#
44716856 |
| 13-Aug-2020 |
Aditya Kumar <1894981+hiraditya@users.noreply.github.com> |
Fix PR45442: Bail out when MemorySSA information is not available
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
4f04db4b |
| 15-May-2020 |
Eli Friedman <efriedma@quicinc.com> |
AllocaInst should store Align instead of MaybeAlign.
Along the lines of D77454 and D79968. Unlike loads and stores, the default alignment is getPrefTypeAlign, to match the existing handling in vari
AllocaInst should store Align instead of MaybeAlign.
Along the lines of D77454 and D79968. Unlike loads and stores, the default alignment is getPrefTypeAlign, to match the existing handling in various places, including SelectionDAG and InstCombine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80044
show more ...
|
#
11aa3707 |
| 14-May-2020 |
Eli Friedman <efriedma@quicinc.com> |
StoreInst should store Align, not MaybeAlign
This is D77454, except for stores. All the infrastructure work was done for loads, so the remaining changes necessary are relatively small.
Differentia
StoreInst should store Align, not MaybeAlign
This is D77454, except for stores. All the infrastructure work was done for loads, so the remaining changes necessary are relatively small.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79968
show more ...
|
#
accc6b55 |
| 04-Apr-2020 |
Eli Friedman <efriedma@quicinc.com> |
LoadInst should store Align, not MaybeAlign.
The fact that loads and stores can have the alignment missing is a constant source of confusion: code that usually works can break down in rare cases. S
LoadInst should store Align, not MaybeAlign.
The fact that loads and stores can have the alignment missing is a constant source of confusion: code that usually works can break down in rare cases. So fix the LoadInst API so the alignment is never missing.
To reduce the number of changes required to make this work, IRBuilder and certain LoadInst constructors will grab the module's datalayout and compute the alignment automatically. This is the same alignment instcombine would eventually apply anyway; we're just doing it earlier. There's a minor risk that the way we're retrieving the datalayout could break out-of-tree code, but I don't think that's likely.
This is the last in a series of patches, so most of the necessary changes have already been merged.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77454
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
5c5cf899 |
| 21-Nov-2019 |
Alina Sbirlea <asbirlea@google.com> |
[MemorySSA] Moving at the end often means before terminator.
Moving accesses in MemorySSA at InsertionPlace::End, when an instruction is moved into a block, almost always means insert at the end of
[MemorySSA] Moving at the end often means before terminator.
Moving accesses in MemorySSA at InsertionPlace::End, when an instruction is moved into a block, almost always means insert at the end of the block, but before the block terminator. This matters when the block terminator is a MemoryAccess itself (an invoke), and the insertion must be done before the terminator for the update to be correct.
Insert an additional position: InsertionPlace:BeforeTerminator and update current usages where this applies.
Resolves PR44027.
show more ...
|
#
05da2fe5 |
| 13-Nov-2019 |
Reid Kleckner <rnk@google.com> |
Sink all InitializePasses.h includes
This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it caused lots of reco
Sink all InitializePasses.h includes
This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it caused lots of recompilation.
I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the current checkout: recompiles touches affected_files header 342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h 314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h 307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h 213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h 170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h 162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h 158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h 140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h 137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h 131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in an incremental rebuild.
Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211
show more ...
|
#
4ae74cc9 |
| 12-Nov-2019 |
Alina Sbirlea <asbirlea@google.com> |
[GVNHoist] Preserve AAResults.
Resolves PR38906, PR40898.
|
#
57e8f0b0 |
| 21-Oct-2019 |
Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk> |
GVNHoist - silence static analyzer dyn_cast<> null dereference warning in hasEHOrLoadsOnPath call. NFCI.
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to u
GVNHoist - silence static analyzer dyn_cast<> null dereference warning in hasEHOrLoadsOnPath call. NFCI.
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 375429
show more ...
|
#
d400d451 |
| 03-Oct-2019 |
Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet@google.com> |
[Alignment][NFC] Remove StoreInst::setAlignment(unsigned)
Summary: This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type. See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm
[Alignment][NFC] Remove StoreInst::setAlignment(unsigned)
Summary: This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type. See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet, bollu, jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, asbirlea, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68268
llvm-svn: 373595
show more ...
|
#
ab11b918 |
| 30-Sep-2019 |
Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet@google.com> |
[Alignment][NFC] Remove AllocaInst::setAlignment(unsigned)
Summary: This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type. See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llv
[Alignment][NFC] Remove AllocaInst::setAlignment(unsigned)
Summary: This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type. See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, eraman, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68141
llvm-svn: 373207
show more ...
|
#
17380227 |
| 30-Sep-2019 |
Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet@google.com> |
[Alignment][NFC] Remove LoadInst::setAlignment(unsigned)
Summary: This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type. See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-
[Alignment][NFC] Remove LoadInst::setAlignment(unsigned)
Summary: This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type. See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet, jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, asbirlea, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68142
llvm-svn: 373195
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3 |
|
#
0eaee545 |
| 15-Aug-2019 |
Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com> |
[llvm] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement of
[llvm] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
efd94c56 |
| 23-Apr-2019 |
Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com> |
Use llvm::stable_sort
While touching the code, simplify if feasible.
llvm-svn: 358996
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1 |
|
#
2946cd70 |
| 19-Jan-2019 |
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> |
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the ne
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
show more ...
|
#
978ba615 |
| 20-Dec-2018 |
Michael Kruse <llvm@meinersbur.de> |
Introduce llvm.loop.parallel_accesses and llvm.access.group metadata.
