[clang-tidy][NFC] Use C++17 nested namespaces in the clang-tidy folder

Fix applied by running:

run-clang-tidy.py -checks=-*,modernize-concat-nested-namespaces

Differential Revision: https://review

[clang-tidy][NFC] Use C++17 nested namespaces in the clang-tidy folder

Fix applied by running:

run-clang-tidy.py -checks=-*,modernize-concat-nested-namespaces

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141770

show more ...

[clang-tools-extra] Remove remaining uses of llvm::Optional (NFC)

This patch removes the unused "using" declaration and removes #include
"llvm/ADT/Optional.h".

This is part of an effort to migrate

[clang-tools-extra] Remove remaining uses of llvm::Optional (NFC)

This patch removes the unused "using" declaration and removes #include
"llvm/ADT/Optional.h".

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...

[clang-tools-extra] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)

This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<. I'll post
a separate patch to clean up the "using" declarations, #i

[clang-tools-extra] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)

This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<. I'll post
a separate patch to clean up the "using" declarations, #include
"llvm/ADT/Optional.h", etc.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...

[clang-tools-extra] Add #include <optional> (NFC)

This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace

[clang-tools-extra] Add #include <optional> (NFC)

This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optional with
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...

Don't include None.h (NFC)

I've converted all known uses of None to std::nullopt, so we no longer
need to include None.h.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

Don't include None.h (NFC)

I've converted all known uses of None to std::nullopt, so we no longer
need to include None.h.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...

[clang-tools-extra] Use std::nullopt instead of None in comments (NFC)

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optio

[clang-tools-extra] Use std::nullopt instead of None in comments (NFC)

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...

[clang-tidy] Use std::nullopt instead of None (NFC)

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount

[clang-tidy] Use std::nullopt instead of None (NFC)

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...

[clang-tools-extra] Use value_or instead of getValueOr (NFC)

[clang-tidy] Fix #55134 (regression introduced by 5da7c04)

5da7c04 introduced a regression in the NOLINT macro checking loop, replacing the
call to `getImmediateExpansionRange().getBegin()` with
`ge

[clang-tidy] Fix #55134 (regression introduced by 5da7c04)

5da7c04 introduced a regression in the NOLINT macro checking loop, replacing the
call to `getImmediateExpansionRange().getBegin()` with
`getImmediateMacroCallerLoc()`, which has similar but subtly different
behaviour.

The consequence is that NOLINTs cannot suppress diagnostics when they are
attached to a token that came from a macro **argument**, rather than elsewhere
in the macro expansion.

Revert to pre-patch behaviour and add test cases to cover this issue.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126138

show more ...

Re-land "Cache the locations of NOLINTBEGIN/END blocks" with fix for build bot

[clang-tidy] Cache the locations of NOLINTBEGIN/END blocks

Support for NOLINT(BEGIN/END) blocks (implemented in D108560) is
currently costly. This patch aims to improve the performance with the
foll

[clang-tidy] Cache the locations of NOLINTBEGIN/END blocks

Support for NOLINT(BEGIN/END) blocks (implemented in D108560) is
currently costly. This patch aims to improve the performance with the
following changes:

- The use of tokenized NOLINTs instead of a series of repetitive ad-hoc
string operations (`find()`, `split()`, `slice()`, regex matching etc).
- The caching of NOLINT(BEGIN/END) block locations. Determining these
locations each time a new diagnostic is raised is wasteful as it
requires reading and parsing the entire source file.

Move NOLINT-specific code from `ClangTidyDiagnosticConsumer` to new
purpose-built class `NoLintDirectiveHandler`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116085

show more ...