History log of /llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCBranchSelector.cpp (Results 1 – 25 of 90)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4
# f71cb9db 14-Nov-2024 Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com>

[PowerPC] Remove unused includes (NFC) (#116163)

Identified with misc-include-cleaner.


Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1
# d5b73a70 23-Nov-2021 Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com>

[llvm] Use range-based for loops (NFC)


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2
# 00d19c67 01-Jun-2021 Michael Benfield <mbenfield@google.com>

[various] Remove or use variables which are unused but set.

This is in preparation for the -Wunused-but-set-variable warning.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102942


Revision tags: llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1
# 9de1241b 30-Jan-2020 Stefan Pintilie <stefanp@ca.ibm.com>

[PowerPC][Future] Branch Distance Estimation For Prefixed Instructions

By adding the prefixed instructions the branch distances are no longer
computed correctly. Since prefixed instructions cannot c

[PowerPC][Future] Branch Distance Estimation For Prefixed Instructions

By adding the prefixed instructions the branch distances are no longer
computed correctly. Since prefixed instructions cannot cross a 64 byte
boundary we have to assume that a prefixed instruction may have a nop
prepended to it. This patch tries to take that nop into consideration
when computing the size of basic blocks.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72572

show more ...


# 805c157e 21-Jan-2020 Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet@google.com>

[Alignment][NFC] Deprecate Align::None()

Summary:
This is a follow up on https://reviews.llvm.org/D71473#inline-647262.
There's a caveat here that `Align(1)` relies on the compiler understanding of

[Alignment][NFC] Deprecate Align::None()

Summary:
This is a follow up on https://reviews.llvm.org/D71473#inline-647262.
There's a caveat here that `Align(1)` relies on the compiler understanding of `Log2_64` implementation to produce good code. One could use `Align()` as a replacement but I believe it is less clear that the alignment is one in that case.

Reviewers: xbolva00, courbet, bollu

Subscribers: arsenm, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, Jim, kerbowa, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73099

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1
# 18f805a7 27-Sep-2019 Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet@google.com>

[Alignment][NFC] Remove unneeded llvm:: scoping on Align types

llvm-svn: 373081


# d4c4671a 18-Sep-2019 Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet@google.com>

[Alignment][NFC] Remove LogAlignment functions

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-J

[Alignment][NFC] Remove LogAlignment functions

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, jsji, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67620

llvm-svn: 372231

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5
# af11cc7e 12-Sep-2019 Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet@google.com>

[Alignment] Move OffsetToAlignment to Alignment.h

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/201

[Alignment] Move OffsetToAlignment to Alignment.h

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet, JDevlieghere, alexshap, rupprecht, jhenderson

Subscribers: sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, jakehehrlich, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, jsji, seiya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67499

llvm-svn: 371742

show more ...


# 48904e94 11-Sep-2019 Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet@google.com>

[Alignment] Use llvm::Align in MachineFunction and TargetLowering - fixes mir parsing

Summary:
This catches malformed mir files which specify alignment as log2 instead of pow2.
See https://reviews.l

[Alignment] Use llvm::Align in MachineFunction and TargetLowering - fixes mir parsing

Summary:
This catches malformed mir files which specify alignment as log2 instead of pow2.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D65945 for reference,

This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67433

llvm-svn: 371608

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4
# aff45e4b 05-Sep-2019 Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet@google.com>

[LLVM][Alignment] Make functions using log of alignment explicit

Summary:
This patch renames functions that takes or returns alignment as log2, this patch will help with the transition to llvm::Alig

[LLVM][Alignment] Make functions using log of alignment explicit

Summary:
This patch renames functions that takes or returns alignment as log2, this patch will help with the transition to llvm::Align.
The renaming makes it explicit that we deal with log(alignment) instead of a power of two alignment.
A few renames uncovered dubious assignments:

- `MirParser`/`MirPrinter` was expecting powers of two but `MachineFunction` and `MachineBasicBlock` were using deal with log2(align). This patch fixes it and updates the documentation.
- `MachineBlockPlacement` exposes two flags (`align-all-blocks` and `align-all-nofallthru-blocks`) supposedly interpreted as power of two alignments, internally these values are interpreted as log2(align). This patch updates the documentation,
- `MachineFunctionexposes` exposes `align-all-functions` also interpreted as power of two alignment, internally this value is interpreted as log2(align). This patch updates the documentation,

