[analyzer][NFC] Cleanup BugType lazy-init patterns (#76655)

Cleanup most of the lazy-init `BugType` legacy.
Some will be preserved, as those are slightly more complicated to
refactor.

Notice, t

[analyzer][NFC] Cleanup BugType lazy-init patterns (#76655)

Cleanup most of the lazy-init `BugType` legacy.
Some will be preserved, as those are slightly more complicated to
refactor.

Notice, that the default category for `BugType` is `LogicError`. I
omitted setting this explicitly where I could.

Please, actually have a look at the diff. I did this manually, and we
rarely check the bug type descriptions and stuff in tests, so the
testing might be shallow on this one.

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Remove useless class BuiltinBug

...because it provides no useful functionality compared to its base
class `BugType`.

A long time ago there were substantial differences between `BugT

[analyzer][NFC] Remove useless class BuiltinBug

...because it provides no useful functionality compared to its base
class `BugType`.

A long time ago there were substantial differences between `BugType` and
`BuiltinBug`, but they were eliminated by commit 1bd58233 in 2009 (!).
Since then the only functionality provided by `BuiltinBug` was that it
specified `categories::LogicError` as the bug category and it stored an
extra data member `desc`.

This commit sets `categories::LogicError` as the default value of the
third argument (bug category) in the constructors of BugType and
replaces use of the `desc` field with simpler logic.

Note that `BugType` has a data member `Description` and a non-virtual
method `BugType::getDescription()` which queries it; these are distinct
from the member `desc` of `BuiltinBug` and the identically named method
`BuiltinBug::getDescription()` which queries it. This confusing name
collision was a major motivation for the elimination of `BuiltinBug`.

As this commit touches many files, I avoided functional changes and left
behind FIXME notes to mark minor issues that should be fixed later.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158855

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Move away from using raw-for loops inside StaticAnalyzer

I'm involved with the Static Analyzer for the most part.
I think we should embrace newer language standard features and gradu

[analyzer][NFC] Move away from using raw-for loops inside StaticAnalyzer

I'm involved with the Static Analyzer for the most part.
I think we should embrace newer language standard features and gradually
move forward.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154325

show more ...

[clang] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)

This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<. I'll post
a separate patch to remove #include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h".

This is p

[clang] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)

This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<. I'll post
a separate patch to remove #include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h".

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...

[clang] Add #include <optional> (NFC)

This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Option

[clang] Add #include <optional> (NFC)

This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optional with
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...

[analyzer] Change FindLastStoreBRVisitor to use Tracker

Additionally, this commit completely removes any uses of
FindLastStoreBRVisitor from the analyzer except for the
one in Tracker.

The next ste

[analyzer] Change FindLastStoreBRVisitor to use Tracker

Additionally, this commit completely removes any uses of
FindLastStoreBRVisitor from the analyzer except for the
one in Tracker.

The next step is actually removing this class altogether
from the header file.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103618

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions

Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options.
To make this possible this patc

[analyzer][NFC] Change LangOptions to CheckerManager in the shouldRegister* functions

Some checkers may not only depend on language options but also analyzer options.
To make this possible this patch changes the parameter of the shouldRegister*
function to CheckerManager to be able to query the analyzer options when
deciding whether the checker should be registered.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75271

show more ...

[analyzer] NFC: Introduce sub-classes for path-sensitive and basic reports.

Checkers are now required to specify whether they're creating a
path-sensitive report or a path-insensitive report by cons

[analyzer] NFC: Introduce sub-classes for path-sensitive and basic reports.

Checkers are now required to specify whether they're creating a
path-sensitive report or a path-insensitive report by constructing an
object of the respective type.

This makes BugReporter more independent from the rest of the Static Analyzer
because all Analyzer-specific code is now in sub-classes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66572

llvm-svn: 371450

show more ...

[Clang] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique

Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
o

[Clang] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_unique

Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259

llvm-svn: 368942

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Prepare visitors for different tracking kinds

When we're tracking a variable that is responsible for a null pointer
dereference or some other sinister programming error, we of course

[analyzer][NFC] Prepare visitors for different tracking kinds

When we're tracking a variable that is responsible for a null pointer
dereference or some other sinister programming error, we of course would like to
gather as much information why we think that the variable has that specific
value as possible. However, the newly introduced condition tracking shows that
tracking all values this thoroughly could easily cause an intolerable growth in
the bug report's length.

There are a variety of heuristics we discussed on the mailing list[1] to combat
this, all of them requiring to differentiate in between tracking a "regular
value" and a "condition".

This patch introduces the new `bugreporter::TrackingKind` enum, adds it to
several visitors as a non-optional argument, and moves some functions around to
make the code a little more coherent.

[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-June/062613.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64270

llvm-svn: 368777

show more ...

[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function

Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. T

[analyzer] Supply all checkers with a shouldRegister function

Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. This will force every
checker to implement this function, but maybe it isn't that bad: I saw a lot of
ObjC or C++ specific checkers that should probably not register themselves based
on some LangOptions (mine too), but they do anyways.

A big benefit of this is that all registry functions now register their checker,
once it is called, registration is guaranteed.

This patch is a part of a greater effort to reinvent checker registration, more
info here: D54438#1315953

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55424

llvm-svn: 352277

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend

ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed

[analyzer][NFC] Move CheckerRegistry from the Core directory to Frontend

ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend,
whereas it's base is located in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core. It was, from what I can
imagine, used to circumvent the problem that the registry functions of the
checkers are located in the clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers library, but that
library depends on clangStaticAnalyzerCore. However, clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend
depends on both of those libraries.

