Lines Matching defs:RTTI

394   /**************************** RTTI Uniqueness ******************************/
397   /// Returns true if the ABI requires RTTI type_info objects to be unique
402   /// What sort of unique-RTTI behavior should we use?
404     /// We are guaranteeing, or need to guarantee, that the RTTI string
408     /// We are not guaranteeing uniqueness for the RTTI string, so we
412     /// We are not guaranteeing uniqueness for the RTTI string, so we
508   // ARM64 libraries are prepared for non-unique RTTI.
2004   llvm::Constant *RTTI =
2010   CGVT.createVTableInitializer(components, VTLayout, RTTI,
3415   /// Fields - The fields of the RTTI descriptor currently being built.
3422   /// GetAddrOfExternalRTTIDescriptor - Returns the constant for the RTTI
3497   /// BuildTypeInfo - Build the RTTI type info struct for the given type, or
3498   /// link to an existing RTTI descriptor if one already exists.
3501   /// BuildTypeInfo - Build the RTTI type info struct for the given type.
3533   // Mangle the RTTI name.
3544     // RTTI, check if emitting vtables opportunistically need any adjustment.
3577   // GCC also emits RTTI for __int128.
3578   // FIXME: We do not emit RTTI information for decimal types here.
3718   // If RTTI is disabled, assume it might be disabled in the
3720   if (!Context.getLangOpts().RTTI) return false;
3732     // N.B. We must always emit the RTTI data ourselves if there exists a key
3736     // Don't import the RTTI but emit it locally.
3982   //   by making them local static objects. Finally, a dummy class RTTI is
3984   //   complete class RTTI (because the latter need not exist), possibly by
4001     // RTTI is not enabled, which means that this type info struct is going
4003     if (!CGM.getLangOpts().RTTI)
4033   // Check if we've already emitted an RTTI descriptor for this type.
4046   // Check if there is already an external RTTI descriptor for this type.
4244   // of RTTI generally require class types to be complete, even when
4417     // The __base_type member points to the RTTI for the base type.
4572 /// What sort of uniqueness rules should we use for the RTTI for the