History log of /llvm-project/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenAction.cpp (Results 51 – 75 of 325)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
# 90cb325a 29-Mar-2022 Paul Kirth <paulkirth@google.com>

Revert "[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics"

This reverts commit 2add3fbd976d7b80a3a7fc14ef0deb9b1ca6beee.


# 2add3fbd 19-Mar-2022 Paul Kirth <paulkirth@google.com>

[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics

Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.

New checks

[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics

Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.

New checks rely on 2 invariants:

1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.

2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.

These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.

Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.

Reviewed By: tejohnson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907

show more ...


# 964398cc 18-Mar-2022 Paul Kirth <paulkirth@google.com>

Revert "Revert "Revert "[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics"""

This reverts commit 6cf560d69a222bff4af4e1d092437fd77f0f981c.


# 6cf560d6 18-Mar-2022 Paul Kirth <paulkirth@google.com>

Revert "Revert "[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics""

I mistakenly reverted my commit, so I'm relanding it.

This reverts commit 10866a1df4a82cdc54187330c509a2d46235455d.


# 10866a1d 17-Mar-2022 Paul Kirth <paulkirth@google.com>

Revert "[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics"

This reverts commit e7749d4713a5ec886011ceb0fc821c6723061724.


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3
# e7749d47 09-Mar-2022 Paul Kirth <paulkirth@google.com>

[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics

Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.

New checks

[misexpect] Re-implement MisExpect Diagnostics

Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.

New checks rely on 2 invariants:

1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.

2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.

These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.

Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907

show more ...


# b3dae59b 09-Mar-2022 Ryan Senanayake <senanayake@google.com>

[clang] Fix CodeGenAction for LLVM IR MemBuffers

Replaces use of getCurrentFile with getCurrentFileOrBufferName
in CodeGenAction. This avoids an assertion error or an incorrect
name chosen for the o

[clang] Fix CodeGenAction for LLVM IR MemBuffers

Replaces use of getCurrentFile with getCurrentFileOrBufferName
in CodeGenAction. This avoids an assertion error or an incorrect
name chosen for the output file when assertions are disabled.
This error previously occurred when the FrontendInputFile was a
MemoryBuffer instead of a file.

Reviewed By: jlebar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121259

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2
# 551b1774 03-Dec-2021 Joseph Huber <jhuber6@vols.utk.edu>

[OpenMP] Add a flag for embedding a file into the module

This patch adds support for a flag `-fembed-offload-binary` to embed a
file as an ELF section in the output by placing it in a global variabl

[OpenMP] Add a flag for embedding a file into the module

This patch adds support for a flag `-fembed-offload-binary` to embed a
file as an ELF section in the output by placing it in a global variable.
This can be used to bundle offloading files with the host binary so it
can be accessed by the linker. The section is named using the
`-fembed-offload-section` option.

Depends on D116541

Reviewed By: JonChesterfield

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116542

show more ...


# 2d303e67 25-Dec-2021 Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com>

Remove redundant return and continue statements (NFC)

Identified with readability-redundant-control-flow.


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1
# 063c2f89 19-Oct-2021 Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks@google.com>

[clang] Add option to disable -clear-ast-before-backend

Some downstream users have plugins that -clear-ast-before-backend may
affect. Add an option to opt out.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential R

[clang] Add option to disable -clear-ast-before-backend

Some downstream users have plugins that -clear-ast-before-backend may
affect. Add an option to opt out.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112100

show more ...


# d0a5f61c 13-Oct-2021 Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks@google.com>

[clang] Support -clear-ast-before-backend without -disable-free

Previously without -disable-free, -clear-ast-before-backend would crash in ~ASTContext() due to various reasons.
This works around tha

[clang] Support -clear-ast-before-backend without -disable-free

Previously without -disable-free, -clear-ast-before-backend would crash in ~ASTContext() due to various reasons.
This works around that by doing a lot of the cleanup ahead of the destructor so that the destructor doesn't actually do any manual cleanup if we've already cleaned up beforehand.

This actually does save a measurable amount of memory with -clear-ast-before-backend, although at an almost unnoticeable runtime cost:
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=5d755b32f2775b9219f6d6e2feda5e1417dc993b&to=58ef1c7ad7e2ad45f9c97597905a8cf05a26258c&stat=max-rss

Previously we weren't doing any cleanup with -disable-free, so I tried measuring the impact of always doing the cleanup and didn't measure anything noticeable on llvm-compile-time-tracker.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111767

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4
# 6522b7cc 14-Sep-2021 Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks@google.com>

[clang] Add option to clear AST memory before running LLVM passes

This is to save memory for Clang compiles.
Measuring building PassBuilder.cpp under /usr/bin/time, max rss goes from 0.93GB to 0.7GB

[clang] Add option to clear AST memory before running LLVM passes

This is to save memory for Clang compiles.
Measuring building PassBuilder.cpp under /usr/bin/time, max rss goes from 0.93GB to 0.7GB.

