[mlir][pdl] Cast the OperationPosition to Position to fix MSVC miscompile

If we don't cast, MSVC picks an overload that hasn't been defined yet(not sure why) and miscompiles.

[mlir][PDL] Add support for variadic operands and results in the PDL Interpreter

This revision extends the PDL Interpreter dialect to add support for variadic operands and results, with ranges of th

[mlir][PDL] Add support for variadic operands and results in the PDL Interpreter

This revision extends the PDL Interpreter dialect to add support for variadic operands and results, with ranges of these values represented via the recently added !pdl.range type. To support this extension, three new operations have been added that closely match the single variant:
* pdl_interp.check_types : Compare a range of types with a known range.
* pdl_interp.create_types : Create a constant range of types.
* pdl_interp.get_operands : Get a range of operands from an operation.
* pdl_interp.get_results : Get a range of results from an operation.
* pdl_interp.switch_types : Switch on a range of types.

This revision handles adding support in the interpreter dialect and the conversion from PDL to PDLInterp. Support for variadic operands and results in the bytecode will be added in a followup revision.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95722

show more ...

[mlir][pdl] Remove CreateNativeOp in favor of a more general ApplyNativeRewriteOp.

This has a numerous amount of benefits, given the overly clunky nature of CreateNativeOp:
* Users can now call into

[mlir][pdl] Remove CreateNativeOp in favor of a more general ApplyNativeRewriteOp.

This has a numerous amount of benefits, given the overly clunky nature of CreateNativeOp:
* Users can now call into arbitrary rewrite functions from inside of PDL, allowing for more natural interleaving of PDL/C++ and enabling for more of the pattern to be in PDL.
* Removes the need for an additional set of C++ functions/registry/etc. The new ApplyNativeRewriteOp will use the same PDLRewriteFunction as the existing RewriteOp. This reduces the API surface area exposed to users.

This revision also introduces a new PDLResultList class. This class is used to provide results of native rewrite functions back to PDL. We introduce a new class instead of using a SmallVector to simplify the work necessary for variadics, given that ranges will require some changes to the structure of PDLValue.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95720

show more ...

[mlir][pdl] Restructure how results are represented.

Up until now, results have been represented as additional results to a pdl.operation. This is fairly clunky, as it mismatches the representation

[mlir][pdl] Restructure how results are represented.

Up until now, results have been represented as additional results to a pdl.operation. This is fairly clunky, as it mismatches the representation of the rest of the IR constructs(e.g. pdl.operand) and also isn't a viable representation for operations returned by pdl.create_native. This representation also creates much more difficult problems when factoring in support for variadic result groups, optional results, etc. To resolve some of these problems, and simplify adding support for variable length results, this revision extracts the representation for results out of pdl.operation in the form of a new `pdl.result` operation. This operation returns the result of an operation at a given index, e.g.:

```
%root = pdl.operation ...
%result = pdl.result 0 of %root
```

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95719

show more ...

[mlir][pdl][NFC] Rename InputOp to OperandOp

This better matches the actual IR concept that is being modeled, and is consistent with how the rest of PDL is structured.

Differential Revision: https:

[mlir][pdl][NFC] Rename InputOp to OperandOp

This better matches the actual IR concept that is being modeled, and is consistent with how the rest of PDL is structured.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95718

show more ...

[mlir][pdl] Fix bug when ordering predicates

We should be ordering predicates with higher primary/secondary sums first, but we are currently ordering them last. This allows for predicates more frequ

[mlir][pdl] Fix bug when ordering predicates

We should be ordering predicates with higher primary/secondary sums first, but we are currently ordering them last. This allows for predicates more frequently encountered to be checked first.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95715

show more ...

[mlir][BuiltinDialect] Resolve comments from D91571

* Move ops to a BuiltinOps.h
* Add file comments

[mlir][NFC] Remove references to Module.h and Function.h

These includes have been deprecated in favor of BuiltinDialect.h, which contains the definitions of ModuleOp and FuncOp.

