[ProfData] Address a unit test FIXME

Bump googletest to 1.10.0

[Coverage] Support overriding compilation directory

When making compilation relocatable, for example in distributed
compilation scenarios, we want to set compilation dir to a relative
value like `.`

[Coverage] Support overriding compilation directory

When making compilation relocatable, for example in distributed
compilation scenarios, we want to set compilation dir to a relative
value like `.` but this presents a problem when generating reports
because if the file path is relative as well, for example `..`, you
may end up writing files outside of the output directory.

This change introduces a flag that allows overriding the compilation
directory that's stored inside the profile with a different value that
is absolute.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100232

show more ...

Revert "[llvm-cov] reset executation count to 0 after wrapped segment"

This reverts D85036

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98084

Revert "[Profile] Include a few asserts in coverage mapping test"

This reverts commit 80f329bcd0281c11062879025761d0657167fe8b.

[Profile] Include a few asserts in coverage mapping test

These should catch any accidental use of the compilation directory.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97402

[Coverage][Unittest] Fix stringref issue

We will pass StringRef and change it in reader.
But we reuse the same Filename vector without clear it,
so in some systems, we may clobbeer previous results.

[Coverage][Unittest] Fix stringref issue

We will pass StringRef and change it in reader.
But we reuse the same Filename vector without clear it,
so in some systems, we may clobbeer previous results.

Reviewed By: phosek

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97353

show more ...

[Coverage] Store compilation dir separately in coverage mapping

We currently always store absolute filenames in coverage mapping. This
is problematic for several reasons. It poses a problem for dis

[Coverage] Store compilation dir separately in coverage mapping

We currently always store absolute filenames in coverage mapping. This
is problematic for several reasons. It poses a problem for distributed
compilation as source location might vary across machines. We are also
duplicating the path prefix potentially wasting space.

This change modifies how we store filenames in coverage mapping. Rather
than absolute paths, it stores the compilation directory and file paths
as given to the compiler, either relative or absolute. Later when
reading the coverage mapping information, we recombine relative paths
with the working directory. This approach is similar to handling
ofDW_AT_comp_dir in DWARF.

Finally, we also provide a new option, -fprofile-compilation-dir akin
to -fdebug-compilation-dir which can be used to manually override the
compilation directory which is useful in distributed compilation cases.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95753

show more ...

Revert "[Coverage] Store compilation dir separately in coverage mapping"

This reverts commit 97ec8fa5bb07e3f5bf25ddcb216b545cd3d03b65 since
the test is failing on some bots.

[Coverage] Store compilation dir separately in coverage mapping

We currently always store absolute filenames in coverage mapping. This
is problematic for several reasons. It poses a problem for dis

[Coverage] Store compilation dir separately in coverage mapping

We currently always store absolute filenames in coverage mapping. This
is problematic for several reasons. It poses a problem for distributed
compilation as source location might vary across machines. We are also
duplicating the path prefix potentially wasting space.

This change modifies how we store filenames in coverage mapping. Rather
than absolute paths, it stores the compilation directory and file paths
as given to the compiler, either relative or absolute. Later when
reading the coverage mapping information, we recombine relative paths
with the working directory. This approach is similar to handling
ofDW_AT_comp_dir in DWARF.

Finally, we also provide a new option, -fprofile-compilation-dir akin
to -fdebug-compilation-dir which can be used to manually override the
compilation directory which is useful in distributed compilation cases.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95753

show more ...

[RGT][ProfileData] Correct a test assertion

Found by the Rotten Green Tests project.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95258

[llvm-cov] reset executation count to 0 after wrapped segment

Fix the bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36979. It also fixes this bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35404, which I t

[llvm-cov] reset executation count to 0 after wrapped segment

Fix the bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36979. It also fixes this bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35404, which I think is caused by the same problem.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85036

show more ...

Reland: [Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size

Try again with an up-to-date version of D69471 (99317124 was a stale
revision).

---

Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size

Reland: [Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size

Try again with an up-to-date version of D69471 (99317124 was a stale
revision).

---

Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:

1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.

This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).

Rationale for changes to the format:

- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.

- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.

- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).

See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.

Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.

[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471

show more ...