This does not turn it by default yet.

I've turned on the option locally and run it over a good amount of files without any issues.

For more background, see
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2021-September/068930.html.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111105

show more ...


# 25682868 14-Sep-2021 Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks@google.com>

[clang] Don't use the AST to display backend diagnostics

We keep a map from function name to source location so we don't have to
do it via looking up a source location from the AST. However, since
f

[clang] Don't use the AST to display backend diagnostics

We keep a map from function name to source location so we don't have to
do it via looking up a source location from the AST. However, since
function names can be long, we actually use a hash of the function name
as the key.

Additionally, we can't rely on Clang's printing of function names via
the AST, so we just demangle the name instead.

This is necessary to implement
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2021-September/068930.html.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110665

show more ...


# aa53785f 23-Sep-2021 Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks@google.com>

Reland [clang] Rework dontcall attributes

To avoid using the AST when emitting diagnostics, split the "dontcall"
attribute into "dontcall-warn" and "dontcall-error", and also add the
frontend attrib

Reland [clang] Rework dontcall attributes

To avoid using the AST when emitting diagnostics, split the "dontcall"
attribute into "dontcall-warn" and "dontcall-error", and also add the
frontend attribute value as the LLVM attribute value. This gives us all
the information to report diagnostics we need from within the IR (aside
from access to the original source).

One downside is we directly use LLVM's demangler rather than using the
existing Clang diagnostic pretty printing of symbols.

Previous revisions didn't properly declare the new dependencies.

Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110364

show more ...


# 7833d20f 28-Sep-2021 Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks@google.com>

Revert "[clang] Rework dontcall attributes"

This reverts commit 2943071e2ee0c7f31f34062a44d12aeb0e3a66fd.

Breaks bots


# 2943071e 23-Sep-2021 Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks@google.com>

[clang] Rework dontcall attributes

To avoid using the AST when emitting diagnostics, split the "dontcall"
attribute into "dontcall-warn" and "dontcall-error", and also add the
frontend attribute val

[clang] Rework dontcall attributes

To avoid using the AST when emitting diagnostics, split the "dontcall"
attribute into "dontcall-warn" and "dontcall-error", and also add the
frontend attribute value as the LLVM attribute value. This gives us all
the information to report diagnostics we need from within the IR (aside
from access to the original source).

One downside is we directly use LLVM's demangler rather than using the
existing Clang diagnostic pretty printing of symbols.

Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110364

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2
# 846e562d 25-Aug-2021 Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>

[Clang] add support for error+warning fn attrs

Add support for the GNU C style __attribute__((error(""))) and
__attribute__((warning(""))). These attributes are meant to be put on
declarations of fu

[Clang] add support for error+warning fn attrs

Add support for the GNU C style __attribute__((error(""))) and
__attribute__((warning(""))). These attributes are meant to be put on
declarations of functions whom should not be called.

They are frequently used to provide compile time diagnostics similar to
_Static_assert, but which may rely on non-ICE conditions (ie. relying on
compiler optimizations). This is also similar to diagnose_if function
attribute, but can diagnose after optimizations have been run.

While users may instead simply call undefined functions in such cases to
get a linkage failure from the linker, these provide a much more
ergonomic and actionable diagnostic to users and do so at compile time
rather than at link time. Users instead may be able use inline asm .err
directives.

These are used throughout the Linux kernel in its implementation of
BUILD_BUG and BUILD_BUG_ON macros. These macros generally cannot be
converted to use _Static_assert because many of the parameters are not
ICEs. The Linux kernel still needs to be modified to make use of these
when building with Clang; I have a patch that does so I will send once
this feature is landed.

To do so, we create a new IR level Function attribute, "dontcall" (both
error and warning boil down to one IR Fn Attr). Then, similar to calls
to inline asm, we attach a !srcloc Metadata node to call sites of such
attributed callees.

The backend diagnoses these during instruction selection, while we still
know that a call is a call (vs say a JMP that's a tail call) in an arch
agnostic manner.

The frontend then reconstructs the SourceLocation from that Metadata,
and determines whether to emit an error or warning based on the callee's
attribute.

Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16428
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1173

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106030

show more ...


