5007 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY wor
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY work.
show more ...
|
5006 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY wor
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY work.
show more ...
|
5005 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY wor
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY work.
show more ...
|
5004 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY wor
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY work.
show more ...
|
5003 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY wor
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY work.
show more ...
|
5002 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY wor
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY work.
show more ...
|
5001 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY wor
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY work.
show more ...
|
5000 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY wor
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY work.
show more ...
|
4999 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY wor
change the send queue to be only one queue instead of one per mailer. this is slightly inefficient but simpler. also, pass this queue around so we can have multiple send queues. this makes VRFY work.
show more ...
|
4998 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
convert to SMTP draft 3 -- finishing touches. Punt on the VRFY/ EXPN commands for now; they aren't required anyhow. Move the fullname into the address structure so it can be inherited. |
4997 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
convert to SMTP draft 3 -- finishing touches. Punt on the VRFY/ EXPN commands for now; they aren't required anyhow. Move the fullname into the address structure so it can be inherited. |
4996 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
convert to SMTP draft 3 -- finishing touches. Punt on the VRFY/ EXPN commands for now; they aren't required anyhow. Move the fullname into the address structure so it can be inherited. |
4995 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
convert to SMTP draft 3 -- finishing touches. Punt on the VRFY/ EXPN commands for now; they aren't required anyhow. Move the fullname into the address structure so it can be inherited. |
4994 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to do it. Sigh.
show more ...
|
4993 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to do it. Sigh.
show more ...
|
4992 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to do it. Sigh.
show more ...
|
4991 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to do it. Sigh.
show more ...
|
4990 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to do it. Sigh.
show more ...
|
4989 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to do it. Sigh.
show more ...
|
4988 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to do it. Sigh.
show more ...
|
4987 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to do it. Sigh.
show more ...
|
4986 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to do it. Sigh.
show more ...
|
4985 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to
links together aliases into proper trees. This is in part an attempt to do the SMTP VRFY command properly, but there are a number of annoying problems that convince me that this is the wrong way to do it. Sigh.
show more ...
|
4976 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
convert to SMTP draft 3 |
4975 | 21-Nov-1981 |
eric |
convert to SMTP draft 3 |