[Thumb,ELF] Fix access to dso_preemptable __stack_chk_guard with static relocation model (#78950)

PR #70014 fixes A32 to use GOT for dso_preemptable `__stack_chk_guard`
with static relocation model

[Thumb,ELF] Fix access to dso_preemptable __stack_chk_guard with static relocation model (#78950)

PR #70014 fixes A32 to use GOT for dso_preemptable `__stack_chk_guard`
with static relocation model (e.g. -fPIE/-fPIC LTO compiles with -no-pie
linking).

This patch fixes such `__stack_chk_guard` access for Thumb1 and Thumb2.
Note: `t2LDRLIT_ga_pcrel` is only for ELF. mingw needs
`.refptr.__stack_chk_guard` (https://reviews.llvm.org/D92738).

Fix #64999

show more ...

[Thumb,test] Improve __stack_chk_guard test

[ARM,ELF] Fix access to dso_preemptable __stack_chk_guard with static relocation model (#70014)

The ELF code from https://reviews.llvm.org/D112811 emits LDRLIT_ga_pcrel
when `TM.isPositionIndepende

[ARM,ELF] Fix access to dso_preemptable __stack_chk_guard with static relocation model (#70014)

The ELF code from https://reviews.llvm.org/D112811 emits LDRLIT_ga_pcrel
when `TM.isPositionIndependent()` but uses a different condition
`Subtarget.isGVIndirectSymbol(GV)` (aka dso_preemptable on ELF targets).
This would cause incorrect access for dso_preemptable
`__stack_chk_guard` with the static relocation model.

Regarding whether `__stack_chk_guard` gets the dso_local specifier,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D150841 switched to
`M.getDirectAccessExternalData()` (implied by "PIC Level") instead of
`TM.getRelocationModel() == Reloc::Static`.

The result is that when non-zero "PIC Level" is used with static
relocation model (e.g. -fPIE/-fPIC LTO compiles with -no-pie linking),
`__stack_chk_guard` accesses are incorrect.
```
ldr r0, .LCPI0_0
ldr r0, [r0]
ldr r0, [r0] // incorrectly dereferences __stack_chk_guard
...
.LCPI0_0:
.long __stack_chk_guard
```

To fix this, for dso_preemptable `__stack_chk_guard`, emit a GOT PIC
code sequence like for -fpic using `LDRLIT_ga_pcrel`:
```
ldr r0, .LCPI0_0
.LPC0_0:
add r0, pc, r0
ldr r0, [r0]
ldr r0, [r0]
...
LCPI0_0:
.Ltmp0:
.long __stack_chk_guard(GOT_PREL)-((.LPC0_0+8)-.Ltmp0)
```

Technically, `LDRLIT_ga_abs` with `R_ARM_GOT_ABS` could be used, but
`R_ARM_GOT_ABS` does not have GNU or integrated assembler support.
(Note, `.LCPI0_0: .long __stack_chk_guard@GOT` produces an
`R_ARM_GOT_BREL`, which is not desired).

This patch fixes #6499 while not changing behavior for the following
configurations:
```
run arm.linux.nopic --target=arm-linux-gnueabi -fno-pic
run arm.linux.pie --target=arm-linux-gnueabi -fpie
run arm.linux.pic --target=arm-linux-gnueabi -fpic
run armv6.darwin.nopic --target=armv6-apple-darwin -fno-pic
run armv6.darwin.dynamicnopic --target=armv6-apple-darwin -mdynamic-no-pic
run armv6.darwin.pic --target=armv6-apple-darwin -fpic
run armv7.darwin.nopic --target=armv7-apple-darwin -mcpu=cortex-a8 -fno-pic
run armv7.darwin.dynamicnopic --target=armv7-apple-darwin -mcpu=cortex-a8 -mdynamic-no-pic
run armv7.darwin.pic --target=armv7-apple-darwin -mcpu=cortex-a8 -fpic
run arm64.darwin.pic --target=arm64-apple-darwin
```

show more ...

[ARM][test] Improve stack-protector tests

llvm/test/LTO/ARM/ssp-static-reloc.ll is more about using the static
relocation model with "PIC Level" and unrelated to the LTO infrastructure.
Move the tes

[ARM][test] Improve stack-protector tests

llvm/test/LTO/ARM/ssp-static-reloc.ll is more about using the static
relocation model with "PIC Level" and unrelated to the LTO infrastructure.
Move the test. Update stack_guard_remat.ll to clearly test "PIC Level"
with the relevant relocation models.

show more ...