Reviewers: lattner, thegameg, courbet

Subscribers: dschuff, arsenm, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, javed.absar, hiraditya, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, dexonsmith, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits, courbet

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65945

llvm-svn: 371045

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3
# 0c476111 15-Aug-2019 Daniel Sanders <daniel_l_sanders@apple.com>

Apply llvm-prefer-register-over-unsigned from clang-tidy to LLVM

Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Re

Apply llvm-prefer-register-over-unsigned from clang-tidy to LLVM

Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).

Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor

Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&

Depends on D65919

Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon

Reviewed By: arsenm

Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962

llvm-svn: 369041

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1
# 2446f843 12-Apr-2019 Kang Zhang <shkzhang@cn.ibm.com>

[PowerPC] Add initialization for some ppc passes

Summary:

Some llc debug options need pass-name as the parameters.
But if we use the pass-name ppc-early-ret, we will get below error:
llc test.ll -s

[PowerPC] Add initialization for some ppc passes

Summary:

Some llc debug options need pass-name as the parameters.
But if we use the pass-name ppc-early-ret, we will get below error:
llc test.ll -stop-after ppc-early-ret
LLVM ERROR: "ppc-early-ret" pass is not registered.
Below pass-names have the pass is not registered error:
ppc-ctr-loops
ppc-ctr-loops-verify
ppc-loop-preinc-prep
ppc-toc-reg-deps
ppc-vsx-copy
ppc-early-ret
ppc-vsx-fma-mutate
ppc-vsx-swaps
ppc-reduce-cr-ops
ppc-qpx-load-splat
ppc-branch-coalescing
ppc-branch-select

Reviewed By: jsji

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60248

llvm-svn: 358271

show more ...


# b6926bdc 12-Apr-2019 Eric Christopher <echristo@gmail.com>

Revert "[PowerPC] Add initialization for some ppc passes"

This reverts commit 6f8f98ce8de7c0e4ebd7fa2e1fd9507fe8d1c317 as it
is breaking nearly every bot.

llvm-svn: 358260


# 6f8f98ce 12-Apr-2019 Kang Zhang <shkzhang@cn.ibm.com>

[PowerPC] Add initialization for some ppc passes

Summary:

Some llc debug options need pass-name as the parameters.
But if we use the pass-name ppc-early-ret, we will get below error:
llc test.ll -s

[PowerPC] Add initialization for some ppc passes

Summary:

Some llc debug options need pass-name as the parameters.
But if we use the pass-name ppc-early-ret, we will get below error:
llc test.ll -stop-after ppc-early-ret
LLVM ERROR: "ppc-early-ret" pass is not registered.
Below pass-names have the pass is not registered error:
ppc-ctr-loops
ppc-ctr-loops-verify
ppc-loop-preinc-prep
ppc-toc-reg-deps
ppc-vsx-copy
ppc-early-ret
ppc-vsx-fma-mutate
ppc-vsx-swaps
ppc-reduce-cr-ops
ppc-qpx-load-splat
ppc-branch-coalescing
ppc-branch-select

Reviewed By: jsji

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60248

llvm-svn: 358256

show more ...


# 330dcd9d 26-Mar-2019 Guozhi Wei <carrot@google.com>

[PPC] Refactor PPCBranchSelector.cpp

This patch splits the huge function PPCBranchSelector.cpp:runOnMachineFunction into several smaller functions.

No functional change.

Differential Revision: htt

[PPC] Refactor PPCBranchSelector.cpp

This patch splits the huge function PPCBranchSelector.cpp:runOnMachineFunction into several smaller functions.

