing for -O0 functions. In the
"pure" case of unoptimised code, this won't really harm the debugging
experience because most variables won't have been promoted off the stack,
so can't go missing. It becomes more complicated when optimised code is
inlined into functions marked optnone; however these are rare, and as -O0
doesn't run many optimisations there should be little damage to the debug
experience as a result.

I've taken the opportunity to refactor testing for instruction-referencing
into a MachineFunction method, which seems the most appropriate place to
put it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108585

show more ...


# 2fc07594 18-Aug-2021 Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks@google.com>

[NFC] Remove some unnecessary AttributeList methods

These rely on methods I'm trying to cleanup.


# 7dc9d737 27-Jul-2021 Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse@sony.com>

[DebugInfo][InstrRef] Handle llvm.frameaddress intrinsics gracefully

When working out which instruction defines a value, the
instruction-referencing variable location code has a few special cases fo

[DebugInfo][InstrRef] Handle llvm.frameaddress intrinsics gracefully

When working out which instruction defines a value, the
instruction-referencing variable location code has a few special cases for
physical registers:
* Arguments are never defined by instructions,
* Constant physical registers always read the same value, are never def'd

This patch adds a third case for the llvm.frameaddress intrinsics: you can
read the framepointer in any block if you so choose, and use it as a
variable location, as shown in the added test.

This rather violates one of the assumptions behind instruction referencing,
that LLVM-ir shouldn't be able to read from an arbitrary register at some
arbitrary point in the program. The solution for now is to just emit a
DBG_PHI that reads the register value: this works, but if we wanted to do
something clever with DBG_PHIs in the future then this would probably get
in the way. As it stands, this patch avoids a crash.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106659

show more ...


# f86694cb 26-Jul-2021 Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse@sony.com>

[InstrRef][AArch64][1/4] Accept constant physreg variable locations

Late in SelectionDAG we join up instruction numbers with their defining
instructions, if it couldn't be done during the main part

[InstrRef][AArch64][1/4] Accept constant physreg variable locations

Late in SelectionDAG we join up instruction numbers with their defining
instructions, if it couldn't be done during the main part of SelectionDAG.
One exception is function arguments, where we have to point a DBG_PHI
instruction at the incoming live register, as they don't have a defining
instruction. This patch adds another exception, for constant physregs, like
aarch64 has.

It may seem wasteful to use two instructions where we could use a single
DBG_VALUE, however the whole point of instruction referencing is to
decouple the identification of values from the specification of where
variable location ranges start.

(Part of my aarch64 work to ease adoption of instruction referencing, as
in the meta comment on D104520)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104520

show more ...


# 241f3e38 20-Jul-2021 Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse@sony.com>

[DebugInfo][InstrRef] Fix a broken substitution method, add test coverage

This patch fixes a clearly-broken function that I absent-mindedly bodged
many months ago.

Over in D85749 I landed the subst

[DebugInfo][InstrRef] Fix a broken substitution method, add test coverage

This patch fixes a clearly-broken function that I absent-mindedly bodged
many months ago.

Over in D85749 I landed the substituteDebugValuesForInst, that creates
substitution records for all the def operands from one debug-labelled
instruction to the new one. Unfortunately it would crash if the two
instructions had different numbers of operands; I tried to fix this in
537f0fbe82 by adding a "max operand" parameter to the method, but then
didn't actually change the loop bound to take account of this. It passed
all the tests because.... well there wasn't any real test coverage of this
method.

This patch fixes up the loop to be bounded by the MaxOperand bound; and
adds test coverage for the x86-fixup-LEAs calls to this method, so that
it's actually tested.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105820

show more ...


# f551fb96 09-Jul-2021 Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse@sony.com>

[Debug-info][InstrRef] Avoid an unnecessary map ordering

We keep a record of substitutions between debug value numbers post-isel,
however we never actually look them up until the end of compilation.

[Debug-info][InstrRef] Avoid an unnecessary map ordering

We keep a record of substitutions between debug value numbers post-isel,
however we never actually look them up until the end of compilation. As a
result, there's nothing gained by the collection being a std::map. This
patch downgrades it to being a vector, that's then sorted at the end of
compilation in LiveDebugValues.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105029

show more ...


