Lines Matching defs:dirty

62  * basis, ZFS tracks the amount of modified (dirty) data. As operations change
63  * data, the amount of dirty data increases; as ZFS syncs out data, the amount
64  * of dirty data decreases. When the amount of dirty data exceeds a
66  * of dirty data decreases (as data is synced out).
68  * The limit on dirty data is tunable, and should be adjusted according to
71  * changes. However, memory is a limited resource, and allowing for more dirty
79  * dirty space used; dsl_pool_dirty_space() decrements those values as data
82  * zfs_dirty_data_max determines the dirty space limit. Once that value is
89  * The IO scheduler uses both the dirty space limit and current amount of
90  * dirty data as inputs. Those values affect the number of concurrent IOs ZFS
93  * The delay is also calculated based on the amount of dirty data.  See the
115  * If there's at least this much dirty data (as a percentage of
122  * Once there is this amount of dirty data, the dmu_tx_delay() will kick in
130  * Larger values cause it to delay more for a given amount of dirty data.
131  * Therefore larger values will cause there to be less dirty data for a
621 	/* Choose a value slightly bigger than min dirty sync bytes */
678 	zio_t *rio;	/* root zio for all dirty dataset syncs */
691 	 * Run all early sync tasks before writing out any dirty blocks.
708 	 * Write out all dirty blocks of dirty datasets. Note, this could
821 	 * We have written all of the accounted dirty data, so our
826 	 * Note that, besides any dirty data from datasets, the amount of
827 	 * dirty data in the MOS is also accounted by the pool. Therefore,
829 	 * attempt to update the accounting for the same dirty data twice.
837 	 * its dsl_dir's dd_dbuf will be dirty, and thus have a hold on it.
984 	uint64_t dirty = dp->dp_dirty_pertxg[txg & TXG_MASK];
986 	return (dirty > dirty_min_bytes);
1014 		/* XXX writing something we didn't dirty? */
1463 	"Max percent of RAM allowed to be dirty");
1473 	"Determines the dirty space limit");