Revert "[Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size"

This reverts commit 99317124e1c772e9a9de41a0cd56e1db049b4ea4. This is
still busted on Windows:

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-w

Revert "[Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size"

This reverts commit 99317124e1c772e9a9de41a0cd56e1db049b4ea4. This is
still busted on Windows:

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-win7/builds/40873

The llvm-cov tests report 'error: Could not load coverage information'.

show more ...

[Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size

Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:

1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.

[Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size

Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:

1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.

This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).

Rationale for changes to the format:

- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.

- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.

- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).

See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.

Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.

[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471

show more ...

Revert "[Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size"

This reverts commit e18531595bba495946aa52c0a16b9f9238cff8bc.

On Windows, there is an error:

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-win

Revert "[Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size"

This reverts commit e18531595bba495946aa52c0a16b9f9238cff8bc.

On Windows, there is an error:

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-windows/builds/54963/steps/stage%201%20check/logs/stdio

error: C:\b\slave\sanitizer-windows\build\stage1\projects\compiler-rt\test\profile\Profile-x86_64\Output\instrprof-merging.cpp.tmp.v1.o: Failed to load coverage: Malformed coverage data

show more ...

[Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size

Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:

1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.

[Coverage] Revise format to reduce binary size

Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:

1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.

This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).

Rationale for changes to the format:

- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.

- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.

- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).

See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.

Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.

[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471

show more ...

[llvm] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique

Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of

[llvm] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique

Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.

llvm-svn: 369013

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

[Coverage] Take filenames into account when loading function records.

Summary:
Don't skip functions with the same name but from different files.

That change makes it possible to generate code cover

[Coverage] Take filenames into account when loading function records.

Summary:
Don't skip functions with the same name but from different files.

That change makes it possible to generate code coverage reports from
different binaries compiled from different sources even if there are functions
with non-unique names. Without that change, code coverage for such functions is
missing except of the first function processed.

Reviewers: vsk, morehouse

Reviewed By: vsk

Subscribers: llvm-commits, kcc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46478

llvm-svn: 331801

show more ...

[Coverage] Scan ahead for the most-recent completed count (PR35495)

This extends r319391. It teaches the segment builder to emit the right
completed segment when more than one region ends at the sam

[Coverage] Scan ahead for the most-recent completed count (PR35495)

This extends r319391. It teaches the segment builder to emit the right
completed segment when more than one region ends at the same location.

Fixes PR35495.

llvm-svn: 319990

show more ...

[Coverage] Use the most-recent completed region count (PR35437)

This is a fix for the coverage segment builder.

If multiple regions must be popped off the active stack at once, and
more than one of

[Coverage] Use the most-recent completed region count (PR35437)

This is a fix for the coverage segment builder.

If multiple regions must be popped off the active stack at once, and
more than one of them end at the same location, emit a segment using the
count from the most-recent completed region.

Fixes PR35437, rdar://35760630

Testing: invoked llvm-cov on a stage2 build of clang, additional unit
tests, check-profile

llvm-svn: 319391

show more ...

[Coverage] Use the wrapped segment when a line has entry segments

We've worked around bugs in the frontend by ignoring the count from
wrapped segments when a line has at least one region entry segme

[Coverage] Use the wrapped segment when a line has entry segments

We've worked around bugs in the frontend by ignoring the count from
wrapped segments when a line has at least one region entry segment.
Those frontend bugs are now fixed, so it's time to regenerate the
checked-in covmapping files and remove the workaround.

llvm-svn: 317761

show more ...

[Coverage] Simplify r316141. NFC.

llvm-svn: 316147

[llvm-cov] Move LineCoverageIterator to libCoverage. NFC.

LineCoverageIterator makes it easy for clients of coverage data to
determine line execution counts for a file or function. The coverage
iter

[llvm-cov] Move LineCoverageIterator to libCoverage. NFC.

LineCoverageIterator makes it easy for clients of coverage data to
determine line execution counts for a file or function. The coverage
iteration logic is tricky enough that it really pays not to have
multiple copies of it. Hopefully having just one implementation in LLVM
will make the iteration logic easier to test, reuse, and update.

This commit is NFC but I've added a unit test to go along with it just
because it's easy to do now.

llvm-svn: 316141

show more ...