# 2b2ffb7b 02-Jun-2021 Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse@sony.com>

[DebugInfo][InstrRef][3/4] Produce DBG_INSTR_REFs for all variable locations

This patch emits DBG_INSTR_REFs for two remaining flavours of variable
locations that weren't supported: copies, and inte

[DebugInfo][InstrRef][3/4] Produce DBG_INSTR_REFs for all variable locations

This patch emits DBG_INSTR_REFs for two remaining flavours of variable
locations that weren't supported: copies, and inter-block VRegs. There are
still some locations that must be represented by DBG_VALUE such as
constants, but they're mostly independent of optimisations.

For variable locations that refer to values defined in different blocks,
vregs are allocated before isel begins, but the defining instruction
might not exist until late in isel. To get around this, emit
DBG_INSTR_REFs in a "half done" state, where the first operand refers to a
VReg. Then at the end of isel, patch these back up to refer to
instructions, using the finalizeDebugInstrRefs method.

Copies are something that I complained about the original RFC, and I
really don't want to have to put instruction numbers on copies. They don't
define a value: they move them. To address this isel, salvageCopySSA
interprets:
* COPYs,
* SUBREG_TO_REG,
* Anything that isCopyInstr thinks is a copy.
And follows chains of copies back to the defining instruction that they
read from. This relies on any physical registers that COPYs read being
defined in the same block, or being entry-block arguments. For the former
we can put an instruction number on the defining instruction; for the
latter we can drop a DBG_PHI that reads the incoming value.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88896

show more ...


# 47c3fe2a 01-Jul-2021 Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse@sony.com>

[DebugInfo][InstrRef][1/4] Support transformations that widen values

Very late in compilation, backends like X86 will perform optimisations like
this:

$cx = MOV16rm $rax, ...
->
$rcx =

[DebugInfo][InstrRef][1/4] Support transformations that widen values

Very late in compilation, backends like X86 will perform optimisations like
this:

$cx = MOV16rm $rax, ...
->
$rcx = MOV64rm $rax, ...

Widening the load from 16 bits to 64 bits. SEeing how the lower 16 bits
remain the same, this doesn't affect execution. However, any debug
instruction reference to the defined operand now refers to a 64 bit value,
nto a 16 bit one, which might be unexpected. Elsewhere in codegen, there's
often this pattern:

CALL64pcrel32 @foo, implicit-def $rax
%0:gr64 = COPY $rax
%1:gr32 = COPY %0.sub_32bit

Where we want to refer to the definition of $eax by the call, but don't
want to refer the copies (they don't define values in the way
LiveDebugValues sees it). To solve this, add a subregister field to the
existing "substitutions" facility, so that we can describe a field within
a larger value definition. I would imagine that this would be used most
often when a value is widened, and we need to refer to the original,
narrower definition.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88891

show more ...


# 990278d0 20-May-2021 Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault@amd.com>

CodeGen: Store LLT instead of uint64_t in MachineMemOperand

GlobalISel is relying on regular MachineMemOperands to track all of
the memory properties of accesses. Just the raw byte size is
insuffice

CodeGen: Store LLT instead of uint64_t in MachineMemOperand

GlobalISel is relying on regular MachineMemOperands to track all of
the memory properties of accesses. Just the raw byte size is
insufficent to disambiguate all situations. For example, if we need to
split an unaligned extending load, we need to know the number of bits
in the original source value and can't infer it from the result
type. This is also a problem for extending vector loads.

This does decrease the maximum representable size from the full
uint64_t bytes to a maximum of 16-bits. No in tree testcases hit this,
other than places using UINT64_MAX for unknown sizes. This may be an
issue for G_MEMCPY and co., although they can just use unknown size
for large static sizes. This also has potential for backend abuse by
relying on the type when it really shouldn't be relevant after
selection.

This does not include the necessary MIR printer/parser changes to
represent this.

show more ...


# 74909e4b 21-Jun-2021 Eli Friedman <efriedma@quicinc.com>

Rename MachineMemOperand::getOrdering -> getSuccessOrdering.