# 1c829ce1 21-Aug-2021 Bob Haarman <llvm@inglorion.net>

[clang][codegen] Set CurLinkModule in CodeGenAction::ExecuteAction

CodeGenAction::ExecuteAction creates a BackendConsumer for the
purpose of handling diagnostics. The BackendConsumer's
DiagnosticHan

[clang][codegen] Set CurLinkModule in CodeGenAction::ExecuteAction

CodeGenAction::ExecuteAction creates a BackendConsumer for the
purpose of handling diagnostics. The BackendConsumer's
DiagnosticHandlerImpl method expects CurLinkModule to be set,
but this did not happen on the code path that goes through
ExecuteAction. This change makes it so that the BackendConsumer
constructor used by ExecuteAction requires the Module to be
specified and passes the appropriate module in ExecuteAction.

The change also adds a test that fails without this change
and passes with it. To make the test work, the FIXME in the
handling of DK_Linker diagnostics was addressed so that warnings
and notes are no longer silently discarded. Since this introduces
a new warning diagnostic, a flag to control it (-Wlinker-warnings)
has also been added.

Reviewed By: xur

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108603

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3
# 94801622 22-Jun-2021 Fangrui Song <i@maskray.me>

Improve clang -Wframe-larger-than= diagnostic

Match the style in D104667.

This commit is for non-LTO diagnostics, while D104667 is for LTO and llc diagnostics.


Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1
# 92f9852f 13-May-2021 Vassil Vassilev <v.g.vassilev@gmail.com>

[clang-repl] Recommit "Land initial infrastructure for incremental parsing"

Original commit message:

In http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143257.html we have
mentioned our plan

[clang-repl] Recommit "Land initial infrastructure for incremental parsing"

Original commit message:

In http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143257.html we have
mentioned our plans to make some of the incremental compilation facilities
available in llvm mainline.

This patch proposes a minimal version of a repl, clang-repl, which enables
interpreter-like interaction for C++. For instance:

./bin/clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 42;
clang-repl> extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=42
clang-repl> quit

The patch allows very limited functionality, for example, it crashes on invalid
C++. The design of the proposed patch follows closely the design of cling. The
idea is to gather feedback and gradually evolve both clang-repl and cling to
what the community agrees upon.

The IncrementalParser class is responsible for driving the clang parser and
codegen and allows the compiler infrastructure to process more than one input.
Every input adds to the “ever-growing” translation unit. That model is enabled
by an IncrementalAction which prevents teardown when HandleTranslationUnit.

The IncrementalExecutor class hides some of the underlying implementation
details of the concrete JIT infrastructure. It exposes the minimal set of
functionality required by our incremental compiler/interpreter.

The Transaction class keeps track of the AST and the LLVM IR for each
incremental input. That tracking information will be later used to implement
error recovery.

The Interpreter class orchestrates the IncrementalParser and the
IncrementalExecutor to model interpreter-like behavior. It provides the public
API which can be used (in future) when using the interpreter library.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033

show more ...


# f6907152 13-May-2021 Vassil Vassilev <v.g.vassilev@gmail.com>

Revert "[clang-repl] Land initial infrastructure for incremental parsing"

This reverts commit 44a4000181e1a25027e87f2ae4e71cb876a7a275.

We are seeing build failures due to missing dependency to lib

Revert "[clang-repl] Land initial infrastructure for incremental parsing"

This reverts commit 44a4000181e1a25027e87f2ae4e71cb876a7a275.

We are seeing build failures due to missing dependency to libSupport and
CMake Error at tools/clang/tools/clang-repl/cmake_install.cmake
file INSTALL cannot find

show more ...


# 44a40001 12-May-2021 Vassil Vassilev <v.g.vassilev@gmail.com>

[clang-repl] Land initial infrastructure for incremental parsing

In http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143257.html we have
mentioned our plans to make some of the incremental compila

[clang-repl] Land initial infrastructure for incremental parsing

In http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143257.html we have
mentioned our plans to make some of the incremental compilation facilities
available in llvm mainline.

This patch proposes a minimal version of a repl, clang-repl, which enables
interpreter-like interaction for C++. For instance:

./bin/clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 42;
clang-repl> extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=42
clang-repl> quit

The patch allows very limited functionality, for example, it crashes on invalid
C++. The design of the proposed patch follows closely the design of cling. The
idea is to gather feedback and gradually evolve both clang-repl and cling to
what the community agrees upon.

The IncrementalParser class is responsible for driving the clang parser and
codegen and allows the compiler infrastructure to process more than one input.
Every input adds to the “ever-growing” translation unit. That model is enabled
by an IncrementalAction which prevents teardown when HandleTranslationUnit.