The current llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata has a problem in that it uses LoopIDs. LoopID unfortunately is not loop ident
Introduce llvm.loop.parallel_accesses and llvm.access.group metadata.
The current llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata has a problem in that it uses LoopIDs. LoopID unfortunately is not loop identifier. It is neither unique (there's even a regression test assigning the some LoopID to multiple loops; can otherwise happen if passes such as LoopVersioning make copies of entire loops) nor persistent (every time a property is removed/added from a LoopID's MDNode, it will also receive a new LoopID; this happens e.g. when calling Loop::setLoopAlreadyUnrolled()). Since most loop transformation passes change the loop attributes (even if it just to mark that a loop should not be processed again as llvm.loop.isvectorized does, for the versioned and unversioned loop), the parallel access information is lost for any subsequent pass.
This patch unlinks LoopIDs and parallel accesses. llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata on instruction is replaced by llvm.access.group metadata. llvm.access.group points to a distinct MDNode with no operands (avoiding the problem to ever need to add/remove operands), called "access group". Alternatively, it can point to a list of access groups. The LoopID then has an attribute llvm.loop.parallel_accesses with all the access groups that are parallel (no dependencies carries by this loop).
This intentionally avoid any kind of "ID". Loops that are clones/have their attributes modifies retain the llvm.loop.parallel_accesses attribute. Access instructions that a cloned point to the same access group. It is not necessary for each access to have it's own "ID" MDNode, but those memory access instructions with the same behavior can be grouped together.
The behavior of llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access is not changed by this patch, but should be considered deprecated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52116
llvm-svn: 349725
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
e303c87e |
| 15-Oct-2018 |
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> |
[TI removal] Make `getTerminator()` return a generic `Instruction`.
This removes the primary remaining API producing `TerminatorInst` which will reduce the rate at which code is introduced trying to
[TI removal] Make `getTerminator()` return a generic `Instruction`.
This removes the primary remaining API producing `TerminatorInst` which will reduce the rate at which code is introduced trying to use it and generally make it much easier to remove the remaining APIs across the codebase.
Also clean up some of the stragglers that the previous mechanical update of variables missed.
Users of LLVM and out-of-tree code generally will need to update any explicit variable types to handle this. Replacing `TerminatorInst` with `Instruction` (or `auto`) almost always works. Most of these edits were made in prior commits using the perl one-liner: ``` perl -i -ple 's/TerminatorInst(\b.* = .*getTerminator\(\))/Instruction\1/g' ```
This also my break some rare use cases where people overload for both `Instruction` and `TerminatorInst`, but these should be easily fixed by removing the `TerminatorInst` overload.
llvm-svn: 344504
show more ...
|
#
0cac726a |
| 27-Sep-2018 |
Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com> |
llvm::sort(C.begin(), C.end(), ...) -> llvm::sort(C, ...)
Summary: The convenience wrapper in STLExtras is available since rL342102.
Reviewers: dblaikie, javed.absar, JDevlieghere, andreadb
Subscr
llvm::sort(C.begin(), C.end(), ...) -> llvm::sort(C, ...)
Summary: The convenience wrapper in STLExtras is available since rL342102.
Reviewers: dblaikie, javed.absar, JDevlieghere, andreadb
Subscribers: MatzeB, sanjoy, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, eraman, aheejin, kbarton, JDevlieghere, javed.absar, gbedwell, jrtc27, mgrang, atanasyan, steven_wu, george.burgess.iv, dexonsmith, kristina, jsji, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52573
llvm-svn: 343163
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.0 |
|
#
54d56f27 |
| 12-Sep-2018 |
Alexandros Lamprineas <alexandros.lamprineas@arm.com> |
[GVNHoist] computeInsertionPoints() miscalculates IDF
Fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38912.
In GVNHoist::computeInsertionPoints() we iterate over the Value Numbers and calculate the
[GVNHoist] computeInsertionPoints() miscalculates IDF
Fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38912.