Since this method can apply to cmpxchg operations, make sure it's clear
what value we're actually retrieving. This will help ensure we d

Rename MachineMemOperand::getOrdering -> getSuccessOrdering.

Since this method can apply to cmpxchg operations, make sure it's clear
what value we're actually retrieving. This will help ensure we don't
accidentally ignore the failure ordering of cmpxchg in the future.

We could potentially introduce a getOrdering() method on AtomicSDNode
that asserts the operation isn't cmpxchg, but not sure that's
worthwhile.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103338

show more ...


# 93f3c7cc 08-Jun-2021 Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault@amd.com>

CodeGen: Fix missing const


# c77659e5 10-Feb-2021 Leonard Chan <leonardchan@google.com>

[llvm][IR] Do not place constants with static relocations in a mergeable section

This patch provides two major changes:

1. Add getRelocationInfo to check if a constant will have static, dynamic, or

[llvm][IR] Do not place constants with static relocations in a mergeable section

This patch provides two major changes:

1. Add getRelocationInfo to check if a constant will have static, dynamic, or
no relocations. (Also rename the original needsRelocation to needsDynamicRelocation.)
2. Only allow a constant with no relocations (static or dynamic) to be placed
in a mergeable section.

This will allow unused symbols that contain static relocations and happen to
fit in mergeable constant sections (.rodata.cstN) to instead be placed in
unique-named sections if -fdata-sections is used and subsequently garbage collected
by --gc-sections.

See https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-February/148281.html.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95960

show more ...


# 22f00f61 15-Feb-2021 Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com>

[CodeGen] Use range-based for loops (NFC)


# 2962f114 05-Jan-2021 QingShan Zhang <qshanz@cn.ibm.com>

[NFC] Add the getSizeInBytes() interface for MachineConstantPoolValue

Current implementation assumes that, each MachineConstantPoolValue takes
up sizeof(MachineConstantPoolValue::Ty) bytes. For Powe

[NFC] Add the getSizeInBytes() interface for MachineConstantPoolValue

Current implementation assumes that, each MachineConstantPoolValue takes
up sizeof(MachineConstantPoolValue::Ty) bytes. For PowerPC, we want to
lump all the constants with the same type as one MachineConstantPoolValue
to save the cost that calculate the TOC entry for each const. So, we need
to extend the MachineConstantPoolValue that break this assumption.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89108

show more ...


# 1e3ed091 29-Dec-2020 Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com>

[CodeGen] Use llvm::append_range (NFC)


# 6bb2ceac 16-Nov-2020 Victor Huang <wei.huang@ibm.com>

Fix the compilation assertion due to unreachable BB pruning not deleting the associated BB from the jump tables

This patch is added to remove the unreachable MBBs reference in the jump table.

Diffe

Fix the compilation assertion due to unreachable BB pruning not deleting the associated BB from the jump tables

This patch is added to remove the unreachable MBBs reference in the jump table.

Differential Revisien: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90498
Reviewed by: amyk, bsaleil

show more ...


# 537f0fbe 21-Oct-2020 Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse@sony.com>

[DebugInfo] Follow up c521e44defb5 with an API improvement

As mentioned post-commit in D85749, the 'substituteDebugValuesForInst'
method added in c521e44defb5 would be better off with a limit on the

[DebugInfo] Follow up c521e44defb5 with an API improvement

As mentioned post-commit in D85749, the 'substituteDebugValuesForInst'
method added in c521e44defb5 would be better off with a limit on the
number of operands to substitute. This handles the common case of
"substitute the first operand between these two differing instructions",
or possibly up to N first operands.

show more ...


# ead2aa70 15-Oct-2020 Adrian Kuegel <akuegel@google.com>

Fix unused variable warning when compiling with asserts disabled.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89454


# c521e44d 15-Oct-2020 Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse@sony.com>

[DebugInstrRef] Support recording of instruction reference substitutions

Add a table recording "substitutions" between pairs of <instruction,
operand> numbers, from old pairs to new pairs. Post-isel

[DebugInstrRef] Support recording of instruction reference substitutions

Add a table recording "substitutions" between pairs of <instruction,
operand> numbers, from old pairs to new pairs. Post-isel optimizations are
able to record the outcome of an optimization in this way. For example, if
there were a divide instruction that generated the quotient and remainder,
and it were replaced by one that only generated the quotient:

$rax, $rcx = DIV-AND-REMAINDER $rdx, $rsi, debug-instr-num 1
DBG_INSTR_REF 1, 0
DBG_INSTR_REF 1, 1

Became:

$rax = DIV $rdx, $rsi, debug-instr-num 2
DBG_INSTR_REF 1, 0
DBG_INSTR_REF 1, 1

We could enter a substitution from <1, 0> to <2, 0>, and no substitution
for <1, 1> as it's no longer generated.