No functional change.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59623

llvm-svn: 357033

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4
# 11308bdb 06-Mar-2019 Guozhi Wei <carrot@google.com>

[PPC] Adjust the computed branch offset for the possible shorter distance

In file PPCBranchSelector.cpp we tend to over estimate code size due to large
alignment and inline assembly. Usually it caus

[PPC] Adjust the computed branch offset for the possible shorter distance

In file PPCBranchSelector.cpp we tend to over estimate code size due to large
alignment and inline assembly. Usually it causes larger computed branch offset,
it is not big problem. But sometimes it may also causes smaller computed branch
offset than actual branch offset. If the offset is close to the limit of
encoding, it may cause problem at run time.
Following is a simplified example.

actual estimated
address address
...
bne Far 100 10c
.p2align 4
Near: 110 110
...
Far: 8108 8108

Actual offset: 0x8108 - 0x100 = 0x8008
Computed offset: 0x8108 - 0x10c = 0x7ffc

The computed offset is at most ((1 << alignment) - 4) bytes smaller than actual
offset. So we add this number to the offset for safety.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57718

llvm-svn: 355529

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1
# 2946cd70 19-Jan-2019 Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1
# f78650a8 30-Jul-2018 Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>

Remove trailing space

sed -Ei 's/[[:space:]]+$//' include/**/*.{def,h,td} lib/**/*.{cpp,h}

llvm-svn: 338293


Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2
# b3bde2ea 17-Nov-2017 David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com>

Fix a bunch more layering of CodeGen headers that are in Target

All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, n

Fix a bunch more layering of CodeGen headers that are in Target

All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).

llvm-svn: 318490

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.0, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.1, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc3
# 6bda14b3 06-Jun-2017 Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>

Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....

I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line

Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....

I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.

I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.

This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.

Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).

llvm-svn: 304787

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-4.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.0, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc1
# 17d266bc 13-Jan-2017 Malcolm Parsons <malcolm.parsons@gmail.com>

Remove unused lambda captures. NFC

llvm-svn: 291916


Revision tags: llvmorg-3.9.1, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc1
# 530fa5fc 03-Oct-2016 Hal Finkel <hfinkel@anl.gov>

[PowerPC] Account for the ELFv2 function prologue during branch selection

The PPC branch-selection pass, which performs branch relaxation, needs to
account for the padding that might be introduced t

[PowerPC] Account for the ELFv2 function prologue during branch selection

The PPC branch-selection pass, which performs branch relaxation, needs to
account for the padding that might be introduced to satisfy block alignment
requirements. We were assuming that the first block was at offset zero (i.e.
had the alignment of the function itself), but under the ELFv2 ABI, a global
entry function prologue is added to the first block, and it is a
two-instruction sequence (i.e. eight-bytes long). If the function has 16-byte
alignment, the fact that the first block is eight bytes offset from the start
of the function is relevant to calculating where padding will be added in
between later blocks.

Unfortunately, I don't have a small test case.

llvm-svn: 283086

show more ...


# 117296c0 01-Oct-2016 Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>

Use StringRef in Pass/PassManager APIs (NFC)

llvm-svn: 283004


# f0bc9db9 04-Sep-2016 Hal Finkel <hfinkel@anl.gov>

[PowerPC] During branch relaxation, recompute padding offsets before each iteration

We used to compute the padding contributions to the block sizes during branch
relaxation only at the start of the

[PowerPC] During branch relaxation, recompute padding offsets before each iteration

We used to compute the padding contributions to the block sizes during branch
relaxation only at the start of the transformation. As we perform branch
relaxation, we change the sizes of the blocks, and so the amount of inter-block
padding might change. Accordingly, we need to recompute the (alignment-based)
padding in between every iteration on our way toward the fixed point.

Unfortunately, I don't have a test case (and none was provided in the bug
report), and while this obviously seems needed, algorithmically, I don't have
any way of generating a small and/or non-fragile regression test.

llvm-svn: 280626

show more ...


# 1eb47368 25-Aug-2016 Matthias Braun <matze@braunis.de>

MachineFunctionProperties/MIRParser: Rename AllVRegsAllocated->NoVRegs, compute it

Rename AllVRegsAllocated to NoVRegs. This avoids the connotation of
running after register and simply describes tha

MachineFunctionProperties/MIRParser: Rename AllVRegsAllocated->NoVRegs, compute it

Rename AllVRegsAllocated to NoVRegs. This avoids the connotation of
running after register and simply describes that no vregs are used in
a machine function. With that we can simply compute the property and do
not need to dump/parse it in .mir files.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23850

llvm-svn: 279698

show more ...


1234