Lines Matching defs:NamingClass

167                CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass,
170     : AccessedEntity(Context.getDiagAllocator(), Member, NamingClass,
620   const CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass;
629                          const CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass)
630     : S(S), EC(EC), NamingClass(NamingClass),
632                      NamingClass->isDependentContext()),
658     if (Cur == NamingClass)
661     if (CheckDependent && MightInstantiateTo(Cur, NamingClass))
707 ///   NamingClass <= P
709 /// NamingClass would have some natural access in P, which implicitly
710 /// imposes the constraint that P <= NamingClass.
713 /// Instead of saying that a notional protected member of NamingClass
717 /// of NamingClass) might be more accessible along some path not
732                                            const CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass) {
735   assert(NamingClass->getCanonicalDecl() == NamingClass);
738   // that NamingClass <= P <= NamingClass, i.e. P == NamingClass.
740   if (!InstanceContext) return GetFriendKind(S, EC, NamingClass);
742   ProtectedFriendContext PRC(S, EC, InstanceContext, NamingClass);
750                               const CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass,
753   assert(NamingClass->getCanonicalDecl() == NamingClass &&
769       if (ECRecord == NamingClass)
772       if (EC.isDependent() && MightInstantiateTo(ECRecord, NamingClass))
778       switch (IsDerivedFromInclusive(ECRecord, NamingClass)) {
826         // We know that ECRecord derives from NamingClass.  The
827         // restriction says to check whether NamingClass derives from
832         if (NamingClass == ECRecord) return AR_accessible;
872     switch (GetProtectedFriendKind(S, EC, InstanceContext, NamingClass)) {
880   switch (GetFriendKind(S, EC, NamingClass)) {
1046   const CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass = Target.getEffectiveNamingClass();
1051     switch (IsDerivedFromInclusive(ECRecord, NamingClass)) {
1071       if (NamingClass == ECRecord) continue;
1282   const CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass = Entity.getNamingClass();
1289     << S.Context.getTypeDeclType(NamingClass)
1339   const CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass = Entity.getEffectiveNamingClass();
1349     switch (HasAccess(S, EC, NamingClass, UnprivilegedAccess, Entity)) {
1392     if (DeclaringClass == NamingClass)
1398   assert(Entity.getDeclaringClass() != NamingClass);
1548     CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(NamingD);
1559                         NamingClass,
1606 bool Sema::isMemberAccessibleForDeletion(CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass,
1615   AccessTarget Entity(Context, AccessTarget::Member, NamingClass, Found,
1642   CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass = Dtor->getParent();
1643   if (ObjectTy.isNull()) ObjectTy = Context.getTypeDeclType(NamingClass);
1645   AccessTarget Entity(Context, AccessTarget::Member, NamingClass,
1708   CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass = Constructor->getParent();
1728     ObjectClass = NamingClass;
1732       Context, AccessTarget::Member, NamingClass,
1742                                                CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass,
1746       !NamingClass ||
1750   AccessTarget Entity(Context, AccessTarget::Member, NamingClass, Found,
1760                                            CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass,
1763       !NamingClass ||
1767   AccessTarget Entity(Context, AccessTarget::Member, NamingClass,
1796   CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(RT->getDecl());
1798   AccessTarget Entity(Context, AccessTarget::Member, NamingClass, Found,
1866   CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass = Ovl->getNamingClass();
1868   AccessTarget Entity(Context, AccessTarget::Member, NamingClass, Found,
1926 bool Sema::IsSimplyAccessible(NamedDecl *Target, CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass,
1929   if (Target->isCXXClassMember() && NamingClass) {
1936     AccessTarget Entity(Context, AccessedEntity::Member, NamingClass,