This approach means that if an instruction or value is deleted once we've
left SSA form, all variables that used the value implicitly become
"optimized out", something that isn't true of the current DBG_VALUE
approach.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85749

show more ...


# 2c5f3d54 14-Oct-2020 Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse@sony.com>

[DebugInstrRef] Parse debug instruction-references from/to MIR

This patch defines the MIR format for debug instruction references: it's an
integer trailing an instruction, marked out by "debug-instr

[DebugInstrRef] Parse debug instruction-references from/to MIR

This patch defines the MIR format for debug instruction references: it's an
integer trailing an instruction, marked out by "debug-instr-number", much
like how "debug-location" identifies the DebugLoc metadata of an
instruction. The instruction number is stored directly in a MachineInstr.

Actually referring to an instruction comes in a later patch, but is done
using one of these instruction numbers.

I've added a round-trip test and two verifier checks: that we don't label
meta-instructions as generating values, and that there are no duplicates.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85746

show more ...


# 6913812a 20-Sep-2020 Fangrui Song <i@maskray.me>

Fix some clang-tidy bugprone-argument-comment issues


# 751a6c57 17-Sep-2020 Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault@amd.com>

IR: Move denormal mode parsing from MachineFunction to Function

This was just inspecting the IR to begin with, and is useful to check
in some places in the IR.


# 7841e21c 14-Sep-2020 Rahman Lavaee <rahmanl@google.com>

Let -basic-block-sections=labels emit basicblock metadata in a new .bb_addr_map section, instead of emitting special unary-encoded symbols.

This patch introduces the new .bb_addr_map section feature

Let -basic-block-sections=labels emit basicblock metadata in a new .bb_addr_map section, instead of emitting special unary-encoded symbols.

This patch introduces the new .bb_addr_map section feature which allows us to emit the bits needed for mapping binary profiles to basic blocks into a separate section.
The format of the emitted data is represented as follows. It includes a header for every function:

| Address of the function | -> 8 bytes (pointer size)
| Number of basic blocks in this function (>0) | -> ULEB128

The header is followed by a BB record for every basic block. These records are ordered in the same order as MachineBasicBlocks are placed in the function. Each BB Info is structured as follows:

| Offset of the basic block relative to function begin | -> ULEB128
| Binary size of the basic block | -> ULEB128
| BB metadata | -> ULEB128 [ MBB.isReturn() OR MBB.hasTailCall() << 1 OR MBB.isEHPad() << 2 ]

The new feature will replace the existing "BB labels" functionality with -basic-block-sections=labels.
The .bb_addr_map section scrubs the specially-encoded BB symbols from the binary and makes it friendly to profilers and debuggers.
Furthermore, the new feature reduces the binary size overhead from 70% bloat to only 12%.

For more information and results please refer to the RFC: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143512.html

Reviewed By: MaskRay, snehasish

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85408

show more ...


# 79ce9bb3 08-Aug-2020 Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault@amd.com>

CodeGen: Don't drop AA metadata when splitting MachineMemOperands

Assuming this is used to split a memory access into smaller pieces,
the new access should still have the same aliasing properties as

CodeGen: Don't drop AA metadata when splitting MachineMemOperands

Assuming this is used to split a memory access into smaller pieces,
the new access should still have the same aliasing properties as the
original memory access. As far as I can tell, this wasn't
intentionally dropped. It may be necessary to drop this if you are
moving the operand outside of the bounds of the original object in
such a way that it may alias another IR object, but I don't think any
of the existing users are doing this. Some of the uses widen into
unused alignment padding, which I think is OK.

show more ...


12345678910>>...24