Lines Matching full:more
48 results to determine if you succeeded or failed (more on that later).
184 Instead, switch from L<Test::Simple> to L<Test::More>. L<Test::More>
185 does everything L<Test::Simple> does, and more! In fact, L<Test::More> does
187 L<Test::Simple> out and put L<Test::More> in its place. That's just what
190 L<Test::More> does more than L<Test::Simple>. The most important difference at
191 this point is it provides more informative ways to say "ok". Although you can
196 use Test::More tests => 8;
214 you get more information:
265 use Test::More tests => 32;
297 C<%ICal_Dates>. Now that it's less work to test with more dates, you'll
298 be inclined to just throw more in as you think of them.
300 the C<< use Test::More tests => ## >> line. That can rapidly get
306 use Test::More;
318 To be even more flexible, use C<done_testing>. This means we're just
321 use Test::More; # instead of tests => 32
327 If you don't specify a plan, L<Test::More> expects to see C<done_testing()>
330 number ran differs, L<Test::More> will give you another kind of warning.
339 We've added more detail about what we're testing and the ICal string
366 use Test::More tests => 7;
393 use Test::More tests => 7;
461 use Test::More tests => 1;
482 use Test::More tests => 1;
500 L<Test::More> doesn't say "Looks like you failed 1 tests of 1". That '#
561 failed? No problem, L<Test::More> employs some magic to catch that death