One can make the observation however, that CheckerRegistry has no place in Core,
it isn't used there at all! The only place where it is used is Frontend, which
is where it ultimately belongs.

This move implies that since
include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ClangCheckers.h only contained a single function:

class CheckerRegistry;

void registerBuiltinCheckers(CheckerRegistry &registry);

it had to re purposed, as CheckerRegistry is no longer available to
clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers. It was renamed to BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h,
which actually describes it a lot better -- it does not contain the registration
functions for checkers, but only those generated by the tblgen files.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54436

llvm-svn: 349275

show more ...

[analyzer] introduce getSVal(Stmt *) helper on ExplodedNode, make sure the helper is used consistently

In most cases using
`N->getState()->getSVal(E, N->getLocationContext())`
is ugly, verbose, and

[analyzer] introduce getSVal(Stmt *) helper on ExplodedNode, make sure the helper is used consistently

In most cases using
`N->getState()->getSVal(E, N->getLocationContext())`
is ugly, verbose, and also opens up more surface area for bugs if an
inconsistent location context is used.

This patch introduces a helper on an exploded node, and ensures
consistent usage of either `ExplodedNode::getSVal` or
`CheckContext::getSVal` across the codebase.
As a result, a large number of redundant lines is removed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42155

llvm-svn: 322753

show more ...

[analyzer] Add generateErrorNode() APIs to CheckerContext.

The analyzer trims unnecessary nodes from the exploded graph before reporting
path diagnostics. However, in some cases it can trim all node

[analyzer] Add generateErrorNode() APIs to CheckerContext.

The analyzer trims unnecessary nodes from the exploded graph before reporting
path diagnostics. However, in some cases it can trim all nodes (including the
error node), leading to an assertion failure (see
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24184).

This commit addresses the issue by adding two new APIs to CheckerContext to
explicitly create error nodes. Unless the client provides a custom tag, these
APIs tag the node with the checker's tag -- preventing it from being trimmed.
The generateErrorNode() method creates a sink error node, while
generateNonFatalErrorNode() creates an error node for a path that should
continue being explored.

The intent is that one of these two methods should be used whenever a checker
creates an error node.

This commit updates the checkers to use these APIs. These APIs
(unlike addTransition() and generateSink()) do not take an explicit Pred node.
This is because there are not any error nodes in the checkers that were created
with an explicit different than the default (the CheckerContext's Pred node).

It also changes generateSink() to require state and pred nodes (previously
these were optional) to reduce confusion.

Additionally, there were several cases where checkers did check whether a
generated node could be null; we now explicitly check for null in these places.

This commit also includes a test case written by Ying Yi as part of
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12163 (that patch originally addressed this issue but
was reverted because it introduced false positive regressions).

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12780

llvm-svn: 247859

show more ...

[analyzer] Apply whitespace cleanups by Honggyu Kim.

llvm-svn: 246978

Rewrite users of Stmt::child_begin/end into for-range loops.

No functionality change intended.

llvm-svn: 241355

Clarify pointer ownership semantics by hoisting the std::unique_ptr creation to the caller instead of hiding it in emitReport. NFC.

llvm-svn: 240400

unique_ptrify BugReporter::visitors

llvm-svn: 217205

[C++11] Use 'nullptr'. StaticAnalyzer edition.

llvm-svn: 209642

Replace OwningPtr with std::unique_ptr.

This compiles cleanly with lldb/lld/clang-tools-extra/llvm.

llvm-svn: 203279

Expose the name of the checker producing each diagnostic message.

Summary:
In clang-tidy we'd like to know the name of the checker producing each
diagnostic message. PathDiagnostic has BugType and C

Expose the name of the checker producing each diagnostic message.

Summary:
In clang-tidy we'd like to know the name of the checker producing each
diagnostic message. PathDiagnostic has BugType and Category fields, which are
both arbitrary human-readable strings, but we need to know the exact name of the
checker in the form that can be used in the CheckersControlList option to
enable/disable the specific checker.

This patch adds the CheckName field to the CheckerBase class, and sets it in
the CheckerManager::registerChecker() method, which gets them from the
CheckerRegistry.

Checkers that implement multiple checks have to store the names of each check
in the respective registerXXXChecker method.

Reviewers: jordan_rose, krememek

Reviewed By: jordan_rose

CC: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2557

llvm-svn: 201186

show more ...

Replacing calls to getAttr with calls to hasAttr for clarity. No functional change intended -- this only replaces Boolean uses of getAttr.

llvm-svn: 197648

[analyzer] Apply the suppression rules to the nil receiver only if the value participates in the computation of the nil we warn about.

We should only suppress a bug report if the IDCed or null retur

[analyzer] Apply the suppression rules to the nil receiver only if the value participates in the computation of the nil we warn about.

We should only suppress a bug report if the IDCed or null returned nil value is directly related to the value we are warning about. This was
not the case for nil receivers - we would suppress a bug report that had an IDCed nil receiver on the path regardless of how it’s
related to the warning.

1) Thread EnableNullFPSuppression parameter through the visitors to differentiate between tracking the value which
is directly responsible for the bug and other values that visitors are tracking (ex: general tracking of nil receivers).
2) in trackNullOrUndef specifically address the case when a value of the message send is nil due to the receiver being nil.

llvm-svn: 178309

show more ...

Add "KnownSVal" to represent SVals that cannot be UnknownSVal.

This provides a few sundry cleanups, and allows us to provide
a compile-time check for a case that was a runtime assertion.

llvm-svn:

Add "KnownSVal" to represent SVals that cannot be UnknownSVal.

This provides a few sundry cleanups, and allows us to provide
a compile-time check for a case that was a runtime assertion.

llvm-svn: 175987

show more ...