<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl.xml"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
    <title>Changes in Makefile</title>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2015</copyright>
    <generator>Java</generator><item>
        <title>a60b99094c1a7688733618571c193f4a2d7f53e7 - * Split sys/kern/sys_process.c into three parts:</title>
        <link>http://src.rcs.uwaterloo.ca:8080/history/netbsd-src/sys/modules/ptrace/Makefile#a60b99094c1a7688733618571c193f4a2d7f53e7</link>
        <description>* Split sys/kern/sys_process.c into three parts:        1 - ptrace(2) syscall for native emulation        2 - common ptrace(2) syscall code (shared with compat_netbsd32)        3 - support routines that are shared with PROCFS and/or KTRACE* Add module glue for #1 and #2.  Both modules will be built-in to the  kernel if &quot;options PTRACE&quot; is included in the config file (this is  the default, defined in sys/conf/std).* Mark the ptrace(2) syscall as modular in syscalls.master (generated  files will be committed shortly).* Conditionalize all remaining portions of PTRACE code on a new kernel  option PTRACE_HOOKS.XXX Instead of PROCFS depending on &apos;options PTRACE&apos;, we should probably    just add a procfs attribute to the sys/kern/sys_process.c file&apos;s    entry in files.kern, and add PROCFS to the &quot;#if defineds&quot; for    process_domem().  It&apos;s really confusing to have two different ways    of requiring this file.

            List of files:
            /netbsd-src/sys/modules/ptrace/Makefile</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>pgoyette &lt;pgoyette@NetBSD.org&gt;</dc:creator>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