Differential Revisi

[mlir][NFC] Remove references to Module.h and Function.h

These includes have been deprecated in favor of BuiltinDialect.h, which contains the definitions of ModuleOp and FuncOp.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91572

show more ...

[mlir] Add a conversion pass between PDL and the PDL Interpreter Dialect

The conversion between PDL and the interpreter is split into several different parts.
** The Matcher:

The matching section

[mlir] Add a conversion pass between PDL and the PDL Interpreter Dialect

The conversion between PDL and the interpreter is split into several different parts.
** The Matcher:

The matching section of all incoming pdl.pattern operations is converted into a predicate tree and merged. Each pattern is first converted into an ordered list of predicates starting from the root operation. A predicate is composed of three distinct parts:
* Position
- A position refers to a specific location on the input DAG, i.e. an
existing MLIR entity being matched. These can be attributes, operands,
operations, results, and types. Each position also defines a relation to
its parent. For example, the operand `[0] -> 1` has a parent operation
position `[0]` (the root).
* Question
- A question refers to a query on a specific positional value. For
example, an operation name question checks the name of an operation
position.
* Answer
- An answer is the expected result of a question. For example, when
matching an operation with the name "foo.op". The question would be an
operation name question, with an expected answer of "foo.op".

After the predicate lists have been created and ordered(based on occurrence of common predicates and other factors), they are formed into a tree of nodes that represent the branching flow of a pattern match. This structure allows for efficient construction and merging of the input patterns. There are currently only 4 simple nodes in the tree:
* ExitNode: Represents the termination of a match
* SuccessNode: Represents a successful match of a specific pattern
* BoolNode/SwitchNode: Branch to a specific child node based on the expected answer to a predicate question.

Once the matcher tree has been generated, this tree is walked to generate the corresponding interpreter operations.

** The Rewriter:
The rewriter portion of a pattern is generated in a very straightforward manor, similarly to lowerings in other dialects. Each PDL operation that may exist within a rewrite has a mapping into the interpreter dialect. The code for the rewriter is generated within a FuncOp, that is invoked by the interpreter on a successful pattern match. Referenced values defined in the matcher become inputs the generated rewriter function.

An example lowering is shown below:

```mlir
// The following high level PDL pattern:
pdl.pattern : benefit(1) {
%resultType = pdl.type
%inputOperand = pdl.input
%root, %results = pdl.operation "foo.op"(%inputOperand) -> %resultType
pdl.rewrite %root {
pdl.replace %root with (%inputOperand)
}
}

// is lowered to the following:
module {
// The matcher function takes the root operation as an input.
func @matcher(%arg0: !pdl.operation) {
pdl_interp.check_operation_name of %arg0 is "foo.op" -> ^bb2, ^bb1
^bb1:
pdl_interp.return
^bb2:
pdl_interp.check_operand_count of %arg0 is 1 -> ^bb3, ^bb1
^bb3:
pdl_interp.check_result_count of %arg0 is 1 -> ^bb4, ^bb1
^bb4:
%0 = pdl_interp.get_operand 0 of %arg0
pdl_interp.is_not_null %0 : !pdl.value -> ^bb5, ^bb1
^bb5:
%1 = pdl_interp.get_result 0 of %arg0
pdl_interp.is_not_null %1 : !pdl.value -> ^bb6, ^bb1
^bb6:
// This operation corresponds to a successful pattern match.
pdl_interp.record_match @rewriters::@rewriter(%0, %arg0 : !pdl.value, !pdl.operation) : benefit(1), loc([%arg0]), root("foo.op") -> ^bb1
}
module @rewriters {
// The inputs to the rewriter from the matcher are passed as arguments.
func @rewriter(%arg0: !pdl.value, %arg1: !pdl.operation) {
pdl_interp.replace %arg1 with(%arg0)
pdl_interp.return
}
}
}
```

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84580

show more ...