The IncrementalExecutor class hides some of the underlying implementation
details of the concrete JIT infrastructure. It exposes the minimal set of
functionality required by our incremental compiler/interpreter.

The Transaction class keeps track of the AST and the LLVM IR for each
incremental input. That tracking information will be later used to implement
error recovery.

The Interpreter class orchestrates the IncrementalParser and the
IncrementalExecutor to model interpreter-like behavior. It provides the public
API which can be used (in future) when using the interpreter library.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033

show more ...


# 0f1137ba 19-Apr-2021 Nico Weber <thakis@chromium.org>

[clang/Basic] Make TargetInfo.h not use DataLayout again

Reverts parts of https://reviews.llvm.org/D17183, but keeps the
resetDataLayout() API and adds an assert that checks that datalayout string a

[clang/Basic] Make TargetInfo.h not use DataLayout again

Reverts parts of https://reviews.llvm.org/D17183, but keeps the
resetDataLayout() API and adds an assert that checks that datalayout string and
user label prefix are in sync.

Approach 1 in https://reviews.llvm.org/D17183#2653279
Reduces number of TUs build for 'clang-format' from 689 to 575.

I also implemented approach 2 in D100764. If someone feels motivated
to make us use DataLayout more, it's easy to revert this change here
and go with D100764 instead. I don't plan on doing more work in this
area though, so I prefer going with the smaller, more self-consistent change.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100776

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2
# 5de2d189 23-Feb-2021 Yuanfang Chen <yuanfang.chen@sony.com>

[Diagnose] Unify MCContext and LLVMContext diagnosing

The situation with inline asm/MC error reporting is kind of messy at the
moment. The errors from MC layout are not reliably propagated and users

[Diagnose] Unify MCContext and LLVMContext diagnosing

The situation with inline asm/MC error reporting is kind of messy at the
moment. The errors from MC layout are not reliably propagated and users
have to specify an inlineasm handler separately to get inlineasm
diagnose. The latter issue is not a correctness issue but could be improved.

* Kill LLVMContext inlineasm diagnose handler and migrate it to use
DiagnoseInfo/DiagnoseHandler.
* Introduce `DiagnoseInfoSrcMgr` to diagnose SourceMgr backed errors. This
covers use cases like inlineasm, MC, and any clients using SourceMgr.
* Move AsmPrinter::SrcMgrDiagInfo and its instance to MCContext. The next step
is to combine MCContext::SrcMgr and MCContext::InlineSrcMgr because in all
use cases, only one of them is used.
* If LLVMContext is available, let MCContext uses LLVMContext's diagnose
handler; if LLVMContext is not available, MCContext uses its own default
diagnose handler which just prints SMDiagnostic.
* Change a few clients(Clang, llc, lldb) to use the new way of reporting.

Reviewed By: MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97449

show more ...


# a25e4a6d 25-Feb-2021 Jan Svoboda <jan_svoboda@apple.com>

[clang][cli] Store additional optimization remarks info

After a revision of D96274 changed `DiagnosticOptions` to not store all remark arguments **as-written**, it is no longer possible to reconstru

[clang][cli] Store additional optimization remarks info

After a revision of D96274 changed `DiagnosticOptions` to not store all remark arguments **as-written**, it is no longer possible to reconstruct the arguments accurately from the class.

This is caused by the fact that for `-Rpass=regexp` and friends, `DiagnosticOptions` store only the group name `pass` and not `regexp`. This is the same representation used for the plain `-Rpass` argument.

Note that each argument must be generated exactly once in `CompilerInvocation::generateCC1CommandLine`, otherwise each subsequent call would produce more arguments than the previous one. Currently this works out because of the way `RoundTrip` splits the responsibilities for certain arguments based on what arguments were queried during parsing. However, this invariant breaks when we move to single round-trip for the whole `CompilerInvocation`.

This patch ensures that for one `-Rpass=regexp` argument, we don't generate two arguments (`-Rpass` from `DiagnosticOptions` and `-Rpass=regexp` from `CodeGenOptions`) by shifting the responsibility for handling both cases to `CodeGenOptions`. To distinguish between the cases correctly, additional information is stored in `CodeGenOptions`.

The `CodeGenOptions` parser of `-Rpass[=regexp]` arguments also looks at `-Rno-pass` and `-R[no-]everything`, which is necessary for generating the correct argument regardless of the ordering of `CodeGenOptions`/`DiagnosticOptions` parsing/generation.

Reviewed By: dexonsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96847

show more ...


12345678910>>...13