In GVNHoist::computeInsertionPoints() we iterate over the Value Numbers and calculate the Iterated Dominance Frontiers without clearing the IDFBlocks vector first. IDFBlocks ends up accumulating an insane number of basic blocks, which bloats the compilation time of SemaChecking.cpp with ubsan enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51980
llvm-svn: 342055
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3 |
|
#
484bd13e |
| 28-Aug-2018 |
Alexandros Lamprineas <alexandros.lamprineas@arm.com> |
[GVNHoist] Prune out useless CHI insertions
Fix for the out-of-memory error when compiling SemaChecking.cpp with GVNHoist and ubsan enabled. I've used a cache for inserted CHIs to avoid excessive me
[GVNHoist] Prune out useless CHI insertions
Fix for the out-of-memory error when compiling SemaChecking.cpp with GVNHoist and ubsan enabled. I've used a cache for inserted CHIs to avoid excessive memory usage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50323
llvm-svn: 340818
show more ...
|
#
9ae926b9 |
| 26-Aug-2018 |
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> |
[IR] Replace `isa<TerminatorInst>` with `isTerminator()`.
This is a bit awkward in a handful of places where we didn't even have an instruction and now we have to see if we can build one. But on the
[IR] Replace `isa<TerminatorInst>` with `isTerminator()`.
This is a bit awkward in a handful of places where we didn't even have an instruction and now we have to see if we can build one. But on the whole, this seems like a win and at worst a reasonable cost for removing `TerminatorInst`.
All of this is part of the removal of `TerminatorInst` from the `Instruction` type hierarchy.
llvm-svn: 340701
show more ...
|
#
96fc1de7 |
| 26-Aug-2018 |
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> |
[IR] Begin removal of TerminatorInst by removing successor manipulation.
The core get and set routines move to the `Instruction` class. These routines are only valid to call on instructions which ar
[IR] Begin removal of TerminatorInst by removing successor manipulation.
The core get and set routines move to the `Instruction` class. These routines are only valid to call on instructions which are terminators.
The iterator and *generic* range based access move to `CFG.h` where all the other generic successor and predecessor access lives. While moving the iterator here, simplify it using the iterator utilities LLVM provides and updates coding style as much as reasonable. The APIs remain pointer-heavy when they could better use references, and retain the odd behavior of `operator*` and `operator->` that is common in LLVM iterators. Adjusting this API, if desired, should be a follow-up step.
Non-generic range iteration is added for the two instructions where there is an especially easy mechanism and where there was code attempting to use the range accessor from a specific subclass: `indirectbr` and `br`. In both cases, the successors are contiguous operands and can be easily iterated via the operand list.
This is the first major patch in removing the `TerminatorInst` type from the IR's instruction type hierarchy. This change was discussed in an RFC here and was pretty clearly positive: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123407.html
There will be a series of much more mechanical changes following this one to complete this move.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47467
llvm-svn: 340698
show more ...
|
#
406f1ff1 |
| 24-Aug-2018 |
Florian Hahn <florian.hahn@arm.com> |
[Local] Make DoesKMove required for combineMetadata.
This patch makes the DoesKMove argument non-optional, to force people to think about it. Most cases where it is false are either code hoisting or
[Local] Make DoesKMove required for combineMetadata.
This patch makes the DoesKMove argument non-optional, to force people to think about it. Most cases where it is false are either code hoisting or code sinking, where we pick one instruction from a set of equal instructions among different code paths.
Reviewers: dberlin, nlopes, efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47475
llvm-svn: 340606
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1 |
|
#
592cc78d |
| 23-Jul-2018 |
Alexandros Lamprineas <alexandros.lamprineas@arm.com> |
[GVNHoist] safeToHoistLdSt allows illegal hoisting
Bug fix for PR36787. When reasoning if it's safe to hoist a load we want to make sure that the defining memory access dominates the new insertion p
[GVNHoist] safeToHoistLdSt allows illegal hoisting
Bug fix for PR36787. When reasoning if it's safe to hoist a load we want to make sure that the defining memory access dominates the new insertion point of the hoisted instruction. safeToHoistLdSt calls firstInBB(InsertionPoint,DefiningAccess) which returns false if InsertionPoint == DefiningAccess, and therefore it falsely thinks it's safe to hoist.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49555
llvm-svn: 337674
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3 |
|
#
31b98d2e |
| 04-Jun-2018 |
David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com> |
Move Analysis/Utils/Local.h back to Transforms
Review feedback from r328165. Split out just the one function from the file that's used by Analysis. (As chandlerc pointed out, the original change onl
Move Analysis/Utils/Local.h back to Transforms
Review feedback from r328165. Split out just the one function from the file that's used by Analysis. (As chandlerc pointed out, the original change only moved the header and not the implementation anyway - which was fine for the one function that was used (since it's a template/inlined in the header) but not in general)
llvm-svn: 333954
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2 |
|
#
5a0872c2 |
| 16-May-2018 |
Vedant Kumar <vsk@apple.com> |
[STLExtras] Add size() for ranges, and remove distance()
r332057 introduced distance() for ranges. Based on post-commit feedback, this renames distance() to size(). The new size() is also only enabl
[STLExtras] Add size() for ranges, and remove distance()
r332057 introduced distance() for ranges. Based on post-commit feedback, this renames distance() to size(). The new size() is also only enabled when the operation is O(1).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46976
llvm-svn: 332551
show more ...
|